with massively unequal distribution of wealth you have an unstable society. >> i live in small-town america and talk to many business owners and they are excited about this. they understand what this will do to their businesses. this is not just wall street, it will trickle down to main street and impact. >> that stay right here. we see the stock market surge. a new study with grim news for the american dream which rachel brought up, researchers at harvard, stanford and university of california compiled tax and census data and this is what they found was the percentage of people who make more than their parents did buy a -- around age 30 has plummeted over the years with 90% of people born in 1940 did better than their parents by age 30. by 1960 the number dropped to 60%. 4 people who were born around 30, only half make more than their parents did. all of this is adjusted for inflation but we haven't seen that much recently. what are your thoughts? >> part of it is to be expected but the country was industrialized, there was a lot of work and an increase in life expectancy says that is what

justice brennan early on said to the effect that equal treatment of unequaled is as much a violation of equal protection as is anything else so there are strands of doctrines, their lines of cases, the marriage equality case being the most recent of the most profound one and of course this was the 50th anniversary this year of loving. so there are all kinds of developments in the law that require, though the text doesn't change, required the justices to take fresh looks at new facts and figure out what they mean. so i think your desired outcome is what we are living now. >> i just want to say that the 14th amendment has its own program. so those are definitely important questions as we look at the expounding of the constitution but this night is brought to you by the first amendment which don't address a quality directly. those are excellent questions and we certainly have to look at the amendment to that land. i just wanted to try, we haven't even gotten to the ninth amendment. do we have time for one more question and? we have one more. >> thank you very much for this conversation.

he believes that men are created unequal. and that there should be what he calls peaceful ethnic cleansing. he is a follower of hypocrite there been other richard spencer's before. there have been a number of charismatic, highly educated white supremacist. one comes to mind as the late dr. william pierce, the leader of the national alliance, the author of the book that was the blueprint for the oklahoma city bombing. dr. pierce was a physicist and also a follower of george lincoln rockwell, the former leader of the american not to -- nazi party. i think it's naive to think that all people in white supremacist organizations are dimwitted. i think that there are a number of highly intellectual yet twisted people there. we have seen richard spencer's in the past. i think it's very important when the media interview him for them to confront him with his statements. richard spencer is news because steve bannon is news. i would say it's important to cover him because one might argue that steve bannon is his alter ego. the reason i

unequal is what you would have. and nobody can explain how that works. juan: gideon levy, can there be a jewish state at the same time there's a democratic state in a one state solution? kerryhink what secretary described so nicely about the future is the past and the present. he just described the reality in the west bank in gaza and the recent years. nothing changed. it is exactly there. therefore, my claim is the one state could have been established 50 years ago. you only question now is what kind of regime will this state have? by the end of the day, the green line was killed many, many years ago. the 1967 borders are, unfortunately, irrelevant anymore. the settlers go to such a quantity, that it became into reversible reality. and what secretary kerry described is very, very precise. but the only question i ask myself is, mr. secretary, don't you know this is the reality by now? don't you know this is the reality in the recent decades? you are speaking of the future. when will be the stage in which people like secretary kerry will admit a two state

that many concerns that they have had, even before the day of cell phone videos about unequal treatment at hands of the police are only now being validated i think what is importanut is o recognize that we have a problem, and to go about -- >> armstrong: who has the problem? >> guest: society, has a problem. i think helet look first at law enforcement. i think president obama's 21st century policing task force had some gems. one, to real -- hold that. >> armstrong: i want to come that uninterrupted. we will take a preak, and we will come pack to the attorney general of washington d.c. i'm armstrong williams. don't go away. >> armstrong: i'm armstrong williams and this is the "right side forum." ♪ ♪ ♪ >>> carl, please continue. the president and 21st century had a few gems. >> i think there's a few golden nuggets in there, number one the task force came out with a recommendation as to ways in which between law enforcement in community. importantly, there were creative ideas around community policing that would have police more engaged in everyday interactions with citizens. also importa

