say unbounded we were able to execute in the way i hope we can. something out, suddenly, we are 50% bigger, and that doesn't work anymore. "bloomberg's studio 1.0" is brought to you by -- ♪ emily: you have not shied away againstaking out president trump or candidate trunk. you realized it was not getting better. what do you think about the world today? stewart: dramatic. about this in terms of policies at this point, and there are all kinds of policies where i think it is worth vigorous opposition for different reasons. immigration laws, for example. and just understanding of what has made this country great historically. the trade policy is something that could do really significant damage on the economy and the world economy. i still think we're going to and 10,e repair to do 20, 50, 100 years from now, i hope we will be in better shape. you have come out in support of planned parenthood. you spoke out against the travel ban. when you take these political stands, how do you decide to do that? the personal things, and you have a company. individu

power,issue of executive on which judge kavanagh seems to hold an almost unbounded view, i asked him whether he believed a sitting president must comply with a subpoena or testify or provide records. he would not say that the president must comply with a subpoena or provide records. on a major civil rights case, shelby v holder which gutted the voting rights act and led a torrent of discriminatory restrictive voting laws, judge kavanagh would not say if the decision were correctly decided. i reminded him that after the case was decided and chief justice roberts said, well, the world has changed. we don't need this law anymore. 19 states went ahead and change their law and in a few of them, there is documentation explicitly changing the law to prevent people of color from voting. i asked him, given that new evidence, wouldn't he agree that shelby was wrongly decided? he would not agree. we also spent a good deal of time going over his years in the bush white house. judge either, the wouldn't answer or couldn't remember key moments of his tenure. he acknowledged being part of the white

on the issue of executive power in which judge kavanaugh holds an unbounded view, i asked whether he believed a sitting president must comply with the subpoena were testify, or provide records. he would not say that the president must comply with the subpoena or provide records. the major civil rights case, shall be versus holder which gutted the civil rights act and lead many discrimination laws he would not save it work correctly decided. i reminded him that after the case was decided and chief justice roberts said, the world is changed we do not need this law anymore, 19 states change their law. in few of them there were documentation that were changing the law to prevent people of color from voting. giving that new evidence would and he agreed that shelby was wrongly decided? he would not agree. we also spent a good deal of time going over his years in the bush white house. unfortunately, the judge either would not answer could not remember key moments of his tenure. he acknowledged being part of the enron case but would not provide details of what he did. his lack of recollectio

superdelegates ended up swaying -- the role of superdelegates, they are able to vote for whomever they choose, unboundy primary results. there's this feeling within the if it is an , it isshment candidate fixed for them. host: where does the chairman of the dnc come down on this issue? the dnc leader has generally been behind this issue. they really feel the need to rebuild trust in the party, bring it together. that's where a lot of the energy of the party is right now on the left. they want to bring in the sanders supporters. so theytablish trust can feel like those who felt alienated can come back into the fold. we really need them in 2020. host: they start up in a couple of hours. explain how the day will play out. when will we see a final vote on this measure? guest: they convene at 8:00 a.m. this is the third in three days. it is a summer meeting for the dnc in chicago. there will be a lot of debate. there's been protests all week, noisy protests pushing for this measure. we will see a lot of arguments probably on both sides. it gets fiery from the progressive side pushing for this. i think it w

emily: amazon is obviously another company with unbounded ambition. does that concern you?e anyone who wants to come into the space. i think this industry has never been delivery and the off-line world has largely been ignored by the tech industry. if you think about the biggest companies serving consumers, they are largely online even though off-line is 10 times bigger. it is not surprising to me to see so many different interests come in. for doordash, that has been our mission from day one and we are excited to be doing that. emily: so, even if there is a lot of competition, what keeps you up at night? >> the people and whether or not we are providing the right opportunities for the people to do the best work. if we have the right people in the right positions, we are going to be just fine. there are so many opportunities that we want to build on in order to accelerate the transformation of every business in america and really make sure that the 60% of jobs produced on the streets every year stay in america. emily: do you have plans to go global? >> we are always looking

. >> i've felt unbounded and inspired to pursue a lot of things over time i recognize to be cricked in ways i didn't anticipate you know i've followed the calling but now put me in a position to spend most of my time doing things i love this is the whole point; right? you ought to feel inspired in our work and found opportunities to have you're work put you in service for others and happy doing what you're spending so much time. >> my father was a journalist lift and my mom a teacher when we finally decided to give up their lives because of me and now i actually get to serve the city and county of san francisco it makes me feel really, really good not this didn't happen overnight i've worked my entire life to get to this point and much more to learn and i have a lot of changes ahead. >> really think about what moves you what you're pat's about and trust that you are sufficient and enough where you are to begin and then is her that you are being tenacious about getting to the next place in the evolution but by all means start with you are and know that's enough

when i say unbounded potential, i mean we should end up as big as microsoft if we are able to executee way i hope we can. emily: that said, microsoft, facebook, and perhaps even google are trying to do what you do. do you think they have too much power? stewart: if i had to answer the question point-blank, i would say no. it depends on what you mean by too much power. i think things change. sometimes they seem impossible. people tend to overestimate the short-term effects of technological change, but they underestimate the long-term effects. i think the same thing is true in business. there will be disruptors to those companies in the fullness of time. emily: i know you are nervous about being held up as a model for diversity, but the truth is your numbers are far above industry average when it comes to diversity. you, personally, decided very early on in slack's lifecycle to make it a priority. what was the spark that sort of brought you that realization? stewart: first of all, it wasn't just me. it was a company-level decision. it was when we were around 30 people, and we looked aro

he's trump unbound. this is like trying to put a straitjacket on the incredible hulk. you can do it for a minute when he's bruce banner. then he hulks out and donald trump is hulking out and he feels frustrated by aides who try to tell him what not to do. we're entering a dangerous phase right here where you lose the restraint of don mcgahn and you wonder will trump go out and fire jeff sessions, which is something he's itching to do. now he's being encouraged to do by some members of the senate. of course, a replacement could get rid of robert mueller. >> let's talk about this. lits drill down a little bit more on this, laura. was surprised by the news. he's tweeting. the president, the real donald trump. i hope it's not true mcgahn is leaving white house counsel. you can't let that happen. mitch mcconnell called it sad news for your country. when you get that, do you sense there's a fear among republicans if he leaves. >> i think there's a sincere fear of what is happening. let's go back more than 11 days ago when the president essentially had learned that don mcgahn

