and we must understand that to give these words the proper respect. verse 2: "and he had in his hand a little book open: and he set his right foot upon the sea, and his left foot on the earth," so this message is for the entire earth; that's the point here. it's for everybody! and that's what's going to happen to everybody, that mystery is going to be removed! it's going to be finished! it's not going to be a mystery anymore very soon, and that's to the entire world. verses 3 and 4: "and cried with seven thunders uttered their voices. (4) and when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, i was about to write: and i heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not." so we have a booklet about the little book, and it tells you what those thunders are all about and what this lion-roaring message is all about. it is something that really ought to thunder to us if we're looking at it spiritually. it comes at us like the roar of a lion and it makes a big difference. verses 5 and 6: "and

i think people just want to see and understand the technology and understand the data.ple are making life-and-death calls based on this data. they want to understand the why. emily: this is a $10 billion company. do you think it's a fraud? anne: i'm sure it's possible. everything i know, she works incredibly hard. i have seen her discipline and how much she is working. i'm not close enough to the company to know about the technology. it's what everybody wants to know. everybody is excited about the potential and what that technology actually is. emily: how do you walk that line between your trade secrets and being transparent? anne: she is not required to have the transparency people are asking for. that's part of the disconnect. the fda has put out guidance, they are trying to regulate the industry. if that is the call they are making, it will be good to have that same transparency across all diagnostics. when you are in a crisis, it's hard to ever evaluate. you guys are all digging in. when you are executing and you have more approvals, the things will speak to the re

no one understands that more than me. one of the most crucial resources we have in america is clean drinking water. water to water outcrops. we all want the same thing, but the rules we have now does not accomplish that, but we are so entrenched that we have to have this rule and i think if you would repeal the rule, step back, get with congress, get with farmers, get with environmentalists, get a whole group of people in a room and say what do we want to achieve and what is the most effective way to do that and let's all take pride out of it because we are all prideful regardless of what we are, but to get back to the humility to the sarpy when the room, get a group or commission together and let's come out with a wotus that works because i can tell you businesses, farmers, legislators , courts, everyone right now knows this wotus ruled that we have is not the right rule. let's quit sticking a flag in the ground and defending the something that doesn't work and let's come up with something that does protect our clean dri

my understanding is we're -- [inaudible] behave yourselves. [laughter] welcome to valentine's day a bit early. i'm jane harman, the president and ceo of the wilson center, and i can't and we can't imagine what the wilson center would look like today if nobody had been smart enough to put jim billington in charge. [applause] we'd have no kennan institute, no wilson quarterly, two projects at the heart of what we do. who knows how many friends, how much wisdom we would have missed out on. .. the one and only president for sure trevor of the carnegie corporation. ishmael the director of the library in alexandria, and they are joining us to celebrate your service. we are also lucky to be joined by the latvian ambassadors to the united states committee acting librarian of congress david howell and jane mcauliffe the director of outreach and delegates to the board. grace mckenna and come i haven't seen her come there she is, whose family has done so much to shape this institution come and diana davis spencer who has been a great friend to our work.

true -- in producing understanding. serving up information in that fashion to the public is not the vocation of a librarian or the aspiration of an intellectual. selectivity, creation and presentation were needed. and as early as 1990, jim was the first to understand that the simple digitization of lots of material and putting it on the internet would simply be the equivalent of bringing that room full of disorganized files to the person's hands delivered through the computers. ah, but bring him a collection created, interlinked to each person's internet, that would be something different. digital creation is all about the selection, preservation, p maintenance, collection and or archiving of these digital assets. it establishes, maintains and adds value to the repositories for present be future use. this is a work that is accomplished by archivists, librarians, scientists, historians and scholars. but it's the design of the links and the explanations that was also targeted to an audience that covers the, k-12 range of

