now, we are trying to understand trends over time. but we realized was that the heat coming from the reactor would dissipate. but we needed to stabilize the situation on the ground to allow for that key to dissipate over time. the alternative was to flood the reactor. the concern with that strategy is that although it would put the temperature into a controllable situation sooner, it would provide far more contamination into the environment, which was already at an intolerable level. so, we went digging into understanding what radio isotopes were the ones we were trying to deal with and how to react. but i am showing you here is downloaded from the next public web site. you are looking at 80 sensors around tokyo. a report on atmospheric levels of cesium and iodine. which is critically important during a crisis. what this means is information. the information in a seat -- event like this is critically important. anyone can go to this web site and download the information. anyone can get these actual readings. they will be published aft

embedded in that is an understanding of how to work logistics, and understanding to how to respond to lift requirements, and understanding of command and control. the plea today -- the fleet today has people who have strong technical competence in being able to respond and answer those sorts of questions. the fleet today is more mature and more seasoned because of the forward-deployed in nature of our operations. and we can apply that in the lessons that we have learned, and i think what you'll recognize is a very adaptable force. so this is what japan looked like before 2:00 p.m. on march 11, 2011. what you see at the top of the chart is the question the dai- ichi power plant -- the fukushima power plant. on the left-hand side is sendai airport. on the other side, any japan. this is a bird's-eye view of what the tsunami looked like -- so as approximately 2:45 p.m. in the afternoon, what we now know is that a 20-meter way -- wave hit the prefecture', ands in the course of that, located approximately 125 miles off the coast at a depth of about 20,000 feet, the eurasian plate and the pa

it is the case that sba works with these organizations to try to help small businesses understand how to get credit and fine tools to be able to do that. sba programs cover a wide range, and i will talk about this range of lending and the kinds of things we do, but in many ways, we do not do it alone. we do it with partners, and that is the takeaway message, the sba lending activity, while would guarantee loans through a number of lenders, we do it with a lot of other partners as well. let me give a little bit of a sense of what the small business administration does and is. we in san francisco covered the bay area and north coast counties, and we do a variety of things. i will come back to the credit card because i know that is what this session is about, but before i do that, there's two other roles we play that are important as well. one is about helping small businesses understand how to start businesses, getting good technical assistance, getting good advice about starting and managing your business. equally important is being prepared for credit. one of the things we tried to do

i understand. you think that you should have acted quicker? the only reason i ask, click this i is the way to mf global what do. whether they did right or not it's clear the incredible doors that were opened by the ctc through 1252 allow them to hype oh everything. what i see, again, still catching up and it looks like to find close the door. the fact you close the door a week after the bankruptcy raises even more red flags that you knew that there was an open door and you knew should have closed it earlier. so i guess the question is, if you had closed earlier would we be sitting here today? >> i would like to clarify in terms of what regulation 1.25 type of transaction it would allow and transactions it does not cover. regulation 1.25 speed are using mf global has violated 1.25? >> know, congressman. i'm saying 1.25 covers what investments of customer finds -- >> i know what it covers. i understand. that's why we're trying to get back customers. 1.25 is the regular for all intents and purposes en

in understanding consciousness... we're really talking about understand unconsciousness. >> you're understanding both because one of the things we want to know what that what are the mechanisms that such that transfers e to the other? but what is it that makes this sound the way it is and why are some things things we're consciously aware of and others stay below. so the two can be studied in tandem and the kind of co-evolutionary science. but it isn't all about the unconscious. >> what is really attractive about this if we understand it further is the that there are a number of different ways of thinking about things. one is unconscious process, the other conscious. each has their own strength. so if you evolve two different kinds of mental ocesses to deal with dferent kinds of formation it will be inresting to see how far this goes back. these are very deep questions that are going to occupy usor many more charlie rose programs. (laughter) >> rose: i hope so. i think the excitement about this... so can i say in a jo

if we want to understand the collapse of the global economy, if we want to understand terrorism, if we want to understand climate change, we need a global approach. >> so, a example, twisting arms? hard to do? what's the hook and the pay? >> very tough. historically, it's always been sort of the thinking that if you do reporting out of africa, then no one will really watch. and a lot of networks, of course, are concerned about--as newspapers are concerned about circulation, a lot of networks are very concerned about ratings. so it takes an act of i suppose determination to get these stories in front of people. i think that, however, the arguments are heard because there is a sense that they must be done. i think that the fact that i work for so many broadcasts on nbc and i can convince many different executives, news executives, that they'll say yes. but i think that the question you broach, which is really an important one: can traditional media do this kind of reporting still? i think the answer is no. and i think that traditional media has failed, actually, historically to do enough

