we want to understand is that technically feasible? the understanding is yes. do we bring that together. i have three program managers. i have to work with him. a lot of this is not the science but business of the science. each of those projects that we have, have in stones experimentation and demonstrations and understanding how we bring that together takes day-to-day program management and leadership in the technological domain. thanks, shelley. . .

understands hillary clinton understand that if someone in this country works 40 hours a week, that person should not be living in poverty. e >> she understands that we must raise the minimum wage to a living wage. and she is determined to create millions of new jobs by rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, our roads, bridges, water systems and wastewater plants. but her opponent, donald trump, he has a very different point of view. he does not support raising the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, a starvation wage. while trump believes in huge tax breaks, huge tax breaks for billionaires, he believes that states should actually have the right to lower the minimum wage below $7.25. brothers and sisters, this election is about brothers and sisters, this election is about overturning citizens united. citizens united is one of the worst supreme court decisions in the history of our country. all wealthiest people in america that decision allows the wealthiest people in america, like the billionaires who spend hundreds of millions of dollars buying elections, and in the process undermin

you might understand one piece of that military history, but you don't really understand world war ii. as i said to you before, in order to really understand world war ii, you have to look at world war ii from all different perspectives. in order to understand it, yes, it's important to look at it through the eyes of that 20-year-old marine on normandy. but it's also important to look at it through the eyes of japanese-americans. through the eyes of women and african-americans. you simply cannot understand the full impact, the total war impact unless you do that. so what we're going to do today is sort of flesh that out a little bit. the greatest effect that war has on the people involved is change. in war times, change occurs. and that seems like a very simple statement, but it doesn't just occur on a global scale or a national scale. it changes us individually. it changes the way we see the world. it changes the way we are in the world. whether we're talking about world war ii or whether we're talking about vietnam or whether we're talking about the war with iraq, people change as a

it is my understanding that they did. we can double-check that. but that is my understanding. we'll double-check that. going on, let me move to the next topic. you explained on tuesday that you were providing, quote, an update on the fbi's investigation of secretary clinton's use of a personal e-mail system during her time as secretary of state. you explained that you received a referral on this matter from the inspector general of the intelligence community on july 26, 2016, is that right? >> yes. >> today, tens of thousands of af probably available on state department's website. and our staff have been reviewing the e-mails that were retroactively determined to include classified information. based on this review, it appears that these e-mails included more than 1,000 individuals who sentt is now redacted as classified. let me make that clear. about 1,000 people sent or received the same information that was contained in secretary clinton's e-mails and retroactively classified. were you aware of that? >> no. the number doesn't surprise me, though. >> why not? >> because this

just finding out what happened and understanding how that affects what's going to happen. if we don't learn from the mistakes we've made, we are condemned to repeat them so knowing what happened is crucial for anybody who wants to understand what's going to happen. >> host: you talk in "writings on the wall: searching for a new equality beyond black and white"" about your conversion to islam and what it's meant to you and what it's meant to other people. >> guest: i think my conversion to islam really was something that was personal to me. it was a religious ... a religious event in mylife . people have tried to make it political but really it was a spiritual thing for me. and i think islam has given me an anchor that has enabled me to differentiate between right and wrong and understand life in those terms. so my conversion to islam was something that was very personal . it ended up becoming political but i didn't want it to be like that. i probably would have done it different if i had had a chance to go back. i do a little bit differently so i didn't necessarily ask for

do you understand or would you understand why people say she broke enough law here that you would come to a different conclusion? >> sure, i respect different opinions and i smile because they are my friends and i worked with them a long time. knowing what i know, they wouldn't think about it differently. they have a different perspective outside. >> i think the gentleman from california. >> thank you mr. chairman. director, i want to thank you as others have. i think the american people need to hear you have done a wonderful job today. there are moments in my political life and i despair for the future of the country, not often and those comes when an individual by p providence or good fortune. i believe you have served the country and all americans well. two questions and two lines of questions, one, another colleague brought this up. you mentioned in previous about the the bed rock and importance of public confidence and public safety. i want to give you an opportunity. i think you responded. give you little more opportunity because it is it important for the american public to upon