i understand your intention but i also understand that we have been able to have-- [inaudible] >> there a gigantic tone problem. when i come out of my district hearing from people all over the state saying it is a punitive regulating system and when epa comes calling we don't even have a chance to implement rule number one and here comes implementation of rule number two and i am curious especially on wotus because i agree with my colleagues and i would ask you to pull this rule and bring shareholders around this and let's do it right let's do it balanced. i am not calling for one extreme or the other. i believe there is a balance. i can tell you my state does that but my question is this: so when we talk about on one hand you say the epa doesn't tend to regulate every dish and on the other hand we look at actual implementation of the rule in the ditch exemption appears to leave room. so is the ditch exemption automatically given if a business farmer or local government believes its exempt or do they have to prove its exempt? >> the way in which the law works is that if there is a quest

i think people just want to see and understand the technology and understand the data. the concern. people are making life-and-death calls based on this data. they want to understand the why of how these things are happening. emily: the thing is this is a $10 billion company. people think it's a fraud. do you think it's a fraud? do you think it's possible, what she is trying to do? anne: i'm sure it's possible. everything i know about elizabeth, she is somebody who works incredibly hard. i have seen her discipline and how much she is working. again, i'm not close enough to the company to know about the technology. but i think that's what everybody wants to know. everybody is excited about the potential of new technology, but they want to understand what that technology actually is. emily: how do you walk that line between protecting your technology, your trade secrets and being transparent with the industry? anne: she is not required to have the transparency people are asking for. i think that's part of this disconnect that's happening now. the fda has put out guidance,

she's been there she understands in fact what many african americans are saying and what they want.l of these factors coming together i think really paints a picture for hillary of someone who at least has an understanding. because she's been there over time, and tradition, of what many african americans not only want but are thinking and saying about the big-ticket issues of the day. bernie'bernie's really on the lg curve when it comes to that. he's got a lot of ground to make up. he's trying to do it. he's making a mighty effort to do it but the gap is too great at this point. >> contested terrain, clinton and sanders, stay with us. it's "inside story." >> the only live national news show at 11:00 eastern. >> we start with breaking news. >> let's take a closer look. >> you're watching "inside story." i'm ray suarez. the resume, the outlook, the history. as hillary clinton and bernie sanders look for advantage among black voters, contested terrain this time on the program. bill fletcher jr, and earl are farley hutchinson is with me. bill fletcher what is going on and does it matter

don't understand i don't understand. what's going on? and the message, as well as the world scene, who is best qualified? think about it. who is best qualified? arnesen, this idea of idealism versus realism, and achievable. >> let me just say a couple of things. so hillary clinton has been a lawyer. ae has been the spouse of very powerful president. she became a u.s. senator after to new york, where wall street is. wall street is her constituent, remember that, everyone. she ran for president. lost. and barack obama made her state.ry of bernie sanders has been the mayor of a city. burlington. a city that has to survive with capitalism and business. ran for congress. congress in vermont, there's only one. that's how tiny the state is. only one. then he ran for the united states senate. so pott of them have -- both of pretty impressive resumes. and both of them are smart. understand howso the system works. they also understand what you can pass and what you can't. remind you, there is a real machine that doesn't democrat ine is a the white

(mister ed sputters) ed, i thought at least you would understand. it's easier to understand arthur. going, going, gone. sold to gloria for 60 cents. -your money? -oh, here you go. and now girls. girls. all: oh, wow. this brand-new bikini bathing suit that my father won't let me wear. what are my bids? i'll bid 10 cents. gloria, how could you only bid 10 cents for this brand-new bikini? well, my father won't let me wear it, either. anybody have an understanding father? sold to gloria for 10 cents. i wonder how i'd look in a bikini. there's nothing else to auction, and i'm still a dollar short. wait a minute, girls. this last item is this bobby dexter record. who needs that? who needs it? this bobby dexter record's a collector's item. it's the only flop he ever made. i'll bid 25 cents. only 25 cents for i wonder who's sharing your straw? there were only seven of these records sold in the whole world. it's the worst record bobby dexter ever made. he wasn't even bobby dexter then. he was still elmer diggins. hmm, maybe that would make a good souvenir. 55 cents. it's worth a dollar. 65.

