understand society you first have to understand the individual human being. in this he follows what is a fairly familiar to students of american political thought and british political thought the model of the state of nature, way of understanding society. let's imagine society begins with independent individuals coming together and deciding we would be better off if we lived together if there is a mutual enforcer of laws, protector of property and safety, that is how society is formed and exist for that purpose and needs to be understood entering to that purpose. any government, any society that doesn't answer to that purpose, violates our rights and doesn't protect our property, doesn't protect us properly from one another is a -- we have a right to destroy it. this is his vision. is a familiar vision, a liberal vision, and from there he begins his political thinking. that means his political thinking is very individualist, very rights based, very devoted to individual liberty as a defining principle of political life. every book start by looking at that sa

i don't know that anybody understands it all but maybe somebody does if your sixth book is or are you writing the same thing over and over again well i think a lot of my mouth a lot of my theme comes out and it's god's good it's have faith it's moved forward so that some of it is but you know i'm been doing this for fourteen years and you grow you learn more you mature and i think i'm better than i am i believe i'm better than i was you know years ago so i feel like it's my best book who's it for it's for anybody that wants to just move forward it's a call it up a faith building book it's easy to get stuck in iraq and think well you know this is a good it's a good so it's just really something to give a boost in our faith and when i say faith you know have to be a religious person it's principles in there that will help you to think bigger to have the right perspective things like that so someone can use this book without being a church go without being religious i think so many people watch that or like that the book deals was self-imposed limitations you put limitations on yourself

their own views better, understand the views of the of the better, understand where they differ from people who i describe is maybe the origins of the own way thinking and what they don't. i think it's more useful as a presentation of what seems to have been one of the first instances of the left-right divide in a recognizable way back in attempt to try to show how the line goes from here to there. because of course the line doesn't go in a straight way. a lot has changed about the left and the right. a lot has changed about our circumstances. i would say especially a long century and more long debate about economics that they were not part of. between socialism and capitalism, they are sent are not part burke and paine debate. i think that has changed things some, but that what burke and paine to a show you where the basic disposition, the basic difference of approaches, the basic differences a definition between left and right. there are different understanding of what the liberal society is, come from and what they look like in their original form. what you point to helps to get t

is a function of human beings, many human beings together and so understand society you have to understand the human being. and this follows what is a fairly familiar to students of american political thought and british political thought to be the model of the state of understanding society so let's imagine society begins with independent individuals coming together and deciding we would be a lot better off if we lived together, if there was a mutual enforcer of the law that would protect the safety. that is how the societies for me and it exists in that purpose and has to be understood as answering to that purpose that any government and society that doesn't answer to that purpose and it violates our right doesn't protect our property from one another. it is an illegitimate government. it is a familiar vision and it's a liberal vision and it is a sort of lockean vision. and from there he begins his political thinking so that means his political thinking is very individualistic and jerry wright space and is devoted to the idea of individual liberty as a kind of defining political life. he

i don't understand how at&t can claim that they were denied a permit when all the dpw did was suggest that they go back and look for an alternative location at which time when they find one that works a permit will be granned granted so i find their argument strange and don't understand why they made the appeal in this manner anyway. that's all i wanted to add. >> thank you. all right. >> you want to allow time now for -- >> we have a public speaker. >> thanks. >> i'm addressing the issue at 620 and the issues are similar to what this previous speaker said. we were in the midst of trying to finds alternative locations when we were surprised. in fact, mark even instructed his people to work with us and then cut him off and next thing we knew there was an appeal so we -- that's basically the situation and we had some ideas, but those ideas have yet to be vetted. we've never had an opportunity to have secondary conversations. >> thank you. any other public comment? okay. >> i'm mark with at&t. i withdraw the that dpw administers. each one of those sections explicitly states that -- >> ca

