i, too, work with you pretty much every day, and i really think that this use of unassigned funds in our current budget makes perfect sense. now if we were tapping into reserve funds or some other source of funding, i would have reservations and think we should plan it according to the normal budget process, but given it -- the condition of our streets and how hazardous the condition is -- the materials are, i would say that this is appropriate. i do want to appreciate chair cohen for the approach you're taking to the budget this year. i'm really excited about it. i think it's the type of leadership that we need. i think it's going to make us have a different experience than we've had in previous years. i appreciate your comments, supervisor cohen, and i'm really excited about participating in the process that you've setup, but i'm really in support of this supplemental whether it's the full 2.5 million amount or a lesser amount that we might discuss in a minute. i do think it's something that's not only appropriate but something that our residents are demanding of us and rightfully

wertheim, the missing millions, the $80 million that we talked about last time that was yet unassigned, can we come up with some recommendations on where we go? >> yes. we assigned it out last time i presented to you exactly how the 70 million would be spent, right, so if memory serves me, there was 25 million towards social and cultural programming within the 25 years, basically, to keep funding soma stablization in perpetuity because that's about to run out, there's 25 million to fill a gap because the yerba buena facility can't figure out how to fund their facility. on the other end, we have about 6 million peryear for bessie carmichael. about 20% of the kids are from homeless families, and 100% are receiving free or subsidized lunches, so we work with the school district to fill that gap. there's about 9 million towards neighborhood cleaning services, that was about maybe 300 or 400,000 peryear that was requested by supervisor kim to help keep the neighborhood clean. and then about 600,000 peryear towards maintenance and upkeep of the new parks and recreation, and that was what we

these were unassigned lands and the government opened them up at noon on april 22, 1889, and people came and staked their claim for parts, you could stake up to 160 acres. so the community began developing right after this. the university came in 1890. where we're headed now is the east side of town, and what you see straight ahead, we'll see a little closer. some of the remnants of the state hospital for the mental institution, which was opened here about 1895. >> is that it over to the left? >> yes, the state had three mental hospitals, central state hospital, which was this one. western state, eastern state, and at one time there were thousands of patients that lived here on the grounds. my grandfather was a psychiatrist here, and they lived in a home right here on the corner, so my father grew up right here, so the doctors lived on the grounds and the patients all had jobs. this was a city within a city, that one time there were probably 4,000, 5,000 patients that lived here on the premises. we joked that it was norman's first gated community, because there were fences all around. th

such as invalid or unassigned phone numbers. this allows phone companies to block many scam calls before they even get to consumers. additionally, we are seeking public input on ways to help authenticate caller i.d. information. that would give each phone number a verified digital fingerprint that would give every call recipient the confidence to answer, knowing a legitimate caller was on the line. just yesterday, the fcc launched an initiative to explore the creation of a database for reassigned phone numbers, a measure that would help reduce unwanted calls to consumers. the fcc's focus hasn't been limited to the rule-making side of the ledger alone. aggressive enforcement also has been a key component of our strategy. we sent a very clear message that those who engage in illegal robo call schemes will pay a price, literally. in 2017, the fcc proposed over $200 million in fines against illegal robo callers, including the largest single fine ever proposed in the history of this agency. i've also personally raised this issue with

it's, do not originate, it's invalid numbers, unassigned or unallocated numbers. so in that category, you have what are basically identifiable numbers that can be blocked. when you start looking at the other industry sectors like first orion, like umail, like nomorobo, there is broader latitude for the categories of calls that they can block. and i know having participated in a lot of these industry forums, they put tremendous effort into looking at multiple characteristics to make sure that when they do decide to flag that call or score that call, that they get it right. but i do think michele is right that even in that instance, we do want to make sure that there is a mechanism whereby when an instance of a false positive arises, that can be addressed, that it can be resolved quickly and efficiently. and there's a lot of different ways that you can go with that, and that is a lot of the discussion that's happening and i know ustelecom, we've had one initial workshop in october this year to discuss this exact issue. we've scheduled a second for may 4th here in wa

we allowed carriers to take steps to block calls from spoofs or unassigned phone numbers. additionally working with technologists and others to come up with a call authentication standard. if you can imagine a digital fingerprint for every phone number, so if you see a number on the foam has not been programmed in by you you have the confidence knowing this is actual number assigned to an actual person. i can answer with confidence, i don't have to worry about whether marriott telling me i won vacation or purported irs agent and the like. additionally on the back end we've an extremely aggressive on enforcement, cracking down on unwanted robocallers. the largest fine ever been proposed fcc history proposed under my leadership against a guy who unleashed hundreds of millions of american robocalls on consumers in last three months and 2016. 100 million-dollar fine on the individual who testified in congress and taking action against others like him in the time to come. additionally we're working with counterparts at federal trade commission. i have also coordinated with some