one point mark brought up about the stereotype of democrats being the party of the uneducated rabble. that stereotype shifted to the tea party, who were considered and a ticket rabble, -- uneducated rabble, and they have raised the level of discourse by making people look at the constitution. let me just say one thing about romney and newt. newt's endorsement is not important, but santorum's will have some effect. i don't expect newt will get anything in tampa. santorum gained influence with social conservatives, who are still not enthusiastic. it will be hard for him to do it, but if he did something for romney that is half-sincere, it would help to shore up the base and let it run the appeal to the middle. -- romney a bill to the middle. >> it is problem that romney is seen as cold and out of touch, but obama has the same problem. he is a pretty chilly guy. it is the weird thing in this election, this age of populism, that we have these chilly technocrats who graduated from harvard law school. they don't want people to know that, -- >> a book coming out about obama -- >> making the

two story types of the two parties are the democrats are the party the rabble, uneducated -- >> like the tea party people.. >>eah, so they likeke to nominate candidates tt are wellborn, franklin roosevelt adlai stevenson the republicans are the wellborn and they like to nominate people from humble origins, ronald reagan herbert hoover. the problem with romney is that he reinforces that stereotype of the republicans of the party that is wellbornrn and out of touch. >> not saying that senator mitchell's report is s entirely wrong. i'm saying the statements about me are wrong. i have n never taken steroids or hdh. >> that is roger clemens testifying before congress in 2008. he is on trial for perrjury. nina you were there. >> the prosecution's star witness was supposed to be andy pettitte because they're under main witness has credibility problem. the problem is that he was not the icing on the cake, and he basically recanted when the defense lawyer on cross- examination said, "is it possible you are e wrong? what are the odds that this was 50/50 that you are wrong was " he says, "that

the two types of the parties, the democrats are party of the rabble, uneducated -- >> like tea party people. >> so they nominate people who are wellborn, franklin roosevelt, adlai stevenson. republicans are well off and they nominate people for humble, ronald reagan, herbert hoover. ronny reinforces the stereotype of the republicans as a party that is well-off and a little out of touch. >> romney does not help fat cat image, talking about the cars. don't, and look, i understand why they keep stumbling into that. that is his weakness. i am surprised he is so careless with that. one point that mark brought up about the stereotype people have of democrats being uneducated rubble could that shifted over to the tea party if you years ago, -- a few ago, considered uneducated gravel, and it turned out to be an extremely important force in politics that raise the level of discourse by making people look at the constitution. let me say one thing about romney and newt. newt's endorsement is not important, but santorum's will have some effect. santorum gained some influence with social conserva

the democrats of that -- ththe democrats are the party of the rabble, the uneducated, and like to ninatestocrats. the republicans are the party of the will to do d at they nominate candidas of humble origins -- ronald reagan gerald ford. mitt romney reinforces this stereotype of the rich caring about the rich. he has to break out of that. >> last word. enjo

democrats are the party of the rabble, the uneducated, and they white to nominate aristocrats. republicans, because they are the party of the privileged, they nominate people from humble origins -- ronald reagan, richard nixon, gerald ford, john mccain. mitt romney reinforces the republican stereotyped as the rich taking care of the rich. has got to break out of that mold. last >> word. enjoy your weekend. see you next week.