>> you understand. >> you understand as well. [laughter] >> so i apologize. >> and so do you want to talk about getting paid for the faster service. >> and so otherwise insurance can connect their images along. >> when it comes to paragraph 76, and they didn't say that it would never be allowed. and they said given section 706 they didn't want to do this. because if verizon could do it, what they would have an incentive to do is to create congestion and attractive jam and so i understand why the commission had developed all these tools. a double purpose of the rules was to ensure that all of this was provided with free assets. then disallow the digital part of this to survive. >> and i think the answer of this was part of the situation. you have to look at this in the context of this is not actually a relationship. and i want to make sure that you understand that it is not that cents. and what i haven't heard is the condition and there is an easy fact of what you think and there was a classic carrier that was self-described and t

that and i appreciate it very much what was said and i understand that whole argument. it's absolutely fair to say but i am charged with one role to maximize assets of the trust and find the money and bring it to your attention. now, fully insured -- you could do that and we could see that or see if there is money to put it in the trust and is this better for kaiser in the long run? i will answer that question. you didn't ask that. kaiser's preference is still fully insured and run their organization that way as one big kaiser family, not we take advantage of this and do that and i want that on public record that is absolutely -- and i can say that without looking to kaiser and that's their prerogative so with that do you want me to look at it or stick with fully insured or this and there isn't a lot of difference between the two and it's up to you guys to decide what you want to do. >>

understand communication matters. with us this morning to talk about this issue in honor of november and jewish book month is haired friedman and michael lavine, a novelist most recently publishing the wanting. howard, let's jump in. the jewish community library is a library that houses books and has all sorts of programs that encouraged people to read to enjoy the imagination of writing and the relationship between a book and a writer. how do you see this issue of everdeepenning technology? >> that is a good question. the first word touched me. there's a back that came out last year -- book that came out last year called jews in the words. and they have a memorable sentence that is about jews that ours is not a blood line but a text line and they sort of locate at the center of the jewish experience, the passing on of the word of text and we see ourselves at the library very much in that tradition and i see that encounter whether it's through a written become or whether on line or whether or through e back, what we'r

a, you know, that ice skating rink i understand is still there and i understand that this shooting mayave happened near that location, or that some evidence was located near that location in the rink? is that true? >> well, there -- it happened in a store on the second level of the mall, and it's kind of a skateboard shop, and you know, a lot of the discussion about the food court makes sense, because it's a store that's essentially right above the food court. there's a big escalator that goes right up from the food court to where this store is. so the sounds probably appeared to people to be taken place in the food court. if you can imagine, you've been there. it's a large mall that would have been packed at 11:15 on a saturday morning, and it caused a lot of, a very scary incident. >> and at this point, what do you see in terms of trying to, you know, piece together these events and -- doing what you can as a county executive, you know, to ensure people in that area, and other places, you know, how do you make a public place like a shopping mall a safe place? it's presumably one of t

we haven't had a chance to understand that. i would like to understand that from greater detail. as far as finance, this is more than doubling of rent. i understand it's the current market rate, but a massive increase per employee and maybe it's all necessary and valid and so forth. but from my perspective i would like to have more time to evaluate that. i'm happy, we are going to have to take public comment. if my colleagues have different thoughts, that's fine. supervisor john avalos: i would like to come visit the retirement board site. i have been there since 2008. i would like to check it out especially in light of the decision that we have before us. prior to approval of a lease. >> be happy to arrange that or you can just show up and say that you are here to see the operations and the public area. supervisor john avalos: i will have the staff reach out. >> if it wasn't for the brown act we can do a field trip. i'm sure we'll be down there in the next few weeks. colleagues any questions? okay, at this point we'll open it up for public comment. anyone wish to comment on no.