people did not understand what caused in the clips and then people came along, we don't understand what it is. it must be wolves jumping across the sky and i'm saying just because we don't understand consciousness or every aspect of human beings right now we shouldn't just grab onto an explanation like wolf stroud ring across the sky. assigns the explanation? science leave blanks in our understanding of the physical world but it doesn't mean we are free to fill in those blanks with any answers that we want. unknowns and there are the science has a different frontier there are levels of realities that will never be accessible to us. >> i did not hear him say that. >> you where does -- come from? >> science can never answer that because you answer that with how would you answer where these laws came from? then you say where did those laws come from? physics by definition starts with some laws are some principles and the consequences so physics can never asked the question where did those laws come from? and what created those laws? physics. >> vaidya physics than not acknowledge that ther

but if i understand you, you understand that this is an imperfect system. >> one thing that we understand -- this is the power of the district attorney's office to pursue the conviction. he has the right to the judge and the trial, but by the same token, i have never heard the district attorney say -- did he ever prosecute a police officer for perjury. did he ever prosecute? and any other office persecutes -- prosecute. continue to do that. did they ever prosecute anyone as a prosecutor for of seen things were bad things. when you try to put accountability together, you look at the whole picture and was going on in the trial. where is most of the misconduct happening. it becomes important. who is up to, so unless we can put accountability not just with the district attorney, he needs to have accountability. we need to find out who will be responsible for the prosecutors that go wild, and how do we deal with this? does the defendant get a chance to make that claim? what happened? nothing. this is his witness. >> can you tell me this story that you told me? you showed me a photograph of a m

again, i am not convinced the people did not understand. i just do not think that they wanted to comply. i do believe that the department is not being unduly hard or harsh against the academy. i feel that they were given ample warning. the bottom line is that they did not want to comply with the code. i do not think a supervisor walker's -- >> commissioner. [laughter] >> that was last year. >> actually, it was not last year. >> commissioner walker's motion is not unreasonable. if we are giving them enough time and opportunity to uphold the building code as our inspectors have said that they must, it is just not an unreasonable request. i believe that the motion is fair. >> let me ask, i have a feeling that sometimes when we make a motion to uphold abatement at the appellant time, we do not want to see the matter before us again and we are just trying to cut the time of having the appellant before us in the department. in this case, i think what is being said is let's continue the item and have the apartment and appellant -- have the departm

is that your understanding? >> i was looking at the sx exc110737, the fukushima actions, a tier one, two, and three approach, and the staff upon reviewing added spent fuel pool instrumentation to the list which has been approved by the commission. >> okay, good, thank you very much for that clarification. >> can i make a comment, senator? >> very briefly, please. >> this is a good example how confident people have different views. >> uh-huh. >> i was talking over dinner, actually with some members of the adviser committee on the safeguards, and they said, why do you want to do that? it doesn't improve safety. no, receiving information, of course, is always a good thing, but, again, if we think in terms of the constraints, in terms of resources and so on, and the chairman mentioned them earlier, they didn't feel this was a paramount importance that had to be done without delay. eventually we said, yes, do it, but i think it's an example of how confident people can have different views. i was very surprised when t

then you have the people know and understand the business practices. the challenge is to approve the business practice, bring on new technology,

and, you know, i don't understand that. i think that they should recognize that in some ways the bible's just outdated, an outdated way of looking at the physical universe. >> so, deepak, when leonard writes about the mind, the brain, he makes a pretty powerful case that science has unlocked secrets that are, were beyond anybody's imagination even a couple of hundred years ago, how the brain functions, how the universe is exploding at this extraordinary pace, how it's -- we know how it started, we know how it'll end. um, you're suggesting that consciousness is this concept can't touch, you can't get a microscope around it, but it's there. it seems kind of fanciful. >> you've stated the dilemma very, very accurately, and that's why it's so difficult to actually talk about consciousness. because consciousness is what is talking right now, okay? because if i wasn't a conscious being, i couldn't articulate what i'm saying, and you wouldn't be able to listen to me or understand what i'm saying. we are conscious beings, and what

