but, unelected people as you call them, i call them deep state, are running all over you guys. the department of justice is running you, fbi is running you. stalling you for absolutely frustrating you fies at every turn. and guy the way. they worked out a special counsel deal, a witch-hunt, first 11 months of investigation by the fbi into collusion with the russians between the trump campaign and the russians be then special counsel, just to add zest to it all, that is actually running right now running every effort to subvert this president. >> i agree with you. lou: these are unelected folks running the country right now. >> i agree with your criticism, this is a fair one. i would add our oversight work in congress has resulted in a lot of firing termination, and demotions. lou: will i hear you cheer for christopher wray, he looks every bit as uncooperative as james comey. >> i would say christopher wray has an opportunity to to the right thing, i would hope he would seize it to date there are things he has done that i have been in agreement with, regarding in standing up for

judge kavanaugh understands that in the united states of america, judges are not -- not -- unelected super legislators whom we select for their personal views or policy preferences. a judge's duty is to interpret the plain meaning of our laws and our constitution according to how they are written. judges need to be unbiased. they need to treat all parties fairly. they need to approach every case with open ears and an open mind. judges' decisions must turn on the facts of each case and be based on the text that it is their job to interpret. by all accounts, judge kavanaugh is precisely that kind of judge. his resume, to put it simply, is topnotch. a bachelor's degree from yale with honors. a law degree also from yale where he was a member of the law review, a lecturing position at harvard law school to which he was appointed, by the way, by then-dean and now justice elena kagan. after graduating, he quickly built a reputation as a star law clerk, including on the supreme court for justice kennedy. as an energetic and talented public servant and as one of the preeminent legal minds of

judge kavanaugh understands that and united states of america super are not unelected legislators who we select for their personal views or policy preferences. a judge's duty is to interpret the plain meaning of our laws and our constitution according to how they are written. judges need to be unbiased. they need to treat all parties fairly. they need to approach every case with open ears and an open mind. judges decisions must turn on the facts of each case and be based on the text that it is their job to interpret. by all accounts, judge kavanaugh is precisely that judge. resume to put it simply is top-notch. his bachelor's degree from yale, , aaw degree from yale lecturer position at harvard appointed by dean and justice scali elena kagan. a law clerk on the supreme court for supreme court justice kennedy. he is one of the preeminent legal minds of his generation. in 2006, the senate confirmed him to the d.c. circuit. he has compiled an extensive record on the federal bench. he has published more than 300 opinions and earned considerable praise for his clear writing and reasoning.

could never pass such a law in the congress, even with republican majorities but the court, the unelected branch, that's what they're headed for and that's why we have to be so vigilant. up to 130 nonelderly americans have a pre-existing condition. a third of america, more than a third period for insurance companies that used to be the case that a condition as commonplace as asthma was justification for jacking up rates to unaffordable levels. the law was rewrote to prevent that from insurance company is on the chopping block, likely to go if judge cavanaugh becomes justice cavanaugh. how can we afford that? the american people should have their eyes wide open to the stakes. president trump's own justice department is currently arguing in court that those protections are unconstitutional. i like president trump at one of his rallies to tell the people at the rally he is taking away their protections when they have someone with a pre-existing condition and their family. he wouldn't dare, but that is what is legal department in hhs injustice is doing. the president doesn't tell people what

become its own quasi legislative body, a congress 2.0 of sorts filled with hundreds of judges who are unelected and therefore unaccountable to the american people. this conception of judicial power is inherntly antidemocratic. it undermines the principle of representative government and creeds long- -- cedes the power to powers, a clustered group of men and women who have no constitutional authority to make legislation but seek to do so any way through their opinions. given the left's radical vision of judicial power, it's no wonder the confirmation wars have escalated over the years and it's no wonder the democrats have made a circus of confirmation hearings. they seek to politicize the process because ultimately they seek political judges. mr. president, it's usual -- as usual what the left wants is not what america needs. america doesn't need political judges. it doesn't need an army of super legislators telling us what to do. it certainly doesn't need a second congress making laws on a whim. isn't the one we have dysfunctional enough? now, mr. president, what is best for america is wholly d