it is my understanding that they did. we can double check that. that is my understanding. we will double check that. going on, let me move to the next topic. you explained on tuesday that you were providing, quote an update on the fbi's clinton's use of a personal e-mail system during her type as secretary of state. you explained that you received a referral on this matter from the inspector general of the intelligence community on july 6, 2016. is that right? >> yes. >> today tens of thousands of secretary clinton's e-mails are probably available on state department's website. our staff have been reviewing e-mails that were retroactively determined to include classified information. based on this review, it appears that these e-mails included more than 1,000 individuals who sent or received the information that has now redacted as classified. let me make that clear. about 1,000 people sent or received the same information that was contained in secretary clinton's e-mails and retroactively classified. were you aware of that? >> no. the number doesn't surprise me, though. >

you can now begin to understand the conundrum the list to understand those and revolted against washington in 1861 thought they were in the footsteps of those who voted against london in 1776 as revolting continued that institution known as slavery and in any case with united states government as it looks around its neighborhood and villages under british rule cuba, jamaica, barbados, tri nidad, but you have the two independent states that is revolutionary 80 in the dominican government bacchanals to the spanish after they were invited back in 1860 with the assistance of haiti so the idea in washington under president grant was to advance the island and haiti and then deport the newly freed in slave population in mass to the island of that scheme was narrowly defeated in the u.s. congress otherwise a person like myself may not be sitting here speaking english by could be speaking creole or spanish on the island and that is where this book ends but sadly that is not where tens of the island but i am sure you recall 100 years ago the rest u.s. military occupation of both haiti and the domini

it's potentially years in prison. >> i don't understand, would you help me understand why somebody wouldn't have tipped you off she's talking about the very specific case under oath that you're investigating? >> there's a difference between us being aware of testimony and us opening a criminal investigation for potential perjury. again, not this case in particular, but all cases, we don't do that without a committee saying we think there was an issue in testimony given in this separate branch of the government. >> you also mentioned earlier, and it's been quoted several times that no reasonable prosecutor would move forward with some of the facts. is there any room at all that somebody would differ on the opinion? i know former united states attorney general michael mukasey said with a illegal server disqualifies her from ever holding any federal office. there are some people of high esteem that may differ, obviously not privy to the exact facts. but can you make any room -- you said no reasonable person. do you understandhy the american people or would you understand why people may say she

it is my understanding that they did. we can double check that. that is my understanding. we will double check that. going on, let me move to the next topic. you explained on tuesday that you were providing, quote an update on the fbi's investigation of clinton's use of a personal e-mail system during her time as secretary of state. you explained that you received a referral on this matter from the inspector general of the intelligence community on july 6, 2016. is that right? >> yes. >> today tens of thousands of secretary clinton's e-mails are probably available on state department's website. our staff have been reviewing e-mails that were retroactively determined to include classified information. based on this review, it appears that these e-mails included more than 1,000 individuals who sent or received the information that has now redacted as classified. let me make that clear. about 1,000 people sent or received the same information that was contained in secretary clinton's e-mails and retroactively classified. were you aware of that? >> no. the number doesn't surpr

booker, i understand you made the case against mr. but who is hillary clinton almost as polarizing and divisive, how does she make the case she's the candidate for reconciliation? >> i patently disagree with you on issues of race and religious issues that she's polarizing. if anything, i've watched her in black communities and white communities put forth the spirit of america and our founders said this is a time we need to mutely pledge our sacred honor and she's manifested that on race, religion, of gender diversity, she's someone that can build our bridges and far more than the alternative. someone who is injecting more divisiveness through the affiliation and refusal to denounce patent racists. >> thank you both for coming on together. hopefully we can make this a habit again on "meet the press". appreciate it. >> thank you. >>> coming up, how will this week impact the presidential race and is this the week we'll learn who donald trump's running mate will be? we'll be right back. the beginng of the 21st century, the earth needed to

