he also said the e-mails, quote, were unclassified at the time and they are in my judgment still unclassified. what's the takeaway? >> this was nbcnews.com, by our colleague, and he reported yesterday exclusively that in fact, there had been unclassified retroactively classified e-mails sent to two former secretary of state offices. one to colin powell personally on his e-mail and the other to deputies of condoleezza rice who did not use e-mails while she was secretary of state. this would validate the hillary clinton campaign quickly leaped on, saying this validates her claim all along that she's being targeted by republicans, that in fact this is a common practice. not a great practice, but the fact is the only way to communicate with these unclassified systems is to -- the only way to do business in the state department when you're traveling long distances, people are communicating from overseas, they didn't have mobile devices that were classified, is to let people know who importaen impor things are happening, and the ambassadors in pakistan, it's important to let the secretary know, and

unclassified.ans it is not in the original classified document. that's what is being alleged for the most part as far as we know. >> when you hear -- i mean, how do you see this situation? what is your overall take on her maintaining 1200 documents they now say on an unsecured server that were classified? >> in fact the explanation you heard in the earlier segment with abc she was talking apples and oranges. there's a difference between classified information and using this private server. that is what some of the predecessors did. not a private server but at least sending e-mails on a private e-mail ask t account. nobody was sending classified information on a classified system. i have seen pundits on the left or the right saying there's no way she will be prosecuted, she definitely will be prosecuted. the who, what, why, whens we are waiting to see. i need to see the context of some of these documents and what information is at issue. what i do see from a political standpoint is whoever is advisi

think of the insights that a foreign service would get even to unclassified information. i don't mean to be suggesting we may or may not do anything against the russian foreign minister. i'm just saying secretary clinton is a legitimate foreign intelligence target, and her personal, okay, government but unclassified, just assuming that to be true, e-mails would be of great interest to a foreign intelligence service, and, fareed, to round it out, i would lose respect for a whole bunch of intelligence services around the world if they weren't thumbing through the pile now. >> mike hayden, always a pleasure to talk to you. >> thank you. >>> next on "gps" for centuries societies have wondered what is the best way to discourage criminals from committing crimes? well, one city in america is trying a novel idea. paying the would-be criminals to stay out of trouble. is it working? it actually seems to be. i'll explain. then, woosh, it's gone. i swear i saw it swallow seven people. seven. i just wish one of those people could have been mrs. johnson. [dog bark] trust me, we're deal

do you have any evidence someone took something off the classified server and sent it on the unclassifiedhat i have seen in the news reporting about this particular case. but the issue is if you are going to have s.a.p. or special access program material on a private -- on your blackberry or your iphone, somebody has to physically take that information off of a highly classified system physically and put it onto that unclassified public device. >> but you don't have evidence that that happened. >> i don't have any personal evidence, but it's obvious from the ig. national intelligence committee and some of the very senior people that have reported about this in government. >> we'll have you come back and talk about isis sometime soon. >> absolutely. >> good to see you. >>> in our world lead, the zika virus already being called a pandemic. for the first time, it's now being blamed for three deaths. that story next. what makes this simple salad the best simple salad ever? heart healthy california walnuts. the best simple veggie dish ever? heart healthy california walnuts. the best simple din

they took their thing on a private unclassified server, said they scrubbed it themselves. there was no classified information. that's false hundreds of times. it's not just sensitive information. it's top secret information, and we still don't have access to all the e-mails. it was the clintons to scrubbed them first. we don't know what else they never turned over. >> you don't think this neutralizes the issue for republicans at all? you're still going to continue to bring this up? >> absolutely. it's a fair thing. she's been asked. she took them, put them on a private server, which is unclassified, never mind the cyber issues we face of others trying to seek information about how our government operates. we think see how things have no allowed certain sensitive up to top secret information be put in the secret sphere. that's dangerous. in seeking to be commander in chief, there are different circumstances that existed in those. the last thing is from my understanding, the only reason we know about this is the fbi spoken colin powell. i don't believe that's occurred with s

forget whether it's classified or unclassified.sed to have government email. >> right. what she did was do government business on a private email server. that's obviously wrong. that's just a matter of common sense. and even worse, over this personal server, she sent and received classified information and clearly knew it it that's why so many elementary security precautions have been violated here that's just hard for people who have been in the government and actually had this kind of classified information to understand how she got away with it for so long. >> all right. the information would are getting obviously is from anonymous sources. we haven't yet seen exactly what it is. presumably though if it's wrong and those emails are there, this will go to a grand jury, right? >> i think it's almost unavoidable. take any of the defenses that she has raised that$áu just saw in thoseww clips, that the information was not marked classified. in the emails, number one, that's irrelevant. and number two, it's an unarguable admission of

