no one abandons an apartment house unless it is uneconomical to continue to own it.y i think i was paying 37, 38 cents a gallon for fuel oil. now i pay $1.23 a gallon. if i could get a decent rental-- i'm not out to overdo anything. i'm only asking for what is necessary to keep the property in good order. there are times when that may be true. at other times you have to subordinate the economic factor to the social factor. when people of middle income or low income cannot find housing which they can afford, something has to be done to help. where rent controls don't apply, the natural laws of supply and demand have come into play. if there is demand for something, someone will oversupply it. that will drive down the rents. i've lived in this apartment for about 28 years. to move now to any other location without rent control, i couldn't afford it. i'm determined to keep what i got. rent control will probably always be an emotionally charged issue in new york city. it provided affordable housing to many in need, but over the long run, it put a stranglehold on the quan

they are politically and uneconomically week. that's why they started an n.g.o. the u.n. security council adopted a resolution on peace and security and the u.n. was a major player in the transition to peace. they had an action plan which analysts say looks good on paper, but has major problems. >> the whole focus was to get them out of the company. it was basically basic needs and the economic security part. >> the once powerful women snubbed by the state and their own party until they can build a life for themselves. >> reporter: people in one of india's largest state say a ban on the slaughter banned the killing of bulls used for meet and leather. we have this report from mumbai. these are the last leather tans to be used. the reason for the ban on the slaughter of bulls put it at risk. >> translation: the leather was sent for finishing in other parts of the company and came back to make jackets, shoes and bags. a lot can't feed their family. has the government come to help or kill us. >> reporter: many say the ban hurt them. three of 10 sewing stations are used. those

transition lines we have today that is a pressure on t us a challenge our transition assets maybe uneconomic for us to operation and the pg&e enter miblz with the transition serve only pg&e we pay pg&e for that service and have open access and pg&e has open assess requirements that works to our favor with the extradition of your interconnection agreement that presents an opportunity and moving to the expeditiously challenge our water first policy we have basically on the power side n an operating realty the water first policy reduce our operating operations responsiveness to the power needs because power is really treated as a biproduct of water delivery so as we see dissected our water neatest over generation and we're less able to match our supply with our demand less able to respond and in the swhoelt market we'll see a wholesale price spike if we're not in need of water we can't take advantage of the generation of sales into that favorable market because we are producing electrical as a biproduct of flowing of water for san francisco's citizens on the waterside as i say that's an operati

situation in which epa -- or epa faced a situation in which 50% or 75% were going to face vastly uneconomic consequences, but this case didn't present that situation. epa made a judgment about -- >> can i simplify your answer for you? >> yes, i'd be delighted if you did that. >> all right. basically, you have consistently in your brief and so has the other respondents, basically said at the listing stage we don't consider costs, we consider it later. and everybody gave a few examples. whether this example was given or not is irrelevant. the issue here was do you have to do it at listing? it's only some of my colleagues here who are concerned that when you issue standards you never consider costs. >> and that's exactly right. the question here is whether epa's got to conduct a cost-benefit analysis when it goes to the listing. and the logic of the statute of 7412 doesn't offer -- >> at that point the game is over. >> no, i don't think it is justice kennedy, for several reasons. first, the standard under section 7412d for setting emissions standards once you've decided to list that is your ho

part of the recently caol --- of the reason coal plants were going to close because they were uneconomicalo the operators. this is been worked on for a long time. community residents have been working on that in little village or 20 years. it was the result of people in the working -- in little village working for a long time. rahm emanuel: in a negotiating is a mayor, you use that as leverage to shut down. the effort goes into the community groups. the difference is that protesting is not the same as making process. not to shut down coal plants, but to invest in neighborhoods so that they-- jesus garcia: not money came the state. host: we have a viewer question for mayor emanuel. many of your donors receive contracts in the city and are exempt from your new revelations. given -- your new regulations. rahm emanuel: that is a fundamental reform of chicago's hiring practice where corruption to occur. here are the three things that i thought supporters that they are wrong. we are raising the minimum wage in the city of chicago by 40%. if you work, work should pay. 2, i told the real estate de