so it takes an understanding of what's gone on over the last 99 years and i understand people's questions and i think they're in good faith. >> we talk about gross negligence here and you said secretary clinton was careless with this classified material and how dangerous it could be and how threatening even to people's lives that it could be to disclose classified material. do you agree that there is a very thin line between gross negligence and extreme carelessness and would you explain to me what you consider to be that difference? >> sure, as a former judge you know there isn't actually a great definition in the law of gross negligence. some courts interpret it as close to willful and others drop it lower. my term extremely careless is trying to be kind of an ordinary person. that's a common sense way of describing it. it sure looks real question to me. the question of whether that amounts to gross negligence is not at the center of this. when i see there's one case brought on a gross negligence theory there's no way they're bringing a case against john doe or hillary clinton for the s

the tribulations of people of african descent unless you understand they fought against the formation and sided with london just like the africans did not accept the establishment of a new stage of rhodesia and when you fight a war in the loose you can expect to be penalized unless and until you can turn the tables against your oppressors and one of the way we could turn the tables was through the haitian revolution which follows quickly upon the footsteps of the first convening of congress that is why start the book with george washington with the haitian revolution and in any case the africans could succeed against the french military one of the most powerful examples of fortitude known to history through this point to establish the independent black republic but there was grave consternation in the slave holding republic of the victory of the haitian revolution and you may recall if you look at many of the major slave revolts that rocked north america through 181821 or 22 they all had the fingerprints of haiti in particular the revolt in virginia that takes place at the same time a

and i understand the importance of those markings. so you're suggesting that a long length of time that she had no idea what a classified marking would be? that's your sworn testimony today? >> no, no. not that she would have no idea what a classified marking would be. but it's an interesting question as to whether -- this question about sfax came up earlier. whether she was actually sophisticated enough to understand. >> so you're saying this former secretary of state is not sophisticated enough to understand a classified marking? >> that's not what i said. >> that's a huge statement. >> not what i'm saying. you asked me did i assume that someone would know. probably before this investigation, i would have. i'm not so sure of that answer any longer. i think it's possible -- possible that she didn't understand what a "c" meant when she saw it in the body of an e-mail like that. it's possible. >> after years in the senate and as secretary of state? i mean, that's hard for me and the american people to believe, director comey. and i'm n

you have to understand the history of this time period to understand who owned this book.you almost have to do detective work. to determine who owned this book, you look at this, and when you see this you see a crown. so that makes you think royalty. you go, okay, well, now you see the fleur-de-lis so you think that's french royalty, but why do you see the two sides asked this is because this person was married. so this would be a queens copy. the king at the time was louis xvi. this is the ceo of marie antoinette, and this, it's in latin. you may not recognize the book and you may overlook that if you know what marie antoinette's seal looked like he would be able to identify this. there are very few of her books that survived because we just executed or libraries were absorbed into the french national library. this would've been a little book she carried with her and she would've had more than one. this is something that each year they were given new copies so she would have had if you and that's why she could have given this copy away and that's what it is currently not

she understands that we must raise the minimum wage to a living wage. and she is determined to create millions of new jobs by rebuilding our fumbling infrastructure, our world's bridges, water systems and wastewater plants. what her opponent donald trump he has a very different point of view. he does not support raising the federal minimum wage of 7.25 an hour, a starvation wage. while trump believes in huge tax breaks, huge tax breaks for billionaires, he believes that states should actually have the right to lower the minimum wage below 7.25. (crowd booing). brothers and sisters, this election is about overturning citizens united. [cheering] citizen united is one of the worst supreme court decisions in the history of our country. that decision allows the wealthiest people in america like the billionaire, cope koch brothers who spend hundreds of millions of dollars, buying elections and in the process, undermine american democracy. hillary clinton will nominate justices to the supreme court who are prepared to overturn citizens united. and end the move

you need to understand that. secondly, congress does not get up in arms about the vast majority of these species. the only one congress has spoken the house spoke on. this is a big deal. we need to single out this species where there has been overreach, and to a lesser extent, the wolf. i thought this was getting too specific, but then i thought references to the animas river spill. i have never heard of the animas river. i am sure somebody has, but that seems like a pretty granule detail. i know oil drillers in kansas going out of business because they can't drill because they are in prairie chicken habitat. people cannot sell their land because it is in prairie chicken habitat. so, just because you have not heard of this, don't think, oh, it is granular. i understand we are doing a platform, but there is so much granular detail, hundreds upon hundreds of references in this graph. i know it is hard for me to tell you about something you have not heard before. this really is a big deal and the house of representa

