. >> guest: when i like across the country i see a lot of undeveloped land but a lot of it is undeveloped. >> host: if you look at the price of commodities over time that keep falling if they were scarce the prices would be going up, even the most basic commodity which is food in the second most basic was water and fuel. those prices have come down to. it doesn't look like were facing a world of scarcity and the population growth has come down in the rich get richer and have fewer children. >> guest: certainly climate change is one what surprises me is i don't think this is an issue that should be a partisan issue. i think there are differences in what we do about climate change but i think to deny climate change and that it's actually happening and we will have serious effects on our lifestyle and crops and where we can live in all of that, the economy particularly it's sticking your head in the sand. >> host: i suggest part of the reason we have this debate is that there are some people who simply say it's a hoax or not true, it's been made up by china or whatever it's been made up to h

commercial and industrial water use is another major component, that to be totally honest, a somewhat undevelopedin the service area. is not the largest sector of water use, and it has been one that has not easily been responding to previous water conservation efforts. so now, looking at, you know, what kind of commercial audits can we do? which ones are successful? how do we all classify our commercial accounts? do we all do it the same? and how do we change that at what would that take? these type of questions all get into different departments, if you will in the city, you know, who does the billing, who does all the information. it is not a slamdunk and try to figure out the answers. and then, water loss is another major component of legislation. it was building on a previous bill that passed a few years before that. senate bill 555 that required agencies did you water loss evaluations, and then do verifications after that, every year. the first set of evaluations were sent in last fall. and now he requires verification. this is done annually. again, these are areas where it is like, what wor

different methodology but it's benign and was pioneered by the obama campaign in 2008 and 2012 and undevelopedin our own way in 2014, 15 and 16 so forth. this is a similar technology that the other agencies were using certainly across western europe but possibly not in the country such as turkey which is why we saw the market opportunity. there is no cheering of the secrets of a company. >> there are numbers of people that are raising concerns about this but in terms of sure methodology, what have they done in particular with a combination of big data and psychological profiling. let's talk about the particular interests of your work for the campaigns that you are involved in a. a. i think it's understandable why some people are worried about this. >> how many clients could they be representing the. the. are we talking about politics or commercial work? >> when i last saw you february, we had maybe 3 30 clients were 5 client. >> do you have any due diligen diligence? >> not enough as is demonstrat demonstrated. >> to you have a process or place for any sort of due diligence? is that a yes or n

with regard to the mexican asylum and refugee assistance agency, it is very small and undeveloped. you can ask, we have developed an extensive refugee and asylum capacity and citizenship and immigration services. we didn't always have that. this is an occasion to start to build that capacity. the width of experience not only from u.s. agencies, but also world agencies to say to mexico, you are not a transit country and will shortly become a destination country with regard to migration, and you have to have the capacity to deal with asylum and refugee claims. i think the mexican people have proclaimed their support for immigrant rights. we are at the beginning of a new era in migration. it should be an occasion to build up that capacity. >> on the side agreements, i would say that most of the actions that have to be taken are at the national level. bi-national or regional level. for example, in the u.s., there is something called trade adjustment assistance. why can't that be proactive to make sure there is training for workers? why does it have to be trade related? why isn't it tec

jug life provides clean drinking water in undeveloped areas of the world.tes steph curry, kevin durant and draymond green will take part in this. >> that's going to be amazing. >> i love that. rocking the fanny pack, doing his beach dance. i loved it. >> all the time on instagram you said going live? >> i think he was doing instagram live or instagram story or something. >> spencer is 6'1". >> for some perspective. >> yes, that's true. our green screen is almost big enough for javale. notice he was squatting down a little. >> the green screen is like ten feet tall, right? >> could have dunked on it? >> let's talk about what's going o. weather wise, it's going to be a warm one and a sunny one. good news, we stopped the delays at sfo at least weatherwise, three consecutive days yesterday. look at all that sunshine. let's use that for the backdrop and talk about unfortunately dangerous heat today and linger through tomorrow. we'll see stars everywhere tonight. not feeling quite as cool as this morning. our normal pattern, we'll get back to that next week. unti

they're concern for human rights of migrants and they would continue to support this, but, yes, undeveloped now but, in fact, we're at the beginning of a new era in migration and it should be the occasion to build up that capacity. >> antonio? >> briefly on the side agreements. i would say that most of the actions that have to be taken are at the national level not at the binational or regional level. for example, the u.s. there's something called trade adjustment assistance. why does it have to be assistance? why can't it be proactive to make sure there's ongoing training for workers and why does it have to be trade related? what if it's technology related. it gets very complicated. it's easy to blame trade and especially the worse agreement that the u.s. has ever subscribed for everything that happens in the u.s., but it is just wrong. it's just wrong. you need to do a lot of things domestically in terms of mexico, u.s. cooperation perhaps ambassador jacobson will speak about this but it will be great to have much more work transfers between mexico and the u.s. mexican companies and u.s.

