we understand that responsibility. that is why law enforcement -- there is always updates on the holsters that police officers carry and the training that police officers -- it is mandatory that they receive this training on firearm or tension. training very physical that we go through. we have other officers who are continually trying to take the firearm away from you in different scenarios, and you have to physically restrain him from taking it for that is a responsibility that is upon that police officer, and that training is very serious. policeandatory for officers to receive it. host: all right. mike is a parent from new mexico. you are on with mac hardy. caller: hi, c-span. thank you. hi, kimberly. thanks. thanks, mac, for doing this. i have been a united states concealed carry member for four years. i have not a proponent of arming teachers at all, because i think teachers just need to do their job like the senators and congressmen need to do their job without fear of reprisal. i have a question, and i am has i

if you understand we are an existential threat, is makes you understand. if you accept the proposition strategically inferior countries will try to defer us by scaring us, that would also, i think, allow you to understand certain foreign countries. i think this is much less useful understanding putin than understanding north korea. or if we could go back in time, understanding saddam hussein in 2001 and 2002. we have a hard time in this country understanding dictators because we assume that they play the game the way we do. one of the outcomes of studying the kennedy-khrushchev relationship, khrushchev was rationalal, just his inputs and incentives were different. the united states didn't understand them. what kennedy understood, when push came to shove, khrushchev was not suicidal. he was reckless but he wasn't a madman. it's that basic understanding you have to constantly engage and be empathetic that laid the basis for kennedy's masterful handling of the second week of the cuban missile crisis. i would argue the first week was much messier than people t

geology, understanding the impact of water on rocks. as simple as that. but out of that comes, you know, a basis -- well, one of the few areas in which u.s. industry has made great strides and has really moved the needle on the composition of energy sources. and with that, of course, comes thousands of jobs both for these geologists i talked about earlier, but also oil rig workers, people who work in the field of fracking sites. so that's the kind of example, e think, of the broader impact of these climate and environmental research and development programs. beyond just the scientific and engineering work force that we talked about primarily in this report. >> thank you very much. my name is michael, i'm at resources for the future. i understand that the general tendency is to look at the physical and the biological sciences in terms of the science r&d investments, but i'm also very interested in the decision sciences and research and investment in economics, policy making and other areas where the federal agency budgets invest in a lot

a better understanding of the young bay mud. as you know, that's a layer of soil that does not -- it's highly compressible and does not necessarily have high strength, but we do think there's some better opportunities there to understand exactly what that strength is. and because we think that it's maybe been conservatively represented due to the lack of sufficient data. and then, understanding improved characterization of the liquefax susceptiblity. as you know, that's going to determine measures in terms of our vulnerablity and consequences. this particular geotechnical view will reduce the conservativism that we have today because we have a lack of data, but also that will translate into a reduction of construction costs. so the next few slides that i'm going to take you through is going to be explaining two of the major activities in the phase that we're currently undergoing. so one is the development of the multihazard risk assessment and the alternatives analysis. i'm going to talk about the purpose, the out cocome, and t

it's natural, it's understandable, i share that fear. nobody wants to admit people into this country who will do us harm. but to mistake these students and their families for possible terrorists, it's a great mistake to make. - but one being made. - well, i think for lack of information. so, you know, the department of homeland security vets every refugee family before they're admitted to the u.s. in europe, you see asylum seekers walking to germany, walking to european countries without being vetted. but if a refugee enters this country after being vetted by the department of homeland security, they have not made a mistake one time. there is no instance of a vetted refugee - so the need for extreme vetting, the vetting that we're doing is already extreme in that respect. - we could vet more, that's not, i would never object to that. but we vet already to a level that is quite extraordinary. - and one of the other differences between here and europe, you've just identified one key one, a second one, back to this notion of assimilation, o

i understand you may disagree, but it's still my job. host: what are the social media companies doing, facebook, twitter, about the next election? what policies have they put in place, and what are they hoping the government doesn't make them do? guest: so they've been responding to a lot of pressure, public pressure and some lawmaker pressure, senator warner from virginia has a bill to make political content on social media, particularly facebook, work more like political advertising on tv, different levels of scrutiny you can apply to it. facebook has been a little bit better on this, i would have to say. they began very late but did eventually inform users that had accidentally, again, accidentally -- the user is i think rather blameless, but they did take the step of informing users who accidentally shared, spread or interacted with misinformation from a kremlin sponsored source and they informed them about the specific content and that's key. for 2018 they have taken the step involving the a.p. in sort of vetting information that co