we understand your pain as much as we can. >> i don't understand why people think it's okay to kill police officers. i don't understand why black men die in custody and they're forgotten the next day. i don't know why this has to be us against them. this is all really -- it has to stop. >> the world -- you have everybody's attention, doctor, quite honestly. what do you want to say? what would you like to say to america right now? >> we are all in this together. we are all connected. all this violence, all this hatred, all these disagreements, it impacts us all. whether you realize it or not. this is not the kind of world we want to leave for our children. something has to be done. >> can we talk about your daughter, because you say that you're often out with your daughter and you want her to see you having positive experiences with law enforcement and there are certain things that you do in her presence in the presence of law enforcement to reinforce that. >> well, i -- when i'm out, if i'm at a restaurant and i see police officers in uniform eating, i make it a point to pick up their tab.

and she understands me she understands me better than anybody else. >> you need a ph.d. to do that. >> i could have had you. [ laughter ] >> she is going to hopefully be just doing a great thing. i mean it's a very, very tough thing for somebody to get up in front. >> she doesn't seem the spotlight. >> no, she doesn't. she has tremendous confidence. as i say do make america great again. i'm so happy i did it. i have gotten to know the people of this country. if shy scad or nervous. >> i will give her a short explanation. she is a terrific person and i think she is going to do a terrific job. >> is she dismard. >> i think she is a very confident person but i think she has to be a little bit. i don't even want to ask her the question. i don't want to put it in her mind. >> you are going to introduce her, right? >> i'm going to give her a very quick brief introduction because i want -- this is about her. this evening is really about her. she is a great mother. she is a terrific woman. you know her. and she has been a great wife and i'm going to give her an introduction and

also sings understand of what readers respond to. and his understand of the business. he has a brilliant mind for how organizations were, how retail works. he was the chairman before he became a full-time writer but he knows a lot about marketing. he approaches it from a reader's point of view. he pioneered this idea of doing the one book a year which is way of publishing five hardcovers for adults every year. they are all great. he worked with co-authors. these are his ideas, a his outlines any works within certain bring his ideas. he's built an incredible series of children's books. creating the next generation of readers. he has a new idea that we are launching next june which you can comes out of the reader. he as a reader has sent a looking at how busy i don't allies are contagious and a lot of readers books are too long. they know they like books but they're just a long. he came up with the idea of tracking all of the thrills of one of his thrills in a short novel that is only 140 pages that you can finish in one night to all those thrills than half the time. the

so i understand the critics and the cynics and the people who are frustrated.and just in that view but i also think there's the other view which is if you think about important the important aspects of our life like making sure the food or kitsy at school is not going to make them sick for the drugs that her parents take her back was to kill them. and the drone flying over the playground is not going to crash and hurt some kid. the governor wants to provide basic rules of the road and want the government to prove i'd safety and consistency. the same time they don't want the government to stifle innovation so how do you strike the right balance? more people that have an entrepreneurial background making those decisions whether being congress or the white house. i get frustrated when i hear either the technology innovator saying government is irrelevant or the government saying you can't trust the market. government needs to be more involved. the reality is both of them are portman may need to dance together in a constructive play and listen to each other and res

world to understand why this is so important. [applause] >> thank you, mr. kerry. inspiration to us. today's campaigning anti-trafficking efforts. we really appreciate and honored to have you today. i would like to ask each tip --ort here to stand up with the bahamas. [applause] in recognition of her role as the driving force, her in implement in the country's action plan and her commitment to training those likely to come into contact with victims of human trafficking. [applause] from botswana. [applause] recognition of her by the contribution to the antitrafficking legislation and botswana, her steadfast commitment to enhancing law enforcement and judicial awareness, understanding of human trafficking and bringing prosecution to botswana, her dedication to a victim center approach. [applause] from the republic of cyprus. [applause] in recognition of her dynamic leadership as the head of the police antitrafficking unit in the republic of cyprus, her passion for any command to protection of victims throughout the process and her

