yes that's that's going to get undefined bit that's now undefined it we all of us that may want to think like oh oh we're for preexisting conditions because of the most popular item out of obamacare if the item that most of the american public is in favor of and that will benefit the most number of cyclists said just because hitler like milk doesn't mean we are going to get our this is really about republicans figuring out finally that public opinion is in favor of people actually getting health care well i think in general i've i think everybody wants everybody have health care it's how you go about it those that amount of government involvement in i grieve the cole i think they found the one part that people seem to like to meet and they're not risking anything and they've gone after it i mean any logical opposition to obamacare or for this type of health care program so i don't think they do it really just if you're against it i think you should be against i don't really think you should piecemeal stick with your guns on this i mean maybe this is an improvement to something and and yo

the concert series is still relatively undefined. and figuring out the numbers of people that are going to attend the concerts from san francisco from the east bay, from outside of the region, very complicated sketchy at best. so, we decided best not to include those things in our revised estimates. >> could you explain a little bit more about the concert series you're talking about and the red bull event, the youth event sponsored by red bull? >> sure, i'm probably not the best one to speak about those events. if somebody else would like to speak to those, that would be terrific. >> either mr. martin or mr. barkley can talk conceptually about what is going on. >> an important consideration for us was that we talked about having 55 days of racing through the summer of -- here in san francisco and that's what we wanted to deliver. so, i'm pleased to say that we still have roughly 55 days of racing through the summer. but to achieve it, we've filled a void with some specialist events. one of them is the red bull youth america's cup, an

the budget week meals include an extremely rich dessert which will be offset by future undefined weights. it's budget weight. the festivities kick off on the hill with the official release of the house republican budget. the following day, wednesday, senate democrats will release their budget. there will be duelling budget proposals. what is not to love. the reason why i've been looking forward to this budget week in particular, this republican budget is this. >> we're committed to doing a budget and a ten year plan and to balance our budget. i think it's time for the senate an the white house to produce a budget that will balance over the next ten years. >> a balanced budget in just a decade. the guy in charge is former vice presidenti presidential candidate paul ryan. the reason why serviit was so exciting is because this is way faster than paul ryan's original deadline for balancing the budget. in the last plan we wouldn't have had a balanced budget for 25 years. when i learn he plans to do the same thing in a mere ten years, he had changed 15 years off the timetable, how? what is he

if you sit things out because one day at some undefined point down the road it must end, you are committinghe ultimate sin of passing up what might be a once in a lifetime opportunity to make money. plus, many of the companies that are doing well today are not expensive on earnings basis, even unaided by the lack of serious competition. to me, the risks of a precipitous sell-off are much lower if or when it does occur and that makes it more imperative that this rally not be blindly dismissed by bearish theoreticians who are saying that danger lurks around every corner. high quality, high growth companies that sell 13 times earnings or less, financials, cut tech on this, and the risk that we could sell off if the fed tightens overnight isn't as miserably frightening as if they sold like the '87 crash. the underlying companies were growing much more slowly then, sure. yeah, i know, i've got to tell you if we moved up to 7% to 10% higher from here, that's a different story. up 7% to 10% higher, i would say i don't like the odds. i think there is a lot of selling to do. here is the rub. if we w

. >> it starts from a false premise which is something that all colleges are equal in some undefinable some cultures are better at some things and worse at other things, and particular times in history. one group's culture maybe asen dent and another group, but what you almost never see is what they assume is the norm namely all groups performing pretty much the same in all kinds of fields across the board. that you can go through centuries of history without finding a single example of that. >> tucker: you say that that assumption in fact holds different groups down. you write multi-culturalism paints people into the corner in which they happen to be born, but at least the cast system doesn't claim to benefit those at the bottom. >> when the multi-culturalists say, for example, the schools should not try to make black students speak standard english, the difference between speaking standard english and not speaking standard english can be huge in terms of your jobs, your careers and all sorts of other things. >> tucker: so tell me how it's changed. you have a remarkable career, wrote

but, as you say, it's really very undefined.ehow these people are going to come, they are going to force us to be socialist. you know, those of us who resist will be thrown into fema-constructed concentration camps, you know, and this is all some sort of plot to destroy the constitution. so, no, i don't think it's terribly well thought out. at the same time, i think the fears are very real. i think one other thing played into the enormous expansion of these groups in the last four years, aside from obama's appearance on the political scene, and that, of course, is the economy, which began to collapse at the very same time as obama appeared running for president. so i think that added an element of real fear and anger and insecurity that made for a kind of perfect storm in terms of fostering the growth of these groups. now with the gun control talk, it's gotten even worse. >> okay. ari, the only way you can think these things is that you have to be profoundly ignorant of what's happening in the world and the way the world works a