supervisor chu: i try to understand this. i am glad we will have a continuance so i have a chance to better understand some of the issues that may have gone into the drafting of the legislation. i am wanting to understand what this means for our city departments, not contractors, city businesses. with regard to work for individual employees versus independent contractors, on that component, to receive other examples aside from the sludge contractor where that is the case? >> no. we could, but we have not. supervisor chu: that is a unique situation we have seen in the city? >> correct. supervisor chu: with regard to the three-month, six-month detention policy, what was the reason? >> that is a question better addressed by supervisor wiener. is my understanding it would provide greater drops a dirty for folks who were being displaced. that was the intent. supervisor wiener: the current is 3 months. there had been discussions, a desire by some to extend to one year. we went with six months as something that was a reasonable incr

he gained a few and no one understands that as well. but when he's awake he looks at me, he moves fingers when i ask him to and for me it's a big deal. >> rose: you think he can hear you? >> yeah, i think so, yeah. >> rose: has prime minister netanyahu been to see him? >> no. >> rose: has anyone else? you don't allow? why is that? i know they've asked. >> i think what he would like... i mean, i don't think he would like... he always wasvery happy and strong. he wouldn't like to have them see him lying in the bed. >> rose: so no israeli leaders are allowed to see him. >> no. >> rose: thank you again. >> thank you so much, it was a pleasure thank you. captioning sponsored by rose communications captioned by media access group at wgbh access.wgbh.org

i understand the neighbors' concerns, but i understand the rest of the commission. commissioner borden: i understand. it is interesting because we have a quandary on this case, i appreciate the comments that we have put these people through a lot have to tell them to do something different is very difficult. we are in a 40 x and district. whenever we decide within this case, we are going to see more and more additions in the neighborhood. it is happening all over the city. there are height limits that people are planning their buildings within, and we have to make a decision, are we saying that in this neighborhood, we want to see horizontal editions, and we should have staff go back and talk to people? and does that mean what we want to see, are going to feel that way 10 years down the road? i am just putting this out there. or would we say that we would rather have the smaller third story addition and doing it the way we're doing it now? i might point to a certain degree that this is precedent- setting in whatever direction we choose to go, we need to be comfortab

as more definition comes to the plan and people have a better understanding of the community benefits, what are the youth opportunities, what are the workforce and job plans and that is unfold being the next three -- unfold bei folfold ing the n months so we are going out to sell those opportunities for folks to help us facilitate our obligations. generally i say i'm raising $40 million if you count the $32 million specified in the host city agreement. there is a bond provision and other obligations, whether taxes or utilities, garbage. then i have the operational expenses. so if you roll it all up, a little bit of contingency, i think we are generally comfortable saying we are raising $40 million. >> of the 32 you have raised what do you have so far? >> we told you this summer when we got the status we raised just over $2 million, gifts from 10 members of the committee helping us get started with staff. we are now in a quiet phase. when we are done with that and come to the board of supervisors we will demonstrate that aware able to raise $12 million and we are well on track. i won't

global he doesn't seem to understand that he stole a billion dollars he has no self-knowledge at all he's a sociopath maybe he needs to visit an austrian school to understand at least himself your thoughts there's a thing i like your description very much i do think yes i think the austrian school starts with the individual you know human act you know the austrian school. is very clear that economics is not like natural sciences absolutely correct and i do think a lot of the problems that we face now in the world and that i think even modern mainstream economics is in fact in crisis because it's very clear as though the strengths of mainstream economics that have developed over the last year fifty seventy eighty years and that dominate academia and you know that provide theories and knowledge for the central bankers and the financial bureaucrats around the world you know one of the problems is that these theories try to mimic the natural sciences you know that they they treated it can nomics or something like natural phenomena and how do you deal with natural phenomena where you have

but i don't understand why it happened, and i don't understand what it was for. at least spencer made me feel like he was on my side and that i'm not to blame for it all. he had a reason. there was a reason, milner. what do you mean? i don't agree with his views, but guy spencer is a good man. milner, i'm sorry to have to disillusion you, but... is this the book he lent you? "the protocols of the elders of zion-- how the jews plan to overthrow christianity and conquer the world." have you read it? no. are you anti-semitic? no! is hitler right doing what he's doing to the jews? no! you don't understand. i just wanted the facts. spencer gave them to you? while he was at the hotel, spencer took possession of a letter smuggled out of whitehall and given to him by a traitor--rosemary harwood, and given to him in the hope that he'd pass it on to the enemy. after the murder, spencer was trapped. he had the letter, but he didn't know what to do with it. he gave it to you because you were the one person at the hotel we wouldn't dream of searching. after the investigation,