i understand the questions and concerns. i want the american people to know that we really did this the right way. you can disagree with us. you cannot fairly say we did it in any click away. we don't carry water for anybody. we try to do with the right thing is. >> i very much appreciate that. and i appreciate that it takes strong people to make certain that we continue to be the nation of laws. one final thing. we have a political debate where a lot of these issues have been raised in will be in the campaign. yet secretary clinton who will have to defend what she did. she has acknowledged. of the great constitutional scholar with the company will make the case why this is wrong. -- we have the great constitutional scholar mr. trump who will make the case that this is wrong. >> adjustment will yield back this time. -- the gentleman will get back his time. the gentleman from kentucky. >> thank you for showing up. and willingness to be transparent and enter a lot of unanswered questions. a few hours before the restart it, i w

don't understand trade, or don't understand foreign-policy, or don't understand the intervention ofhe central banks -- we are all captive. we are living in $19 trillion of debt. we just keep printing money and the debt is not secured by anything. it is too overwhelming for the average individual to think through. we just can't figure out where it is. i think hillary and ted and marco and all these people, they are all first-class. they would not have gotten to where they have gotten if they weren't capable, competent, and elegant and well-meaning. charlie: but that's not how he characterizes them, is it? and you are saying if he did not characterize them that way, he probably would not have won? it was a galvanizing use of language? tom: it was his way around the club. otherwise, the political rhetoric and legacy would not allow him even in the room. so, the only way you could get in the room was to knock the walls down. charlie: how much of it is set -- said for effect and to get around, and how much of it is said for effect and to get around, and how much of it is what he believes

we have to understand that is really important. think one of the great concerns that the religious leaders have had on the island and we have certainly express in every debt restructuring plan we have worked on around the world for the last 20 years is that going forward, there needs to be greater public budget transparency. the debt audit commission is key to this. we also agree that the oversight board is not the actual answer for this. there's no way to talk about the oversight board in puerto rico without talking about puerto rico's colonial status. and it is also true the religious leaders acknowledge that reality and are very saddened by that. but they knew going forward, passing this legislation in order to get votes on both sides of the aisle had to do this. acknowledging the oversight commission's status and the issues o of colonialism on the island, i think it is really important to understand what the legislation actually says about the oversight commission. even though we don't believe it is an efficient way to install

now, i understand what the meaning of the tarmac at the and thewith mr. clinton secretary in charge of all of that attorneys and so forth. i understand with that meeting was about now. that is the end of my thought. host: as of yet there has been no reaction from hillary clinton or her spokesman. donald trump has tweeted "the system is rigged. petraeus got in trouble. very unfair. " he also says that crooked hillary compromised our national security. act ii your phone calls. calling fromul washington on the others line. caller: you know, i think the fbi director is an honest and honorable person. i don't think he really had any other choice. because i don't think he would be able to get a job in washington, d.c.. with theis the problem system that we have right now. i think the pressure put on him was phenomenal. and we have to take his hat off for his statement. i think he is an honorable person. i don't think people should be upset with him. i'm not clear where you are standing here on the fbi director. well, i don't think he had any choice but to not b

you understand? you understand me? >> yes. >> i can't hear you. do you understand me? >> yes! >> all right, guys. >> hurry up. let's go. >> it's not often that you see all the inmates, you know, working to the sort of a common cause. and once those kids were brought up into that unit you could tell that everyone was there to put the fear inside them. >> get them sneakers. >> they're gone already. >> you in there? >> bring them in here. bring them in here. >> bring them in here. >> you and me going to play, right? >> while the three younger boys seem shaken at times. 16-year-old damon pope maintained his nonchalant attitude. >> can you give me the time? >> you have somewhere to go? >> i'm going somewhere. >> keep your mouth shut. what i tell you? i don't care how much -- you're in jail. you're in jail. okay? welcome to nashua street jail. step to the back of the wall. >> we followed the kids up to one of the housing units so they could see where one of their next bedrooms could be if they continued on this path. i think it was probably one of the scariest parts for the kids, th