>> i'll try to keep it unclassified. it breaks roughly one-third/two-thirds. based on maintenance we always say there's 30 but it can go up or down one or two total and then you'll see us as we go to 44 that mix will be a higher percentage of ce 2s. >> 30 to 44 by the end of '17. incrementally adding. >> we're adding -- we're going beyond 30 every month between now and tend of '16. i think the number is 37 by the end of '16. and then 44 by tend of '17. so you're going to start to see that number go up. >> what's the next intercept test scheduled? you haven't had one since june of '14. >> we have learned a lot through our non-intercept test. that data is equally important to any intercept test we do. the intercept test that we're scheduled to conduct is in november of this year. against an icbm. and that will be the ce 2 block 1 interceptor. >> it's going most sophisticated target ever? >> certainly the longest range target ever that we've intercepted. and i'll keep the other part of that test classified in terms of what we're going to present and what the spee

>> i'll try to keep it unclassified. it breaks roughly one-third/two-thirds. based on maintenance we always say there's 30 but it can go up or down one or two total and then you'll see us as we go to 44 that mix will be a higher percentage of ce-2s. >> 30 to 44 by the end of '17. incrementally adding. >> we're adding -- we're going beyond 30 every month between now and the end of '16. i think the number is 37 by the end of '16. and then 44 by the end of '17. so you're going to start to see that number go up. >> what's the next intercept test scheduled? you haven't had one since june of '14. >> we have learned a lot through our non-intercept test. like the one last week -- or two weeks ago. i would argue that that data is equally important to any intercept test that we do. the intercept test that we're scheduled to conduct is in november of this year. against an icbm. and that will be the ce-2 block 1 intercepter. >> it's going most sophisticated target ever? >> certainly the longest range target ever that we've intercepted. and i'll keep the other part of that

i think it's not on the people that took those messages off of classified servers and it on an unclassified server to send to secretary clinton. but it's also some of the other language you hear that hillary asked individuals that worked on her staff to send it anyway, knowing it was classified. >> it seems -- i know the clinton abit to talk her around things and the use of semantics. it feels like the noose is starting to tighten. you wonder how long it will take and if there is deliberate foot dragging. >> you see this reflected in her trust war anywhereness polls -- her trustworthiness polls. with loretta lynch, you have one in five americans saying the government is trustworthy. one in three say they believe there is corruption. and what happened with the irs is not confidence inspiring. charles: hillary clinton invoking colin powell saying former secretaries of state did the same thing. >> everything single line of defense hillary clinton put up during this scandal has been breached. that it's retroactively classified is absurd. someone at the top level of our government knows how clas

. >> there were a number of documents that were transmitted in an unclassified manner that were clearly classified at birth. and show this retroactive classification is a red herring. >> reporter: this 2011 hearing forwarded, kick started the fbi probe. the state department released the document without any redactions. two intelligence agencies now say that was a mistake. the e-mail contained specific information came from classified sources as well as satellite images. intelligence that included the information outside the rebel stronghold was compromised. >> it clearly does indicate two things. one is the level of interest the united states has in that particular region and the collection capability. >> thursday's debate moderator failed to ask a single question. the more than 1,600 classified e-mails, nor a subpoena investigation. earlier a campaign spokesman went after the state department's inspector general who was an obama poinlee. >> all i know is they have mount several different fishing style investigations since she decided to run for president. >> that was the same line of a

i would ideally like an unclassified version. maybe if it has a classified annex, that would be fine. would that be something you could agree today? i think -- this is really a breakthrough report in my view given the cross section of experts involved. is that something you could do for us? >> sure, we'll do that. >> great. thank you very much. thank you, mr. chairman. >> senator kay? >> thank you. one quick comment and one question. director clapper, there's been a lot of praise heaped upon you today. i'd like to join you on that. the more i read, the more i appreciate washington. not for necessarily the war and the presiding over the constitutional convention, but his role as the first president establishing precedence and sort of how this whole enterprise would function. i realize you're not the first director of national intelligence, but i think by your tenure and your character and your intelligence and your experience you have served a similar function in really establishing how this entity should operate and will operate