how do i get an understanding of it?en it comes to language understanding, where would you say we are right now? are we at the toddler or adult stage? we have watson seen things go from watson -- we have seen things go from watson rtoto siri. >> it is not like that. if you do something sophisticated that would take a smart person hours or weeks to stitch together and figure out and then in other areas it will seem really stupid. computers process the data very differently than humans do. i think one of the interesting going forward is in dutch is can we get more of a convergence and machines to think more like humans? can the process data in a similar way? we are not there yet. there's a lot of work to do. this is something you think about a lot in terms of contemplating the future. >> we think a lot of the intersection between people asking computers questions and asking them for advice immersing the computers being really proactive and recognizing the context and say i know you do not ask me for anything but i sensed s

i don't understand that procedure, and maybe someone can explain this to me. i see, a series of rather serious allegations against the high level official in the public utilities commission saying that she violated several aspects of conflict of interest, working at a paid commission at another job and lobbied the public utilities commission to give contracts that she worked for which would have aamounted to $250,000 that she would have been a beneficiary of that and i wind up agreeing with the stipulation and i have no problem with it and obviously underlying it, our staff must have done a fine job of working on it with the fppc. and in bringing about this stimulation. but, why is it that something like this comes to us, and without telling the public and i think that the education of the public, and on this, a high level public utilities officials lobbying her own agency for $200,000 for lobbying for a company that she works for and that is fairly significant in terms of conflict of interest and we should be delving into it and the staff must have to come up

, the public can understand it as well. each one of those methods measured against those goals and objective and where it sitses, where you will get the solid fwox you will get the strongest and you are achieving the most amount of objectives helps you then get a tangent and not just the numbers but the human aspect and the real aspect of this delivery method and these are two things that we would say we would recommend for you to say go forward with this kind of analysis and you become more informed of what it will be and how it could work, and with that i will stop and i will be happy to answer any questions that you may have. >> thank you. >> we do actually appreciate the speed. eny know. >> but it was a lot of information, so i do appreciate that. >> why don't we start with, just it is a question, and it is, it is probably something to be studied, but curious if you had initial thoughts? >> so, with dtx, connecting with the cal train system. which it appears that it will be electrified before dtx happens and so the boar

we want to understand how the s.ain work we want to understand disease states. we want to understand how mental functions have an impact on other aspects of society. for example, how do people respond to a work of art? what is it about music that moves you in a certain way? what makes usnd human. >> that is right. i assume part of this is not the mapping thing, but maybe it is, the connection between neurons. >> they are not looking at this level with the mri at the connections between neurons. we are looking at the connections between regions and information flow and the direction of information flow. other people are looking at the connections between neurons more in mice and fruit flies. >> one is systematically mapping the brain of the fruit fly and is combining this with behavior. what we talked about the last , this is what you are seeing in action. people are doing things that they did before, more systematically and collaboratively to push this forward. >> are they getting more money? >> no. the money is embarrassing. >> are you talking about money fromn

they didn't understand what we meant. we said how do you feel about a candidate who proposes to fight big government? they were like the windows are too big, what are you talking about. for young voters big isn't scary. big is getting a million followers on twitter and being able to send a message to them in an instant. what is scary is an intrusive government. it's about the language we use to describe this. if we talk about reducing spending. the things we mean when we say big government. we just say them differently to younger voters in a language that is relevant to them. what matters is just talking to younger voters. it's just a basic tenant of human interaction. if someone isn't talking to you, they don't think you care about them much. we need to talk to younger voters. [applause] >> you have effectively used the prolife message to resonate with voters. you want to talk about that a little bit? >> i have the opportunity in the senate to sponsor a lot of bills, i do education policies, and tort reform. the pro-life

and united states understand the importance of this alliance and understand the importance in relationto peace and security in northeast asia and how strong this alliance can be in the realm of peace and security. as some of us have talked about, you know, the u.s. during the time i was there was primarily focused on the middle east, what was going on and area in afghanistan and not part of the world. to be able to say look what is happening here and if we want to maintain peace and security, the alliance going on within korea is important not just the korean peninsula, but the entire region. that took a lot of work not just by me, but kathy stevens, other diplomatic folks that are there and i am convinced are not completely realize what the ships come in to rebalance in the pacific as we are as i said earlier, putting our money where our mouth is that this is an important region to us. what is the best memory is along the same line as a personal relationship and personal friendships that for general tilelli and myself go back to name 296 and still have friends reestablished and i spea