understand our fears. underwhat's going on.something much more hopeful and inspirational. >> getting the balance right, donna, is a challenge. >> it is. you can say there's a lot of pain in america. but also have solutions. talk about how to make america, stronger, safer, without what i call persecuting hillary clinton. last week, we heard the republicans persecute her. they didn't prosecute a case. they persecuted her. it was personal. it was mean-spirited. and you know what? there came a point where it was just, every -- it was the only thing that united the republican party. they've done that for 7 1/2 years. >> besides being mad at ted cruz. >> oh, well. don't throw it my way. but, i think this week, hillary clinton has a great opportunity to show the american people that she understands their pain and she has -- she has a way to solve it. i think she can do that. >> keith, did she make the right first step with the pick of tim kaine? as we talked about with robby mook. there have been a lot of progressives, not necessarily

but now you understand. [laughter] [inaudible] so letters between jefferson and his daughter? that they felt very strongly about the young lady who was a servant but now we know was the mistress so we have that kind of evidence we know the rest some type of the acceptance. >> we do know from otherssion and love. abutters between the daughter and a family that sally having said that they were special.amily the people who don't know sally having some of there was also a jeffersons wife's father you can tell by the way he treats the entire family she is part of all web of the relationships clearly the six people are separate and different because they're connected to his wife is in just somebody but it is a connection by the way he treats sally having said that she is different. yes there is more to it is much more complicated it isn't the stereotypical symbolic relationship or even the most common that most of these is rape any time you put it then in control of the bodies of women that is what you will have spent heterosexual menp, g and women working in living together like ba

so by monitoring glacier variations, we can understand a lot about climate systems, and so they're one of the first sost of early hallmamarks of climate change on the planet. >> dr. arendt helps create high-resolution computer models of glaciers like this one using data from satellites, airplanes, and deep snow pits like these to develop a clear picture of our future global climate. 95% of alaskan glaciers are melting at an unnatural and unprecedented pace. >> glacieiers arere really large contributors to changing sea levels. you wantnt to be able to quantify how much water is coming out of these systems every year and then use that information to develop modedels and predict in thehe future to help policymakers plan for potential facts of sea level change in the next 50 or 100 years. >> scientists like dr. arendt come here to conduct research and to share their experience with the young-and-upcoming researchersrs taking g part in e program. to colollect the ground data that sophisticated high-tech science depends on, students have to cross vast distances through the isolated heart of

they understand that it is deliberate. they understand that they're playing footsy with some very dangerous radical disgusting elements of this country. and that they hope to ride into the white house based on that support. it's disgraceful. it's disgraceful. >> scotty, i want to just run this by you because this is also why it's important. according to the fbi, almost 57% of hate crime victims are jewish, 57%. 16% are muslim.

i understand that the vast majority, 95% plus of these officers are doing the job right. it's when you have that negative interaction and when you consistently see african-american men and an officer on top, as we saw in baton rouge baton rouge and as we saw shooting through a window with a 4-year-old right behind, it's hard to stop and not ask very important and difficult questions. >> let me play one more sound bite for you. this was the dallas police chief and your reaction to this statement. >> we don't feel much support, most days. let's not make today most days. please, we need your support. >> your thoughts? >> i think he's right. at the end of the day, we have men and women in uniform who are putting their lives on the line, and their brothers in uniform are dying, trying to allow for us to express our first amendment rights, the freedom to assemble, the freedom to express ourselves. and to see that kind of devastation and you see that police officers in the crowd, mixed in, taking pictures and having a good time and then you hear the sound of a sniper targeting n

i understand the concern about business and taxing the wealthy, but i want you to understand that a 46-dollar fee for every unit is a terribly regressive tax on the students. when i was a student at city college in the 70's it was free and the only reason i pay taxes in the city is because city college was free at that time. it would be a terrible mistake to not take advantage of lifting the lives of the 99% -- not just the 1% in our city. we can't call ourselves progressive anymore if we don't pass the real property transfer tax and free city college. boston, l.a. and chicago are already looking at it. l.a. hopes to have it by 2017. boston i understand already has the form and i thank those really supporting it and i would hope our supervisors that tend to put business interests before the people that live here to change their mind about the tax. >> thank you very much. i will call the rest of the cards. i have two more. [calling speaker names] >> hello supervisors. jay chang from the san francisco association of realtors and represent the agents active in san francisco and here to ta