the unelected branch, that is what they're headed for an that's why they have to be so vigilant. but to 130 non-elderly americans have preexisting conditions. for insurance companies that used to be the case as commonplace ass vast numbers justification for jacking up rates to unaffordable levels, who vote to prevent those peccable uses by insurance companies to potentially be on the chopping block him in my view likely to go with judge kavanaugh becomes justice kavanaugh. howan can we afford that? the american people should have their eyes wide open. the supreme court made the challenge to the legal protections for people with preexisting conditions and president trump some justice department is currently are doing those protections are unconstitutional. one of the rallies to tell the people at the rally for taking away their protections when they have someone with preexisting family. he wouldn't dare. he wouldn't dare. that is what his legal department in hhs injustice is doing. that doesn't tell people what he's doing. he says i'm with you. he whispers them with you. you don't

but the court, the unelected branch, that's where they are headed for and that's why we have to be so vigilant. up to 130 nonelderly americans have a preexisting conditions -- a third of america. for insurance companies it used to be the case that a condition as commonplace as az ma was -- asthma was justification to jack up rates. the law is potentially on the chopping block, in my view likely to go, if judge kavanaugh becomes justice kavanaugh. how can we afford that? american people should have their eyes wide open to the stakes. the supreme court could hear the challenge for those americans with preexisting conditions and president trump's own justice department is currently arguing in court that those protections are unconstitutional. i would like president trump at one of his rallies to tell the people at the rally he is taking away their protections when they have someone with a preexisting condition in their family. he wouldn't dare -- he wouldn't dare. but that is what his legal department in h.h.s. and justice is doing. the president doesn't tell people what he's doing. h

will follow-up with senator rand paul said, there needs to be checks and balances, no one that is unelected should have that much power. there was election meddling going into russia with on friday, you know they did a press conference, unelected bureaucrats do not shake public opinion prior to the diplomacy, that is what they did. they cannot try to dictate foreign policy, i believe that is what they did going to the meeting. liz: eric beech thank you so much. >> thank you. >> check your money, president trump did royal the market today. we know that dow was down 130, the dollar weakened slidely, president accused of waking with tradition saying he quote is not happy about fed raising interest rates, every time that fed does that, they do it when the economy strengthens. market watchers know, irony is that republicans own tax cuts are powering the economic the flow, and possibly inflation, necessitating the rate hikes. president said, he will not interfere with the fed. he is not worried about powell's politics interfering with his job, we get to nicole on floor. >> after 5 days of gains w

meanwhile, unelected bureaucrats can make decisions that contradict and ignore the clear and hard intent of the congress. that can happen through the revelatory process or just because some agency lawyerce sad so. for example, the government accountability office found that president obama's epa engaged in unlawful, covert propaganda in the report come from to its aggressive use of social media to drum up support for the waters of the us role. in fact, epa actions violated clear prohibitions that congress have put in place and in 2015 the office of legal counsel single-handedly overturned a critical provision in the inspector general's at. it's a congress did not mean what it said in that act and that inspector general's should have access to all the records they need to do their job. congress had to pass another law to say what we meant when we passed a law in the first place. the law i am referring to was the inspector general's empowerment act and clarified that the inspector general's could have access to all records, notwithstanding any other law so how do we hold these bureaucrats

but the court, the unelected branch, that's where they are headed for and that's why we have to be so vigilant. up to 130 nonelderly americans have a preexisting conditions -- a third of america. for insurance companies it used to be the case that a condition as commonplace as az ma was -- asthma was justification to jack up rates. the law is potentially on the chopping block, in my view likely to go, if judge kavanaugh becomes justice kavanaugh. how can we afford that? american people should have their eyes wide open to the stakes. the supreme court could hear the challenge for those americans with preexisting conditions and president trump's own justice department is currently arguing in court that those protections are unconstitutional. i would like president trump at one of his rallies to tell the people at the rally he is taking away their protections when they have someone with a preexisting condition in their family. he wouldn't dare -- he wouldn't dare. but that is what his legal department in h.h.s. and justice is doing. the president doesn't tell people what he's doing. h