>> is my understanding that it would go to general treasury. restitution would go back to the customers but the fines would be returned to the general treasury. >> thank you mr. chairman. >> the gentleman's time has expired. i now recognize the gentleman from virginia for five minutes. >> commissioner sommers, mr. kovach welcome. my first question is related to how this works. if i understand the customers of mf global would place fans -- funds, large amounts of funds into account that is like a trust account or an escrow account that would be held there and then at the appropriate time the customer would give instructions to mf global to engage in a particular trade and when they did that they would take the funds from that account and engage in the trade. so, what has happened is that mf global has taken those funds without the customers authorization and place them in various types of investments, some of which like the foreign sovereign debt might be viewed as quite risky? is that is what is at the heart of this? >> mr. goodlatte, i wouldn'

it helps us to understand what is going on with the water in the reactors. modeling and simulation that we have at sea is based on what happens with oil. what happens with oil and a radio isotope are different properties. we come up short when we look at what happens when radioisotopes are introduced to overtime. that is a common operating picture. that is what we developed so that, as the next aftershock came in the next power loss incident took place, in the launch floor that we build with the self-defense force, we were able to work side-by-side. we have a hot line to the embassy and ministries in japan as an event takes place, everyone knows. one of the critical questions that everyone wanted to ask was -- and i at risk? do i need to evacuate? the concern that we had was that the level of radiation in the background, which is to say people, the 90,000 americans that were there, in the event of one of these crises getting worse, they actually tried to get in line and get on a ship. this would put them at more risk. where they needed to release radiation i

understand what is it must be rules jumping across the sky and by saying i just because we don't understand consciousness into another aspect of human beings right mel we shouldn't just grab on to any explanation like wolves jumping across the sky. [laughter] selling and leaves blank the understanding of the world but it doesn't mean that we are free to fill in those planks with any answer that we want. that will never be accessible to us. >> i didn't hear him say that. >> where did this come from? >> science can never answer that. because if you're going to answer that in physics how will you answer where they came from the other laws are principals and you deride those and then use the word to those come from pacs just physics by definition starts with a law we are the principal and the consequences. so the physician should never answer the question where do they come from, who created the law or what created them that is physics. some quite as physics did not acknowledge that there is a first cause? >> first walls of the universe? >> of anything. >> they can explore the laws company and

i understand this is the practice. it would seem to me it would the ball frequently enough that you would not want to put it in the code. i do not know if there is an easy way to write it so that it is not a fixed number, but percentages. i do not know. i have not looked at that closely enough. looking at the lccu, it sounds like the existing code makes lot more sense. based on the distance issues that people talked about, the waterfront advisory committee seems like the suitable seems like the suitable committee to look at those

we are in the planning phase of that and trying to understand what the time line is they will need in order to have those needs met and working closely with the city so we don't recreate the wheel and we leverage existing access whether 311 or neighborhood services, working with congresswoman pelosi's office and having direct connections to the federal agencies that ned to deliver some -- need to deliver pieces. i think that is generally what you need to know is going on with the organizing committee. we will add more members. we are also helping for the advancement of the sustainability plan and community benefits package. >> can you go over the money part again? what is your total obligation and time line? >> the host city agreement calls for $32 million to be raised by the local organizing committee. it is broken up in terms of deliverables. the first $12 million is due by the end of the environmental review process. i defer to the city on exactly what the time of that will be. i think we are on track to meet the commitments of the host city agreement at the end of this year. we ar

they will understand what we are held to. there will be consequences. they may forfeit getting paid. we thought that was fair. musicians or performers might not get paid. that will send a message home. >> do you have a sign, please respect the neighbors? >> we do. >> can we have a show of hands? we are limited to two minutes per person. >> i have lived in different neighborhoods. that is how i met lisa. i would like to address the people hwwho objected. i have seen lisa where she is taking on jobs and dealing with problems. knowing in her work as a manager where she put on events, she will be able to address any concerns. i -- the neighbors should know they have a good team. president newlin: thank you. next? >> i moved to san francisco in june. i am the person who doesn't like bars. i dont' like to go out to eat. the first time i went i had the feeling that it was a person -- where a person felt safe. she is a kind woman who creates an atmosphere where everyone feels welcome. there is a great deal of interracial comfort. everyone makes friends. the mus