we are not guaranteed to remain so i understand people that are frustrated and i understand that view but i also think there is the other of you if you think about important aspects making sure the food our kids need a school isn't going to make them sick or kill them and even drones flying over the playground but aren't going to crash. they want the government to provide some basic kind of safety consistency and at the same time they don't want government to overreach and stifle innovation. so it's a good example. making those decisions it's important to strike that balance. i get frustrated if i hear either side saying we can't trust the market they need to dance together in a constructive way or listen to each other or respect each other to figure out what the right path is forward. it should be obvious because it is so large. it's certainly bureaucratic and can get in the way that there are things that are indispensable for government has to do so you touch on that in the book and while acknowledging i don't want to provide fuel to the fire that you are advocating that you're not

i understand. was there any evidence of hillary clinton attempting to avoid compliance with the freedom of information act? director comey: that was not the subject of our criminal investigation, so i cannot answer that sitting here. chairman: it is a violation of law, is it not? director comey: yes, my understanding is there are civil statutes. chairman: let us for the boundary on what you did not look at, you did not look at whether there was an intention or the reality of noncompliance with the freedom of information act. director comey: correct. chairman: you did not look at testimony that hillary clinton gave in the united states congress, both house and senate. director comey: to see whether it was perjury? no, we did not. chairman: did you review a look at those transcripts as to the intent of your recommendation? director comey: i am sure my folks did. i did not. chairman: so, ok, this is an important point. those of us in congress knowing you have a criminal referral from inspector general

it's about understanding that if we do not transform our economy, our younger generation will likely have a lower standard of living than their parents. endingection is about the grotesque levels of income and wealth inequality in america today. >> [cheers and applause] sen. sanders: it is not moral, it is not acceptable, and it is not sustainable, that the top 1/10 of 1% now owns almost as much wealth as the bottom 90%. >> [booing] top sanders: or that the earnedrecent years, has 85% of all new income. that is unacceptable. that must change. >> [booing] sen. sanders: this election is about remembering where we were seven and a half years ago, when president obama came into office after eight years of republican trickle-down economics. >> [cheers and applause] sen. sanders: the republicans want us to forget that as a result of the greed, recklessness, and illegal behavior on wall street, our economy was in the worst economic downturn since the great depression. >> [cheers and applause]. sen. sanders: that is where we were. that is where we were. month wereple a losing their jobs, 800

the good news here, i understand the fear so many people have and mistrust and secretary clinton understands when we bring people together, when we learn about how we can do things like de escalation training, when we understand and not talk past each other but together with each other, i think you can build trust. i saw it in los angeles and saw it in seattle, washington. i worked a lot with the police department there. secretary clinton understands we can do this as long as we marshall the collective power of we and don't talk past each other and don't create false choices. >> yesterday, the formal announcement mrs. clinton will pursue a public option for government healthcare, one she's associated with in the past. senator bernie sanders issued a statement congratulating her and conservatives not the tame. desperate to win over the warren-sanders crew that deeply distrusts her, secretary clinton is willing to adopt even the most extreme left wing views as her own. there is quite literally flog she won't do or say to fit into today's modern socialist party. has the party pulled her so far

to understand those implications there is an important meeting of the famous conference and paul and several others discovered the technology to cut and paste. that is relatively simple technology. and then to stick them together and of another factor which your dna strand breaks. but if you just combined these you could suddenly start taking a gene from a frog in the virus. and cancer drugs are made this way. you could pick a gene from a blue whale to put into a monkey sell them recognize it as a monkey she never make it as such. because we evolve from the original same organisms so well in this technology was first created in the open meeting the journalists came in a all spent months reading. . . suggested that there should be a moratorium on anything in particular kinds with embryonic stem cells of certain kinds. meanwhile they went ahead and tried to find embryos to. >> and what was the result? >> it was published and the quick answer is that in principle they could make genetic changes. >> and what does that mean? >> in principle if you tweak the technology you could say i'm in

understand jealousy, we would understand hate. love is the only thing we moderns say can't have existed in the past in the same way. we recognize hate, jealousy, all those things are the same but this one is not. just because we are talking about family, we are talking loss. people do not always -- what the law says it does, that is a way of saying because african-american people did not have legal families, they did not have love. you would never say that, you would never say that. this is a complicated thing and that is why it is such a hard notion, because we have an understanding of family. he can't accept it will be a partner -- parlor wife, and can't be family in that way. we really don't know. we really don't agree. >> we do know at least based on your first book sally hemmings didn't just appear. he -- he was 9 years old when he sent for the first time. >> he did not send for her. what happened was, people didn't hear sally hemmings, was she 9 years old when he sent for her? jefferson is in paris, he wants's younger daught