so, i really would like to understand the impact of this decision. and thank you, supervisor campos, for proposing that we move on to public comment in order to allow more time to do that. >> supervisor avalos, any final comment before we go to public comment? >> let's go into public comment. i know mr. chafee is waiting very patiently to speak first on the mic and we'll presume after. >> i do want to acknowledge our deputy city attorney. i understand you need to leave at 5 o'clock. are there any final comments you would like to make? >> deputy city attorney jon givner. i unfortunately have to leave the meeting at 5:00. one of my very capable colleagues has volunteered to take my place. but in response to supervisor breed's question about where these amendments are, we have not drafted all of the amendments because they have been coming at the board today, some for the first time. but they are all changes to one specific paragraph in each ordinance. it's the paragraph regarding the -- regarding eviction. and in the demolition merger conversion ordina

so, that was my understanding. so, just wanted clarity that that is actually accurate. >> my understanding is we would need to return to the board next year for the additional -- for the additional year. >> mr. givner, can you clarify whether or not that's the case? because the resolution doesn't appear to read that way. or did you need a little bit more time? >> yeah, just give me one minute. >> okay, i'll let her -- if you don't mind, you finish your presentation and then maybe the city attorney can let us know. >> sure, happy to. so, i'll just verbally go through. we have budgeted every year about $7 45,000 in staff salaries that are used to provide services inside the jails. one staff member is someone who manages our legal services. one person is a farmer who does the farming for gardening at c.j. side. we have a senior administrative analyst who oversees the services provided for women, and three re-- four rehabilitative services coordinators who coordinate the programming inside the jails. in addition, we sp

okay, so let me understand, let me understand where you are coming from.y, your employed right now, right. >> yes, sir. >> stephen: and what dow make an hour. >> i make right now i'm making $8, because fast food workers like us, you know, stood up and have a voice, so now i'm making $8 an hour. >> stephen: so it was 7.25 minimum wage in new york and it's gone to $8 in the last year. >> yes, sir. >> stephen: so you understand that that extra 75 cent an hour is passed on to a consumer like me. and i could be paying more than 4 cents more for my go tub, you understand that. you understand that you are take money out of my pocket when you do that. >> hey, these multibillion-dollars are making-- taking money out of my pocket too. i work and give them all that money, they can afford to give it to me. (cheers and applause) >> stephen: okay, but you-- why not just work more. how many hours do you work a week. >> wait, wait, wait, steve, steve,xd hold on. (laughter) >> i don't know if people told you, i work at two kfcs and still couldn't make it, i did two kfcs, 3

we understand that. that's why we're working as quickly as we can to identify the victims and give them peace of mind. we understand that. we would like to give all the support that we have from law enforcement, local, state and federal level. we'll take a few questions. >> can you provide the genders? >> i cannot provide the genders or the ages. >> police chief, can you describe where does this exactly happen in the food court and what types of weapons. >> i didn't say it was a food court. i said it was in the upper level at a store. i won't identify the store right now. >> what types of weapons were recovered? >> again, we have not gotten our investigators in to identify all that. >> is there true that there was a domestic issue involved here. >> we don't know the motive yet. i understand the question and the interest in it, but understand our position. >> you have been speaking to witnesses. do they give an educatio indicat there was an argument, people knew each other, or a random event where people

consensust a understanding today. we should encourage and help countries so that they can prepare better for the next membership. the -- to see up, among we wish to see, among the conclusions of the nato summit, a recommitment to the two percent spending sensible. -- principal. today, five countries out of 28 spend less than 1% of the gdp to defense. than 175 --end more 1.75%. only four countries crossed the 2% threshold. 1990's, it was 12. if the negative defense spending trend continued, nato's military capabilities and political credibility could be put at risk. outraged bywe are the cost of war, but we are more outraged by the cost of peace. we should not consider europe as but thateneous area, all the countries think and act at the same time. the countries of that understands the necessity to continue to contribute 2% of gdp to defense and who actually does so. when i became minister in 2012, it was the first year that we contributed 2%. we will remain at that level. is toggest difficulty sustain that level when

