i had been through 2 1/2 years of pure, unadulterated hell, as far as i was concerned.to walk into a room and everybody knew how i felt-- they understood why i wanted to cry one minute and laugh one nute, why i was mad, who i was mad at, why i felt guilty. n't you think it's kind of instant acceptance? we're all standing in the same shoes. another service is a hot lin call information and referral for der adts-- part of family eldercare, incorporated. you need transportation to a doctor's appointment? austin gups for the elderly coornate their efforts and consolidate their expenses, making it lessostly for everyone. it gives them money to use for programs. here they have common areas. they have copying machines-- all the kinds of things that are available to them without any extra cost, so that should give them more money for their own programs. we have centralized services so that ery one of them doesn't need a computer, typewriter, secretary, et cetera, and th's a saving. a theme that cuts across all the agencies is old people working with young people. for instance,

look, i think that what the president is doing here is that he has put forward a very pure, unadulterated liberal vision of some of the policies he would like to see passed on higher taxes, on guns, maybe on immigration. i think he is going to push very hard and put pressure on republicans to try to pass them. what he has not done is shown that he is will to compromise much in the aiding of that passage. so i think what he is also doing is getting ready but if the republicans do not go along with his wishes. he is going to tee them up yet again as obstructionists saying they are the reasons that things are dysfunctional. try to drive some turnout to the 2014 election. >> what you are implying is that he actually may be wants failure. that he basically is playing not to accomplish things in this congress but to set up for the next congress to defeat republicans in the election. >> i think that you have to wonder if that's not what it is. look at what he has put out there, paul. when you come out and you say you want higher taxes, knowing that the republicans have said that just is never go

you come home to find your spouse doing something with the whale and plastic this was pure unadulteratedemeditated from the gas cans to the gun to the knife to cleaning up and putting a camera in the dishwashing machine and having? with a guy with a false sense of security then slaughtering him when he was down on the ground as what the evidence showed. lori: that is disturbing. death penalty? >> absolutely. >> this has been the longest , i don't know but i feel this has been a never ending case. >> i think it will be a hung jury on first-degree murder i don't think they will buy the fact she planned a nice deal she went over there to work things out and there was the intervening events the camera fell and the confrontation in sudan she had to kill him. >> second degree murder. >> why would she use a credit card to buy gas and stop in monterey? >> you are a great defense lawyer if i am in trouble i will call you. in the meantime there is overwhelming levitt -- evidence of premeditation and it makes no sense it is inconsistent from the time he was shot he was already dead so she lied abou

in this case, it was blatant, clear, unadulterated, fire. >> investigate it, find facts as soon as pockget rid of people. >> it's st a matter of when among you guys, just how quickly you act. >> and at what level. we agree more than you think. neil: thank you, all. that'll do ♪ lou: hello, everybody, and than you for being with us. these people are swearing to tell the truth in fro of the house oversight committee, although not many americans are expected to believe them, and this woman, lerner, the woman a the center of the ira scandal did the unthinkable for a supposedly public servants. >> i have be advised by my counsel to assert my constitutional right not to testify or answ questions related to the subject matter o this hearing. lou: lerner took the fth and refuse to answer questions afte plding her case for a series of denials and deflections abou the lawfulness of her actions.

in this case, it was blatant, clear, unadulterated, fire. >> investigate it, find facts as soon as pocke. >> it's just a matter of whn among you guys, just how quickly you act. >> and at what level. >> we agree more than you think. neil: tnk you, all. that'll do ♪ >> tom: here we are memorial day weekend the unofficial kickoff to summer but primarily a time to remember those that have fallen defending other freedoms. on this holiday we wanted to share some of our favorite interviews right here, right now >> tom: david stockman rose to prominence at the head of office management and budget in the reagan administration. he was worried then about the state of nation. but his worries had turned into indictment of our nation's leaders who for deces have been making mistakes to the point where

in this case, it was blatant, clear, unadulterated, fire. >> investigate it, find facts as soon as pocks just a matter of when among you guys, just how quikly you act. >> and at what level. >> we agree mor than you think. neil: thank you, all. that'll do $15.5 billion. "imus in the morning" starts right now. >> ladies and gentlemen, "imus in the morning". don: i was thinking about n coming to work today. the only reason i came to work is so wouldn't have to cancel shooter jennings. i know my voice soundsorrible but i am going to be all right, just going to take a few days. before we get to shooter jennings who has the new album, didn't realize how

in this case, it was blatant, clear, unadulterated, fire. >> investigate it, find facts as so as pockd of people. >> it's just a matter of when among you guys, just ow quickly you act. >> and at what level. >> we agree more than you think. neil: thank you, all. that'll do it will be slightly down. "money" is up next. >> i am denis neil. here is what is my niece and i will i am pulled the plug on u.s. power grid? that an escalation in cyber attacks you have to do this but as transcanada berndt surtout billion dollars for thing? that is a budget spent on the keystone xl pipeline a the president sll sits on his han and the president of transcanada joins us to push o of the pipine and who made money today? proctor and gamble replaced the ceo. keep watching to find out. even when they say it is not

