a pretty modest variance, and to not grant it would practically make that lot and buildable -- unbuildable in the sense that you're not going to generate any income and what was paid for the property. if you were to do those kinds of numbers, it is probably out of line. at any rate, that is not part of the consideration. i intend to uphold the variance. commissioner hwang: this is a stark image. this is the one i kept asking about. because it does -- it is a little bit striking in 2d. we are looking at a very challenging space here in which to build a property. i can relate. i can sort of empathize with the appellant's concern with having this huge thing right next to it. but i am -- there are limitations to the space in which to build something. my inclination is next here. -- mixed here. i am having some difficulty really. whereas the setback issue is a very important one for the appellant, it seems like the nature and size and style will be addressed at the building of. -- building level. i am not sure where i am going here. i will have to keep thinking about it. commissioner garcia: pl