because they have to decide howuch is aeasonable amount that sulbe pai undethe ciumstances, because youasi see at the will lo of problems with regartoiquidated damages,ecause in e event thathe a no acal damages suffered, gardless, anhe coct is gog to have y at10a day. [narrato >> the johons decided to contact an attorney after the contractor refused to correct theool probm. in examining the construction contract their lawyer noted tt the liquidated damage clause for non-completion of the conact would not apply in this situation, and that there was no mention of any oer clause for liquidated damages. their attorney also pointed out that punitive damages did not apply in their case, because there wasn't any evidence of bad condt or ttuous bevior, and the urts rarelaward putive damages for each of contract. their lawyer did, however, focus on the development of a suit for compensatory damages. those sumsf money that would place the johnsons, the injured party, in the same economic posionad tontrac en perrmed correctly the johnsons liked the idea of compensatory damages e ey wanted some mps