but understanding that's attributable to the fact that other people understand. they give them no information about it. and now they understand. so think about this in the last election. imagine everyone around you things they understand why hillary is cricket. or, let's be fair, they understand why diversity is affected. nearly the fact that everybody else understands, if understanding is contagious in the way that were suggested it will give you a sense of understanding. if everybody sense of understanding with everybody around them having a sense of understanding then they couldn't have a lot of confidence and belief based on nothing. it's basically house of cards. the last thing is to draw up -- science, c intelligence, decision-making, technology, and one or two other things that are not remembering. that's what the book is about. >> as a reader of the book and some related things that a film that was new and let me to things in a different way is it great to read as well. maybe we can put you on the couch, so it's interesting especially with someone writes

all we say is other people understand and now they understand. is so think about this in the context of, say, to pick a random example, the last election, right? imagine everyone around you thinks they understand why hillary is crooked or, you know, let's be fair, maybe everyone around you thinks they understand why diversity is effective, right? merely the fact that everybody else understands -- if understanding is contagious in the way we're suggesting -- is going to give you a sense of understanding. and if everybody's sense of understanding is a result of everybody else, everybody around them having a sense of understanding, then we can have a lot of confidence and belief based on nothing, right? confidence that's essentially a house of cards. so finally, the last thing we do in the book is we draw out the implications of these ideas for a number of things, science, literacy, our understanding of intelligence, decision making, technology, and something, one or two other things that i'm not remembering at the moment. that's what the book's abo

they understand how it works. they've discovered it. and not surprisingly people said and understand it all. another group same thing scientists had discovered the system of helium rain. they understand how it works. and now people say they feel like they fully understand helium rain but there is a little in understanding that is attributable to the fact that people understand the get them no information about it. and now they understand. take about this in the context of say the last election. imagine everyone around you thinks they understand why hillary is crooked. let's be fair maybe everybody around you thinks they understand why diversity is affected. merely the fact that everybody else understands if understanding is contagious in the way we are suggesting it's good to give you a sense of understanding. and if everybody says that has a sense of understanding. then we can have a lot of confidence in belief based on nothing. finally the last thing we do in the book as we draw out the implications of these ide

he understands racism is bad. a 12-year-old understands that. but he also doesn't like this thing he's calling the alt-left because they don't like him and so when he thinks about the people that are really egregious, he thinks people who are racist and want to hurt people, of course that's not good, just like i shouldn't punch one of my friends but on the other hand he doesn't like the left because they don't like him and he finds them shrill so it has to be both sides. i'm suppose tod say that he is a racist to himself and he's dog whistling to a certain element of the electorate, etc. i think that it gives him more credit as a thinking being than is necessary. steve bannon has told him to watch out and he's probably got that in his ear and so he thinks well, my job is to not step on those people and he wouldn't want to anyway because the people who want to do evil things such as take confederate statues down or combat racists, they're mean too because they're mean to him. >> you don't think his world view has pushed us in that direction when

are in, understand your caveats, understand your resources, understand the culture, understand all the relationship with the various. once you understand that you need to visualize how you going to take the resources you have available and in time and space based on your understanding of the problem such as that your visualization results in a position of advantage with regards to the resources you have available. then once you visualize how you're going to get a position of advantage, you describe your visualization to your subordinates, to the people left the right of you, the members of the coalition, to your subordinates, your superiors. you describe your visualization so that you come to a common understanding of the problem. once you have this common understanding you visualize how you'll solve it, you've described the vision relation to everybody involved the results in a common understanding, you then direct, late, says. you will still give direction but you don't give direction until you've done this part, and this is generally the most difficult part. especially in a complexi

understand that this is not full swing. it's something that has completely come up to the top again and has momentum. it is recruiting hundreds of thousands of young people in this country and abroad. it's probably just as dangerous if not more in europe because there is a sense of historical nationalism. and we need to speak up and not being afraid to speak up but also know where to draw the line where that becomes an ideological battle because at 18-years-old if you told me i was wrong or if you had canceled my gym membership for anything that's happening for some of the people today, i would have come back with a gun. it wouldn't have deterred me or change to buy was. so, we have to find a way to connect with the people that are sometimes the ugliest account. and i know it's not for everybody. i know it's not something there are groups that are on the left that are anti-racists to try to solve it with violence and what i see happening is the right becoming more violent and growing because now they are killing more margin