jail for what has been done because the assumption in the intelligence community is if you check unclassified means there is the potential for and likelihood that foreign governments are targeting those accounts and gathering intelligence which means that individual and the others associated with an have been passing along to and secure networks information, sources and methods of people on the ground, compromise in real time, this is a real deal, full-blown national security scandal and republicans need to keep pointing that out time and time again. will bernie have the courage to do it? >> not just the names of cia agents or details of special operations missions that this is cut and dried. when you take information, top-secret, off of that server and put it in an open architecture server is a felony of the highest order. immediately ten years in prison. the damage assessments we are all concerned, we all want to know how much was attacked. we won't know that because they can't look at the e-mails said they are conducting a damage assessment but we will never know because they can't actuall

correspondent to write about the ability of the national security agency to intercept and penetrate the unclassifiedls of the syrian armed forces. what civil liberties quotient are we suggesting when he makes public that nsa and gchq intercepted the satellite phone of someone at the g 20 meeting. charlie: has there been, as far as you know, any deaths because of what he did? michael: i don't know. i am not in government. it might be difficult to prove even with the full evidentiary trail that a caused b. when i talk to people still in government, i say, i am saying public things. tell me that you will not saw the limb off behind me. have these revelations harmed american security? what i get is something like, oh, yes. charlie: harmed it because it gave some insight? michael: there is a lot out there now that was legitimately secret. charlie: if you know they are doing this, you can change your behavior. michael: you can avoid that pathway. here's a softball. he revealed something called the cbjb. the congressional budget justification book. it is a massive document we create every year. in it, down

no student is considered "unclassified," left to wander aimlessly through the curriculum. --align mathematics to programs of study. mathematics that are not relevant to programs of study and career goals present a serious obstacle to college success. instead, institutions should provide statistics and quantitative literacy, which better align with most non-stem programs. --provide academic maps for students. programs, not random individual courses. after making the "big choice" of academic majors, all other choices, including the course sequence, are laid out for them. in this way, a clear map to on-time completion is prepared, showing each student's path from day 1 to on- time graduation. --default students onto academic pathways. students remain on their chosen path approval to change exploration outside one's major is allowed and intentional investigation, replacing aimless wandering. students are able to chart their path to on-time see their progress staying on track understanding the time and money making a change. --use critical path courses that must be completed ea

makes her very much responsible when she traffics in sensitive information that should not be in unclassifiedserver, should never have been on hers. trish: if this happens, sometime in, again, any estimates on timing? next couple weeks, next couple months? >> it's important that the director act sooner rather than later. he is in fact a non-partisan appointee. he is supposed to be and historically they have been above being influenced by the administration. the later he acts looks more like he is influenced. to be candid, not as a pro-hillary person, but this is something that primary voters should know that either she has been cleared of or indicted for. they shouldn't be choosing between two candidates. trish: political process from here on out, how does she run as democratic nominee if she is indicted? >> how does she run with cloud of suspicion when 22 documents that above top secret level were found on her server? these are documents not only highly classified she took them from government. when she left government, she didn't take a copy. she took it all. i know it didn't say top secret

. >> unclassified e-mail system .es: and these would be people that work for hillary clinton then? she probably -- i mean she wouldn't be doing that. >> uh-huh. okay. so almost all the e-mails that are being sent to mrs. clinton come from her closest aide. so that would be her chief of staff at that time, cheryl millions, also jake as you will vin who is the career state department person. but she herself has sent e-mails that have been released and heavily redacted where classified information is involved. so it is simply not a question of her receiving this information. she also sent information that falls into that b one classified bucket. charles: lieutenant general loretta lynch saying earlier in the week the investigation is still on going. which i found odd that she had to remind everyone that this investigation still going on. any sort of time horizon or timeline? any sort of estimated time where we may be able to get some conclusion to this? >> well, you know, i mean there's such powerful forces that play her

government, they look at classified and unclassified information and they focus on programs. i have a team working on terrorism, hezbollah sanctions, isil sanctions, everything in the terrorism realm. we follow the intel as well as everything dealingn. with yemen and teams that focus on the ballistic-missile program. ..o they know what we're doing. we don't want to, for example, interrupt a sensitive intelligence operation. we don't want to interfere with a law enforcement operation, so we make sure that what we do, we communicate very well so that when we roll out, we're able to roll out in the smartest, most effective way. so, basically we start from scratch, developing the intel, building cases, working with the team, so that we can roll out successive sanctions against the greatest threats to our national security and foreign policy. mr. keating: and in that process, what triggers re-evaluating things? without getting into detail. because i don't want to undercut the lesk rang you have. but -- leverage you have. but i mean, what are the things that are important when you