i understand that p.h.a.'s face many challenges in maintaining high quality of housing for families. due to years of underfunding, public housing alone faces an estimated $26 billion. that's with a b, $26 billion backlog of repairs. my senate democratic colleagues and i propose an infrastructure package that includes funding for public housing repairs and revitalization to help address these challenges. we have an obligation to make sure these struggling families have safe and decent housing. i have been clear throughout this process, i want to help community lenders and housing providers better serve their customers. we don't do that by reducing accountability. we don't do that by returning to the free-wheeling housing market that led to millions of families losing their homes. we have to remember when we talk about escrow and lending requirements, it sounds kind of boring, it sounds dry, but it may sound like legalese that doesn't matter, but it matters to the biggest, most important purchase most americans

, understandings. years ago i did a word search in some of the documents, and the word understanding comes up more often than anything else. we have to build understandings, must understand each other, and by not talking to area experts, talking direct face to face. to understand intentions, understand the rules of the game, to create a stability based upon a common knowledge set for operating as a society. i would argue that to some extent what nixon does actually is successful. i'm with many scholars like matt eadvantage li eadvantage -- you can't understand the gorbachev generation, can't understand the new thinkers, robert english writes about this as well. the ways in which these personal relationships broke down barriers, the exchanges that arise, scientific exchanges, the ways in which east and west, due to the personal relationships, not to fundamental agreements on ideology, but the personal relationships of the leaders open says give legitimacy give cover to those who have long wanted to comm

of assaultive i can't understand it or make it work. verbally displaying an intention to assault. an assault is an attempt to commit battery. it's an unsuccessful battery. you don't display an intent to commit a successful battery and if he or she is brought up on disciplinary charges. they're going to point to language we won't be able to interpret and i'm trying to make it so the language is clear and the training should be consistent with the training we're doing under 5.01. >> commissioner turman: the language is verbatim from 5.01. >> commissioner: i just read it. >> commissioner turman: we need to move on from this but i'm going to throw my two cents in. i'm not comfortable or clear on the verbal language either. and if i don't want someone using a taser because of a terrible -- verbal altercation. there needs to be more than that. i'm going with commissioner hirsch on this as well. all right. >> commissioner: if i may -- >> commissioner turman: then push the button if you want to speak. >> commissioner: as far as the consistency

that is all understandable and i understand that i think many people that are younger are attracted torathat. i meet them i love talking with them. what i have observed in this is something else. i will say to the gentleman who called that yes, i have done my homework. buchanan has 20 volumes of collected writings that i have read most of his public writing. i read all of the stuff i was able to find in his archives. his records going back even to the 1930s. and yes, i have read every conservative source just about out there. i adchecked the websites, i ver much know what i am talking about. i wrote on that basis. one thing very unfortunate is that, this is a spoiler alert, and last chapter of my book, i put a colleague of james buchanan who got disgusted with what charles coke had done to the libertarian cause. and he said that the libertarian because we never recover from his investments. he said he was sorry that no one in the libertarian cause would call out because they were all dependent on pocket change from an authoritarian businessman. this is a libertarian who said this. not

>> well, my understanding -- my understanding again from what i've read, of what general council rob is proposing, part of the structure within the regional directors and the regional offices requires a delegation from the board, and so it would -- my understanding based on what i've seen would -- what he's proposing would require board action in order to amend the delegation. >> that is helpful to understand. i look forward to following up with you on that. i also wanted to opponent out that the general council has suggested that one of it reasons for the proposed changes is budgetary concerns that the board has. so if confirmed do you plan to appeal to congress for additional appropriated funds to ensure that public service needs are met? similarly, are you expecting to be involved in developing and multily approving any nlrb recommendations or plans? >> appreciate that. as a nominee i haven't been involved in the budget issue either, but i have seen a number of the press accounts about general council rob's justification for some its changes based on budgetary cuts. what i would s