do you understand what is behind that the client? what if it is so far outside the area where they have flood insurance but it won't cover? floodse that have insurance fee to be activating their policies. those who don't will be dealing with the small business administration and looking at low-interest loans. they also have a disaster declaration. outside,e uninsured smallxt step will be the business administration. i don't know the answer to that. i am sorry. i'm not familiar with that vocalist issue. thes there any update on [indiscernible] >> i don't have an update on that at this time. we are working with mexico and canada to take advantage of their offers of support. there is one local airport that is open, but they did cancel their flight for today. heard when their opening. we expect the rainfall to continue for another 24 to 36 hours, then it will take a while for the rain to go away. the main airports remain close. d. >> thanks, folks. president trump will be in missouri to take to talk about changing the u.s. tax code in ab

do you understand what's behind that decline? because the flood is so far outside the area where people have flood insurance, what's the advice for homeowners? >> so very simply put, those that have flood insurance need to be activating their nfip policies. those that don't will most likely be dealing with the small business administration and looking at low interest loans antipathies because they also have a disaster declaration through sba. typically anything, if you're uninsured outside the nfip, the next of the most likely going to be the small business association. >> what's behind the decline in numbers of people who have interest? >> i don't know the answer to that. i'm sorry, i'm not familiar with that localized issue

we have a powerful he turns most powerful in the world the north koreans understand that and they understand that we're prepared to use it i think it does not hurt to repeat a statement like. we know we have an obligation and we will support that obligation to defend our ally south korea japan if north korea use a nuclear weapon against them or for that if they try to use them against us if they do that we will respond to the woman for us i don't think we have to be theatrical about that force what that force is a north korean understand it very well. you said you see the u.s. and north korea heading for some form of conflict. what kind of conflict. well north korea has always been reckless and their program cations against south korea so it's easy to imagine they might conduct some kind of a provocation which would lead into a military conflict even a small military conflict but small military conflict would very quickly get out of the hands of the leaders in the countries and escalate into a major military conflict if we had another conventional war with north korea it's one that they woul

he doesn't understand how jobs are created. this is a guy who is not a great businessman and he doesn't relate to great businessmen and women. >> thank you both. i appreciate it. at the top of the hour, president trump defiant in the face of national outrage. sources telling cnn that he has no regret saying they share the blame for the violence in charlottesville. that violence took the life of heather hire. we'll hear from her mother and i'm going to talk to her pastor in just a few moments right here on cnn tonight. it's easy to over look the fact that the charlottesville violence began after white nationalists began to march the protest the aremoouvl of a state of robert e. lee. president trump. >> this week it's robert e. lee. i notice stonewall jackson's coming down. i wonder is it george washington next week and thomas jefferson the week after? you have to ask yourself where does it stop? >> the debate about what to do with confederate memorials taking place overnight. gainesville taking down a statue that stood over 100

right understanding. okay? that's a more positive statement of their understanding of religious liberty than you're free to belief what they believe or get out. over simplification. but it makes a point. okay, another thing. religious government officials had no business getting involved in religious affairs. keep your hands off. that cannot be a true religion which needs carnal weapons to uphold it. anybody want to translate that one for me? that cannot be a true religion which needs carnal weapons to uphold it. okay. yeah, go ahead. >> is it like the you saying carnal weapons. so flesh weapons. the things that we as humans have made up. not spiritual. >> what sort of can you be more specific? >> carnal weapons. force, coercion. >> specifically wielded by whom? >> the government officials. >> there you go. if you need government help to prop your religion up, then it's really not a true religion. is what he's saying here. a true religion doesn't need that. and that's what you're getting at why he's so passiona

and they didn't understand. there was even one point where my mom, bless her heart, said why do you like this guy like go for someone italian like alod capone at least or something like that. [laughter] >> she would've tried everything possible to get me away from when i was involved in and i have to tell you that thanks to my parents i am here today because they never gave up on me that's the white house calling. >> not this white house. >> on that very grateful for the fact my parents did not give up on. they would never give up, even when i didn't have a good relationship and i had-- i wanted nothing to do with them and i thought why can't you understand what i'm telling you. i really thought i was saving the world. if they had given up on me, i don't know that i would be here now.here. >>) to. >> how do you propose that we as a nation get rid of the hate because of someone like trump who encourages and thinks it's okay to punch that person in the face and how does that make it right? how do we get the change