jug life provides clean drinking water in undeveloped areas of the world. steph curry, kevin durt and draymond green are taking part. that's going to be some outing. >> i liked his fanny pack on. can you do this little javale dance the next time you show the santa cruz camera. >> i think he was taking national selfie day serious. >> was it facebook live or instagram? >> i think it was insta. >> interesting how he could look at his phone and still see what was behind him. good for him. i hope they had fun. sometimes working the mornings does have its advantages. >> stop by at 5:20 in the morning, javale. >> welcome mat is always out. >>> hi, everybody. you're never more than seven minutes away from my accuweather forecast. a couple of rappers going to be there and about the entire team at the tournament. hopefully you can get out there and raise some money. here is a look at our roof camera. you can see no activity at least flagwise at the ferry building. look how limp they are. things will be robust today and tomorrow under sunshine. poor air quality possib

that analogy does not apply to a developed high-wage economy, essentially being preyed on, to an undeveloped low-wage economy to destroy whole economic sectors in this country. it doesn't even out over time. even if the economic aggregate rise,h goes up, the net if it isn't distributed equally in this country here, you are going to cause a lot of political pain and heartache and other things. and once industries are gone in this country over here, that builds -- that becomes a national security risk. you can't build a fighter jet anymore without all kinds of parts from china. well, do you really want the chinese to have much of anything to do with the u.s. defense industry? i don't. >> the president the other day said he was worried about chinese jobs, and we should walk back. >> he pointed out that in a particular company -- u.s.particular company the intelligence community has warned about for years at the commerce department has gone after because they violated sanctions on north korea and iran. the secretary of commerce to study at, in part based on a u.s. job component in the supply cha

projects include affordable housing in gilroy, called gateway senior apartments is planned for an undeveloped area on monterey street near ir vine court. today county supervisors will also vote on creating a $25 million down payment to help for first time home buyers. all new this morning, miss america getting rid of its swim suit competition and it also will not be called a beauty pageant anymore. the two bombshells announced on abc this morning, outlining future of the miss america competition, not only will the swim suit competition go away but the evening gown competition also being revamped. the goal is to stop judging women on the outward appearance and also acknowledged the me too movement for inspiring the changes. you'll see them when the next miss america competition takes place in september. >> gun shows could be a thing of the past in cow palace there today in san mateo county supervisors will consider whether to support a ban to ban sales of guns at the venue. the bill is making its way through the state legislature now. gun control advocates recently protested at the cow palace

. >> guest: with eye flight across the country i see a lot of undeveloped land. a lot of it is unlivable. >> host: if you look at just the price of commodities over time you see the keep falling which suggests there's plenty of them. if they were scarce the price of would be going up to even the price of those basic commodity of all which is food, and the second most basic commodity argue become a well, food and water, fuel. those prices have come down, too. doesn't look like we're facing a world of scarcity and the population has come down, population growth, as people get richer they have fewer children. maybe not the same probably you think. >> guest: i don't see it as a pressing problem that we thought it was. i still think it's an issue. >> host: all right. >> guest: shortly climate change i believe is one. you know what stuns me is, disappointed about climate change is i don't think this is an issue that should be a partisan issue. i don't think we should be, i think there are differences in what we do about climate change, but i think to deny climate chang

does not -- that analogy does not apply to a high wage economy essentially being preyed on to an undeveloped low wage economy deliberately setting policy to destroy whole economic sectors in this country over here. over sn't even itself out time even if the economic aggregate of both goes up, -- the net the net rise, if it isn't distributed equally in this country here, is going to cause a lot of pain and political heartache and other things. you know, once industries are gone in this country over here, that also becomes a national security know, can't build a fighter jet in the united states anymore with all kinds of steel and parts from china. well, you know, do you really want the chinese having really to do with u.s. defense industry? i don't. >> i don't know. i mean, the president the other the president the other day said that he was worried about chinese jobs and we should -- >> no. we should walk back sanctions. >> he pointed out that in a there are --mpany, >> particular company that the u.s. intelligence company has warned about for years and which commerce department has gone afte