individuals who are admitted do access full civil liberties, enter with work status and what is an undefined -- not a permanent residency but unlimited residentcy and are fast tracked to citizenship. it is a great opportunity for them to be safe. i'll hand it over to paedia mixon there. [applause] >> i'm paedia mixon. i'm the executive director of the r. resettlement and services of atlanta. we're one of six agencies that welcome refugees into georgia. our mission is to welcome, serve, and empower refugees in georgia. our organization resettles somewhere between 450-500 refugees per year. i'm going to talk a little bit about how refugee resettlement looks at the local level. i got involved as a family friend volunteer at one of our sister organizations, catholic r. of atlanta. the first refugee family i met was from somalia that was resettled in atlanta. i was a family friend coming into their home to teach english, which i never done before. it was interesting exspeshes. but i spent a year and a half with this family. i had the punt to be with the family as they learn how to avigate the gro

years is the right amount of time for a central bank leader to serve or should it be less or more or undefinedre specifically as it regards to you, your term is ten years from completion. how are you think being what you'll be doing next year after your term is completed? >> well, on the latter question, i don't have anything for you. i'll certainly be informing "the wall street journal" some decision or some developments on that front. in terms of term limits, i don't have a strong view on that. different countries use different approaches. of course, the president always has the topoption to reappoint not reappoint fed chairman. and the senate always has the option of confirming or not confirming. so in that sense, term limits are redundant. and if you had term limits, i think that would be the only office besides president and vice president that had that restriction. but that being said, i don't view this as a major issue, nor have i actively discussed, i think, on the hill. perhaps i missed it. but i don't have a strong view about that. my ten-year term, of course, is not as chairman. my

they have specifically left a that undefined because they are looking at too many indicators for themjust give you a level of the jobless rate that they want to hit -- they have specifically left that undefined. we need to essentially be creating enough jobs that we are consistently putting a dent in unemployment. the general measure that economists are looking at is we had surprisingly strong job growth of 236,000 jobs, and the pace of job growth has improved in the last few months. if we keep that up for another three or four months, the expectation is we start to dial back on the stimulus, cut back ,he monthly pace of bond buying and then there is another aspect, which is that rates will stay at 0 even after they stop buying bonds. the other thing that they tell going toy are not raise rates until the jobless rate falls to 6.5%, but an interesting part of what you mention is the fact that the fled -- the fed is flagging fiscal concerns. it speaks to how dissonant monetary policy is from fiscal policy. you have a monetary policy that is pedal to the metal, really trying to get growt

this is not the first time our society has undefined marriage.t of the force, --divor ce changed marriage from a permanent relationship to a temporary one. almost any child of divorce will tell you divorce was a tragedy in their lives. same-sex marriage will bring us further down that path, the bribing children of their right to a mom or a dad. as a gay man, i can say categorically, it is not homophobic to oppose same-sex marriage. [applause] , it is very wise to maintain marriage as it has always been. to the supreme court, legislatures and jurors around the country, slow this train down. ignore the media relentless many factored urgency to institute same-sex marriage. slow down, put on the brakes. thank you. applause]d should pray for doug and others that are standing up. doug has toine what go through. spoke inez who just france, we need to pray and support them in any way we can. our next speaker knows a little bit about proposition eight. he was the campaign manager for proposition eight. he is also the national organization for marriage is

should it be less, more, undefined?ifically as regards to you, your term is 10 years from completion, how have you thought whaabout what you'll be doing ar your term is complete? >> to the large latter questiont have anything for you. i will certainly be informing the "wall street journal" and other publications i have i come to some decision for some developments in that front. in terms of term limits, i don't have a strong view on that, different countries use different approaches. of course the president always has the option to reappoint or not reappoint fed chairman and the senate always has the option of confirming or not confirmed. in that respect, term limits are redundant and indeed if you have term limits on the fed chairman, that would be the only office the federal government decides president and vice president that would have that restriction. that being said, don't view this as a major issue nor have i seen it actively discussed in the hill. perhaps i missed it. i don't have a strong view about that. my 1

not the first time our society has undefined marriage. no-fault divorce sound of like a great idea at the time, but a change marriage from a permanent relationship to a temporary one. and almost any child of divorce will tell you divorce was a tragedy in their lives. same-sex marriage will bring us further down that path, depriving children of their right to a mom or dad. i as a gay man, i can state categorically it is not homophobic to oppose same-sex marriage. [cheers] in fact, it is very wise to maintain marriage as it has always been. supreme court legislators and jurors are around the country, as low this train down. slow this train down. [cheers] ignore the media which relentless manufactured urgency to institute same-sex marriage. the slowdown and put on the brakes. thank you. [cheers and applause] forll of us should pray doug and others who were standing up. you can imagine the sort of vitriol he has to go through. and bobbi lopez, who just spoke in france, who is gay against the marriage. we need to pray and support them in any w

where we have new technologies, as will said i'm agreeing with will, put it in the newspaper this is undefinedl-defined war and we have not had the conversation we need to have. what rand paul did yesterday was used the filibuster the way it's supposed to be used. it's not a post-it to gum up the government. you should stand there and do it the way he did it and this is an important issue. i don't think that the american public has a clear view of what this administration thinks is the limits of power when it comes to drone strikes and it's important we have the conversation. it's wrong to call it a stunt. what is a stunt is when they put the post-it on the door and slip the thing aund the table and you don't know who is filibuster. >> as a former white house official how would you advise the white house or the president to respond to this, if to respond at all? >> i think he should invite a public discussion about this. there is always a danger in any white house. this is not just about the obama administration. when you're in the white house, you are you have so much more information than th