and we understand it as part of our birthright. recognizing that we have responsibilities as citizens to understand and apply that to the present so that we can pass it on to the future. that farewell address is an inspired -- is an inspiring document. it is durable wisdom and that is why it was such an honor to write the book. >> we will get into the real substance of the address at the moment. could be a good place to begin, recognizing that is not the first farewell address. getting farewell addresses was not something washington likes to do with something he had thought about before. >> he had a genius for goodbye. -- and i think it's a measure of both his innate modesty and his understanding of politics that he knew that absence could be a higher form of presence. he knew that the person being pursued is always more desirable than the person doing the pursuing. washington's first farewell address was when he was on his commission as commander of the continental army. you have to understand, in a life full of firsts, this was t

charlie: i understand by the this is a microcosm. the main argument for turning point usa is will you thrive in a diverse opinion. they are a microcosm of what the united states is as a larger unit. you really front-loaded your argument. you through your opinions out there but -- the hasan: first of all, we really don't have a narrow definition of safe space. it seems to me that conservatives are both claiming that liberals are looking for safe spaces but then they also try to act like they are the victims themselves. so which is at, charlie? charlie: i am looking for the ability to speak freely. i'm not playing victim. i am happy to speak freely. here is where it is different. when ben shapiro goes to a paul university and by the way the young turks did a segment saying this was wrong. hold on a second. he went to napalm and the administration disinvited him. this happens thousands of times a semester. hasan: over 500 documented cases of conservative -- charlie: >> do you feel as though the reason for why there is such backlash towa

because we understand even other. we understand where we came from. and we help each other through this thing called life. we've been very successful with that. i would say over -- since we launched the program in 2015 -- i have to say hi to tony in the background, our board chair. he happened to be in new york at the same tome. toneis also a former, and it's good to have him here. we have helped people disengage and start good lives, people going on to get their ph.ds, people who are teachers, people who for the first time, because they've been able to talk about this, have been able to work through the issues that have broken them for many years. very proud of that. i just want to talk about some of the types of thing -- things we see. this young girl, call her. >> 17 years old from florida. her parents contacted us bass they were concerned she was making neonazi prop began to videos on youtube. also dating a 23-year-old boy from idaho. some is in florida. who was recruiting her, has written the scripts for the videos and had become her virtual boyf

understanding the pronoun.ck to our story, i'm i guess i did not stick to my notes -- to get back to our story, what he said i havet come to you from the companions of god's messenger. they witnessed the revelation. this is important because he said they witnessed the revelation and they are more knowledgeable of the koran then you are. there is not one of them amongst you, all of these 6000, who have considered the rest of the muslim nation to be non-muslim. there is not one companion who witnessed the revelation who were with mohammed and saw his teachings, is not one of them amongst you. to show them that in order to understand this religion properly, you must understand it coupled with that interpretation. , whatsaid to them grievances do you have against the khalifa? they mention three grievances and i will only mention one because the rest are related to the koran and for the sake of time. they said to him, as was the first thing they mentioned, our main grievance against him is that he brought other peop

her grasp and understanding of the -- having only a tenth grade education, but the kind of worldly understandingthat she possessed. i don't know where she got that from. tried to understand my grandmother, who in a certain kind of adventurous spirit, the male side of the family, which is pretty much unknown for me. so she is kind of the -- a resource over the years and moving us around the community of detroit for the most part when i talk about my history in the city, it's really her history. and the close read of it, people will find immediately who she is and what she meant to not only my understanding of the history but her whole life. it's her biography of her life and i know some degree she takes exception -- don't be be putting my business on the street, that kind of attitude, and i can understand that. i think that's instructive. think the lessons of her life should be shared with a much larger population than just our family. i think what she has meant to me and i try to convey that. try to capture what i feel is the essence of her spirit, and because at 97 years of age, she still expre

you do not have to be a phd to understand how to take care of yourself. i use this analogy, i tell people that we are not going to beat, and i would argue, james clapper, reads this to the house armed services committee, back in 2015, he said, the cyber threat will never be eliminated. i agree with that. everything that we do in lsu, it starts with that premise. will will never eliminate this threat, we have lived for millennia, with the flu virus, and never eradicated it. we learned to live with it. you do certain things when you know that you are exposed, and when the flu was going around, you inoculate yourself, you isolate yourself from folks who have it. that youare measures take in the physical world, that we now have to take in the digital world. we have a hard time getting her head wrapped around that. now, with social media the way it is, and i will talk about that in a few minutes, people don't understand it. they do not always understand the0s.and >> you said he would talk about social media? jeff: absolutely. in my mind, social media is danger

you got to understand the centrality it has. it was more widely reprinted then the declaration of independence. it's number of reprints spiked during times of national crisis, particularly washington's death and the war of 1812. in the run-up to the war, it is bandied about because washington warns us against secession and disunity. andrew jackson's entire federal address -- entire farewell address is basically a rumination on washington's wisdom in the farewell address, saying when washington wrote that, we didn't know the constitution would work. we know it works now. don't be seduced by the claims of secession which were being --anced by his former vibe vice president, johnson calderon. -- john calhoun. daniel webster and other folks are arguing both sides of it. abraham lincoln uses a risk from the farewell address as part of his core 1860 stop speech justifying the newly formed republican party against attacks. it is not a regional party. it is a national party, and a party of progress, which i think is sometimes lost. duri