i didn't understand the process. i didn't understand the value. and it wasn't until a close friend of mine that i actually met through the pageant -- her name's sharon chung. she's so passionate about politics that that's what encouraged me to do it. and so sometimes social media is great to see all of that, but you really need someone -- a friend, a family member -- i think to encourage it to really happen. >> yeah, good point. and, lan, i want to get your thoughts. but first we have some video of your swearing-in ceremony as a san jose city council member. let's roll the clip. >> i, lan diep... >> do solemnly swear... >> ...do solemnly swear... >> ...that i will support and defend... >> ...that i will support and defend... >> ...the constitution of the united states... >> ...the constitution of the united states... >> ...and the constitution of the state of california... >> ...and the constitution of the state of california... >> ...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... >> ...against all enemies, foreign and domestic. >> lan, you've spoke

but i don't think i'll ever fully understand how it happened. that's why i so earnestly wanted to donate funds from the book to research and support programs and prevention programs because i think we have many answers we need to find. >> you mentioned your sons friend eric harris, and some believe it was the dynamic between the two of them that contributed to the tragedy. what are your thoughts on that. >> i believe that is true. i believe that's highly likely that i had quite a few experts that i spoke with that supported and substantiated that belief. for whatever reason, reason i may not understand, there was a chemistry between them, and interdependence. somehow dylan was willing to go along with the plan to blow up a school and kill people and i don't know what it was in dylan that made him able to do that but i believe the impact of that friendship was a significant causal factor. >> have you spoken to eric parents? have they talked about the book with you. >> when i get asked questions about the harrises or even about my own family i usu

i understand his -- to understand his motives, get them on the phone and keep talking and establish arapport where this can end peacefully.>> the officers have assault type weapons on the ground, they are in body armor. but we understand they are also trying to negotiate with this man, so they are trying to negotiate with him. we understand that one federal agency has made contact with the suspect and are in ongoing negotiations with him right now. we understand he had a cell phone. napa police said that in an earlier press conference today. and so they are reaching him and talking and negotiating with him to get out and release of hostages safely here. >> were going to have a lab report comic up next from ktvu's tom baker right after the break. ♪ ♪ get high-speed internet from at&t $30 per month. no extra monthly fees. more for your thing. that's our thing. att.com/internet >>> this started about 10:30 am and have been going on for several hours. it was a going away party for the nonprofit group. authorities say that is when they received a call of shots fired. they exchanged gunfire

we understand the differences. and the similarities of cultures across the world so no matter how you take it al-jazeera will bring in the news and current events that matter to. al-jazeera. hello i'm daryn join in doha with the top stories here on al-jazeera dozens of people have been killed in separate asteroids and syria rebel held eastern go to a market was hit leaving more than seventy dead and activists say fifteen others died when turkish forces bombed the only functioning hospital in kurdish controlled a friend alan fischer reports.

i will say that we have to understand, be very measured, be very mature, and understand that these issuesnothing to do with the american people. these issues have nothing to do with the american goods. these issues have nothing to do with the american companies. quite the opposite. this is a moment where we have to be closer. this is a moment, an opportunity to show that together, we are better, that together we are more competitive, that together we have better creativity. so let's not be angry. let's be measured, let's be mature, and let's look at the positive side of all this. our thanks to all of our international friends, the consuls general of mexico, israel, and russia for taking their time to share their thoughts on building bridges of friendship. we invite you to become citizen diplomats, create your own events, small or large in your community, and please share those ideas and images with us on our social media sites. just go to our website, abc7news.com/community. we're also on facebook, @abc&communityaffairs, as well as @cheryljenningsabc7, and please follow me on twitter, @ch

>> that's my understanding, commissioner. and it was just incorporated by reference to this outside map. so i don't think that our office sees it as a drastic shift. i think that there's consensus within the department staff and that the blue map needs to go. and that is something that was in there at some point and it was incenterred after reference to the seismic hazard zone map, that the blue map was being relied upon and everybody agrees that needs to go. we thought, well, let's just refer back to the 25% threshold and understanding that that may create some implementation on the back end of this which i think that our office is willing to collaborate with the department in making sure that that is as smooth as possible, that project applicants understand, you know, clearly and easily whether they fall within that 25% threshold. >> so -- >> sure. >> so most of the people that i think that would be impacted on this, first of all i get the spirit of it and on the legislation, but there's unintended consequences that we can