i can't support something that i don't completely understand the impacts. i don't understand this. for example, when we talk about the signatures that are needed from a tenant and owner, does it need to be notarized? do we need to specify that in the resolution? terms of alterations, i guess that that means alterations as it relates to completely changing. i don't understand the specifications of some of the codes in the resolution to understand what we're speaking to in terms of the alterations. and also, i just want to -- there is just a lot of confusion right now. and i want to understand this legislation, but i don't completely fully understand the impact and how this could help with what we're experiencing. and, so, i just really -- i need some more time and that's where i'm at and that's pretty much unfortunately where i'm at today. >> supervisor breed, are you making a motion to continue or just stating that -- your perspective? >> well, i mean, i don't know -- i don't know if i'm the only one who feels this way, but i want to hear what others have to say. but i just -- if i

to understand the individual human being. in this he follows what is the fairly familiar to students of american political thought and british political thought very the model of the state of nature the way of understanding society so let's imagine society begins with independent individuals coming together and deciding we would be a lot better off if we live together, if there's a mutual enforcer laws and a protector of property and safety. that is how societies form. they answer to that purpose and every government in any society that doesn't answer that part is that violates her rights and doesn't protect their property and doesn't protect us properly from one another is an illegitimate government and we have a right to overthrow it. this is basically his vision. it's the liberal vision and awlaki and sort of vision and from there he begins his political thinking. so that means his political thinking is very individualist, it's very rights-based and it is devoted to the idea of individual liberty is this defining principle

we understand that. that's why we are working to identify those victims to give you piece of mind we would like to thank all the support we had from law enforcement and emerge s i management, fire departments, local, state and federal level. i'll take a few questions. can you provide the genders? >> i cannot provide gender or ages. >> can you describe where this exactly happened in the food court and what type of weapons? >> i didn't say it was at the food court. i said upper level of the mall at the store. i'm not going to identify which store. the other question was? >> which types of weapons were recovered? >> again, we have not gotten our investigators in there to identify that. >> was there a domestic issue involved here? >> as i said earlier, we don't know a motive yet. i appreciate the question. i understand the interest in it. our investigators haven't gotten a chance to get in there and identify people yet. >> you have been speaking to witnesses. do they give an indication of there was an argume

an easy to understand. that was a really important report. and mike andclark the others, i think they really nuanced an effort to be about this and to be sympathetic to all of the concerns raised, but also to a national security establishment from which they themselves come. was a veryt interesting report that really set the stage quite properly for precisely the kind of legislative and executive branch action that is probably forthcoming now. of the most interesting things about the report is that the group was and so much in the beginning as being a hand-picked panel by the administration and everyone looked at them membership percent these are allies of the administration. i remember hearing rumblings in october or so that these guys were taking a broad look at an essay structure and i am thinking, is that really their mandate? the start to hear a little rumbling along the way suggesting they might actually make recommendations that would get noticed. i do not know whether or not that played a role, but it seems like they took it quite ser

and i am trying to understand this. and the eight weeks that we takes and the number of the goal of 14 days or two different things >> it is our goal for the sexual kit, and there are cases where we are able to do that. and you mentioned that there is an eight week average now. and our goal is 14. and our average is 8 weeks, our goal is 14 days, and we had a lot of instances that i could point to where we got the kit, we analyzed it and we turned it around at 14 days and entered into cotus and got a match and followed the investigation. and you know, led to our investigators be able to identify a perpetrater. >> and so, i was just going to say one thing that i learned about this is that the administrative code sets these time goals and the 14 day is a goal the department prioritized where there was not a known suspect for that 14 day and that is the asap program and i think that given a lack of resources the other cases take a little bit longer and the average as you said is lower than in other jurisdictionses but you a