i hope you would understand. i can reassure you that when our company comes across information in which there is an immediate threat to life we provide that to the authority. any requests associated with terrorists or would be terrorists we take extremely seriously. >> the female who had gone with a young child to syria and the returned, during the course of the proceedings in court and also the judging coming up the person was found guilty by a jury. it appears she had use social media to advertise her intentions. the whole point, was what i start at the beginning of my question, the concern of what could possibly happen in any way in ordinary print material happens on social media because of the very nature of the company in which -- >> i would draw a strong between sin the pages of the daily mail online and facebook. facebook is a a community of almost 1.6 billion people. billions of things get posted every day. just like the u.k. which is the preparation of 60,000,000, there are some bad people. there are peo

oversight is essential to our ability to understand these issues. some might argue this is one of the world's greatest producers of sheep. i want to make sure we are not getting the wool pulled over our eyes. we need to make sure the information we are receiving reliable. we are asking the right questions, and able to travel the country to assess the conditions. here are some bedrock issues that require more clarity. we need to know how the afghan progress is being measured, what we learned from the challenges of the last year, and how daft capabilities will be addressed going forward? are the afghan forces on a positive trajectory for meeting and sustaining their capability objective? it is apparent our assistance is needed to build and sustain institutions and they need an airforce and sound operational planning. it was reported that military advisors are being sent to southern afghanistan to give additional support to the avgins in that region. in sort the afghans are not ready to secure their own country without assistance from the u.s. and our

it caused panic when people saw people don't understand about guns. media has done a good job dumbing down guns. terrorists are going to find a way to get weapons in an illegal way. their job is to wreak havoc on american soil and any place around the world. larry prat is president of gun owners of america. demetria roberts is former police officer. i want to have a frank conversation about guns. somebody wants a firearm, there is something wrong with that, it is because they don't understand what guns are about. we are having this conversation audience, guns are your best sfrendz friends, more so than the german shepherd? >> i don't have feed my gun. >> armstrong: i like that line. talk about guns. >> you mention some of those advocating fewer guns, no guns, when the president, secretary of state call for the australian example to be our guide, that means getting rid of half the guns we have or more in private hands in the united states. i really wonder if they are willing to show us what it is like for example. idea for the rest of us? we are not go

we are not obdues, we understand what it means, it's been told to us, we grew up with it, we understandt it means, now, because of the death that happened, historic and horrific event at mother emanuel church, finally they are doing what should have been done. >> stay with us, perhaps at sol point in the past couple of weeks, you have been surprised at how rapidly people withdraw their support. are we inching close toing saying hard things to each other about what it means or meant. with we finding a different place for the emblem. embattled flag is the >> at 9:30 - "america tonight" - top investigative reporting, uncovering new perspectives. >> everything that's happening here is illegal. >> then at 10:00 - it's "reports from around the world". >> let's take a closer look. >> antonio mora gives you a global view. >> this is a human rights crisis. >> and at 11:00 - "news wrap-up". clear... concise... complete. >> the only live national news show at 11:00 eastern. >> we start with breaking news. >> let's take a closer look. "inside story". ja you're watching "inside story", i'm ray suare

i hope you would understand. i can reassure you that when our company comes across information in which there is an immediate threat to life we provide that to the authority. any requests associated with terrorists or would be terrorists we take extremely seriously. >> the female who had gone with a young child to syria and the returned, during the course of the proceedings in court and also the judging coming up the person was found guilty by a jury. it appears she had use social media to advertise her intentions. the whole point, was what i start at the beginning of my question, the concern of what could possibly happen in any way in ordinary print material happens on social media because of the very nature of the company in which -- >> i would draw a strong between sin the pages of the daily mail online and facebook. facebook is a a community of almost 1.6 billion people. billions of things get posted every day. just like the u.k. which is the preparation of 60,000,000, there are some bad people. there are peo