, his unique understanding of the political process. you really are quite original insight that he won a nobel prize economic sense for him in the teen 86. driven by -- guided by his ideas and driven by a libertarian morality that says it would be better to let people die from lack of health care if they cannot afford to pay for it on their own to receive it from government. i think it is extremely important for us to understand that it is a coherent ethical system and it is frankly for some people a kind of fanaticism that is shaping our public policy as we gather here. so the bottom-line idea here is that what they really mean by personal responsibility is that you should be on your realm. you should be a self responsible individual and if you fail to pay for your future needs, whether that's health care, retirement security, whether that is your children's college or your own, your failure will teach other people that they need to conduct their lives differently and start saving from the moment they become sent in. okay, so i want to

and i can sort of understand.as a journalist, i've had plenty of people being upset when they get stuff they don't want to see out. so there's an element there. but john kelly is a four-star marine corps general. and you have an active serving general. general to general, mcmaster said, reince priebus made it really difficult to bring in my people. i need to be able to hire and fire my own staff. that in the military, you're the commander. you get to choose your own staff. that's understood. i think kelly said, yes, two generals can understand that. and that is why we've seen these firings of some of the people who i know are, you know, the president likes, and i know that people around the president likes. and it doesn't necessarily mean they're out of the administration. but i think that, you know, mcmaster is trying to keep the people who he believes are loyal to him and are the no going to go around him in the internal white house wars and so forth, and that's where that's coming from. >> the president put out

because he doesn't understand diplomatic language. >> using language that kim jong-un doesn't understandomatic languages. is that a legitimate argument? >> he does understand the nuances of language and the north koreans are conveying messages between the lines. as a long-time watcher of north korea and what they say, i think they do understand the diplomatic language and they get the message. >> your former colleague, defense secretary leon panetta from the obama administration said the united states is facing the most dangerous situation since the cuban missile crisis. do you agree? >> i'm not sure that it's reached that magnitude. i lived through the tree cutting incident in 1976. i was air force intelligence officer pacific command headquarters and -- >> that's when some north korean soldiers went and killed two americans. >> killed two american soldiers. and i've, again, comparing that episode with this, i think the eminence of war feeling but that is not to say this is not a very incendiary situation. when i served in korea many years ago, what i was worried about was an incendiary

i don't think they understand the ideological understanding we have had. i teach with my great brilliant lawrence bovo. and it is called african, african-american studies 110. introduction of african-american studies, what the kids call blackness 101. we start with the 18th century. the whole class is built around debate that the black people have had over what it means to be black. there never was one way to be black, never, not one time. >> professor luis gates is our guest. he has a series called >> welcome back to the armstrong williams show. i was reading a recent -- >> can i ask you a question? >> sure. >> i think it is important for people to under that it -- to understand that it hurts you when you are attacked. it hurts you when -- all. >> come on. really? >> when people are vicious. >> why? >> i tell you why. >> protect yourself. >> i have learned from being in that laboratory every night at sirius radio is that people don't know you. i found through dialogue and discussions that people who used to say those things, have apologized that i didn't

so i understand that. as a liberal i understood to be race blind is the idea character matters, not skin color. the left is the first ideology since the nazis to say race is important. i'm not comparing them to nazis. nazis are uniquely evil. i'm stating a fact, not an opinion. no one held race was important, only racists, neo nazis and now "the washington post," "new york times" and every college you go to. they believe race is important. but the university of california has issued a list of micro agregsz. you all know what micro aggressions are, right? here's an example of a racist micro aggression, a statement people make thinking it's nice but it's really, get it, racist. if you say there is only one race, the human race, you are a racist, according to the left wing leaders of the university of california. check it, folks, check it. my credibility rides on every comment i make. i know that, i'm very careful before god and man never to exaggerate. that is listed as a statement of racism, to say there is

while i understand, you know, i understand some of the protests, i understand some of the groups and i understand that -- their message. i understand that, but these are not -- these are not really helping people in the long run, and i know peter's going to disagree with me, but we've got a lot of things going on. we've got health care. we've got people that need health care, alex. we've got to come together and pass that, you know?