do you understand how difficult that is? >> i understand the fear. i understand the legacy. but do you honestly believe out of the 3 million interactions of police with people of all colors, there's one cop for every -- that every one of these instances, that police go out and say i'm going to brutalize a black man? >> of course not. it's the consequence. you're making my point for me even better. >> thank you. >> it is an unconscious, if you will, inclination to see that black person differently, through a different prism, to have greater fear. the police, the cop on the front line, feels a kind of intensity that he does not feel. let me give you an example. on the internet right now is a white guy going ham, crazy, beating up, striking out with a machete, and the white police allow him to leave the door of the establishment, and people say, bolt the doors. these are two cops who could have killed him. do you think that an african-american person wielding a machete would have been granted that -- >> michael, come in here. >> i think we're discovering more broadly that our b

see can relate and understand. is even if weal don't know the people, we want to recall their humanity and reclaim their humanity. that is one of the goals of this whole museum. i will take you around. part of what happens is why you're exploring the creation of the united states, you come out to this open space which begins with a constitutional convention and thank you to the slavery that most of us know, 19th-century slavery. what is important is this wall is called the wall of freedom. obviously, gives people a sense of the impact that african americans have had in shaping our national destiny. we look at the declaration, the constitution, the we go around and try to find documents that are written by african-americans that make concrete, make manifest, make real on the notions of freedom and equality. in a way, part of the goal is to suggest that the story of slavery, the story of slavery and freedom is the quintessential american story. not a story about a people, about a nation. if you could talk a little bi

this is my understanding that they did. we can double check that. but that is my understanding. and we'll double check that. going on, let me move to the next topic. you explained on tuesday that you were providing, quote, an update on the fbi's investigation of secretary clinton's use of a personal e-mail system during her time as secretary of state. you explained that you received a referral on this matter from the inspector general of intelligence community on july 6th 2016. is that right? >> yes. >> today, tens of thousands of secretary clinton's e-mails are publicly available on the state department's website. and our staff have been reviewing the e-mails that were retroactively determined to include classified information. based on this review, it appears that these e-mails included more than 1,000 individuals who sent or received the information that is now redacted as classified. let me make that clear. about 1,000 people sent or received the same information that was contained in secretary clinton's e-mails, and retroactively classified. were you aware of that? >> no. t

historic preservation is vital to helping us understand these great american places. centennial year of the national parks service. are nationalsites parks. i think of these places, monticello which is in the national park which has been preserved over the years, these are the places that have been preserved. in each one of the essays, i have a few sentences about some of the heroes and men and women who are not as well known in history, but who played a large role in preserving our history at these great historic sites. on grand central terminal, i quoted jacqueline kennedy onassis who led the fight in the 1970's to preserve grand central terminal. she wrote, and she said as she was fighting for the preservation of grand central terminal, she said something that was universal as far as historic preservation. she wrote "is it not cruel to let our city die by degree, stripped of all her history and beauty to inspire our children? if our children are not inspired by the past of our city, where will they find the strength to find for our future? if the children are not i

i really do want to focus on the understanding part, the creative understanding part. a penn pale tolt working with a colleague in china recently found a forest preserved in volcanic ash from a time nearly 300 million years ago when the earth went through a rapid change from cold to hot, similar to what we're experiencing today. what we're learning there can help predict global warming and how it will progress. another penn team has developed a rapid low-cost genetic test for the zika virus. the ability to rapidly and reliably identify disease outbreaks is the first critical step in effectively controlling them. elsewhere at penn, at our annenberg school of communication, our dean is here with us today, scholars are working at annenberg and across the schools of arts and sciences and other skoos, engaged in pioneering work, understanding how isis uses the tools of social media and the internet to provoke fear and inspire followers, and what tools are available to combat these terrorist forces before they gather and spread. so as these examples suggest and as this wonde