it stood proud refusing underminding its culture and national assets.ian people will do that once again by the participation of all syrians to lead them away from the crisis and to contribute to the construction putting as the primary objection the interest of the homeland and nothing else and atmosphere of reconciliation for all. the homeland is the property of all, and in syria, we don't have a majority and minority. there's syrians only in syria. i say the homeland is owned by all, and it is the property of all, and it is a trust, a trust even if some were misled and even if some defied what is right. syrian patriotism rejects external intervention and stresses that syria's sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity is a red line. syrian patriotism stresses that sereons will stand -- syrians will stand one rank against dissent rejecting violence, rejecting resorting to arms while calling for reform. we have to take a sincere national dialogue and expedite the pace of reform to establish a genuine national partnership to reserve the security

it stood proud refusing underminding its culture and national assets.e syrian people will do that once again by the participation of all syrians to lead them away from the crisis and to contribute to the construction putting as the primary objection the interest of the homeland and nothing else and atmosphere of reconciliation for all. the homeland is the property of all, and in syria, we don't have a majority and minority. there's syrians only in syria. i say the homeland is owned by all, and it is the property of all, and it is a trust, a trust even if some were misled and even if some defied what is right. syrian patriotism rejects external intervention and stresses that syria's sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity is a red line. syrian patriotism stresses that sereons will stand -- syrians will stand one rank against dissent rejecting violence, rejecting resorting to arms while calling for reform. we have to take a sincere national dialogue and expedite the pace of reform to establish a genuine national partnership to reserve the sec

believe that we need more effective measures or enforcement to counter that approach because it will undermind your best efforts which i admire to attract the best and most capable to the guard and reserve. so i'm not asking for your comment but i hope perhaps we can work together on the initiatives we don't have time to discuss here. and just one last question. the ieds that all too often are maiming and killing our warfighters, i wonder whether there are new initiatives there that perhaps we can discuss, if not here, at some period of time point because i have been interested in it and appreciate it, secretary carter's very important work in accelerating delivery of the so-called, biker shorts and groin protective gear and also work i hope is being done to discourage pakistanis from permitting the fertilizer and ammonium calcium nitrate crossing the border and going into these roadside bombs. >> thank you, senator. and i know your time is short on this round but i just assure you, we are seized with this. our relations with pakistan as you know have been somewhat challenged. they're improvin

. >> why do you follow everything i say with a follow-up and you have to undermind me? >> i have no idea why. is our constitution too old and too difficult to amend and too mean? >> it is hard to run an official dictatorship and have a constitution at the same time. >> that's what the problem s. the muslim brotherhood may not want to adopt our constitution. but i think our strongest representatives will have to be mcdonalds, kfc and taco bell. did you seat earnings? amazing. same store sales are up 20%. half of their profits coming from overseas. maybe that's the way we get into the country. first we sell them what we have, and then maybe we adopt our laws. >> leeann, other nations are like newt gingrich. they replace the constitution like their wives on average every 19 years. does that make more sense? >> well, i think they went 19 years because they are talking about every generation and every generation is a little different. i think obviously we are a little different than when our fore fathers framed the constitution. >> in what way? >> please, can i continue? i w

if you do that, we will undermind the peace treaty. it is good chess play. nothing will come of it.hey frankly need the money. >> but, remi, a gallop poll says they don't want u.s. aid. should we grant their wish and stop giving them money? >> i don't think that is going to happen. i don't know how accurate the gallop poll is. i will defer to everything dana vachon said. he is an expert. i'm sorry, but it does sound like black mail to me. >> aid is black mail. the origin of the word for host is latin for hostage hoss tess. in ancient times the son of a king would live at the court of another king as a guest, but could become a hostage like that. they are anciently linked. to our earlier discussion about how the rich tend to be lazy, when you have a dictator, a dictator doesn't have to do the things an elected leader has to do. he can steel a ton of money because he is there by the point of a bay yawn net. the civil regime in egypt hasn't done the things to build a strong civil society, but the muslim brotherhood has. you created a huge vacuum and you are dealing with that and have t