spoke at the rally on the mall yesterday morning that marriage equality will unravel marriage and undefinenie: right. they need to be better defined, because -- huh? as a gay man i can say categorically it is not homophobic to oppose same-sex marriage. [ applause ] >> okay. then. >> stephanie: i'm sure marcus bachmann would love to discipline him because he's a barbarian. >> stephanie: sniem the very near future, he is going to be hitting his pillow with a tennis racket. >> mom, why did you do this to me! >> good boy. >> oh did you knock us off the air? >> okay. i knocked us off of the air. i was doing my skit too much. >> you tried to degay the radio. >> stephanie: dena in maryland. >> caller: oh my god you are hilarious. yesterday you were on fire. >> stephanie: and said is standard is your point? >> caller: no, no no. you are hilarious every day, but yesterday i was almost peeing my pants. >> stephanie: good girl. >> caller: welcome back from your trip. chris touched on yesterday how when a gay couple wants a baby they really want a baby. and like i have said before my brother-in-law is

fourth, ryan relies on $800 billion in undefined savings in mandatory programs, significant cuts that would have dramatic and negative impacts on our country and our economy. there's $800 billion in cuts that he doesn't specify out of his total $962 billion in overall savings to so-called other mandatory spending. and last, ryan claims his tax cuts for the wealthy, which cost more than $4.5 trillion, wouldn't add to the deficit. to give some visual sense of the likely impact, it's anything but balanced. well, ryan claims that his plan would balance the budget and i challenge that assumption given all these mathematical and program attic challenges, it's doing it in a way that is fundamentally unbalanced and doesn't respect our core values. to double down on tax breaks for the wealthiest americans, to give an additional tax break of more than a quarter million dollars a year to the very wealthiest americans while shifting that tax burden beyond the middle class just doesn't make sense. doesn't meet the test of fairness and doesn't meet the test of sustaining economic growth in a balanc

but the state department now indicates that it will hold a 45-day comment period and as yet an undefined period of time before it will issue a final environmental impact statement. then it will conduct an inner agency comment period to make its national interest determination. so while we welcome the finding of no significant impact for the fourth time now, we've got yet another indetermine national delay, which runs counter to both public opinion and reasonable due diligence. after four environmental reviews and favorable results, the president needs to approve the pipeline project without delay because there remains no excuse not to do it. the argument that be advanced that the oil sands will increase carbon emissions and that failing to build the keystone x.l. pipeline will somehow reduce emissions. butes most recent -- but the most recent state department report makes clear that this contention is false. the report actually indicates just the opposite, that if the pipeline is not built from alberta, canada, to the united states, the oil will still move to market, but it's going to mo

but your liberties are many, basically unlimited and undefined. when you read the ninth and tenth amendment, it says that those rights not explicitly given to government are left to the states and the people. they're yours, not to be dispairaged. these are important debates we're having. when month skew talked about the separation of powers and the different checks and balances, he said, there can be no liberty when you combine the executive and the legislative. likewise, i would add to that there can be no liberty when you combine the executive and the judiciary. so if you allow the president to tell you that he can have drone strikes on americans on american soil, you are allowin allowing e not only the executive, you are allowing thim him to be the judiciary. if he takes it secret, nobody can object. i remember one time i was complaining to another senator about these things called suspicious activity reports. your bank is required to file them on you. in fact if you do a large transfer -- a wire transfer and you pay your visa through your bank

either protect marriage and fiect for it, or we are hand it away to people who want to redefine it to undefine it, to separate it from the deep roots in human nature, but when we see hard evidence that traditional marriage is the best situation for children, why would we do anything but protect it? [cheers and applause] so i am here today representing those in my generation who understand that it's okay to be countercultural to represent a view that might not be popular at this moment. it's right to support traditional marriage, and it is right to defend it. thank you. [cheers and applause] >> now we have one of our close friends who helped bring busses from around the country. i was just with him in memphis, tennessee at a great event celebrating family, the founder and president of the coalition of african-american pastors, reverend bill owens. [cheers and applause] >> thank you, brian, greetings. my friends, every morning, i wake up, i look in the mirror, and i see a black man, and there is absolutely nothing i can do to change the color of my skin. i marched and many other thousands of peo

the freedoms left to you are many and undefined. and that's important. and what does this have to do with lochner? the case in lochner is whether a majority rule, a state legislature can take away your due process, your due process to contract. can they take away your life and liberty without due process. and the court rules, no. i think it's a wonderful decision. it expands the 14th amendment and says to the people that you have unenumerated rights. now, there's some dissension on how we look at these cases, but when you go forward to buchanan v. worl yes, the case about jim crowe laws and housing segregation, one of the people who was going to dissent -- and i think he thought better of it when he thought about he would be the first justice in probably 70-some-odd years to say that he believed in the jim crowe laws and was upholding jim crowe laws -- was oliver wendell holmes. he actually writes an opinion that has been found but was never presented to the court and he ended up voting to get rid of the jim crowe laws. but the interesting thing is, he a