. >> we want to understand the evolution of these pathogens. >> this team deals with the planet. >> all the damage microscopic agent. lindsay moran is ex-c.i.a., she's about to join them. entering a biolab. >> sorry, we cannot confirm your identity concern? >> what is going to be like ebola, but we haven't seen it yet. dr charlotte mcshane is a mechanical engineer. tonight what she learnt about tornados. phil torres. i'm phil torres. 'm an entomologist. that's hour team, nout let's do some science. >>> hey, guys, welcome to "techknow", joined by dr ross shimabuku, and lindsay moran. microscopic things have been making news. viruses. take ebola - it caught america offguard. in some places we overreacted and in other places we doesn't do enough. >> there's a lot of scare around ebola, because we don't know much about it, compared to measles. which is also a hot topic. >> when we think of diseases we tend to think of containment. how do we contain them. i had an opportunity to meet a small group of scientists who are seeking out the pathogens in order to understand it. it might surprise pe

i understand the money we asked for, i understand that gsa intends to have whoever wins the bid take our existing building and partial payments, but i do not understand enough about the working capital. i will give you a smart answer but i cannot answer right now. >> to know what the intended use of the present building would be? >> i think gsa's idea is to sell it to a developer, the developer, the developer who built our building will get a partial payments of the current building and can develop it however the local law allows him to develop it. hotel or office building or something like that. it will be using that object as partial payment of the new building. >> this is a gsa deal, that is is my understanding of how they will do it. >> has there been a site for the new building. >> no, it it is narrow to three possibles. this year the competing developers and builders will offer their proposals and it will be a selection thereafter to pick which of the sites is the smartest one. two are in maryland, one by the greenbelt metro, one by fedex field, the third site is in springfield

we better not think like them, we better understand how they think. you don't disregard how rattlesnakes might behave if you get to close to them. by the same token, we should not ignore warning signs of the criminal world and when we see people behaving in a totally self-centered way, i almost used narcissistic. that is a bad sign. about it, this is a sad commentary. things are not going to get better. whether americans like it or not, they will arm themselves. that is the good news. these criminals are not going to change. >> after san bernardino, i saw a picture of a gun store, the line went all the way around the store out of sight in just the sign of san bernardino where it probably wasn't politically correct to have a gun, it is now. >> armstrong: it is common sense. they see the writing on the wall, as much as i respect law enforcement and will do everything to protect me if they are there, they are not going to be there. they can't. >> this is why i appreciate this platform, armstrong. the same. criminals agenda's have been the same. publicall

elisa: do you understand the difference betwn a weather watch and warning? if an advisory is issued... is that a downgrade? these are questions causing some head scratching and its prompting the national weather service to research some changes. they're teaming up with social scientists to better understand how people take in and use weather risk information. how should meteorologists protray information to prompt you to take action and move to your basement in the event of a tornado? for some, the near 70 year old system just isn't doing that. "the watch warning system has been around for a number of years, and it's probably the most misunderstood concept that the national weather service has as far as the public understanding the difference between a watch and a warning... even though when we say 'watch' it means 'watch out... watch the sky', with a warning...'take warning'. but, people get those 'wa-wa' words, if you will, misunderstood" says coordination meteorologist at nws sioux falls. on top of terminology... colors are

the process. >> reporter: understanding the government customer means understanding the unique producteeds. >> the government is looking to purchase recycled products. that's a key initiative. we are able to provide recycled products like toner cartridges. >> reporter: understanding what products appeal to the government led rose disease mary to buy two smaller companies to broaden the product line. >> our first acquisition was gizmo, a fun, hip, technology-based company. in may of 2015 we purchased a company based in van nuys called in ink for all. it just sold toner and ink. gorilla sells toner, ink, janitorial and paper products. >> reporter: michael has stayed on to better integrate his company with rosemary's. so far it's working as planned. >> she inquired about acquiring ink for all. maybe this is better for us. it turned out to be great. helping our section of the company grow. >> reporter: prior to the acquisition michael had no government customers. now the ink and toner portion of the business is a big seller at gorilla, especially for the government customer looking for spe