is that your understanding? >> pardon me kamal was the question? is it my understanding that -- >> you and : describe that it was carried out by the right to department and overseen by legal firms, chapman and the human resources director, personnel director. >> that is my understanding. >> okay. can he tell us why john chapman left the organization? >> they decided that it was in mutual interest to part ways, and that the key, you know, i take one of the pieces here as well is that the company is move forward to. and i think this is important. many of the individuals, even if there is no evidence of wrongdoing or anything like that , and no evidence of an bryan veto many individuals have chosen that is assigned to our ways. i was not involved in discussions with mr. chapman. >> covering up the existence. >> i do not. >> can you tell us about dana clark. >> i don't know. he is out in the business he was the director of human resources for a number of years. not that many. actually, not sure. but over a year ago i think, but i can't follow up with y

i don't understand that.i think they should recognize that in some ways the bible is updated the way of looking at >> so, deepak, when leonard writes about the mind, the brain, he makes a pretty powerful case that science has somewhat secrets that are beyond anyone's imagination even a couple years ago. how the brain functions, how the we know how it started. we know how it will end. you're suggesting that consciousness is this concept that you can't measure. you can't see it come you can't touch come you can't get a microscope around it, but it's there. everyone is as fair, but no one can measure it. >> usage of the dilemma theory can very accurately. and that a site is so difficult to actually talk about consciousness because consciousness is what is talking right now. because if i wasn't a conscious being, i couldn't articulate what i'm saying and you would be able to listen to me or understand what i'm saying. what the mistake that science is making about consciousness -- in science, by the way, as mr. le

i understand how this business works. even though i understand how this machine is driven and how it works, even in making the choices i have on the bigger studio films, i feel really, really lucky and i'm grateful that i have never truly felt like i have done myself any -- i haven't compromised to the place where i feel uncomfortable. i have chosen the big movies with still a belief that there's something creative there in the story telling. it's not a complete sell-out. >> i accept that. we'll take a short break. when we come back, we're going to talk about south africa and your mother who is a heroic constant figure in your life. >> the broad. >> the broad. [ indistinct conversations ] nice, huh? yeah. you know what else is nice is all the savings you can get on cruze and traverse over there. oh! that's my beard. [ chuckles ] it's amazing. ♪ [ male announcer ] this holiday, chevy's giving more. now very well qualified lessees can sign and drive a 2012 cruze ls for around $199 a month. ♪ >> give it to you straight. i'm

my understanding is that as important as the issue is, as i understand it, the issue of the possible devaluation of the property is not relevant to the underlying discussion. i wanted to make sure that we are clear on that. that is an important issue. i wanted to make sure that we were focused on what was before the board. >> supervisor campos, the board may not base its decision to deny a conditional use if the grounds are the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions. that is what you are not allowed to consider in making your decision. it is pre-empted by federal law. >> that may not be a proper basis for a denial? thank you. >> this is a clarification to my colleagues and members of the public that may not be fully versed on laws that govern on this particular issue. it is a very complicated and challenging issue, one bank that we have been supportive in dealing with i do not know how many times in the next three months. >> why do we not hear from our next number of the public? >> thank you. my name is ian wang. i am within 300 yards of the proposed site. i am here to su

but you have to understand that by going broke, we mean going broke. we meet on the verge of insolvency. the devil is in the details, but we have not arrived at a measure for that caveat. but i will make it clear that it is something that we have to be very comfortable with. it is incredibly unlikely to happen. before you take action on this project, you will have a chance to look at that number and talk about it. we don't have the number yet, but is the approach we are taking. president chiu: can i ask a question to the city attorney about that? part of the wonders why such a clause will be necessary. legally, there are certain obligations that you have when you enter into a contract. i don't even know why the need for something like that would be, so i am trying to understand how typical this kind of clause is in a development agreement? is this something with any other project that has come before us for the typical project that we allow for the inclusion of something like this? >> i do not think that a clause like this is legally necessary. one of