and then there's a transcript of the proceedings, unofficial, unauthenticated transcript. but a quick transcript is produced put up on the web verbatim. you can follow if you didn't get a chance to see the proceeding, you can go on the web and see what happened word for word through the proceedings. those are important measures of transparency. then i spoke of unbounded. this is the criticism that, of being concerned about expanded military jurisdiction. the mission of our military is to fight our nation's war, defend our borders. not to police our streets. or hold the trials that enforce the laws. and to embrace this military tribunal is to undercut that important value. that we need to have our civilian juries trying these cases so our society gets skin in the game. the jury is linking the government to the people. if you substitute in this military court that you're undercutting that. there's a long line of distinguished cases in our supreme court's opinions going back to the trial of an indiana man by a military court when the civil courts were open. a distinguished lin