but i think that in order to get that unaniminty, a 5-4 with the liberals dissentencing. >> trevor wood, do you agree we would have seen in many of these cases yet a signal from the con currencies of where individual justices really wanted to go? >> absolutely. and there is, you see justice thomas fors years has written concurring opinions that said he would go way further than the majority would go and with you are trying to get that extra 5th vote, though, you might just need to give away, if that's the right word for it, give away a little thing that narrows the ruling a little bit more, makes make sure you put a paragraph in that says, this doesn't apply to x, y, and z and it may be you can get kennedy's vogt or sotomayor's vote. in the unanimous cases, this foe faux fauxunamity cases. a lot are boring to most people and even to me. decisions. >> don't say that. >> about erisa and bankruptcy law that don't have an ideological component. so that makes up a bunch of the unanimous decisions. >> amanda frost, how does that work in mechanics? are there clerks shuttling back and forth bet