. >> she could have sent him an unclassified e-mail. >> i think you probably -- no. she was talking about cyber security today and i had to -- >> i think that is -- that is the greatest act of chutzpah i remember. for her to talk about cyber security is just a sign that she is totally out of touch with reality and i'll bet you everyone in the audience sitting there going, let me get this straight. you sent over 1,500 secret or top secret documents but you want us to think about cyber security? >> i can see a criminal referral from the fbi and chaos ensuing after that. let's go to the republican side. your take, your analysis and what do you make of this cruz-trump-carson dust-up? >> well, let me say first of all, you'll remember, we talked about at the time i thought trump made a mistake not going to the debate and pretty clear a few more resources on field organization and the debate he probably would have won. i hope he learned a lesson from that. i think that the cruz people did make a mistake. i think that they ended up putting themselves in a position where dr.

. >> there were a number of documents that were transmitted in an unclassified manner that were clearly classified at birth. and show this retroactive classification is a red herring. >> reporter: this 2011 hearing forwarded, kick started the fbi probe. the state department released the document without any redactions. two intelligence agencies now say that was a mistake. the e-mail contained specific information came from classified sources as well as satellite images. intelligence that included the information outside the rebel stronghold was compromised. >> it clearly does indicate two things. one is the level of interest the united states has in that particular region and the collection capability. >> thursday's debate moderator failed to ask a single question. the more than 1,600 classified e-mails, nor a subpoena investigation. earlier a campaign spokesman went after the state department's inspector general who was an obama poinlee. >> all i know is they have mount several different fishing style investigations since she decided to run for president. >> that was the same line of a

doing it on unclassified system. something i've been pointing out to people probably a year. there were bound to be these types of violations where classified information is mishandled. that is indeed the case. reality i don't think latest dump, four dumps that will happen between now and end the month will hurt her. they haven't hurt her with democrats so far. what else is going to come out that will possibly be worse than what we've already seen? andrea: only thing fbi recommending charges if they do. harris: we don't know what they have. complicity argument you made is really delicious one because speaks to what ig, inspector general at state said. there is no way state could not have known about the classifications and all of this within the emails because they let her circumvent the sim from the get-go. not like she had a dot-gov and changed. she had personal from the beginning. andrea: we'll see. they're all covering for her it seems. >> accused of turning a blind eye when victims were victimized time and time

the server of the foreign minister of a potential adversary of the united states, even for their unclassified e-mails, i would have moved heaven and earth to do that. >> was it reckless? >> it was really imprudent. i don't know why the permanent government, the folks at state would actually not have gone to the secretary and said, ma'am, you just can't do it that way. >> looking forward to reading the entire thing "playing to the edge." it is out tomorrow. thank you for your service. >> thank you. >>> ahead, democrats using games of chance to determine election outcomes, but are they gambling with a possible lawsuit? judge napolitano will rule, when we come back. pet moments are beautiful, unless you have allergies. then your eyes may see it differently. only flonase is approved to relieve both your itchy, watery eyes and congestion. no other nasal allergy spray can say that. complete allergy relief or incomplete. let your eyes decide. flonase changes everything. "you don't want to live with mom and dad forever, do you?" "how do i check my credit score?" "credit karma. don't worry, it's free.

there are a variety of projects both classified and unclassified that we are pursuing. to turn over to the readiness and the people side of the budget. >> good afternoon, first want to say that readiness is absolutely a critical part of our efforts. funds service efforts to address readiness from the standpoint of both, ensuring that the units are we will make sure the joint force is ready if they accomplish missions. that is the recovery of a joint force full spectrum readiness. it is a reorientation, the joint force is engaged in combat operations over the past 10 years or more. now, weorm of conflict, must shift focus to the full spectrum to the outline that is implied. are programmed. however, resources are not the dominant factor in readiness recovery. it is different in every service. it is also impacted by mission demands. they may be occurring at any time as occurred today. resources are not the dominant factor. force capacity, up-tempo, maintenance input, all add to this challenge. talk andvices will more specificity about this as we get into a generating more