of understanding what is being requested in moving forward.and i want to say thank you very, very much to kei and ari. we really appreciate you being here and talking with us today about that. thank you. thank you. [applause] >> [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] congress returns to and sometime this week both the house and senate will take up an omnibus spending measure that will need to pass both chambers before friday midnight deadline to avoid a government shutdown. in the house wednesday the right to try bill that will allow patients to try drugs that have not been fully cleared by the fda. also this week the bill that would exempt certain institutions from financial stress tests. the senate resumes work to do on a bullet would make websites more accountable for online sex trafficking also the omnibus bill which if passed could keep the government funded through september. once -- watch the house live on c-span. see the senate live here on c-span2. >> tonight on c-span's landmark cases we will explore the 1896 case of ple

i don't i understand fiscal responsibility is one way but there certain issues i don't understand howthey became conservative or liberal. abortion, wyatt their more liberal supposed to? why are there more conservatives in favor of choice. things like gun control, wyatt more conservators who want stronger gun control more liberals who want to be arms. these don't seem to be issues that fall into liberal or conservatives but how do we get there? >> we talked about this at dinner the other night side little head start. in part it's because the choosing of the size is have to appear opinion nine gay rights what is it have to do? you don't have to check every single by you to have principles this is part of the problem and politics in particular if you are a democrat you must buy all of these positions. maybe if you could break the ice and have a conversation were people say i disagree with you on this or maybe i'm willing to give on that. >> thank you. >> i agree with what you said fundamentally but i'm confused because it seems like trump nationalism is going towards making the rich rich

the brain is a kind of machine and machines are things that you can analyze and understand and represent in mathematics and recreate you can build other versions of. we are why a program our soul is our program in a hundred years we will know how to upload peoples minds into computers because scientists really on course to one knocking the mysteries of the human brain in a way that will enable them to build one just like it one day. our journey begins anew circa inside one man's imagination she roshi she guru is a science fiction fan and robotics expert who's exploring what it takes to be human . he started replication himself by building an android that will live forever. chris and body is not important so we found our our bodies as they were down be extra. and they wish we had a more powerful calculators more powerful rob or so we may chance to hear it all the and the finishing of the humans i again. ask you your to bring that into many. now. ishiguro envision sees robots being put to use as receptionists or television presenter economists can. right now they're little more than a thom

machines are things that you can analyze and understand and represent in mathematics and recreate you can build other versions are. really our white a program our soul is our program in a hundred years we will know how to upload peoples minds into computers because scientists really on course to one knocking the mysteries of the human brain in a way that will enable them to build one just like it one day. our journey begins an inside one man's imagination she roshi ishiguro who was a science fiction fan and robotics expert who's exploring what it takes to be human . she started replication himself by building an android that will live forever. christian body is not important so we can have what are our bodies best interest them being human. and you wish we had a more powerful computers more powerful rob or remake change here in albany and they finish a couple humans i guess. sr to bring back into. our i doubt. frank. envisions is robots being put to use as a receptionist or television presenter. but. right now they're little more than a torment on this equipped with software that he s

was a mistake also made in losing control many people do not understand that. the mistake was made much earlier the chancellor had no concept of a refugee policy though the s.p.d. did not excel here either then the borders were suddenly opened without controls. i don't think it was wrong that she opened them in that particular moment but she had no long term strategy but neither did the s.p.d. . no not at first it took time. but you have to understand that a great deal of hardship accumulated over many years in our societies although were considered rich. our societies are very unequal so it's not difficult to understand it analytically. we have to accept the consequences and build housing for people on long waiting lists and for migrants coming to us. sure people who have been waiting for years for social housing are annoyed that refugee shelters are suddenly being built. both e.s.p. and the conservatives fail to see the divides in our society. that. and across europe yes. there's not so much solidarity as people expect poland for example doesn't want to take

we have to understand we can all stay still and just. be witness of the deal because. i'm doing this because i want the future world to future generations to have and enjoy the ocean we have. it would appear the more the political left and their allies in the corporate media kept donald trump the more we learn about the corrupt behavior of the deep state the firing of andrew mccabe at the f.b.i. is a case in point is this the beginning of a perfect. how does it feel to be a share of the greatest job in the world it's as close to being a king as any job there is one business model helps to run a prison now we do this do or don't like us here nobody obeys the case and they don't no one comes in anymore we don't have to serve them anymore it's the directive. to do that they don't give a damn if you do the job very badly painted to put it back into the louisiana incarceration rate is twice as high as the u.s.n. bridge what she could is behind such success. few. few. i understand that's the party line which is whatever whatever. this is. is a. feel well for. the u.s. presid