because we have to understand what their doing with people who don't go along to understand how they deal with problems. because then that will help us understand what happens in 1692. with the witch trials. how does that make sense from their perspective. all right even if it seems insane from ours. all right. let's talk about a couple people. some you have heard about before. some you may not have. let's talk about a gentleman by the name of roger williams. you should have heard about him at some point in your history class. high school or here. the university. he was a charismatic young professor. cam bridge university educated. arrived in massachusetts bay colony in 1630s and became the minister out of a town northeast of boston called salem. salem town not village. remember we learn quickly they were two different places. very close by. he was really one of our first true champions in what became the united states of true religious freedom. what we would understand of separation of church and state. we'll look at his ideas about that. and how he articulated it. and why he articu

i understand that. a very important point you make is the effects, the lingering effects of jim crow continues today. racism continues. i think that is why we should keep those monuments up. they are tangible evidence in prominent places in cities throughout the united states. they are evidence of the dark days of jim crow segregation. i think that is precisely why we should leave them up. when we take them down, it is much easier to forget that there were once people in charge who did not want african-americans to vote, who wanted segregation in housing, schools, education, who celebrated the war to maintain slavery. i think you make an important case for continuing to keep up these tangible and important and significant reminders of the days of jim crow. host: the historian john meacham has an op ed in "the new york times" this morning, talking about statues on what you do for washington and jefferson? he says they were largely creatures of their time and yet each also believed in the transcended sign

would understand because kim jong-un doesn't understand diplomatic language.that a legitimate argument? >> well, kim jong-un does understand the nuances of language and the north koreans are very adept at conveying messages, many times between with the lines. but as a long-time watcher of north korea and what they say, i think they do understand the diplomatic language and they get the message. >> your former colleague, defense secretary leon panetta, from the obama administration, said that the united states is facing the most dangerous situation since the cuban missile crisis. do you agree? >> i'm not sure that it's reached that magnitude. i lived through the tree-cutting incident in 1976. i was air force intelligence officer at pacific command headquarters and -- >> that's when some north korean soldiers went into the dmz and killed some americans. >> exactly. killed two american soldiers. and i've -- again, comparing that episode with this, i think the imminence of war feeling was much more palpable then than it is today. but it is not to say that this is

please understand there is not good. there is no parent who i ever met who looked at their kid and said you share too much. any of you ever told that by your parents? you just share too much. learn to be more selfish. it doesn't happen. how many times did your parents say to you, say thank you? was it 4,000? 10,000? why didn't it work once? if we're basically good, oh, of course, i should say thank you, but you're not basically good so you have to be told over and over the unbelievably elementary moral decency of thanking someone for doing something good for you. even that doesn't come naturally. it is the grand lie of the secular world since the enlightenment that people are basically good and so much damage has been done by that. for example, one of the biggest is do you blame people for the evil they do or do you blame external sources? if a person rapes, murders, mugs, embezzles, robs a store, burns down a store, do you say they have done evil or they are victims of bad parenting, of racism, of poverty? that's what i

if that is not understandable, i can understand you. how come you... argument is, in some ways powerful, but in some ways is losing me. i agree there is a crisis of trust in media across the world. the only way to address that is by being very transparent and clear about the way we operate. you operate out of qatar, you are completely funded by the qatar government. you say to me that there is no comparison between some of your present enemies such as saudi arabia, egypt and the government of qatar. i would put to use a precise opposite. look at the most recent reports from amnesty international and human rights watch. they said qatar is no more a democracy than the other gulf countries. the amnesty international report said qatar authorities continue to unduly restrict the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly. when it comes to the media, in december 2016, an independent news service in doha was blocked from all of its internet service providers. you try and justify that to me, and tell me that qatar is fundamentally different from

it is the understanding of the constitution as a contract.e he was a delegate, he takes in the discussions and the debates some shows how the discussions and debates formed the constitution to be what it is, and the interesting thing is he didn't actually write it to be a treatise on the constitution. our founders relied on a jurist named blackstone, and his understanding of english common law. and what st. george tucker wanted to do was to take common law understanding through blackstone and apply it to this new form of government, this constitutional republic, and how common law is to be applied now under a constitutional republic rather than under a monarchy, and in that he wrote the premiere treatise on the constitution of the united states. and it's really unfortunate we don't teach that in the law schools anymore. we have traded it for a treatise written by joseph story, which is a more federal-centric and quite often misapplication of the constitution's intent on the power of government. >> host: from our facebook page; joe. you seem t