in this case, it was blatant, clear, unadulterated, fire. >> investigate it, find facts as soon as pockeople. >> it's just a matter of when among you guys, just how quickly you act. >> and at what level. >> we agree more than you think. neil: thank you, all. that'll do it here. be safe, everyone. >>the willis report" is coming up next. thanks for watching.g. gerri: hello, i am gerri willis. tonight on "the willis report." as homeowner claims rise and natural disasters mount, insurance companies are becoming stingier with payouts. also, getting the best deal when you buy a used car. and your medical privacy. we have you covered tonight on "the willis report." our top story tonight is insurance companies becoming stingier with

so i'm absolutely convinced that this was driven by pure unadulterated politics. >> what are we to makey took out the word "islamic extremist with ties to al-qaeda, ansar al sharia, an al-qaeda-linked group. all of these things taken out. is there anything we read into that's correct the things they took out? >> i go back to what i said, the president was trying to tell america in killing ben laud in he took care of the terrorism issue, and anything that suggested otherwise undermined not only that part of his foreign policy hook, but really if benghazi was as bad as we know know it was, it undermined the approach to foreign policy which the president is completely detached, uninvolved, and frankly, i'm astounded to hear him admitting that he is clueless on so many things. if you listen to him and holder, they don't know squat about anything. >> you think when david petraeus wrote in december he said i would just as not use this that he was acknowledging it was a lie? >> i thinknervous in terms of hn reputation and his own character. this whole issue on benghazi is an issue of character

argument, where the justicings are asking questions before they've met together, you get the most unadulterated view of what that particular person thinks before they come together and agree on some kind of least common denominator view. >> how many people work for scotus blog? >> we've got about four full time staff. we've got another part time staff around 15 or 20 people. we have another 100 people who contribute during the year. it's gone from me and amy sitting in the bedroom and clicking away to whole enterprise it probably cost us $5000 the first year and year seven quarter million dollars a year. money doesn't tell you a ton except it gives you a sense of scale. >> what does bloomberg law have to do with it? >> bloomberg law has is unbelievably good to us. it's a competitor of lexington wes law, wants to use the opportunity to get its name out there. on top of that, just thinks the blog is a public good. they let us do our thing. they think it's good to have a relationship with us but they just want to be supportive. they make everything possible in terms of the finances of it. they giv

. >> the argument that the only way we're going to win is to give people the unadulterated purist. >>concentrates the mind like losing five out of the last six elections. it happened with republicans now. they're getting to the point where they've got to settle this internal debate and i'm not sure if this next election cycle will be the one to do it because they're probably going to do very well in the midterms which means the party's right wing will be even more encouraged to stand fast, but they've got to move -- demographics are saying you have to do something to appeal to the hispanic community among others and immigration is not the key issue among hispa c hispani hispani hispanics. jobs the economy are. >> 30 states have republican governors, 315 electoral votes. 24 states have republican governors and republican legislatures. 51%. if you have 315 electoral votes, you are a national party. whether you can looking at scott walker or bobby jindal, rick perry, there are a lot of smart people doing a lot of common sense things that aren't necessary unconservative but they're actual

than right wing conspiracy political propaganda, black helicopter paranoia and most routineny, unadulterateda. now, all of that may, in fact, animate many of the inquiries, but that doesn't vitiate their validity nor does it make the accusations untrue or undeserving of media scrutiny. the lengths to which the administration has gone to silence whistleblowers and their sources is nothing short of astonishing. simply put, this is not the american way. for those of us looking to draw attention to these issues, it's been infuriate to see many of the press often the victims of this very government overreach ignore and dismiss them even as their sources were being prosecuted under the espionage act more times than all previous administrations combined. hopefully, though, now that these stories have become impossible to ignore, the press will finally wake up and smell the chilling effect that puts their very livelihoods in danger. ask me any questions and i'll tell you no lies. the government has lied to us is hardly unique to this administration, but few brave souls have had the courage to ask to

protect citizens from invasive tiazac diseases, and maintain standards and ensure food safety and unadulterated the products. while this is by ustive, regulan illinois, indiana, iowa, maine, michigan, new york, ohio, wisconsin and california would be potentially notified. the amendment will target states was to protect safety and interests within their state boundaries. the amendment does not offer a respectful adherence to the 10th amendment. it is instead a dangerous federal power grab creating a prohibitively burdensome government requirement for federal action on import local and regional issues they should be handled by state laws. i know mr. king has done his due diligence to narrowly tailor this amendment to target my state, but the farm bureau different agriculture industries uncertain of their future and validity of their state laws if the amendment were to pass. i strongly oppose its federal overreach which would nullify state laws protecting public health. i think about this as a former state senator. a lot of thoughts i didn't like were passed, but i still respect the men as many of