help me understand a little bit. are there walls between those two entities or are they just distinct roles? how do you see them as unique entities? >> senator, if i might begin with the dual hat discussion. in terms of the dowual hat arrangement, i'm not predisposed in whether that arrangement stays or ends. >> right. >> i know that the president and congress both have spoken on it. the president in august of '17 and congress in the ndaa that listed a series of six conditions that both the secretary and the chairman must attest to before the dual hat is terminated. it's my assessment that what we should do at the end of the day is make a determination that is in the best interest of the nation. that's the key critical piece of it. if confirmed, my intent would be to spend the first 930 days looking at that, providing an assessment to both the secretary and the chairman and then moving forward from there. >> okay. would you allow us to be in that conversation as well, as far as your assessment? >> certainly, after ta

we understand...l source from saudi arabia, the understanding is that his name was on a list provided, without saying who provided the list, but it was provided to them. by british intelligence, i would imagine? most likely, most likely it was provided by the authorities here. a key question, then, for the police and m15, was saudi arabia his end destination or did masood have an ambition to go to a jihadist theatre of war? counterterrorism sources say they found no evidence that he was trying to fight in syria but he had been linked to people trying to get to the afghan border, in the past. if he was going to be more less in the service of pilgrims, coming into mecca and medina, that is not extremism. if he was using that as a pretext to go into syria, then yes, that was extreme. that as a pretext, that was extreme. his visa was refused, could that be significant? i think it could be significant, like many of his kind, like many islamist extremists, at some stage, they often have an aspiration to tra

and i understand that, i understand the real politic there. i'm g not sure that he would be doing the same thing if he wasn't speaker. the problem with that is that the price gets higher and higher is and higher, you know? whathi profits a man to gain the whole world if he loses his soul or the other way around. well, but for tax ruts? really? for -- cuts? really? for a a lowerrer marginal rate? i still think and i hold out hope because i actually generated an unfortunate controversy when i hadco a momet of candor with a new york times reporter, and i said i'm really getting sick and tired of say, you know, paul ryan must really be upset about this because until he speaks out. but remember, he was one of the few people who was willing to draw a line and speak out in the primary. so i don't know the answer to yourri question. it's heartbreaking to me to watch what ryan and other republicans who have decided to rationalize this have been willing to do. but again, we haven't gotten to the fourth act yet. >> i apologize, but i think we have time f

the brain is a kind of machine and machines are things that you can analyze and understand and represent in mathematics and recreate you can build other versions of it. we are white a program our soul use our program in a hundred years we will know how to upload peoples minds into computers because scientists really on cost to one locking the mysteries of the human brain in a way that will enable them to build one just like it one day. our journey begins anew circa inside one man's imagination she roshi ishiguro was a science fiction fan and robotics expert who's exploring what it takes to be human . he started replication himself by building an android that will live forever. christian body is not important so we can have what are our bodies as they are again being human. and they wish we had a more powerful calculators warcraft were all born so we made changes this year and all the addition is some clever humans i guess. casimir to bring that into many. i doubt that. ishiguro envisions these robots being put to use as receptionists or television presenter economists can. right now they

i understand. >> we don't have the funding. have to come back to us for approval for additional funding, or -- >> you've budgeted. >> i don't understand. i don't understand what you're putting before us. >> let me try to clarify what is before you. at editional money, first of all for 31 -- i'm sorry for 29, you put into your capital budget. it's headed towards the board of supervisors for signature by the mayor this summer. that's when the funds would become available should they make our recommendation on the capital budget which typically they do. so we anticipate that the funding will be available -- >> but if it's not? >> if it's not, we have full -- what we're asking for to you do today is to approve the contract for the improvements for pier 31½ in the amount of $7,516,768. now and then we're asking that in the summer, should the money be -- budget become available as we anticipate it would, we'd come back to you to ask to execute a contract amendment or a change order, depending on your lexicon, for the work at pier 29.