none of you will understand fully what i've been through.think you see that recklessness, that frenzy if you like, as an exciting thing if we recognize it in someone else. they connect there. being drawn in like a loft to a flame allows her to free him and escape in the night. she does that completely off the book. she contravenes every rule going and she swore personal reasons. it's why it works so well. people act. >> why is someone attracted to someone that they know is like that or whatever is in? they need each other. >> there was a moment in the first season where she was the only one who believed he was guilty. now of course she believes that he is innocent. >> does love cloud her vision? >> you would have to say that love elucidates moments for her in a way that it cannot for the others. it is also a danger to her. you would have to say both of those things. they are very human, honest mistakes to make. where brody is concerned, she works from the heart. that is not true all the time, a lot of the time, like the episode last year wer

i said, well, i'll make you understand later. he said, i cannot understand, every you go people say this is malala and they give you an award. what have you done? so he is still trying to understand. >> just my annoying sister who won't give me my ipad. i understand there's a friendly competition between you two about who is to be prime minister and who is to be the secretary. who is winning that one? >> my brother in the middle, my -- both of my brothers are younger than me. my brother in the middle, he doesn't speak a lot. he just plays on xbox. that's his job. i think -- i know that it's not for underrating the game, but -- [laughter] >> and the little brother, he is like a -- i hope there's no lawyer here. he is like a lawyer -- >> oh, no, no lawyers here. >> he is like a lawyer. whenever i fight with him, he can just change his style of his talking, he can just change his emotions and he can just -- like -- then i feel guilty, was i really hard upon him? what was i really cruel? and he just makes me feel that. so that's why

i understand. i understand speaking in tongues. i understand the passion and the end time but how does that translate into like killing people for who they are? that was amazing to america i said i grew up in the church so i want to understand -- i want to understand what your -- what is behind all this? why uganda? >> jon: was there any part? i'm curious. they clearly have taken a stance against -- in the movie homosexuality three things, homosexuality, abortion and islam. >> the threat of islam. >> jon: sorry not islam but the threat of islam. they've taken a stand against this. christians are persecuted in certain places certainly like north korea and that. are they aware of irony of persecuting people for who they are white fighting against persecution for themselves because of who they are? >> i don't think there's any self awareness. >> jon: that never came -- that never? >> i think they are so driven by what they consider biblical law. by the end times about eradicating sin, that's that is what drives them. >> jon: the idea

student-athletes understand it but only to a certain extent. beyond that they're not capable of understanding that there are such huge odds in playing in basketball or football. what they're doing is they're on the court, and their minds are focused on playing. to go back to what john said, it doesn't start in high school but middle school. you're stuck in a system in a combine up until you're released. your train of thought is perpetuated over time so that you can continuously believe that you can make it. so it's very, very difficult to remove yourself from the reality that is not there. >> well, our community is chiming in. reilly said. >> we've got david who said, i feel so story for these student-athletes >> we have a video comment from brook. >> i went to a top ten university, at times it felt as though academic counselors were focused on me maintaining performance and eligibility by all means. keepin if your parents are hands-on its easy to fall in the short-term as well. academic counselorrers need to sit down with the athletes and enco

please understand what we're trying to deal with.ur investigators haven't gotten a chance to get in there to try to get to a motive. >> have been speaking to witnesses, do they give an indication of there was an argument, altercation, the people knew each other or a random event where somebody pulled a gun and starts shooting? >> yeah, i don't have that information yet. i just don't have that information yet. we are -- we are very confident that it was a single shooter, that there's no other shooters in the mall or anything like that. >> did law enforcement fire in this at all? >> we have not. >> can you describe the scene as you understand it. did this shooting happen were there were a lot of people around? we've had people tell us they saw people drop. >> it was in a store in the upper level of the mall. you know how many people are in this mall on a saturday afternoon. i don't have all the particulars about where people were. believe me, i understand the importance of those questions and we will get them to you. >> how do you thin

