>> i think the promoters of the memo overpromised a little and underdelivered a little. personal take, to answer your first question. however, that is not to dismiss the serious issues raised by the memo. i mean, basically we have lawyers in the justice department, lawyers in the fbi and fbi agents making representations to a court that are materially and profoundly deceptive. that is fraud on a court. that is violating the civil liberties of a person based upon a fraudulent application. and then we see the application renewed three times. so there are four fisa warrants here. charles: all of -- >> the last of which was obtained during the trump administration by rod rosenstein himself. charles: right. i want to also representative nuÑes was just on with bret baier, and he has a comment on james comey i want to share with you and the audience and then get your response. >> mr. comey had a chance in january, february, march, april, i believe all the way til june to come clean on who paid for the dossier. he was asked about it in january, and he said very clearly that he k

what the republicans have done and chairman nunes has done is oversell and underdeliver. the last time we saw something like this was when geraldo rivera revealed al capone's vault and what we have is very little evidence of a problem, and in the end this doesn't raise any questions about the mueller probe. >> so, let me pick up on that, matt, because critics say this memo may be used as a pretext for the president to fire rod rosenstein. he is the deputy attorney general in charge of the russia probe. he is the only man right now who can fire the special counsel, robert mueller. the white house insists there are no plans to fire rosenstein, but if the president would do that, what do you think the consequences would be politically? >> well, that's what i think this memo is all about. there really is no legal question that this memo has somehow really substantively argued for. it's really a political memo and the political memo is in the short term it can muddy the waters, but also it can provide donald trump, the president, with some evidence in his mind of how he can ci

it's "underpromise and overdeliver," and in this case, we overpromised and underdelivered.'m frustrated, and i'm angry. i'm still gonna move forward with this deal, 'cause i know that my money is safe with this company, and i know we're gonna be wildly profitable. i guess the disappointing factor is, it's gonna take me a little longer to make a return on my investment. look, this is business. >> [clears throat] >> your numbers weren't right. i need to know for sure that this is never gonna happen again. >> it is never gonna happen again. >> okay? >> yes. >> all right. >> so i'm real excited for you to see the inside. we got a lot done. i know you were worried about the $40,000 to clean the place up. >> for the cleanup. $40,000 to clean up garbage? >> did you see it? >> [bleep], i'd have come done it myself. >> there was a lot to clean up, and believe me, you wouldn't have. >> michael, you did a great job getting this place cleaned up. >> thank you. >> i mean, you move as fast as i do. >> it happened quick. >> it's a great shell. >> it's a beautiful building. it really is. i

it overpromised and underdelivered. frank mentioned a gap between that and the mueller investigation. i'd say there's a gap between the promises they made to show corruption and the department of justice. and the actual amount they delivered. it shows nothing there that shows any corruption. it's a ridiculous thing. i would open hope the reaction would make them stop trying. >> or the fear that they are releasing what could be sensitive information, sources and methods to harm national security. at some point make this honor kick in and stop trying. we'll be back in the next hour. michael steel. >> i'm good. >> excellent. >> coming up, don jr.'s twitter problem. and carson's family affair. more after the break. why create something this extravagant? or make a back seat that feels nothing like a back seat? why give it every feature you could want, along with a few you didn't know you needed? it's simple. you can build a car, or you can build a cadillac. come in now for this exceptional offer on the cadillac ct6. get this

hockey and cross country were two sports that didn't underdeliver, guys those teams each earned one medaled in the report was for 25 medals. so we will see if team usa can still hit that target in the last 48 hours of competition there's a chance, but it's an outside one at that. so we did want to give you a little bit of context for what's going on meanwhile, we're all going for beers when this is over. and given that we're going to be having a beer, we wanted to tell you about a new industry brewing here in south korea. we took a trip to seoul where the country's biggest craft beer brewery is seeing sales boom >> korea's beer business is booming. craft beer is only a $20 million market here, but it's expected to be worth 100 times that just ten years from now the industry's explosive growth is largely credited to recent regulatory changes here that have been favorable to small breweries. >> every single year when regulatory change regarding craft beer it was always for the better less regulations in terms of opening a brew house, less taxes, able to distribute to more locations. >> repo

and overpromise and generally underdeliver. and find ways to align that in a much more realistic way would be good. but you know, we all know there is processes in place. it takes a long time from proposal to deliver capability. i'm not sure i know the right answer to make that more agile. but you know, i think that's why there is a lot of smart folks that can look for ways and frankly, i think the fy provided broad guidance but not a lot of specific direction and very tactical details because in theory you want the department to purr innovation. if we today recreate this organization we have taken on organically over 17 years, what would right look like? how do we sparpen tharpen the f bang and i think there is a lot more work to be done. >> i think he is spot on. to your point, if i could change just one thing along these lines, it would be helping the executive branch. congress would be great. but helping the executive branch is a first step, get on the same page internally. why are we working with this military? who is doin