to pay £39 billion to have no say in your future, to be subservient to a load of unelectable and unaccountable's not what remainders voted for, but along. you don't know what i voted. you point your finger at don't know what i voted. you point yourfinger at a don't know what i voted. you point your finger at a number of targets, including the remainders and michel barnier, but right when he mentioned borisjohnson, he's a member of the elite, michael gove, jacob rees—mogg, all these people, a former cabinet members, senior members of the tory party. their brexiteers who can agree among themselves. there is a huge amount of pressure after the referendum result came in. theresa may became a leader of the party to get away —— along with immediately. she waited 7-8 along with immediately. she waited 7—8 months before triggering article 50? she should have triggered it immediately. we are agreeing on that. on that? can you blame the remainders? delay, obfuscation, sabotage, making sure that brussels are looking to divide... is a vibrant democracy, we need to establish what of brexit the country want

muster or the unelected judge giving instructions on how to insure a will. a lot of folks think he will be in the roberts or kennedy mold. >> i did agree with some of the factual claims there. i think that kavanaugh said that you couldn't challenge the affordable calling it the tax antiinjunction act and roberts it was a nothing opinion saying it did not apply so, that they reached different conclusions. i was at that oral argument when he heard the case and kavanaugh's concerned that the oral argument. he said if you take out the ability to have private-public partnership which is the federal government subsidizing thee purchase of private insurance. then you can't privatize social security. i think he was thinking in terms of the broad, conservative agenda. that he tried to advance in the bush administration. i think he was thinking in terms. if i hand down a decision, this case. is it going to have adverse consequences that i'm not going to like in other cases? >> i don't think you can read into that he was necessarily being a liberalib or conservatis he

accountability to the american people is diminished when unelected judges pursue their own policy goals. a newspaper in the northern panhandle of our state editorialized today, and i quote, kavanaugh has said that if confirmed to the supreme court his allegiance will be to the constitution as it is written, not to his personal preferences. that is precisely what the nation needs. end of quote. another editorial appearing in west virginia today, this one from the -- from the daily mail said, quote, a conservative supreme court justice interprets the constitution for all, not just those on the left or those on the right. i believe judge kavanaugh truly understands a judge's and a justice's proper role and i think no one puts that better than the judge himself. i want to read a portion of a speech that he gave last fall and i begin quoting. one overar muching goal for me is to make judging a more neutral process in all caseses, not just statutory interpretation. the american rule of law, as i see it, depends on neutral, impartial judges who say what the law is, not what the law should be.

arctic areas where quite honestly, there has not been a lot of focus from folks on the outside, unelected leaders or otherwise. i have an opportunity to come in and see for myself, to sit down, to hear from elders about what they have observed. these are folks, they might not have a phd, but they have a phd in living and they can tell you what they are seeing, with the sea ice and the consequence of erosion that is coming about because the sea ice is receding, allowing waves to build up. it's not just coastal erosion, it is in so many other areas. it is what you're seeing in habitats, things growing in places they had not been before. paths, where the caribou are, the fisheries. i look honestly at the reality i believey state and i that our climate is changing and we are seeing the impacts, and how we are able to adapt and mitigate is something that as a lawmaker i try to help our state with on a daily basis. >> you have also recently passed legislation to help with some of the indigenous populations in alaska, didn't you? loan guarantees? sen. murkowski: loan guarantees. when i think abo

