so these children have more probability of dying from normandy and fifty percent of the undefined morbidity is going to much. when the price is done but the one p.p.b. to the input sees only it is also has the goods and we decide that it will act on the interim fund something by each family member. dr van den i go well works for unicef. the organization has set up feeding centers in cities and villages in collaboration with the government. and. there are voluntary workers monitoring the children's weight and health thank you. was cool minkoff. and. they are in charge of feeding them since their families are trouper to do so you. know this is a. lot of these children. a mother says she votes in feel good morning she lifted it up will she be better still a little. then we thought we need to complete if we just had a book this is morning i just put the baby in it it could work if you want for. many months or be. it's even quality over the years if you've been in an area and hide this mission be it is actually. moving. she had made up about on circumstances in there john that his hundred. indic

american warships already off the libyan coast, but the level of their involvement is still yet undefineditaly has said it is prepared to allow its airspace to be used. >> we will speak with our correspondent at the united nations in new york. first, let's look at the pictures that came out of bengazi. as the security council resolution was passed, these were the scenes in the rebel stronghold. it is, of course, where the libyan national transitional council is based. it is a city of 1 million people. there were thousands in the streets. they did cheer and waved flags as they got the news of that u.n. resolution. 1, 2, 3, thank you sarkozy, the crowd shouted. we will triumph. let's speak with mat walls of the united nations in new york. some are saying that it may be too late. >> yes, exactly. i think the feeling here tonight is that, since the four british and the french and the americans forced the hand of the u.n. security council, they dared them to veto this resolution. of course, we do have 10 in favor out of 15, but there were five key extensions. they have grave doubts as to exact

it essentially says it has to be essentially a partially undeveloped area, and that is left undefined, but we believe that means lacking in infrastructure. that is about it. the moneys have to be directed towards public facilities, and, of course, you have to have a vote of either the property owners or the people, and it cannot be within an existing redevelopment area. the logical reason for that is we are already using tax increment with in redevelopment areas, so it would be duplicative of that. those are the broad restrictions if you will on the use of that at the state level. we were asked to restrict it further in san francisco, primarily out of a concern of projecting -- protected the general fund. supervisor cohen: fast by whom? >> by all our partners in the city. their job is to make sure we protect our general fund monies. the concern is simply this is a very powerful financing tool, and we need to use it judiciously. otherwise, presumably, every neighborhood would like to have an ifd, and pretty soon, all the cookies in the cookie jar would be gone. we were proposing this a

american warships are already off of the libyan coast but low level of their involvement is as yet undefined. italy has said that they are prepared to allow their airspace to be used. >> it was about half past midnight in benghazi in the eastern side of libya, these are the scenes when the u.n. security council passed that resolution, fire workers for going off and there was thousands of people also in the main squares of the city, which of course is the rebel stronghold where the national libyan transition council has based itself. there was lots of fireworks. guns were fired in the air. flights were being waved and there was chanting as well. we have stopped his plans, they were shouting. we will triumph. of course, it is not clear how muammar gaddafi will react to the u.n. security council resolution. it was not that long ago that robert gates was saying that there was lots of loose talk about a no-fly zone. what has changed for the u.s., do you think? >> what changed was the arab league to vote over the weekend. it was clear that there was going to be arab involvement in this move toward

it's so undefined, in a certain sense. nobody knows why music produces an emotional response; why this odd collection of mathematics, virtually, basically cycles per second in various combinations, will produce a tear, nostalgia, remembrance, or glory to the future, a passion. and why that occurs is still a mystery to me, and i'm still exploring it. it's like in fantasia when when mickey mouse gets ahold of the sorcerer's book and starts doing things. and the brooms get out of control, and the water's all over everywhere. music is sort of-- for us--is like that. and you almost search for those times when the music does get out of your control. and it takes-- it takes you somewhere that you hadn't planned on when you were going up on the stage that night. you didn't expect to go where it takes you. and that's one of the-- i'm still exploring that. i had the chance to see you play recently, and the show was terrific. but i think the greatest surprise to me was the connection with the audience and the fact that songs that you

you see the global jihadist forces interacting, dealing with, and coping with the change that is undefined and in play. this is a struggle that could have serious implications for a lot of things here. a lot of people are talking about it, but don't know a whole lot. your opinion would be interesting. second, recalling some figures from the past. i wonder what you think about the future of colonel gadhafi. >> i think colonel gadhafi's shelf life can be measured in days. i certainly hope that's the case. he has demonstrated what he's been for the last 40 years, dramatically to the world. all of the myths have fallen. he's a murdering terrorists. killed several hundred americans, pan am 103, he's been engaged in one act of terror after another. i hope this is the end of the game. i don't see a negotiation between the opposition and colonel gadhafi like between hosni mubarak. the egyptian revolution, i think, is much more significant. al qaeda has been caught on the back foot. really taken off guard. al qaeda's philosophy was the only way to bring about change in the arab world was jihad. vio

global jihadist forces from interacting or dealing with for coping with the change that is yet to undefined butted way? this was an interesting struggle and could have serious implications for a lot of things. people are talking about it but don't know lot. your opinion would be interesting. second, -- what do you think of the future of colonel khadafy? [laughter] >> i think muammar qaddafi shelf life could be measured in days. at least we could hope so. he has demonstrated what he has been in the last 40 years dramatically to the world. all of the myths have fallen murdered and killed several hundred americans and has been engaged one active terror of days after the other privacy the negotiation between the opposition and colonel gaddafi just like hosni mubarak. the egyptian revolution is much more significant. al qaeda is caught on the back plant and taken off guard. the al qaeda philosophy, the only way to bring about change in the arab world was jihad and violence and terrorism that should be directed against the crusaders and zionist. but you in this room, what has happened in egypt is