to intercept and penetrate unclassified e-mails to have the syrian armed forces. what civil liberties quotient are we suggesting when he makes public n.s.a. and g.c.s.q. intercepted satellite phone of medvedev in a g2 meeting in the united kingdom. >> rose: have there been deaths because of what he did? >> i don't know because i'm not in government. it might be difficult to prove even with the full evidencery trail in front of you that a cause b. but when i talk to people still in government and i say i'm out there saying public things about this, tell me you won't saw the limb off blind me here, have these revelations harmed american security? and what i get, charlie is something like, oh, yes. >> rose: but they harmed it because they gave some insight into methods and people. >> sure. there is an awful lot out there now that was legitimately secret. >> rose: if you know the u.s. is doing this, you can change your behavior. >> you can avoid that pathway. let me just give you one that's a real softball. he revealed something called the cbjb, the congressional budg

. >> by the time she got the e-mails they were unclassified. somewhere along the way they changed. she has been open with everything. and you got a daughter here and don't you want to show her that a female can be in the white house? >> elizabeth warren could be his choice. >> by randy. we'll see you. >> see you later. >> you got a dad that's fighting for you. >> are we ready for the new count? precinct chairs, please. do you count and let me know. >> are you staying on that side now? >> i just did. there was nobody back there. >> owl of the undecided -- >> and all o'malley -- >> realigned. >> -- realigned and now commencing recounts for clinton and sanders. >> okay. i may not be able to download it because i'm not finding anything that's supporting a mac. any new people? john, is there anyone down here we didn't count? >> i don't think so. >> anybody here that wasn't in the original head count? [ counting ]. is there anybody else? this is really important. anybody else? we're at 232. [ applause ] >> i don't know if they all went over or not. we'll find out in a minute. they're cou

which sullivan replied 'trust me, i share your exasperation, but until ops converts it to the unclassified e-mail system, there is no physical way for me to e-mail it.' "in another recently released e-mail, clinton instructed sullivan to convert a classified document into an unclassified e-mail attachment by scanning it on to an unsecured computer and sending it without any classified markings. quote -- "turn into nonpaper with no identifying heading and send nonsecure. ." she ordered. well, one former -- or one gentleman associated with judicial watch has been one of the entities which has filed the freedom of information litigation which has produced these huge volume of e-mails contained on secretary clinton's server, said receiving top secret s.a.p. intelligence outside secure channels is a mortal sin, he called it. so as you can see, mr. president, these are not trivial matters. these are very, very serious matters. and it's important to remind folks that this issue is even made worse because it's likely some of our adversaries had access to and monitored her private e-mail server. we

it's unclassified. he wrote a memo stating emails received by former secretaries colin powell and condoleezza rice may contain classified information. this is the same trumped up allegation which republicans are currently trying to railroad secretary clinton. as vice chairman feinstein said last week -- quote -- "it has never made sense to me that secretary clinton can be held responsible for email exchanges that originated with someone else, and yet republicans would have you believe that these emails posed a grave threat. secretary colin powell said it best. here's what he said. "upon reading such emails, quote, a normal, air-breathing mammal would look at them and say what's the issue?" close quote. just like they turned benghazi into a political issue, republicans are looking for anything that can be twisted into a partisan political tool for former senator, former secretary of state hillary clinton, and for obvious reasons. pursuit of her email records has caused the republicans to waste millions o

scenario and photographs were taken from the computer screens and manufacturing was copied into the unclassifiedystem. based on court orderlier this week, clinton's closest aides, chief of staff, huma abedin, who you see there there will be deps part of freedom information act lawsuit. how this sensitive information jumped air gap between the classified system and clinton's personal email server will be explored. >> this discovery will cut through the smoke and mirrors we've been getting from mrs. clinton and state department. people will have to go on the record under ate the ways they haven't had before. reporter: final email release is end of this month or days from that. fox understands that it is more likely than not more emails withheld from pull public release because their contents are too highly classified and no redactions would make them safe for others to read, bill. bill: who knew about clinton's personal account and when? how early, catherine? reporter: right, look, the state department senior official. the undersecretary for management who is also in charge of administration and r