unelected charge giving congress instructions on how to ensure it will." be in the roberts mold or the kennedy mold. >> some factual claims there. kavanaugh said you couldn't challenge the affordable care act because they were calling it the tax injunction act. they reached different conclusions. i was at that oral argument when he heard the case. kavanaugh's concern was he said if you take out the ability to have private-public partnerships which is what the affordable care act is. the federal government sub is advising the purchase of private insurance. he was thinking of the broad conservative agenda. he was thinking in terms of if i hand down a decision in this case, is it going to have adverse consequences i'm not going to like in other cases? i don't think you can read into that that he was necessarily being a liberal or conservative. so much as he was trying to think more broadly. >> shannon: is your message tonight to conservatives you should be happy this guy's not scary for you and to the left, he is as bad as we've heard. >> he is as bad -- i am

preferred view and he would hold the administration to task to help test the unrestrained growth of the unelected unaccountable fourth branch of government. he's done all thate. and more. when the administration advances and most of all he understands deeply under the constitution cn for political power lies withur the people and their elected representativesta bought nine justices in washington, d.c.. in all the ways he's been a home run. he's been an independent committed to the constitution and the rule of law. he made his mark in cases involving the separation off power and agency decision-making. he is serious about ensuring the branches of government stay within the proper spheres for sufficient political accountability. he also showed a commitment to theed freedoms and in all of ths he's been a true intellectual leader. and judge kavanaugh demonstrated that in our system of government, judges interpret the law. they don't make the law, they interpret them. policymaking is for the other branches of government. now in a rational world, the judge's nomination would be confirmed by the senate

this appointment, we are appointing an unelected, the most powerful unelected position in a country that is the most powerful and all of human history. it's a big deal. it is for life. we have to make sure we get it right, that's part of my job on judiciary. i'm going to do my job. i'm going to ask tough questions. but i have a pretty strong suspicion he can handle them. >> shannon: okay, senator menendez, one of your colleagues from across the aisle, not a big fan. he hasn't seen his full record but here's what he says. >> i think the american people understand judge kavanaugh's record, they will rise up and that will stop his nomination. >> shannon: what do you think he is referring to? >> i have looked at his record. i'm still reading his opinions. he has written about 300. as best i can tell, here's what judge kavanaugh believes. he believes the role of a judge is to call balls and strikes. to interpret the law. not to decide every other thursday that you want to rewrite the constitution to prosecute your own personal political agenda. i think he understand sometimes charges make pol

some unelected, unaccountable president making $1 million a year in salary?id you see that a college professor makes one million a year. that is more than coach sabin makes. goodness gracious. [laughter] a.g. sessions: the university of the most told stephen, " important indication of bias is your own feelings." this soundslike nice but they are very easy to abuse. these rules are enforced by a group of campus bureaucrats and campus believes were the name of that response team. you who canlls speak of the university of michigan campus. or at least at the time. students can report complaints to the brt and they investigate them, or you. in the last school year brt logged more than 150 cases. we got involved in the lawsuit against the university and i am pleased to note that the university reevaluated what they were doing and what was in that policy and they have changed and made its substantial he -- substantially better. [applause] we will keep: getting involved. we will keep holding public institutions accountable. i believe our work is having an impact. pet

that to me is one of the most important things to reign in the administrative state, unelected bureaucracies writing laws. very, very important. one of the first thing we did. i guarantee chuck schumer will filibuster this until the day he dies. that is what frustrates us in the house. 800 bills we passed. sitting in theem senate. a lot of those first article one bills we passed are sitting over there because of the filibuster , and that is the frustration for us in the house. what do we do? we make sure we write bills what do we and the president has no choice but to sign them. do? the way we draft our laws, we write them very tightly because chevron is out of control and don't want the administrative state, no matter who is president and after the obama , experience, we better right thesehad better write things tightly. we do the rains act kind of thing, the way we write statutes now. we are very cognizant of this and mitch, who has done a very good job of this, get good judges on the bench. don't think this isn't on the front of our minds. it is. we are legislating this way but we need a

