and not all districts have the y to put their services undergrou. i'm kind of torn. i think that if there is a facit goes on top of a pole, this is y the least intrusive in comparest i've seen over the last five ye. so i'm at this point not sure wy i'll go. >> i would -- >> is that a question of the at? is it correct that verizon has t to put a pole -- let's say a pot there, that they have a right ta pole there and put it up on the, is that right? >> i have not researched that sc question. but i trust the council's opinin that topic. right-of-way. >> the law allows them to be ife public right-of-way. yes. >> i would suggest that, again,s not pushback from the appeal an. appellant. the appellant is commenting on e pole and he indicated that as wr developers of buildings and tecy that the neighborhood is open ad willing to accommodate a -- the reasonable development of new technologies. that would be an organized way a grid of these devices throughout presidio heights. i think what we're -- what i woe to -- and that requires proper g of the entire neighborhood, reae ma