>> well it is going to be bad news and that is what leaves the mission partially undefined because as long as qaddafi is in power, the people of libya will need protection and there is no end game. >> julianna, you have covered this president now for over two years. >> it seems there is a pattern. something happens, some big event there is a crisis, they are very slow to start, they just don't quite get their bearings right and then suddenly they turn to secretariat the big guto pull them out and he gives some eloquent speech and things seem to get better. is that always the case and why? >> well, it is the pattern, as you are saying. you have got reverend wright, healthcare, the bp oil spill, it is almost like the white house, they don't want to acknowledge or buy into the cri criticism, t there is only so much bandwidth out there and it becomes a distraction and then as you said they have to pull in secretariat and the president is at his best when he has to come from behind, and that is essentially what they tried to do last height. now the white house says 101 of the reasons they

the question, however, of whether we go from defined benefits or undefined benefits. the question of whether we perhaps have people work longer until they qualify for pensions. and finally, the idea that we're seeing, right here in san jose, having people dig into their pockets to pay more of their pension costs, to pay more of their health care costs. those days are coming. the question is, how soon do they come and how much will it cost? >> it's a passionate battle. larry, thanks for your time. we'll catch up with you later. >> thank you, gentleman. >>> let's turn things over to jeff ranieri in the weather center to talk about the changes we're seeing. it's going to start this evening? >> as we head into the late-night hours and the storm in the overnight, many of you may be sleeping, but the impacts will be lingering into tomorrow morning. a very nice sunset out here tonight in san francisco, and 54 degrees currently. so let's get a look right now at those highs we had today, lows 60s in the south bay, 62 at livermore, and upper 50s and low 60s in the north bay. so

includes undefined deficiencies and administrative savings that will likely impact operations. for example, the request cuts $60 million from air and marine personnel and assets that will reduce surveillance at the southwest border and reduces flexibility by $20 million that will increase wait times at ports of entry. i'm not sure this will sustain the work force much less support investments in technology, infrastructure and assets needed to meet the mission. commissioner, during this time of fiscal crisis, there are two things, truth in budgeting and clear results. first, let's tackle the truth in budgeting. those so-called efficiencies in savings that i mentioned earlier, in addition to those account for 130 million. while it represents some savings, the ress are fix. operations will suffer. the president's request also proposed a hypothetical increase of 55 million for fiscal year 2012. authorizing legislation would be needed to require passengers entering the u.s. from canada and mexico to pay the fee. if not enacted, the history tells us these changes are difficult to ena

i'm concerned that the present request includes undefined efficiencies and administer it in savings that will likely impact operations. for example, the request cuts $60 million from air and marine personnel and assets which will likely reduce surveillance of the southwestern border. it reduces over time flexibility for officers by $20 million that will likely increase week times at ports of entry. i am not convinced that this stabilizes cbt budget, it's less support investment in assets needed to meet the mission. during this time of fiscal crisis, there are two the things that we need, truth in budgeting and clear results. the so-called efficiencies and savings and mentioned earlier account for $330 million. some proposals represent real savings, but the rest for merely budget -- the president's request also proposed a hypothetical increase of custom user fees of $55 million for fiscal year 2012. authorizing legislation would be needed to require passengers entering the united states from canada and mexico to pay the fee. if not enacted, the history tells us these changes are difficult

innovation-protecting provision with a more limited and murky grace period that only runs from the undefined term of disclosure. there is no discovery. litigation is sure to ensue as courts interpret this term, creating uncertainty that i believe will chill investment in start-ups which, in turn, will dampen innovation and job growth. unfortunately, first to file incentivizes inventors to race to the patent office, to protect as many of their ideas as soon as possible so that they are not beaten to the punch by a rival. thus, first to file will likely result in significant overfiling of dead-end inventions, unnecessarily burdening both the patent office and especially small inventors. third reason, difficulty of proving copying. the third major problem with this bill's system is the difficulty of proving that someone copied your innovation -- your invention, excuse me. currently, you, as a first inventor, can prove that you were first by presenting evidence that's in your control. this is under first to invent. your own records contemporaneously documenting the development of your invention.

the reporting requirement for, quote, requests for modification, unquote, is undefined in the amendment and is therefore unworkable based on the research that we've done. it's unclear why this new rule is necessary in the negotiations between private citizens and private companies. furthermore servicers already provide results of their modification efforts to the hope now alliance as well as in their annual reports without disclosing proprietary information. in fact, i hope now alliance reports servicers completed 961,355 proprietary modifications in 2008, 1,172,490 proprietary modifications in 2009, 1.2 million in 2010. now, i might add, this is many multiples in the private sector in terms of mortgage modifications than had been provided under the hamp government-funded program that we're discussing here today and trying to eliminate here today. the program that has hurt about 800,000, just shy of 800,000 americans, destroyed their credit, taken their savings and at the end of the day taking their homes. so i would encourage my colleagues to vote against this amendment and i reserve t