decision not to cross-examine ivy wilson, but in terms of how you view her testimony leer being uncredible, she is upset and frankly as her attorney, i'm upset. you took a snippet of what you want to see and i'm worried that that is what it is is that rather than view something as true, the same with your dismissal of linnette peralta. and it has to be that elaina is not credible to sustain your findings here. as far the whole attorney-client privilege, i'm not eliana's first attorney. sheryl wallace was, but you have to know the first time sheryl ballas had contact with the police, within a day and a half of the video being taken from -- ivory madison, miss wallace asserted it's an attorney-client privilege and i know some of you are lawyers and in terms of attorney-client stuff i have tons of people tell me stuff that i would not disclose to somebody. it's the belief that i tell somebody something in confidence and if you are going to believe the video, you need to also believe that the only reason eliana made that video was to be used in a custody dispute, not to report anything other t

do you know they have had an uncredible run? that's one of the reasons you have heard of out.ighted it as one of the seven best performers since shoed has been on air. do you know it was a 50 cent stock in march of 2005 and now is a $52 stock. penny stock to 52? only a handful of companies have made that traverse. they have run into turbulence. got hammered over the summer falling from 59 in july to 35 at the beginning of august. it slowly worked higher until this week when the stock shot through the roof, soaring nine points to get back to 52 and change. it's been a wild mr. toad's ride. we have to know what will happen next. were the bears right to maul it down to 35 or are the bulls right with the rebound? or has out become the ultimate battleground, a no-win situation where the bulls and bears will fight each other so the best thing to do is avoid the carnage? to understand what's happening, you need to know that it is not your typical controversial biotech stock. it isn't playing the fdr roulette banking on a risky new drug which is when the bears and bulls don't agree on

and it is uncredibly unfortunate because the point that the professor is making is that the right to vote is one that is essential and sacred in this country. and if you think about it, the constitution has been amend more times to protect or span the rights to vote than any other issue. there's six constitutional amendments that address that point. and now on our watch, after we have elect it had first black president, a year after we have erect it had martin luther king memorial and 47 years after john lewis and others engaged in what we call bloody sunday, we are now watching and allowing a series of states to pass these laws that will have a direct impact on the vote that you and i and people that look like us are going to cast. but guess what it is not just voter id. it is also rolling back early registration, early voting periods. so early voting. who votes early? people who can't necessarily take off a long day of work. who votes early? people who may need help getting to the polls, people who are in school. and african americans. on the sunday before the last election in flor