they are top of the tree for us and undeveloped equity exposure.still think fundamentals people should be focusing on. anna: focus on the fundamentals. part of that story is the exit by central banks globally from an extraordinarily loose monetary policy since the financial crisis. warned that markets should not be afraid of shaking markets. europe,nk it is 2018 in a 2019 story. they will continue to try and get the patient off of the emergency management drip. the patient is no longer sick. they don't want to give extreme medicine anymore. i think they will not raise interest rates for at least a year. you could see president draghi leave without heather -- ever raising rates. when you look at the middle of 2020 before you get to zero on deposit rates, that feels a little shy for us. i think we need to get interest rates up because the financial stability risks should start to emerge, because business confidence is at decent levels. manus: very briefly, we look at inflation data on friday. we expect 2% for the second time since 2013. are we at esc

i would like to focus on how the sec treats proven but undeveloped reserves. it concerns me a bit. currently, domestic producers can report on their annual filings, only those reserves they plan to recover within a five year window. this is been the policy since 2008. at that time, shale accounted for a much smaller percentage of oil and gas production than it does now. i would suggest to you that this five year rule right not reflect the realities of the new american energy landscape. the shale formations are so fast and finite that a proper development plan will often exceed five years. chairman clayton, given this change in domestic energy production, have you and your staff given any thought to changing the five-year rule for these reserves? speck of the short answer is yes. -- >> the short answer is yes. let me make sure we're on the same page. is in particular, yes. because i am concerned in this space that's the way the rules require disclosure, it is inconsistent with the way investors value the company's. so, they are looking for additional disclosures. we should make sure

i'd like to focus on how the sec treats proven but undeveloped reserves because it concerns me a bit. currently domestic producers can report on their annual filings only those reserves they plan to recover within a five-year window. this has been the policy since 2008. at that time shale accounted for a much smaller percentage of oil and gas production than it does now and i would suggest to you that this five-year rule might not reflect the realities of the new american energy landscape. the shale formations are so vast and finite that a proper development plan will often exceed five years. chairman clayton, given this change in domestic energy production have you and your staff given any thoughts to changing the five-year rule for these reserves? >> the short answer is yes. and let me make sure that -- if you indulge me, make sure we are on the same page. it's in particular, yes, because i'm concerned in this space that the way our rules require disclosure is inconsistent with the way investors value these companies. so they are looking for additional disclosures and we should make

i would like to focus on how the sec treats-- treats proven but undeveloped deserves-- reserves becauseit concerns me a bit. domestic producers can report on their annual filings only the reserves they plan to recover within five-year window and this has been the policy since 2008 and at that time shale accounted for a much smaller percentage of oil and gas production than it does now and i would suggest that this five-year rule might not reflect realities of the new american energy landscape. the shale formations are so vast and finite for proper development plan it will often exceed five years, so chairman, given this change in domestic energy production have you and your staff can have been any thought to change in the five-year rule for these reservists? >> the short answer is yes and let me make sure-- if you would indulge me to make sure we are on the same page. in particular, guess because i am concerned in this space that the way our rubles require disclosure is inconsistent with the way investors value these companies, so they are looking for additional disclosure and we should

different methodology but it's benign and was pioneered by the obama campaign in 2008 and 2012 and undevelopedin our own way in 2014, 15 and 16 so forth. this is a similar technology that the other agencies were using certainly across western europe but possibly not in the country such as turkey which is why we saw the market opportunity. there is no cheering of the secrets of a company. >> there are numbers of people that are raising concerns about this but in terms of sure methodology, what have they done in particular with a combination of big data and psychological profiling. let's talk about the particular interests of your work for the campaigns that you are involved in a. a. i think it's understandable why some people are worried about this. >> how many clients could they be representing the. the. are we talking about politics or commercial work? >> when i last saw you february, we had maybe 3 30 clients were 5 client. >> do you have any due diligen diligence? >> not enough as is demonstrat demonstrated. >> to you have a process or place for any sort of due diligence? is that a yes or n

cfius has no legal authority to review if a foreign company chooses to buy real estate that is undeveloped. a raw piece of land somewhere, there is not subject to cfius review. but what if an unfriendly government has an investment in a company in their country that wants to buy a big tract of land right next to a sensitive military installation of the united states? that might be a convenient place for them to set up listening devices and other ways for them to spy on our military capabilities, for instance. so i think it's a good idea to give cfius the authority to look at real estate transactions. it would also expand cfius's authority to look at nonpassive investment in critical technology or infrastructure by any foreign person. it would review any change in foreign investors' rights regarding a u.s. business, and there are many other new categories of transactions. so cfius historically, roughly speaking, i think they review something on the order of 200 or 250 transactions per year under existing law. if this new reform is adopted, then the experts believe that cfius will likely rev