involvement i would like to have your team take a look to give us an analysis of 60 days to have the unclassified version would that be something that did say breakthrough report with a cross section of experts is that something you can do? >> sure. >> one quick comment there has been a lot of praise upon new today studying american in history i appreciate washington not this early presiding over that constitutional convention to establish precedents and how the whole enterprise is would function. i know you're not the first director but with the intelligence and for that to i want to profoundly complement to help create an institution now will serve this country well for some period of time. my question is very broad broad, and you commented your report to be on the upward trajectory since the '70s were groups have a safe haven than in the other time in history would kill 20,000 members of isis to yet more foreign fighters have gone to join them. it is a hydra we cut off one and to grow back. is it time to stop to say do we need a new strategy other than trying to kill enemies as they arise and

there's a variety of projects here, classified and unclassified that we're pursuing. at this point i'd like to turn it over to the general to talk about the readiness and the people side of the budget for a few minutes. >> good afternoon. want to say readiness is a critical part of our efforts and in this budget. this budget funds service efforts to address readiness from the standpoint of both ensuring that units are prepared for the missions that they will encounter today as well as the demands of the future and ensuring that the joint force is ready to accomplish missions as they come out in the future and that is the recovery if you will of joint force full spectrum readiness. and its reorientation. the joint force has been engaged in combat operations over the past ten years or more. in one form of conflict. and now we must shift focus to the full spectrum that your outline implied as part of the five challenges that were talked about earlier. resources are programmed for this to occur. however, resources are not the dominant factor in readiness recovery. it's di

had been national street lawyer in the senate when the fisa amendments act was enacted and the unclassifiediefings really wanted the new president and his top team to understand what it is they've inherited in the surveillance world. she organized a briefing in the situation room right after lunch, and obama is late. it's this sort of thing fraught moment. dick cheney had broken the protocol to publicly attack them and say that his decision to end the black site program and torture is going to result in a tiny being attacked in a catastrophic way. the day before cheney says of his, and that it didn't is supposed to go meet relatives of the victims of the 9/11 attacks and the cole bombings were upset with him for their frozen military procedures at guantÁnamo. a very stressful moment with the possibility of an attack in the forefront of thi of his mind. he comes in, he's chewing nicotine gum so he's a little stressed. sitting around a table in the situation room our members of the private sector the state, they office of the director of national intelligence, the central intelligence agency,

involvement i would like to have your team take a look to give us an analysis of 60 days to have the unclassified version would that be something that did say breakthrough report with a cross section of experts is that something you can do? >> sure. >> one quick comment there has been a lot of praise upon new today studying american in history i appreciate washington not this early presiding over that constitutional convention to establish precedents and how the whole enterprise is would function. i know you're not the first director but with the intelligence and for that to i want to profoundly complement to help create an institution now will serve this country well for some period of time. my question is very broad broad, and you commented your report to be on the upward trajectory since the '70s were groups have a safe haven than in the other time in history would kill 20,000 members of isis to yet more foreign fighters have gone to join them. it is a hydra we cut off one and to grow back. is it time to stop to say do we need a new strategy other than trying to kill enemies as they arise and

in this kind of unclassified setting something you can get into more detail about the kind of shortfalls you're facing? >> i prefer not to in this setting but i would be happy to come back to you in closed session or come to your office. >> i understand. we might submit questions for the record. i think that would be height of irresponsibility for civilian and military leaders in this country not at minimum have sufficient munitions to fight and hopefully deter the wars we might face, whatever we might disagree about on longer term, large budget ticket items. we need rounds for soldiers sailors, airmen and marines. admiral harris i would like to turn to the u.s.-philippine alliance something which senator mccain alluded to mutual defense treaty. csis said we should offer explicit guarranty to the philippines that the u.s. will respond under mutual defense treaty with attack to disputed water or territory. should this option be considered? >> i think we should consider it and have a discussion of it in the policy arena. our obligations under the treaty with the philippines is pretty clear

secretary clinton is not the only high-level official who has had classified information in her unclassifiedl system, in her private e-mails. it also came out in this report from the state department's inspector general that condoleezza rice, while secretary of state, her aides received ten e-mails that now are considered classified. rice issued a statement through her office at stanford university pointing out she never used any privs e-mail herself. actually didn't use e-mail at all, and that the information she's looked at in these ten e-mails did not include any intelligence information. we should also point out that what clinton did is far different from what her predecessors did. she had set up a private e-mail server to handle all of her e-mail, all of her government e-mails, carol, and it also -- it bears repeating that she is the only one who has a campaign who has an fbi investigate hanging over it. >> seeing pictures of condoleezza rice. tell us why she is now a part of this? we have months to go in this campaign and they know that republicans are going to keep bringing up leaks a