we are not obdues, we understand what it means, it's been told to us, we grew up with it, we understandt it means, now, because of the death that happened, historic and horrific event at mother emanuel church, finally they are doing what should have been done. >> stay with us, perhaps at sol point in the past couple of weeks, you have been surprised at how rapidly people withdraw their support. are we inching close toing saying hard things to each other about what it means or meant. with we finding a different place for the emblem. embattled flag is the >> our american story is written everyday. it's not always pretty, but it's real... and we show you like no-one else can. this is our american story. this is america tonight. "inside story". ja you're watching "inside story", i'm ray suarez, as we consider the revived debate, argument, reassess reassessment use and abuse of the confederate flag, my guests are with me. we know that the art has not ended with the flag. people are looking at monuments, forts named for confederate generals, halls across the south on college campuses. where d

for us our work has been how do we understand the two. for us, the movement and the moment of black lives matter offered an opportunity to talk about state violence and understand what's happening in our schools both from closings and the prison pipeline. as government power that hurts, government power that harms, it's the education of young people that color receive is the education that teaches them their place and is not lost at its call for school in prison pipeline. where i work now it's beginning to think about what next. for us and the young people and the folks who do it, we have this vision of education and before there was the diet 13, it was the students who showed up to us cool that was supposed to be close demanding an education. we've also begun to understand what's happening in the united states as an international crisis. we want to understand what we are now calling educational colonialism which is what we know as privatization is an international movement. it will take an international movement if her going to liberate

we are not obdues, we understand what it means, it's been told to us, we grew up with it, we understandt it means, now, because of the death that happened, historic and horrific event at mother emanuel church, finally they are doing what should have been done. >> stay with us, perhaps at sol point in the past couple of weeks, you have been surprised at how rapidly people withdraw their support. are we inching close toing saying hard things to each other about what it means or meant. with we finding a different place for the emblem. embattled flag is the >> what in god's name makes you think that you can handle stress, anxiety, depression... post-traumatic stress? >> the closest i got was sitting in my truck, gun in hand. >> who will save america's heroes? >> i wish he'd been able to talk to somebody. >> "faultlines". >> what do we want? >> al jazeera america's hard-hitting... >> today the will be arrested. >> ground-breaking... >> they're firing canisters of gas at us. >> emmy award-winning, investigative series. "inside story". ja you're watching "inside story", i'm ray suarez, as we c

issue is, understand how it's been resolved, and understand a general view of how. the reason we write our opinions is because we have to justify the antidemocratic position we are in. if you don't like what the president is doing, vote him out of office. if you don't like what your congressman is doing, you control him or her out of office. if you don't like what we are doing, it's too bad. [laughter] processuse of that, the has developed that we have to justify ourselves. have to explain to you why we issued this decision. the congress doesn't have to if slain to anybody why they are pursuing a certain course. the president doesn't have to explain the actions he has taken. they are are entitled to do what they do because the people elected them. andre interpreting the law not imposing our own views. and to make sure that is the case, we explain it to you. would like to thank that intelligent laypeople can understand that explanation. if you will like the explanation and don't think it holds together, than they are justified in viewing us is having transgressed the

nobody understands that more than me. one of the crucial resource we have in america is clean drinking water. is water to water our crops. we all want the same thing but the rule that we have now does not accomplish that. but we're so entrenched that we have to have this rule and i think if you would repeal the rules, step back, get with congress, get with farmers, get with environmentalists, get a whole group of people in a room and say what do i want to achieve and what's the most effective way to do that and let's all take our pride out of it. we're all prideful regardless of what we are. but to get back to the humility and get the smart people in the room. gate group or a commission and come out with something that works. i can tell you that businesses, farmers, legislators, courts, everyone right now knows this rule we have is not the right rule. let's quit sticking a flag in the ground and defending something that doesn't work and let's come up with something that does protect our clean drinking water and mr. chairm

