and only for the efforts of the fbi did they get who knows how many undeleted.here has been -- i cannot think of a more significant assault on the premise and the operation of the freedom of information act, as mrs. clinton's decision-making related to her e-mails. brian: the fellow behind the item of information act, congressman john moss, a democrat from california back in the 1960's, had what in mind? was there a resistance? i remember reading lyndon johnson was not particularly happy with this. antonin scalia was not particularly happy with it. tom: some conservative constitutional types do not like the freedom of information act, because it infringes too much on the decision-making of the executive branch and makes them answerable to the other branches in ways that are not appropriate under the separation of powers. but you could see in johnson's opposition, he was a pragmatic politician. he knew what he was up to, he did not want people prying. that is why he did not like it. brian: take your pick. ronald reagan, george herbert walker bush, bill clinton, t

in response to commissioner kopp's questions, i believe the undeleted calendars were provided to the task force in connection with the april 2016 meeting at the march meeting. we asked if they were changing a policy could we see some examples of calendar entries subsequent and those were provided. just a number of different things i'm thinking about. when the original sunshine ordinance was passed, it only dealt with records really in effort with then supervisor achtenberg and shelly that it really sought to enhance the public's right to meetings and records beyond what was required in the brown act in the california public records act both of which senator kopp had amended to in 1974. further in 1999 when prop g was being drafted i was part of those discussions and there was some interest in enhancing the right in prop g and some got muddied as we have seen in the period of time. it was to amend the ordinance and it was already being handled in admin code chapter 8 and not to get into that because of the single subject rule by the board of supervisors amendment and not because of re

in response to commissioner kopp's questions, i believe the undeleted calendars were provided to the task force in connection with the april 2016 meeting at the march meeting. we asked if they were changing a policy could we see some examples of calendar entries subsequent and those were provided. just a number of different things i'm thinking about. when the original sunshine ordinance was passed, it only dealt with records really in effort with then supervisor achtenberg and shelly that it really sought to enhance the public's right to meetings and records beyond what was required in the brown act in the california public records act both of which senator kopp had amended to in 1974. further in 1999 when prop g was being drafted i was part of those discussions and there was some interest in enhancing the right in prop g and some got muddied as we have seen in the period of time. it was to amend the ordinance and it was already being handled in admin code chapter 8 and not to get into that because of the single subject rule by the board of supervisors amendment and not because of re

in response to commissioner kopp's questions, i believe the undeleted calendars were provided to the task force in connection with the april 2016 meeting at the march meeting. we asked if they were changing a policy could we see some examples of calendar entries subsequent and those were provided. just a number of different things i'm thinking about. when the original sunshine ordinance was passed, it only dealt with records really in effort with then supervisor achtenberg and shelly that it really sought to enhance the public's right to meetings and records beyond what was required in the brown act in the california public records act both of which senator kopp had amended to in 1974. further in 1999 when prop g was being drafted i was part of those discussions and there was some interest in enhancing the right in prop g and some got muddied as we have seen in the period of time. it was to amend the ordinance and it was already being handled in admin code chapter 8 and not to get into that because of the single subject rule by the board of supervisors amendment and not because of re