you to understand the world better. i am wary of those because it isn't for you it's for them to keep you on the site and they are giving you reasons it's like i will give you $50 to open up a checking account within the bank fee is $200, so you're thinking it's good that then eventually yoyou get screwed over. i do think though that the question still stands at a very good question as well, how do we understand the social inclination or the social use of these at the same time because a lot of people say if you put a lot of focus getting information on it you are ruining the experience for everybody. we could have a cure for cancer but then all of a sudden w we he a lot of jaundice in newborns and we think that's a really important health issue, but it's not. so i do think it's something we have to talk about, to go back to the initial question of what is new about this, i think the important part is having the categories. i am not against agenda or algorithmic agenda but directionality of what is called the blackbox s

americans do not understand that.oving away from the nation-state, going into the big economic system, getting away from what they have seen in the last century. that is pardon borders and nationalism, but when you lose nationalism, you lose safety to an extent. you are not going to protect nationalism with borders and border security, then you will see this happen. that's what terrorists are taking advantage of. >> juan: i think that type of thinking -- i appreciate it, because i think we are on the same team. we want to stop terrorism, but that thinking is outdated in the sense that the way they ideology is being communicated is through social media. it is to being aimed at young people, for the most part, and especially insecure troubled souls who do not know what they are doing. may be subject to some crazed ideology, or anger at a different society. and they think they are going to be a martyr, a hero, i'm going to fight. i don't know what they are thinking, but they go off. that's why you see them moving around

we lack understanding enough. we are beginning to have understanding in the most important is that every single case will be different. we can find the things we can expect to see them figure out the proportions of each for each particular case. because many people will be very confused people, this is someone in terms of the islamist orientation, he describes himself as islamic state but not understanding the differences between different groups in there literally fighting each other tooth and nail. that was not the issue. are all groups that would be able to do something honorable and remove humiliation. therefore, it's critically important to be able to address both, the social political and the psychological. the environmental and the local global issue and grievance as well. any approach that would be effective has to address all of those. the model would have us do things at a societal level that would make society strong and when you find a place that is susceptible like a neighborhood or school, you do ext

when you show that you understand the business and apply security to that, that is huge. that is powerful. to have a certification alone without the experience is challenging. really being able to apply so that how do you get to that is connecting and taking the initiative in fighting someone who might be interested in doing and taking advantage of those opportunities, sometimes volunteer opportunities to find those connections and demonstrate that. it is challenging. >> you brought up a great point because i teach in a graduate school in the cyber security program. many of our students are in their mid- career and their pursuing advanced education in cyber security and they want to know how do i break in. there is still asking it's a difficult challenge because ultimately, at that level, you need an opportunity. you need someone willing to take a chance, to take a risk. my advice is more for those who have the capacity and authority to hire is to take a risk. willing to pick someone who doesn't look like you. be willing to give someone an opportunity demonstrated academi

i understand that you are saying. -- i understand what you are saying. you're right, except -- i know when i should get good and when i should get bad. sometimes i will say, wow, that is going to be a great story, and i will get killed. i would be a pretty good reporter -- not as good as you. i know what is good. i know what is bad. when they change it and make it really bad, something that should be positive, sometimes something that should be positive, they will make ok, or even negative. so i understand it because i am there, i know what was said. i know who is saying it. i'm there. it is important -- i want to see honest press. i started off today by saying it is so important to the public to get honest press. the public doesn't believe you people anymore. maybe i had something to do with that, i don't know. but they don't believe you. if you were straight and really told it like it is, i would hear -- i would be your biggest booster, i would be your biggest fan in the world, including bad stories about me. but as an example, you are cnn, it is story

need to understand the world therein understand the caveat is and the culture and all the relationships. indeed to visualize how you take those resources to have available based on your understanding of the of problem with a position of the vantage than once you visualize in those members of the coalition and then with that, and understanding of the problem. so do you to describe that visualization use still give direction but generally this is the most difficult part. so what we have to do today is trained them to a understand just to comply with the act of control is not adequate they pretty much wanted me to comply and succumb to them that the death control but now that is no longer possible because you don't have any level of specificity but we describe the visualization and empower them to exploit the initiative. that is the difficult way to run an army because it requires a huge investment and spend a lot of time with people so first of all, the even know how to understand those complexities so within your organization which and you may know well to influence people they're not ev