i understand your intentions but also understand i have been around long enough so we had great gainsas a country with a partner in the epa and when we talk about humility and attitude there's a gigantic stone problem. when i come out of my district hearing people from all over the state saying it is the punitive regulating system and the epa comes calling, don't even have a chance to implement rule number one and here comes implementation of rule number 2 and i am kiri is especially on lotus because i agree with my colleagues, i would ask you if you bring shareholders around us and we do it right, do it balanced. not calling for one extreme or the other. i believe there's a balance between good stewards of the economy and i can tell you my state does that but my question is this. when we talk about on the one hand you say the epa doesn't regulate but we look at implementation of the rule, this extension leaves some room. here is my question. is a ditch exemption given if a business, farm or local government believes it is exempt or do they have to prove it is exempt? >> the way in wh

they think it was an outcome of understanding that we need to understand the lifecycle and all of the challenges associated with clean air and other requirements that are being placed on our constituencies including farmers, ranches and foresters and it was an open dialogue to understand how our rules can enhance not just their health and our health but their viability as a sector. i think that's what sustainability is intended to make sure that we are thinking about the senate common sense holistic way not a narrow media by media approach. >> i agree that you didn't give the legal authority to the epa. what i'm looking for is do you see and that act the legal authority to regulate sustainability? >> we do not regulate sustainability. we do regulate pollutants under the clean air act. one of which are greenhouse gases. if that is what you are referring to that's because under the clean air act the supreme court clearly told us that we had to look at greenhouse gases as a potential pollutants and if we found that they were in endangerment and we had to take appropriate action. that is

i think it was an outcome of understanding that we need to understand the life cycle and all of the challenges associated with clean air and other requirements being placed on constituencies including farmers, ranchers and foresters. it was an open dialogue to understand how our rules can enhance not just their health and our health, but viability as a factor. that is why it is intended to make sure we think about this and they commonsense holistic way, not a media by media approach. >> i agree. it didn't give legal authority to the epa. do you see in that act political authority to regulate sustainability? >> we do not regulate sustainability. we do regulate pollutants under the clean air act, one of which are greenhouse gases. if that is what you are referring to, that is because under the clean air act, the supreme court clearly told us we have to look at greenhouse gases as a potential pollutant. and if we found favor in danger and that, we had to take appropriate action. that action. that is what we are actually doing. >> could you have someone on your staff get me a copy of that? i'd app

it comes from an understanding of the limitations of our being and an understanding of the world.to achieve that self command, which by the way is a word that smith used we must first accept ourselves for who we are, instinctively driven, joys, joyous, self-interested, focused on the short term, and ruled by habit, not a pretty picture. we combine that however with external powers of reason of deception, analysis, imagination and choice. we are also deeply social and we need fellowship. the challenge is to bring these together in harmony, rooted in passion to imagine a sustainable human future that promotes individual well-being and observes the reality of our environmental circumstance. we are privileged to be living in confusing times. nothing is more at -- which in its promotional material gruffly and creeping inequality floods with self-destruction and the ecological sense. but how do we get out from under this avalanche of? adam smith considered three values, fairness, benevolence and prudence. these elements of character are ground in the infancy and crafted over a lifetime,