administration -- the administrative state to task and help check the unrestrained growth of the unelected, unaccountable fourth branch of government. justice gorsuch has done all that, and more. he has shown himself to be an independent thinker who faithfully applies the text of the constitution and the text of statutes. he's shown that is perfectly be comfortable every -- comfortable disagreeing with the administration when the administrations a wrongheaded argument. most of all he has shown deeply that under our constitution political power lies with the people and their elected representatives, not nine justices in washington, d.c. madam president, in all the ways neil gorsuch has been a home run, brett kavanaugh will be one too. in his dozen years on the d.c. circuit judge kavanaugh has been an independent fair-minded jurist who is deeply committed to the constitution and the rule of law. he has made his mark, especially in cases involving the separation of powers and agency decision making. he is serious about ensuring that the branches of government stay within their proper spheres

would like to see it argued out by the people and their elected representatives instead of by nine unelectedo you worry that if this goes back to states that something, like, i don't know, 20 states would immediately overturn it, ban it and make it illegal which means that those women in those states would have to cross state lines, that it would disproportionately affect poor, maybe minority women and it's yet another element of discrimination against some of the most vulnerable? >> well, we look at this very differently. i see the most vulnerable as the unborn children. they really have no voice and they really have no opportunity to say, look, i really would prefer to be born and adopted than aborted and if you took a poll of the unborn, i think they would probably be 100% in favor of being born. so i look at it from the point of view of those disadvantaged people and it's hard to be more disadvantaged than a baby in the womb. >> regarding other social and cultural issues, you're a big probonence of marriage and we'll get to your book in a second and it has been said that in these trouble

the people have spoken, the president is unelectable.hape local and international opinion ahead of an official announcement but the government also escalated its rhetoric, warning the 0pposition leader could face jail for declaring victory early. 0pposition leader could face jail for declaring victory earlylj 0pposition leader could face jail for declaring victory early. i am sure no one wants to provoke the raft of the law and risk being sent to jail. the government of zimbabwe is equally perturbed with the high level of incitement to violence being perpetrated by certain individuals and some political party leaders who have declared themselves winners even before the announcement of results. this afternoon, we filmed police water cannon as they deployed near opposition headquarters. up till now, this election has proceeded with calm and tolerance. it will take cool heads tolerance. it will take cool heads to keep that way. the social media giant facebook says it has closed more than 30 accounts involved in what appear to be a coordinat

an unelected civil servant. in charge coming up with the chequers plan which has been badly shaken by a lot of brexit years. they will be very angry because in the headline, it says she is in control but is ollie robbins in control? a lot of our readers have written in about the sky previously because a lot of express readers support brexit. you are talking about stoking up the next corner? it doesn't take long for one of those. it doesn't seem to improve the shambles we've got because you've got people like boris who haven't really done much since they stood down, probably keeping his powder dry. in his nice fancy house. and dominic raab, who probably thought he got a realjob 15 days ago, is now talking about, it's a shifting of the chequers... sounds like they are preparing for no deal, stockpiling food and medicines, the scary stuff. no deal, stockpiling food and medicines, the scary stuffm no deal, stockpiling food and medicines, the scary stuff. if we crash out, he's the guy in charge. you raise a point, we

they want a trade deal but the european commission, this unelected corps in brussels, what they wanteir future projects. that is the one big negotiation point we have and it is nice to see he is putting that on the table. using the divorce analogy, we were part of the project and contributed to it. we helped to shape it. to turn around and say we have no responsibility is impossible. this rhetoric, while it does... it damages those credentials bed. on the other hand he can say, we we re pa rt bed. on the other hand he can say, we were part of the project, why treat us like an enemy because we have decided on a democratic decision because we don't want to be pa rt of decision because we don't want to be part of this club and want to leave on good terms. it goes both ways, it is nice he is putting that on the table. let's see what comes out of that interview, he is on the andrew marr programme later. we will hear later whether he has gone back on those quotes! and there was the suggestion that some of his cabinet collea g u es suggestion that some of his cabinet colleagues have not com

