never blame the victim for example, you had the unabomber in his hut. al gore's book earth in the balance was in there that al gore inspired the unabomber. that wouldn't be fair.ny or you can take any number ofpl exampleses where left wing words do not cause people. op you cannot say that words are causing people to be violent, ve but that's the narrative on this show.s we condemn show all violence. we deplore all acts of hatred, all acts of bigotry. we stand up against racism where we see it. wewe refuse to exploit horrific loss of life for political gain . democrats, liberals, the media mob should be ashamed of themselves but sadly they have f no shame they will do anything for power. they'll dothey anything to lie, smear, besmirch and slander conservatives. and by the way, for the record,r no one spews more violentas rhetoric than the left in case r you need a refresher course. >> here you go. you cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you standde for, what you care about. but i like to debate this gentleman. ld take i said

i am not telling people that the unabomber had some great ideas. am just saying the people that are bad can also be right sometimes. the 90s might well be the last decade where that was understood. how do you think we will be describing eras after that? if i am asserting that the 90s were the last decade, what are we going to call time after that? do you know at the safe answer is? the safe answer is that time is going to move forward. suddenly, the first ten years of the 21st century will seem to have shared characteristics. if you move further still, that second ten-year period will suddenly seem, and i'm sure it will be really into trump, it will seem as though the ideas from that period are easier to classify. we will probably project things back on to that period. what i am saying, i think those projections are going to be entirely personal. i know that someone is going to say, well, your assumption of the 90s's personal. you are a person. you can't get outside of your own mind. yeah, i know. that is true. i am who i am, i think the way that i

um okay guys asked me he says an eating the dinosaur he goes he's kind of sympathize with the unabomber ted kaczynski mainly due to his concerns about the exponential growth of technology based on the 14-year sense. then do you feel that sympathy has grown or abated and why i don't know if i was ever sympathetic to him. um, i just sort of made an argument that people don't want to hear which is that this crazy murderer may have been right about some things about the culture. i mean you obviously should not be sending bombs to professors. you've never met. he's he's, you know, you can look at him as either mentally ill or if he's not mentally ill that's even worse in a way but the one thing that he was right about in many ways was the internet if you go back and read like that the manifesto he published he's describing the internet in a way that seems amazingly pressing it particularly sense. he obviously had never used it. he was living in a cabin in montana since like 1973 with no electricity or running water. so it wasn't like he was going on aol get his assumption of what technology

bernie sanders, i never blame anybody for violent actions, except -- i didn't blame al gore for the unabomberame the people involved in the actions. but the left doesn't play fair like that. >> now, they never will. sean good may have done for years. let me very dell might be very clear. tomorrow joe biden is going to buffalo to play the white supremacy card. they exploit black americans for one reason, for power. the black on black crime -- you won't see joe biden go to chicago or l.a. it is because they use black americans for power and control. do they help black americans? look at the crime. absolutely not. but they play this rhetoric, they play this game. and he not? it's not working as much. it's not have any in the same it had years ago because people are wise to it. that is why you -- what they are trying to do now is to whatever they can to create a new base, because most people want liberty and freedom. the democratic elite want that control over people's life. the best example with leo 2.0 terrell because when joe biden said, if you vote for trump, you are not black. black american

everybody has contact with individuals, unless you happen to take "the unabomber" living up in the mountainsis buying this equipment? in behavioral analysis, what they call leakage, steps they have seen and why they didn't come forward. will: bill, you're a former fbi investigator. i'm sure you have experience what i'm about to present to you. to your point who might have known him, but who might have seen this coming, i saw some reports there might have been some threats after school shooting in his past. the question for everyone how seriously do you take every step of the way until you realize you have a serious problem on your hands? that just doesn't include those who might have known him but investigators like yourself as well? >> that is a great question, when does it reach the threshold where authorities are called or people take some action? if we're talking about this instance, if some people knew he was acquiring tactical gear, vests helmet, had weapons, some things start to add up. maybe there is not exact formula. there is a preponderance of information you kind of say, wow, the