meaning it is determined that single-family or that unit that is demolished is valued more than one $.65 million we determine that number as unaffordable. >> so basically it doesn't matter we're using that unit for unaffordable unit then the second is derrick whether or not if it is urban sound structure there has been 16 of them 16 yeah. >> 16 and 31 priced out? >> uh-huh. and 16 unsound this ordinance r is remove all the processes and making that a cu we support that recommendations because both of the processes are complicated and some of them applications take along the cu process so unsounded applications are been going on if 6 months to years and also leaves the planners with being with those complex engineering things they don't have expertise on so not a very fair and you know effective process to we basically, the planner will write an analysis and the commission will make the final decisions and commissioner mar please. so i'm all for consistency making sure from the the new definition of the unauthorized unit with the planning regulation dealing with airbnb units. >> is that consistent too. >> once they become legalized then

meaning it is determined that single-family or that unit that is demolished is valued more than one $.65 million we determine that number as unaffordable matter we're using that unit for unaffordable unit then the second is derrick whether or not if it is urban sound structure there has been 16 of them 16 yeah. >> 16 and 31 priced out? >> uh-huh. and 16 unsound this ordinance r is remove all the processes and making that a cu we support that recommendations because both of the processes are complicated and some of them applications take along the cu process so unsounded applications are been going on if 6 months to years and also leaves the planners with being with those complex engineering things they don't have expertise on so not a very fair and you know effective process to we basically, the planner will write an analysis and the commission will make the final decisions and commissioner mar please. so i'm all for consistency making sure from the the new definition of the unauthorized unit with the planning regulation dealing with airbnb units. >> is that consistent too. >> once they become legalized then they're a non-conforming le

meaning it is determined that single-family or that unit that is demolished is valued more than one $.65 million we determine that number as unaffordableo basically it doesn't matter we're using that unit for unaffordable unit then the second is derrick whether or not if it is urban sound structure there has been 16 of them 16 yeah. >> 16 and 31 priced out? >> uh-huh. and 16 unsound this ordinance r is remove all the processes and making that a cu we support that recommendations because both of the processes are complicated and some of them applications take along the cu process so unsounded applications are been going on if 6 months to years and also leaves the planners with being with those complex engineering things they don't have expertise on so not a very fair and you know effective process to we basically, the planner will write an analysis and the commission will make the final decisions and commissioner mar please. so i'm all for consistency making sure from the the new definition of the unauthorized unit with the planning regulation dealing with airbnb units. >> is that consistent too. >> once they become legalized then they'

unaffordable. we know the injury will continue to hardworking americans. we stand united in supporting the reconciliation bill and repeal of obamacare. the speaker pro tempore: th gentleman from maryland is recognized. mr. van hollen: i'm pleased to yield a minute to mr. mcdertt of washington, a member of the budget committee and ways and means committee. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from washington is recognized for one minute. without objection. the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. mcdermott: mr. speaker, here we are again, the same fraudulent bill being brought oue gentleman from michigan says that they have a plan, they have a plan. we have been waiting five years for you to bring that floor and let us have a vote on it. there is no plan that you are willing to bring to the floor because you do not care about the american people and their health security. taking it away from 22 million people and assaulting women with this bill is simply clear evidence that you do not care what happens. now you may think this is good election year politics, but ba

united states, we pay much more for health care than anywhere else in the world. if we as a country don't bring down those costs, it's rapidly becoming unaffordable. >> i know that youep your eye it. i think that the next hearing is next week. >> coming up. there will be a series in the coming weeks. people should watch for those. >> all right. lisa, our health editor, thank you. >> thank you, thuy. >>> this month's powerful storms have duffeled snow and rain across california amid what's expected to be a monster el nino. that's welcome news for our state, now in its fifth year of the worst drought in california's recorded history. will the projected storms be enough, though, to bring the state out of its dire conditions? with me now in the studio is long-time bay area weather expert, meteorologist jan nall. welcome. >> thank you very much. >> with the rain this week and continuing to have, what are we at now in terms of reservoir and snowfall totals? >> the reservoirs are coming up. they're not -- historical averages for this time of year. the snow pack is a better picture, above where we would normally be by a few percentages points. with the upcoming storms, thos

unaffordable. we know the injury will continue to hardworking americans. we stand united in supporting the reconciliation bill and repeal of obamacare. the speaker pro tempore: th gentleman from maryland is recognized. mr. van hollen: i'm pleased to yield a minute to mr. mcdertt of washington, a member of the budget committee and ways and means committee. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from washington is recognized for one minute. without objection. the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. mcdermott: mr. speaker, here we are again, the same fraudulent bill being brought out here again. the gentleman from michigan says that they have a plan, they have a plan. we have been waiting five years for you to bring that floor and let us have a vote on it. there is no plan that you are willing to bring to the floor because you do not care about the american people and their health security. taking it away from 22 million people and assaulting women with this bill is simply clear evidence that you do not care what happens. now you may think this is good election year

built and over 16 thousand luxury units built this is urgent this be corrected and whatever plan that certainly isn't the one before us what we have in ah bp is unaffordable.n. quotenaffordabl unaffordable. >> i'll call nor names and (calling names). >> i'm dense i'm representing the inner sunset neighborhood association and we support affordable housing but not through a massive demolition across the city. >> the city's economic i thought changes if 2012 to 2014 revealed that 60 thousand residents left every year and more moved in but reportedly those who moved out had low income and the city produced one and 9 percent the goals for market-rate while produced about 9 percent of moderate in case housing apparently the market-rate failed to trickle down for those who were forced out i want to talk about the flaws in the legislation let's start with the contradiction between the 200 and 40 soft sites make sense which have not yielded been walked by identified on the computer and the up zoning of thirty thousand parcels for possible demolition and that drama decided the correction it appears to be that ah bp is a major demolition program regards of the filte

united -- my care and given insurance costs have tripled in the last two years. before, when i had health care, it was a audible and since the aca, my insurance is now unaffordable and it seems to me that the people who are importing it before, barely affording it, my deductible used to be $500, now it is $5,000, we cannot afford to get sick. it is unbelievable, like the biggest scam. host: as far as these efforts to repeal it, is it something you support? caller: absolutely. i had a brother with a brain tumor when he was 12 years old and my parents had insurance and as soon as he had his tumor, they dropped him. there is a misconception about pre-existing conditions. he can still get insurance, but it is so ensure -- so outrageous that he really can't. tell you we will do all these magical things and it is not true, it is very expensive. people are not getting health care, they are not getting to choose who they get it from, so i would like to see this repealed, there has to be a better way. host: we will continue on with the conversation about that vote with legislators joining us this morning. first up is representative megalomania of south carolina. the -- r