>> paul: i understand. >> patty: no, you don' t understand, paulie! >> paul: i know, baby. >> patty: no, she' s evil! she' s pure evil! [ knock on door ] >> paul: okay. all right. come in! s out front. >> paul: uh, all right. all right, patty, it' s time to go. >> patty: no. where? >> paul: you' re gonna go back to fairview. >> patty: [ voice breaking ] paulie, no. >> paul: no, i know. >> patty: no, paulie. >> paul: i know you don' t want to. >> patty: i don' t want to go. >> paul: it' s the best place for you right now, okay? >> patty: you get your hands off me! >> paul: patty, no! >> patty: get them off! >> paul: patty, stop! >> patty: i won' t! can' t make me go back there! >> paul: stop! >> patty: no, don' t make me go t! >> patty: no, i don' go! >> paul: i know you don' listen to me! >> paul: you' re gonna be fine. >> patty: no, this isn' t right, paulie. >> paul: listen. >> patty: it' s not fair! t do this! >> paul: look at me! >> patty: no! >> paul: i want you to go out and get in that van. and officer milburn is gonna stay with you and make su

what i don't understand is, why dr. house and mr. milnerhouse a provide those details to the committee. you didn't just say -- both of you. you didn't just say you can't. you said your companies won't provide those companies publicly. >> mr. milner. >> i'm happy to take that. i will check again with my colleagues. my understanding is -- we've been asked this question before. it's not information that we make public. but i will ask again. >> dr. house. >> we're in a similar situation. >> and you're right to ask on that. >> okay, my two points. one was for twitter and the other was for all of you. i just want to check one thing that was reported in april of last year, mr. pickles. this was in the daily mail which is why i want to check whether or not it's factually correct. is it true that more than 1,000 accounts linked to daish militants and their supporters were suspended in a 24-hour period in a fresh crackdown on those tweeting violent threats? is that correct? >> to date, we have definitely suspended more than tens of thousands o

that as it will take a long time for all of us to understand it. if you look at our customers, we have 90 million mobile phone bankers, 30 million computer bankers. the amount of volume on those devices rose 20% a year. the amount of customers continues to grow. the ability to talk to them, transact with them, give the notifications when they are traveling, the ability to tell us all of the different things that used to bother people. they have to call and wait to tell people they are traveling. these are amazing things. it will take a while for regulation to come. i think the clear thing, the basic principle will be it is an activity you have to regulate, regulate it across all of the participants otherwise you end up with arbitrage. that is the struggle, regulators are trying to catch up to people who are not under the tent, so to speak. john: is there a particular area where you see the risk or is it other businesses like money transfer and foreign-exchange? they seem to be pecking away at you. brian: it is all of those. in the lending side, you

but it also understands individuals who have been with them for a very, very long time. carolina for a number of days. i was in south carolina in 2008, i understand these are hard working people with a great history, and they understand the bread and butter issues that secretary clinton has been talking about for decades. being in south carolina, fighting against incarcerating young black boys and adult jail. fighting against segregated schools in alabama. it's about relationships. and then, again, this time around, she has been unabashedly, unashamed about talking about the divided issues. and as a woman who has worked in diverse communities, they feel comfortable that she is comfortable with diversity. and that she can both feel their joy and their pain. but the bread and butter issues of what the campaign and secretary clinton have been talking about, and it's resinating among women, and i think that's important because it's not just south carolina, this is a message that's going to carry secretary clinton to the white house and the overall -- >> are you worried congr

>> my understanding is yes. i don't want to give inaccurate information as to how broad that circle was. >> dozens, 30? 50? >> i don't know the answer to that zbli would like to know how many employees in the epa knew that this children of flint were being poisoned and didn't care. the next question for ms. walters, i would like to thank you for what you've done. can i ask your educational background. do you have any special training that allowed you to seem to exsuppose this thing? >> i have my degree as a medical assistant and i just decided to start researching and educating myself about water trying to figure out what was going on after i was publicly humiliated by the state in a public meeting with the citizens. >> shows once more time having a lot of heart is more important than having a lot of worthless college degrees. thank you very much for what you've done. next question for -- only mr. edwards would know the answer to this. u want to find out exactly physically how many people in each of the three re