president mnangagwa is unelectable. the people spoke.ocal and international opinion ahead of an official announcement. but the government also escalated its rhetoric, warning the opposition leader he could face jailfor declaring victory early. i'm sure no one wants to provoke the wrath of the law and risk being sent to jail. the government of zimbabwe is equally perturbed with a high level of incitement to violence being perpetrated by certain individuals and some political party leaders, who have declared themselves winners, even before the announcement of results. this afternoon we filmed police water cannon as they deployed near opposition headquarters. up to now, this election has proceeded with calm and tolerance. it will take cool heads to keep it that way. it looked promising with calm and orderly voting and it looks more precarious today. it does indeed, the political atmosphere has become noticeably more tense and it was striking to me as someone who has reported on conflict in the past to see police water cannon deployed around

or talking about people having unelected power over the rest of us. i don't agree with this i am very liberal that if they make this critique by large it is true. they don't have or what does stephen colbert say? in your individual life with the average citizen who do you interact with that has power over you every day? it isn't the brothers can't even see their house in a compound that those who prescribed that give you a permit to do this or authorities are people with advanced degrees for members of the professional class. or that secret weird upside down class war running through our society for decades and decades and we never talk about in an open way and conservatives certainly don't. so that. >> read what's the matter with kansas. it's in there. i did develop this theory at great length. it is 25050 pages it is an easy read. you have the whole thing finished by the time you get down to washington. [laughter] connect the big question is how do we rebuild those social democratic institutions like you describe? >> that's a great question and i do

>> my job, this appointment, we are appointing the most powerful unelected position in a country in our human history so this is a big deal. that is part of my job. i'm going to do my job and ask tough questions but i have a strong suspicion he can handle it. shannon: senator mendez, the bull record so far. >> the american people understand brett cavanagh's record, they will rise up and stop his nomination. shannon: what is he referring to? >> he has written 300. here is what brett kavanaugh believes, that the role of the judge is to call the balls and strikes to interpret the law. not to every thursday, to rewrite the constitution to prosecute your own agenda. sometimes judges make policy. it is inevitable when you decide a case, they are making policy and it is a precedent. he understands judges should not do ideologues and do what congress is supposed to do. if you want to be an ideologue and prosecutor person run for congress, run for president. i think that is the proper role of the judge, what brett kavanaugh understands. senator mendez would probably prefer not to put words in hi

mcconnell: judge kavanagh understands that in the united states of america, judges are not -- not -- unelectedegislators who we select for their personal views or policy preferences. emily: whether or not brett kavanaugh is confirmed, the supreme court's next session will have important tech-centric cases to hear. joins us now from new york to discuss. we do now how he has ruled on some tech-focused cases on the last dozen or so years. what do we know? >> probably the most consequential case that brett kavanaugh has had a say in in terms of tech today would be about net neutrality. he did not make a ruling that went into law, he dissented on a judgment made by some of the other judges. he actually was in favor of pushing back net neutrality. now we know congress has legislated away those rules put in place by barack obama earlier. he was in favor of getting rid of net neutrality and his argument focused on free speech. he said internet service providers should have the free-speech right to decide what goes over their wires and how fast. that was his take on net neutrality, which is very import

end of the day, if you want to change the law, you want to change the constitution, it's not up to unelected do, it's up to people to do this. heather: he's right. he wraps up that to the preserve the constitution and american law. thank you. >> thank you. heather: fox news alert for you, troops destroy isis capital in afghanistan killing nearly 170 terrorists, military officials say the site helped fund the terror group and prepare for high-profile attacks this is as secretary of state mike pompeo makes a renewed push for peace in afghanistan. rich edison has details from pompeo's surprised stop. >> the united states government revealed secretary of state mike pompeo strip to kabul only shortly before he left due to security concerns. during his nearly 7-hour stop the secretary met with afghan president, chief executive and pushed for peace talks, possession of a weapon into stopped in afghanistan is part of a week-long international trip that began in north korea following two days of meetings in pyongyang he travel today tokyo to brief top japanese and south korean officials on discussion