there's a variety of projects here, classified and unclassified that we're pursuing. this point i'd like to turn it over to the general to talk about the readiness and the people side of the budget for a few minutes. >> good afternoon. want to say readiness is a critical part of our efforts and in this budget. this budget funds service efforts to address readiness from the standpoint of both ensuring that units are prepared for the missions that they will encounter today as well as the demands of the future and ensuring that the joint force is ready to accomplish missions as they come out in the future and that is the recovery if you will of joint force full spectrum readiness. and it's reorientation. the joint force has been engaged in combat operations over the past ten years or more. in one form of conflict and now we must shift focus to the full spectrum that outlined implied as part of the five challenges that were talked about earlier. resources are programmed for this to occur. however, resources are not the dominant factor in readiness recovery. it's different

they look at the classified and unclassified information that's available and they focus on the different sanctions programs that we have. so i have a team that's working on terrorism, hezbollah sanctions, isil sanctions, everything in the terrorism realm, whether it's iran-related or noniran-related, we follow the non-iran-related, we follow it. anything dealing with yemen. destabilizing activities in the region and also teams that focus on the ballistic missile program. we gather the evidence to see if we see anything that fits within the sanctions program and then if we do, we start to develop a case on it. we talk to the rest of the inner agencies so everybody's onboard, so they know what we're doing. we don't want to, for example, interrupt a sensitive intelligence operation. we don't want to interfere with a law enforcement operation, so we make sure that what we do, we communicate very well so that when we roll out, we're able to roll out in the smartest, most effective way. so, basically we start from scratch, developing the intel, building cases, working with the team, so that we

. >> in this kind of unclassified settings, it's something you can get in more detail about the shortfallsacing? >> i prefer not to in this setting, but i would be happy to come back to you in a closed session. >> i understand. we might submit questions for the record. i think it would be irresponsibility for civilian and military leaders in this country not to at a minimum have sufficient munitions to fight and deter the wars that we might face, whatever we might disagree about on large ticket budget items. we need to have our rounds for our soldier, sailors, and marines. i'd like to turn to the u.s./philippine alliance. we should consider offering a guarantee to the philippines that the u.s. will respond under the mutual defense treaty to attack on the military in disputed water or territory. do you think this option should be considered? >> i think we should consider it and have a discussion of it in the policy arena. our obligations is pretty clear. whether we extend that to which we don't hold is ful peen sovereign territory. we should have that discussion. >> i think deterrence works

>> i'll try to keep it unclassified. it breaks roughly one-third/two-thirds. based on maintenance we always say there's 30 but it can go up or down one or two total and then you'll see us as we go to 44 that mix will be a higher percentage of ce-2s. >> 30 to 44 by the end of '17. incrementally adding. >> we're adding -- we're going beyond 30 every month between now and the end of '16. i think the number is 37 by the end of '16. and then 44 by tend of '17. so you're going to start to see that number go up. >> what's the next intercept test scheduled? you haven't had one since june of '14. >> we have learned a lot through our non-intercept test. like the one last week -- or two weeks ago. i would argue that that data is equally important to any intercept test that we do. the intercept test that we're scheduled to conduct is in november of this year. against an icbm. and that will be the ce-2 block 1 intercepter. >> it's going most sophisticated target ever? >> certainly the longest range target ever that we've intercepted. and i'll keep the other part of that te

in this kind of unclassified setting is it something that you can get into in more detail about the kind of shortfalls you are facing? >> i prefer not to in this setting but i would be happy to come back to you in closed session or come to your office. >> i understand. we might submit questions for the record. i think it would be the height of irresponsibility for civilian and military leaders in this country not to at a minimum have sufficient munitions to fight and hopefully deter the wars that we might face. whatever we might disagree about on longer term, large-ticket budget items, i think we need to have the rounds for our sailors, airmen and marines. i'd like to turn to the philippine alliance and something senator mccain alluded to. csis has recommended that we should consider offering an explicit guarantee to the philippines if the u.s. will respond under the mutual defense treaty to an attack on the philippine military and disputed water or territory. do you think this option should be considered? >> i think we should consider it and we should have a discussion of it in the poli