we understand that fairly well. there are always unknown variables, the number of variables is dizzying, national employment, propensity to serve on the part of a population, believe it or not even family income, a person graduating high school needs to get into a job. in number of recruiters. the number of the amount of pay we give, bonuses, other retirement program, big soup of variables, the commission has to consider that carefully and when you open up and released the glue and introduce a new framework that could allow people to retire earlier those models are going to be upset and we have to determine how to modify them so we can understand and that is part of the challenge for the commission, to understand whether we have a model that can accurately predict behavior so we can profile our force correctly. >> thank you, mr. chairman. senator wicker. >> important hearing, appreciate you calling it and i appreciate you starting out at the outset saying that this cpi minus 1 was wrong and needs to be fixed. not a

he should have done something different, but also what we have to understand.ust made a terrible sentence, didn't i? tavis: no, it wasn't terrible enough -- it wasn't so terrible that i didn't understand it, and i think the audience got it too. >> yeah. tavis: but it does raise a question. i suspect there's somebody in that audience asking right now, "but ms. giovanni, it sounds to me like you're excusing what your father did. >> no, i don't think i excuse -- we called him "gus." i'm not trying to excuse gus. i'm trying to understand it. tavis: right. >> because i do know on my life that he loved us. i also know he couldn't find a way to make that make sense. so in a way, "chasing utopia," because i'm a mama's girl, and in "chasing utopia" and in embracing mommy in the way that i have here, because it was fun writing this book, and if you wouldn't do anything else but "chasing utopia," you will laugh, because the laughter is there. my grandmother's laughter is there. i have a thing in this book called the "giggle bank," and what i had imagined is that my grandm

what i they think -- the affordable -- [inaudible] >> i understand the question presented at 10% that for the stipulation was that the understood set of charges embedded in the icm with no further clarification at that point and time and we've had several discussions. the stipulation was it was reasonable to consider that nor more than 10% at that time. we had subsequent conversations about embedded in the icm and a box that does a bunch of things that we have a slide on. what is the reasonable number? right now the number for business assuming that we believe all items in that box are justified is 16% as percent of claims or 13% as a percent of premium so it's not that the icm is incredibly more expensive than the 10%. it's a difference so were we able to get the 10% agreed upon? no, sir. have we come further in our discussion if we were go to down a path of assuming risk would we agree those numbers are rational at this point? that depends when i do the arithmetic on the risk and it's about 16% now on the claim. >> are you comfortable what is in the box on the icm box? >> am i comfo

they assured us and that became part of the memorandum of understanding and i don't understand why that hasn't been enforced. final thing i want to say is that at&t has petitioned the fcc go out of the land line business by 2020. these boxes are based on communication with existing land lines. what's going to happen when they go out of the land line business? thank you. supervisor scott weiner: thank you. next speaker. >>> my name is rochel clayton with district 5. thank you. i wanted to say for the issue about best solutions and alternatives. you mentioned the fact that new technology for the city and that the technology should be upgraded and renovated. first off, at&t is still working on 100-year wiring copper wiring versus u verse technology. last year they decided to phase out copper wiring in 22 states. not sure if california is onefer those. the disadvantage is that we have dwellings that are built in 1900s that have the same undergone, if you haven't undergone any rewiring it's still operating on the same wiring of the 1900s. that means that at&t assures that the old technology

gold's utility wares in east they understand you know gold usefulness the chinese character for gold and money are in fact the same thing so they intuitively understand gold utility and its usefulness as as money and as long as wealth is being created in that part of the world which it is gold is going to flow from west to east and unfortunately it's a replay of what happened in the one nine hundred sixty s. with the cartel called the london gold pool tried to keep gold at thirty five dollars an ounce eventually there was ten thousand tons of gold to sort of from fort knox during the one nine hundred sixty s. to try to maintain this price but ultimately the market knew that gold was worth more than thirty five dollars an ounce today the circumstances are slightly different because it's harder to actually see the gold coming out of central bank vaults because again the the false reporting that we're seeing and the misleading accounting but we can see it in terms of the flows so you know the gold is going out of the vaults and eventually. we're going to see a ratcheting up of the gold