mcconnell: judge kavanagh understands that in the united states of america, judges are not, knocked, unelectedislators who reselect further policy preferences. emily: whether or not he is confirmed by the senate, the supreme court's next session will have some important tech-centric cases to hear. we are joined by our next guest from new york to discuss. garrett, we know how he is rolled on some tech-focused cases on the last dozen or so years. what do we know? >> probably the most consequential place that he is had a say in would be about net neutrality. he made a ruling that dissented on a judgment made by some of the other judges on his court, and he actually was in favor of pushing back on the net neutrality. congress, we know that went and legislated away those rules put in by barack obama in favor of he was getting rid of it. his argument focused on free speech. he said that internet service provider should have the first amendment right to free's each, to decide what goes over their wires come how fast it goes. take on net neutrality, which of course, is very important for the tech comp

them better, but i think as practical matter, the immigration system is so broken and it's run by unelectedeaucrats that are in favor of more and more immigration. the people who take the jobs in the immigration system are interested in immigration, so by -- by their natural tendency, of course, they want more immigration otherwise they wouldn't be interested in the subject, so you have inherit bias in the entire immigration system toward more and more immigration because the people that aren't interested in immigration don't go to work there. and i think that's -- you have the institutional bias in system. rob: in san bernardino, the shooting, the woman came and didn't ask her any questions. >> the wife of the shooter who participated in the murders was not an american citizen, was vetted supposedly by the united states federal government, by the state department and they never vetted her for her jihadi leanings, they led her into the country and she helps perpetrates the san bernardino tragedy, i guess, you know, what can you say about how much you can trust the government to protect us.

these are bureaucrats unelected. i serve in an oversight role over them. if they're spying on you, then i mean the whole system falls apart, or has fallen apart. >> how about if they're spying on a presidential candidate or a president after he's been elected. those kind of things it turns out were going on. i started to mention i told a private group of our intelligence folks either you get us the names of those people who unmasked all of those people that should never have been unmasked. i'm going to makeee it my life's worth to get rid of this program that allows you to do it. i'm not saying this is why, but very quickly they did come out with the names. wele knew susan rice, folks like that. >> right. we're better for knowing those names. >>ke can't live in fear. they're not going to escape me. we'll keep t moving on. >> protests against i.c.e. are sweeping the country. what's the situation at the border itself? we'll speak with a famous journal who's spent a lot of time there. >> there was a wave of immigration protests across the country over the wee

doctrine that requires judges to give difference to the agency decisions and the interpretations of unelectedent bureaucrats which is really kind of calls the administrative agencies to run, so we know president trump, you know, has been trying to roll back the administrative state, this could be a strong candidate for him for that very reason. carley: interesting, let's caulk about bret kavanaugh briefly. seemed to be in the lead in the beginning, what do you think about him in. >> well, i think, traditional supreme courtras mays, bret kavanaugh probably comes into this with the strongest. you know, he served on the dc circuit which is probably -- which is the biggest feeder for supreme court nominees written nearly 300 opinions. that's a good thing because we have a good idea what kind of judge he can be but also a bad thing because that's a lot of opinions to be able to pour through and pick apart if you're trying to find a reason to oppose him. rob: kavanaugh and our last amy coney barrett, two that the roe v. wade people are the most concerned about, right? >> that's at least with cony b

understandvanagh that in the united states of america judges are not unelected super legislators whomheir personal views or policy preferences. kavanaghecting judge president trump said he -- did exactly what he said he would do on the campaign trail. nominate someone who will overturn women's reproductive rights and strike down health care protections for millions of americans. >> senator schumer said he also plans to oppose kavanagh with everything i've got a drama that lasted more than two weeks and had the world riveted is over in thailand and they are all safe. ty navy seals say all 12 members of the soccer team and the coach have been rescued from the flooded cave. an international