nakasone: you have to begin with understanding what the threats are out there, and understanding when it is appropriate that civilians that are working in a place like the national security agency or military members within their own nations have their loans, are wearing fit its. are there places where they shouldn't have those things on? i think that's the most important piece that we need to have, a realization and then, and understanding of those operational at security risks. senator burr: senator harris. harris: to follow-up on senator cotton's questions, we you commit to coming back to the committee after doing an assessment of vulnerabilities created by these of the smart devices by our troops, and give us some suggestion about what might be a more appropriate policy? i would welcome the opportunity to continue the dialogue on that. senator harris: thank you. i'd like to talk about insider threats. director of the national intelligence, as of october 2015 4.3 million americans held at security clearances. some of the most damaging national security breaches in recent years, how

we see a nation that doesn't understand russia. -- doesn't understand the nation. you could argue they are attacking us because they hear we have been week, rather than seeing the nature of russia in ukraine, crimea, syria, london. regardless ofson: , thehappened 12 years ago litvinenko assassination, i ofnk most people, both sides the commons, all backed ventures that i listened to. approved the response of the u.k. issuing this time. it's been a mixture of a firm, diplomatic response, a function of undeclared russian agents since the 1980's. coupled with a series of measures. pushing back on russia. i don't believe that would've been fact. when the decision was made to make this assassination attempt. he will know what they are, countering russian disinformation with our colleagues, looking at what we can do to tackle cycles of our all thatng sure above we will have a series of way. those that may have illicitly or ,orrectly obtained money connected to vladimir putin. we are working with our colleagues. >> you said they had to talk to each other. is that still yo

here's what i understand happened. he was assigned the high brand case when he came through the board's normal process. . normal process involves the ethics office and the executive secretary's office at the nl rb recusal list. then they assign cases based on that recusal list. high brand was not apparently on his list because on its face there was no conflict with his participating in the case. it's my understanding that how the decision was made and high brand was reached among with a number of things that occurred after the case was assigned led the ethics official to then determine mr. manual should have been recused although the initial process in which the ethics official participated said he should not be recused. so under the circumstances i think the board did only thing they could have done to vo kate the decision. now, mr. ring, that puts us back to where we were the high brand decision i was the obama era joint employer standard announced in the board's browning farris case in 2015. in my opinion, that deci

i understand that distinction. it's important for the tenants to hear that and sometimes it might help as an extra layer of assurance to see it written out on letterhead, so the understanding is there. to reiterate that for members of the public that are here and for the tenants, the conservatory has agreed with the city to ensure that the 23 households will be under the protection of rent control at 150 van ness and when they return to the original site and that agreement is with the city directly. if the project sponsor reneges, the city will enforce rent control. so we'll be your protection to be sure that the sponsor keeps to its word. that agreement is what this board is voting to approve, here today at land use, and full committee in two weeks. thank you very much. any other questions or comments? >> supervisor safai: i want to say as somebody that is greatly impacted by the pressure of need for student housing, our district is book ended by city college, which has thousands of students, as well as san franci

in putting his understanding. the main purpose of foreign policy and international relations is to ensure a comfortable environment for implementing of domestic topps tasks. so he's quiet he's quiet. understandable in his domestic tasks he's got quite a clear plan of development and understanding of policemen or a task of secondary tosk and so on and so forth so what he needs he needs a support from diplomacy to ensure a comfortable environment we've got a lot of questions about whether there is a room for a man your ring between west and russia and there is a place for creative diplomacy but first i want to ask you about us and what we did and the consequences raised and when the president was addressing the nation he unveiled new weapons to the world and said that no one has this kind of weapons they're the best the fastest and he said now the world will listen why do we need to show weapons in order for the world to listen to us and we do not have other means to get our message across. well he's been trying to.

i think that is a point that the crown prince well understands. and yemen is a issue of continuous dialogue. >> the suggestions from washington about -- it looks as though they will tear up the around you are forced through the end of the sunset cause or require ballistic missiles to be included. would like to ask whether you see a likelihood of change to the are in deal? and is the u.s. walking away from the deal and imposing secondary sanctions? and modifications to the sunset cause. and the inclusion of the ballistic missiles in the deal. >> the deal itself is very important and valuable and we want to keep it going. there are things we can do without officiating or opening the deal to stress the accessibility of sites for the iea, the range of the missiles, no more than 2000 kilometers. we can do that. there is the issue of the sunset cause. that is probably the most difficult thing in order to vary the sunset clause, you have to open up the text of the jcp away -- jcpoa. there is a huge amount of work going on to try to do that. there is stro