in article two, you see him an interesting," pointe uses, to a ambassadors and he understands exactly the powers that are his and those he must delegate to other important branches of congress. auctioneering] >> i am the international head of books and manuscripts for christie's and we are here with one of the significant items that we have ever handled, the acts of congress that are assigned an annotated by him in the margins. copy of theington's constitution and he outlined his role as president and sets a precedent for the future. so, it is significant. we do not always have things that are historically significant on that level. this is unique beyond compare. asked about the acquisition and i knew that it was a top priority acquisition and within our category of returning original objects to mount vernon and it was crucial to the formation of the early years of government as an american experiment with democracy and, in terms of washington's wonderful legacy, it is above a top priority, you could say, to have the magnificent work like this where it can be appreciated and enjoyed e

to help them understand what they were hearing. so the role that you played with the members of congress. with the rapidly changing world of the people it is immensely important. but in the broadest experience to take institutions the library of the federation that was a straitjacket for three-quarters of a century but the arcade access controls that was parceled out by rate. the libraries were not designed for people to go read or explore for the people who needed to know something with admiration. he brought to friends in in russia to become a partner to find ways to open up russia's libraries. he pushed the american-led military from libraries closing in europe helped the russians libraries understand modern library techniques. he opened up entirely new connections to a world he headed the counter with. in to organize and understand the past bin with the russian federation would of the problems we had as the american government to have a diplomatic representation that was designed to fight the cold war which more or less mitt we

so i had something of an understanding of the region, and i had an instinctive interest and curiosity because of my heritage. but it was my husband who had to persuade me through his faith in what we could be together, because i kept asking myself, "could i possibly be the right partner for him? i'm an independent young woman who has worked in many different parts of the world, and lived a very independent and unconventional life, and i am... i'm a relatively unconventional personality." and so it was his love and his faith that had to win over my confidence in... that i might be the right partner for him. because i cared and respected and admired his work for peace in the middle east, and i cared enough for him as a person at that moment that i didn't want to in any way be a liability. and the relations of the united states with the middle east have been very, very complex, very... very difficult over generations now. and i didn't want to be a liability for him. so yes, his love had to win... win me... and his faith. it was his faith in us that won me over. >> hinojosa: and i was wri

this is an active crime scene, do you understand? do you understand? stop right there. it, it's okay. let him through. charlie. charlie? chare? he's over there. hey. hey, charlie, how you doing? it's okay, really. it's fine. they weren't violent. there were two of them. why 16 robberies exactly the same, and then this? i mean, first of all, nobody ever tried to stop them, right? and it wasn't just two guys. you know, they had four backing them up. yeah. we had no way of knowing till we confronted them. that's it. yore good to go. nothing to dad, right? charlie. dot say anything to dad. i'll take care of it, okay? you heard me, right? charm school boys. i mean, i'm sorry, they came prepared for war. davi we've got people looking to see if the same accomplic were present at those incidents as well. and there's no doubt in my mind that was a detaile ambush-and-escape plan. and didn't hesitate to kill. ( sighs) well, from what i understand, in the last five years, this office has lost only two agents in the line of fire? mm-hmm. mcknight's parents are flying in from denver

veezeveeze and she didn't understand why that happened and that was unfortunate. one of the other things that i'm aware of. i'm a plaintiff on a lawsuit to roll back the texas voter i.d. law and a lot of our young people when they go to college, they get identification from our universities. and these are good. and campus police officers or need to be able to use the i.d.'s to get on a plane or anything like that, they can use the college i.d.'s. a lot of our young people if they go to vote and show their student i.d. cards that is issued by the state of texas, they cannot vote. hey can be given a provisional ballot. and it discourages them from voting. we need to engage young people. one of the things i hear from young people, for instances like he young lady with we heard, same-day registration and encourages young people to participate in voting but a lot of states like the one i was in they won't take that initiative or that extra effort to engage in people and so many of our young people feel our system is rigid against them. and it is unfortunate. and i woul