part of the reason the coal plants are going to close was because they were becoming uneconomical.here was a lot of advocacy -- the groups deserved all the credit. they worked on it for a long time. the community residents that is why they -- residents that is why they closed. moderator: quick response. mr. emanuel: two points. that was the price of natural gas and when you are negotiating, you'd use that to leverage and the coal plant operator to shut down. the effort does go to the community groups but the difference is protesting is not the same as making progress. not only to shut the coal plant down but to open the park they wanted. that is how you invest in neighborhoods. moderator: the money came from the state. let's move on to the next topic. we have a viewer question. this is addressed to mayor emmanuel. many of your donors receive contracts from the city and are exempt from your new regulations. is inter-leadership compromised by the favors you go to these people? mr. emanuel: two points. first, it was during my tenure that the stain was on chicago for its hiring practic

part of the reason the coal plants are going to close was because they were becoming uneconomical.here was a lot of advocacy -- the groups deserved all the credit. they worked on it for a long time. the community residents that is why they -- residents that is why they closed. moderator: quick response. mr. emanuel: two points. that was the price of natural gas and when you are negotiating, you'd use that to leverage and the coal plant operator to shut down. the effort does go to the community groups but the difference is protesting is not the same as making progress. not only to shut the coal plant down but to open the park they wanted. that is how you invest in neighborhoods. moderator: the money came from the state. let's move on to the next topic. we have a viewer question. this is addressed to mayor emmanuel. many of your donors receive contracts from the city and are exempt from your new regulations. is inter-leadership compromised by the favors you go to these people? mr. emanuel: two points. first, it was during my tenure that the stain was on chicago for its hiring practic

was that aboutgk& 2% of electrical generating capacity could go offline as a result of it being uneconomico it is not a 50% or a 88% -- >> right. as soon as you've said that you've taken costs into account which is what they say they wouldn't do. >> now let me talk about the way epa, under this regime, does take costs into account. the first point i would make is that the situation that your honor described in the hype thete1 is ical one is an unusual one. the kind you discussed in your concurring opinions in whitman and -- in the normal case it is not going to have that effect. it means this percentage of the industry has been able to meet this without an economic matter and congress is trying to force the rest of the industry to catch up. as ñ we know from multiple experiences as your honor acid rain it turned out the cost was vastly lower on industry than epa anticipated it would be. that there is a very great tepidcy to overestimate costs in that situation. the third point is your honor's point about subcategories. section 7412c1, which is the provision that governs the listing of cate

here because they have spent $6 trillion on infrastructure over the last six years that is either uneconomiced or unusable in many cases. so they have a shadow banking system, a real estate problem and then mandy, to switch from shanghai, you've seen stocks go up 55% year to date and there's talk it's driven largely by mom-and-pop investors. >> and that's the concern, mom and pops. >> not to condescend to retail when they start driving up small speculative stocks that's when you start to worry. some of that is spilling over to hong kong has china revolutionized rules. >> and you're certainly hearing a lot of reports about the mom and pop opening multiple brokerage accounts. >> in terms of investor behavior. if china were to rebound from its relatively slow pace of growth, if the qe program comes through and can deal with shadow banking issues without toppling the economy, some of this might be healthy and catch up with the rest of the world. >> so what do you think is going to happen with the market here? >> when i see things go parabolic i start to get nervous. i would be careful with respe

part of the reason the coal plants were going to close was they were becoming uneconomical to the operatorsoups deserve all the credit. they worked on it for a long time as was the case with the park. the community residents have been working on that issue for almost 20 years in a little village, and that's why they closed. it was the result of people in little village and canaryville -- >> moderator: quick response before we get on to the next topic. mayor. emanuel: two points. yes, it was the price natural gas, and that's when you're negotiating, you use that to leverage to force the coal plant operator to shut down. two, the effort does go to all the community groups. the difference is protesting is not the same as making progress, and those are shut today during my tenure working with the community groups. not only to shut the coal plants but to open up a park they wanted for ten years, and that's how you invest in the neighborhood so they have the quality of life. bar garre and most of the money came from the statement. [laughter] >> moderator: let's move on to the next topic, and we h