but when you understand the essence of something in very much in the greek sense of this, you understand a the history of this construct if you will in the way that it is used and you look at it as something, because war is administered violence differently. wars are in our language, we tend to think of periods of war and periods of peace and peace is the interruption or the place where we hold our breath between periods of war. what if that is not, in fact, the model we ought to be thinking about? in the future we should think about war as simply being an increase in the level of violence, right? and that's something that one of the commentators had made about that -- >> define for the audience garomoff because this is important for this discussion. we ask you to unpack the definition, the power of the word "cyber war" which is part of the discussion of the future of war but it is a term that you know has different meanings to different people and different points in time, so in explaining garosmoff, can you explain what you see the future of cyber war or at least how we will define it

they don't understand. >> first of all, i don't think they understand politics either but they certainlyd economics untiles it's taught to them by the chamber of commerce and the business round table. >> they are the tools of that group, as opposed to the leaders for the president's party. the president has to get this thing done. i think he's on the verge of getting it done. and the congress can't stop him. thethey gave their rights up may years ago and he basically has the authority to push the trade tariffs and he basically has come to a conclusion that that's the right thing to do. equally important, gary cohn, the leader of the opposition, did the right thing. i give him credit for basically he lost this fight and he's leaving the white house and it's the right thing to do at the same time i hope he keeps his mouth shut towards the president. lou: ryan and mcconnell were listening to you right now and understand what the right thing to do here is. >> the right thing for ryan to do is to get as many republicans as possible -- i pooh-poohed a second commission here not because i didn'

understand the realities of all the smoke screens and well the reality is there is a lot of those certainly the so-called diplomats on both sides were in fact spies that's what. does what nations do russia has fives in this country we have spies in your country i suspect even they people from a lot where you have spies in this country whatever is just part of state craft so the first thing you do when you're going to tit for tat if you through the other fellows by. so that's one thing the second thing is is the who done it aspect of all this now i keep looking at all this and go on the web and look at the formulas for. the nerve agent it's very unstable it's very dangerous to handle you have to be an expert to handle it or you kill yourself so the question here is why on earth do you want to assassinate mr spear paul and his daughter why would you use a dangerous weapon he's sitting on a park bench when i just grew up behind him and shoot him in the back of the head. so i came to the conclusion that basically the nerve agent we use because the person that did it knew it would be traced back

one of the biggest challenges of neuroscience is understanding how sensory input is transformed into neural connections within the brain and among the most prestigious research laboratories the race is on to find the answer. at harvard university jeffrey lichtman as a pioneer in this field of research. he's trying to construct a complete mouse brain connector home of unprecedented resolution to that end he commissioned the construction of the world's most powerful scanning electron microscope. or and. this machine can cut a one millimeter thick slice of mouse brain into thirty five thousand atom field cross-section. across sections of them laid end to end like the frames of a film. this process allows the researches to map a mouse brain fragment equivalent to the size of a grain of sand. in a while. one hundred thousand fold in a large amount the frames allow them to produce exact diagrams of the brain's neural wiring. for example we can see how this river is connected to the green. further it's possible to distinguish the space between both. this gap is called the synapse. to transm

i was like mom you know understand the school is a scam and she said i don't understand how can a school be a scam. i have a hundred four thousand dollars in student loans as of september two thousand and thirteen and they're only growing by the day. you. how long will it take before public european universities start charging twenty thirty or forty thousand dollars a year how long will it take for a lucrative private educational system to skid out of control like it is today in the u.s. everywhere around the world students are mobilizing can anyone out there hear them can anyone understand that they question our society our political choices what kind of world to want to live in a world where the economy is at the service of man. or a world in which man is at the service of the economy. under-performing the stock market oh my god blackstone one arbitrage opportunity you have brought a mucks just self i suggest you short your styles of money into you abyss or a your own corporate balance sheet and then blow your brains out to live t.v. they gave us a kind of fun experience for the financ

we call it what it is about hate and we need to understand help people understand the harm and how and how we all we can all help protect each other. what would your advice be to anyone who is. the victim of of hate crime particularly. young people juveniles who have an ass pressures as a as well in their in their lives i mean heaven knows growing up you know teenagers have all the the social issues that are going on that they have to deal with what would your advice be and the one thing definitely we urge young people to do is that if you feel that you were subjected to air race or hate incidents based on your or sometimes even based on your looks based on your sexuality based on your religion based on your color based on the language you speak race on the x. and there's a lot that actually kids and younger generation pick up on and keep inside them or not talk about it but you feel that you're targeted for any reason whatsoever speak to an adult to speak to your teacher at school seek out help and speak to someone who trust that would be able to it's great it's very there i mean we a