and vote, the labor unions encouraging democrats to go out and vote for rick santorum in order to undermind mitt romney as a candidate for the general election. do you think that's appropriate? should democrats be voting in this primary? >> guest: there's some people asking democrats to crossover and vote in the republican primary. i already voted. i voted absentee, and i voted for president obama. i encourage everyone now who is watching vote for president obama. vote for who you think will be the best person to lead our country in the next four years. it's clearly the president. he saved auto jobs he provided the families now with opportunities to get more affordable education. >> host: on this issue of the labor unions, president obama speaking today in washington before the united auto workers, having a conference here in washington, why else does he need to say to the workers? >> number one, that every worker must have the right to bargain collectively. that's important. i know this firsthand. my father was an immigrant from india, died when i was 8 years old and died a slow painful de

an increasingly complicated, costly, and ineffective security system that's damaged democracy, undermindedeconomic strength, and ironically, david argues, left us more vulnerable. now, david just doesn't describe. he also prescribes. the final part of the book has a blueprint for the future. as you might imagine, his sering critique, solution for revitalizing american democracy would require radical changes in our approach to national security. some of the things he recommends even have a kind of back to the future quality like requiring that the wars we fight be declared by congress, not the white house, or that we become more selective about what government information is classified. david writes with a lot of passion in his book even if you don't accept all its premises. it will definitely make you think, and i encourage you all to read it. he plans to speak for 20-30 minutes to take question, and then he'll stick around to sign copies of the book. if you have a question, just step up to the microphone in the center and ask because we do record our events, and, of course, we have the c-

iran and north korea continue to undermind stability in the world. there is continuing turmoil in the middle east. any one of those events in the middle east could be thrust upon us in the future. there are rising powers in asia and growing concerns about cyberintrusions and attacks. we have to meet the challenges and threats if we are to protect the american people, and at the same time, as we try to protect the american people, we have a responsibility to fiscal discipline. this is not an easy task. we made the decision that we didn't want to repeat the mistakes of the past. we've gone through draw downs in the past in the defense budget. we decided to be guided by these guidelines. number one, remain the strongest military in the world. number two, we did not want to hollow out the force. in fact past when defense cuts were made across the board, in effect, what you did is weaken every area of defense, and that's what resulted in hollowing out the force. to not have that happen, we have to take a balanced approach to both budgets and put everythin

believe that we need more effective measures or enforcement to counter that approach because it underminds your best effort, which i admire, to attract the best and most capable to the guard and reservement i'm not asking for your comment, but i hope, perhaps, we can work together on the initiatives that we don't have time to discuss here. just one last question. the ieds that are all too often film war fighters, and i wonder if there's no initiatives there to discuss, if not here, at another point because i've been interested in it, and secretary carter's work in accelerating delivery of the biker swords and protective gear and work i hope is being done to discourage the pakistanis from permitting the fertilizer from crossing the border and going outside. >> yes, senator, and i know that your time is short on this round, but i'll assure you, we are seized with this they are improving, but it's something we have to get at. >> thank you very much, i want to associate myself with remarks made by the senator and your remarks about the problem of the sexual assault in the military, but also th

are in a very difficult position of how do they support not having a weapon be developed and not undermindd for the energy resources that they are buying there, and trying to do the calculation of cost benefit right now as with other contraries, and see this as a diplomatic solution to the activity, probably even if it included a nuclear capability, whether it's for energy or more. if that gets fore closed, then they have a very hard decision, and then they have to think their way through that, and to the extent they go someplace else for the energy, that puts pressure in the south pacific. >> admiral? >> yeah, they clearly have their need for energy sources very high on their list. they have another issue, too, and that's the adversity or aversion to activity by that could be meddlesome with internal affairs so they certainly want to maintain the status quo inside of china and one of the things that's clearly very unsettling to them is to see this utilizing of the population, and so if they see or perceive that people are ganging up to instigate similar trouble in iran, iran, today, maybe

government must draw its strength from the people and as it drains away this strength it must inevitably undermindndations of self-government. i ask you to join me in helping restore the individual freedoms and initiatives this nation once knew, to make government more the servant and not the master of us all. in this free nation, we do not choose to be ruled. we elect to be governed. >> in your heart you know he's right. vote for barry goldwater. >> so as you can see the goldwater spot is kind of frozen in time. not much different from the spots shown a decade earlier. so now we arrive at the 1964 johnson campaign and the spot that quite literally changed american politics. what would become known as the daisy girl spot was produced by doyle was seen that dmit night by estimated 50 million people. i would like to note that one of the creators of the spot is it with us today. sid, would you stand up and wave your hand. this is sid meyers [applause] sid is a legend -- [inaudible] that will be determined later i think. sid is a legend in the advertising business. he was a senior art director for ddb