>> well, i mean, you know, it feels like this is the trump unbound phase of the presidency, doesn't ity ways? we've seen the president assert himself, take control over the running of his white house, make significant personnel changes that puts him much more firmly in charge of his foreign policy, his national security, and really he's out there on the road doing campaign-style rallies. he said the other day he might be doing that six or seven times a week leading up to the midterm elections. so i feel like we're seeing the president running the trump presidency that he wanted and feeling very unconstrained in any way. >> you also talk about an uptick in the number of false statements by the president. is it a turning point in that way? >> well, i think perhaps it is. the numbers are just mind-blowing to me. if you look at "the washington post" fact checker column, they do a great job with this. he has actually been tracking all of president trump's factual assertions with a small team of people deposed ever since trump's inauguration. what he's found is that the number of false state

and algorithm risk assessment decide who gets out of prison early or a correctional officer with unboundeddiscretion, i will choose the algorithm every time. that can be tweaked and fixed so that doesn't cause racial disparities. it's very hard to get at that point it's just simply someone's discretion decision. it's part of the reason in racial discrimination we don't want discretion. we want more decision-making that is guided by rules that apply equally to everyone. and i have some concerns about risk assessment, , especially under this current attorney general and how that will play out, but i also know that in the bill and first step, the inspector general is going to be given what the risk assessment tool is used, how it is used, how it is created. all of that will be reviewed by the inspector general, along with reformed community. i'm hopeful if there are problems with that, between the inspector general and the reformed community monitoring this, that those problems will be worked out. at the end of the day i would rather have an algorithm deciding some of these decisions and indi

. >> with confidence in our armed forces, with the unbounding determination of our people, we will gaintriumph so help us god. [applause] jon: there were 24 aircraft carriers built during the war for the united states navy. the uss intrepid is one of them. >> we honor you. we salute you. and we thank you. and i ask the former crewmembers please stand so that we might recognize you. jon: celebrating its 75th anniversary of service this weekend, former intrepid crewmembers returned for a very special ceremony. >> to be able to celebrate what is 75 years since the day of the commissioning of this ship, which was august 16th, 1943, and have a weekend-long series of celebrations for what are 342 crewmembers from around the country, from 37 states, and their 900 or so family and friends, guests, descend upon intrepid, there's nothing else like it. >> back when i was 18, i was proud i could get on the intrepid, this ship. i always wanted to be in the navy. and i -- my dreams come true. jon: the carrier was called to duty again in 1952, participating in military exercises and supporting our all

they were unbound even in the face of tear gas, and night sticks.he poor people's campaign. despite despite crippling fatigue and overwhelming demands on his time. dr. dr. king came to memphis. he came to memphis to lend his moral authority. and express his solidarity. he came to memphis, because he saw the sanitation workers struggl everything everything that the next phase of the civil rights movement must be about. you know, they don't teach it in the schools very much. you won't hear it from today's right-wing politicians who now praise dr. king. but the truth was, he was a proud and longstanding ally of the trade union movement. the civil rights movement. and the trade union movement had common values. but we also have common enemies. it wasn't a coincidence that the same powerful force who is wanted to destroy unions also wanted to oppress black people. dr. king knew he couldn't have racial justice without economic they were all one and the same. justice. they were all one and the same. how how can you overcome segregation without overcoming d

they were unbound. in the face of tear gas and nightsticks pick they did not blink.e mayor prevailed he would never in his own words sign a contract with the [null] union. they stood together marching under a slogan with four powerful words. i am a man. the struggle caught the attention of dr. martin luther king jr. who was in the middle of planning the poor people's campaign. fatigue and overwhelming demands on his time and dr. king came to memphis. he came to memphis to lend his moral authority and express the solidarity. he came to memphis because he saw the sanitation workers struggle. the next phase of the civil rights movement must be about this. they don't teach it in schools very much. you don't hear it from today's white ring -- white ring -- right wing politicians that praised dr. king pick the long- standing ally of the trade union movement. the civil rights movement and the trade union movement had common value. we also have common enemies. it wasn't a coincidence that the same forces who wanted to destroy the unions also wanted to oppress black people. d

his public speeches and writings reveal a man with a nearly unbounded, almost monarchical view of executive power, and yet an incredibly limited interpretation of competitive accountability. those -- of executive accountability. those beliefs are troubling at any moment in time, but they are particularly troubling at this moment in time as the president of the united states routinely belittles the rule of law and as his lawyers pronounced that they will fight a duly authorized subpoena, subpoena that has been obeyed in the past by previous presidents. and, mr. president, there is still much about judge kavanaugh that we don't know, because senate republicans have engaged in a blatant historic obstruction of a large portion of his record. first, chairman grassley broke with tradition and fired off a one-sided partisan request for documents. senator feinstein is known as the most reasonable of members. if she couldn't join with senator grassley in a request for documents, clearly it indicates how biased that request was. chairman grassley unilaterally declared the papers from judge kavanaugh'