cases we get the rule that you cannot have districts that are substantially overpopulated or underpopulated. that you have to make districts that are as equal as is practicable. but as we discussed, that just tells you about the numbers that have to be sort of evened out between districts. it doesn't tell you who should be in those districts or what the denominator should be, and so the court has left open, at at least explit police sitly in burns versus richardson, explicitly and implicitly since then, has said that, well, you could draw districts base and equal numbers of registered voters. and as we discussed, the -- the fact that you have flexibility in the denominator, right, whether you can draw districts based on total numbers of people, voting age population, citizen voting age population. registered voters, eligible voters, actual voters. that the differences between each of those statistics is huge. and so, burns versus richardson is still on the books but for the most part, every jurisdiction uses the total population numbers that come from the census bureau. there is a bit of a