right to vote on the elected representatives who are going to represent the policies, not to an unelected bureaucrat sitting somewhere in washington. [applause] the internal institutional biases or artwork. and a lot of what we are talking about, you have intelligence analysts who for years have made assessments, provided assessments. this is what we think we know. they would update these. this is like the answer sheet to the test. you can check your work. they did not want to check their work. the intelligence committee -- community had said for years ,here was no way the shiites iranian mullahs would cooperate with al qaeda. they would never cooperate and we have this documentation that suggests they were essential to one another. the same is true with the taliban and al qaeda. committeentelligence trying to say on the one hand, we can work with the taliban, including taliban leadership. we can separate them from al toda, work with the taliban establish governing structure in afghanistan and we get these documents and you cannot separate them at all. is on the mind of al qaeda. presiden

>> they are nominating candidates that are far to the left of these districts and unelectable in a general election. one had a crossover state lines, he was in missouri to go to the rally in kansas and supports single-payer healthcare, out of step with most americans. we have that chance in the fall, i relish it. >> we are getting closer and closer, the president believes with the economy where it is, 41/2% growth, record low unemployment, maybe you're making a last stand. will republicans hold out? >> actually. we will hold the house and that will be the headline today after election day. >> you heard it from matt gorman, appreciate it. i appreciate it as we will hear that a lot tonight. when we returned the nfl rejects the league's proposal allowing players who won't stand for the anthem to remain in the locker room, something the president has swatted away over and over. >> in many respects that is worse. isn't that worse than not standing? >> now the president with a new idea to punish players who will not stand for the anthem. we will chew over the plan with jim gray. o... (harmonica

senator mcconnell: judge kavanagh understands that in the united states of america, judges are not unelectedlators who reselect further -- we select for their personal views or policy preferences. emily: whether or not he is confirmed by the senate, the supreme court's next session will have some important tech-centric cases to hear. bloomberg text garrett the bank joins us to discuss. >> probably the most consequential place that he is had a say in would be about net neutrality. she didn't make a ruling that went into law, he dissented on a judgment made by some of the other judges on his court, and he actually was in favor of pushing back on the net neutrality. of course, we know that congress has gone and legislated away those rules put in by barack obama earlier, but he was in favor of getting rid of it. his argument focused on free speech. he said that internet service provider should have the first amendment right to free's each, to decide what goes over their wires and how fast it goes. that was his take on net neutrality, which of course, is very important for the tech companies and

>> they're nominating candidates far to the left and renders unelectable. one lives in missouri to go to the rally tonight in kansas. and he support single-payer healthcare, which is out of the step with most americans. we'll have that choice in the fall. i relish it. >> we're closer and closer. every few months you give us a prediction. the president believes with the economy where it's at, maybe 4.5% growth, record-low unemployment, maybe you guys are making a last stand here. are the republicans going to be able to hold the house. absolutely, we'll hold the house. >> we appreciate you joining us on this friday night. >> thanks. hispanic -- happy birthday. >> the nfl under fire again. something the president has swatted away over and over. >>locker room. i think in many respects that's worse. isn't that worse than not standing? >>well, now the president tossing out a new idea to punish players who will not stand for the anthem. we'll chew over the plan with the legendary sportscaster jim gray who joins us. allstate agents riding sweep. call one today. are

is your right as american voters to vote on the elective representatives of this country, not an unelected bureaucrat sitting somewhere in washington. >> [applause] there are internal institutional biases at work. a lot of what we are talking about, to thought of the focus a bit, you have intelligence analysts who for years have provided assessments, this is what we think we know. they would update these assessments. this is like the answer sheet to the test, right? you can correct your work, and they did not want to check their work. the intelligence community said for here's in assessment -- for years in assessment after assessment that there was no way that the sunni mullahs would cooperate with the shia. lo and behold we have this document saying they not only cooperated, but were essential to each other. you have the u.s. intelligence community saying on the one hand, we can work with the taliban, including taliban leadership. we can separate them from al qaeda, who are really irredeemable, work with the taliban to establish governing structure in afghanistan. again we get these docum