i don't like a man being told he is unequal until he gets a chance to prove on a quality, -- unequality would say. announcer 2: you can watch it tonight. this is "american history tv," only on c-span3. on lectures in history, katarina keane of the university of maryland teaches a class in how moderate advertising with executives, slogans, and brand packaging emerged in the 20th century. she discusses the evolution of professional fields and how consumer experiences changed during this time. her class is about an hour. katarina keane: thank you for coming in on such a sake day. we have a -- soggy day. we have a great topic. we have been talking about the emergence of modern consumer society. we talked about the mass production of goods, infrastructure that moved those goods around the country. we talked about laws and regulations that make it safer for consumers in the marketplace . we talked about new kind of advocacy and activism at national consumers. we will add a layer c t

progressive taxation is fine, but that's not the same as imposing a tax on people purely because it's unequal. we want something other than equality. equality means -- system everybody's repressed except the top party bosses. we want to have a progressive tax system. yes, indeed. but we do not want to say to people, you're successful, we're going to chop your head off. >> but can you put a number to it? can you put a ten times, 100 times what the top guy makes -- >> no, i cannot. i can only say certain government is bad. >> one thing is clear, this is the guillotine, this is fascism is where we're going here. it is literally -- >> you can always move. >> you're overreacting. they usually catch you and then cut your head off. >> got you. >> the fascists usually catch you before you gut across the border and then throw you into camps. obviously this is a very macro slice of that. >> do you think companies will move because of this? >> yeah, i think so. >> do you think charles payne they'll move? >> you know, there might be the three people that adam and ben talked about might be okay with it. y

and the book is an effort to say unevenly and ared unequally and in the process of developing the old industrial city and in ways the emerging ew city has not integrated african-americans on an equal footing. so the first blacks that came into the pittsburgh region -- in the large numbers, some ways, they were migrating from areas f enslavement in the south and were building communities, some were fugitives and some were free. they were setting up a community. the real background for our story is the period between the civil war and the end of world war ii. and that is the long haul of that story is that black people in pittsburgh, in this ohio river valley became part of a new industrial environment that really took off in the period after the civil war. and this moment after the civil war, pittsburgh was beginning to pick up steam as the iron and steel center. when i say blacks fared unevenly is that the perception of african-americans and the behavior towards african-americans was a little bit mixed, but mainly hostile in many, many ways. first of all, industrialists for the most p

was the guy who had a strange accent , a good-looking good-looking, seemed to be treating johnny as unequal. he was grateful to be there and on that occasion i tried to find the date of the tape i think it was around 1985 johnny said white whenever you come to this that i feel like i and in the principal's office? [laughter] i said i want to be like that guy. so with the obsession my wife, this is my lovely wife. [applause] the unsung heroine, she has seen i have many of sessions and die and intense about them in the case of bill buckley i know so many people, christopher that have set the same thing i want to be like that guy but in any case the book began a few years ago are was writing for "national review" trying to find a particular piece that is called is nixon one of those collecting new the headline it was under 71 finally consulted a book called william f. buckley, jr. a bibliography published 2002 when he was alive as the annotated collection of his work and there i learned the editor of that volume said someone should do a volume of his eulogy's because there shattering work and

he argued cases when he told the court, equal not before the court today, these are vastly unequal. knew they had to have some legal training for african-americans. they set up this vastly inferior law school. when he had his building blocks in place and made the big pitch, the aclu women's rights project that i cofounded, that is what we tried to do, to get there. not in one giant step, so that by the time the big step came it would be inevitable. all the building blocks. justice sotomayor: do you think you have reached that stage? justice ginsburg: no. but considering where we were, considering that in 1961, the liberal warren court told wendell and hoyt, the woman we would today call battered, who had been humiliated to the breaking point by her philandering abusive husband, she one day could not bear it anymore. she spied her son's baseball bat, she beat her husband over the head. that was the end of the humiliation and the beginning of the murder prosecution. florida didn't put women on juries in those days. not all that long ago, 1961. the supreme court said we don't understan

>> no, i think he's unequally qualified for many positions but that's not my position to say. i think the president-elect would have to decide and members of the senate. as i woke up to the news, you know, it was a bit of a shocker a cabinet position. i was both shocked that i'm still in this tenuous position and yet happy because i think he should be able to go on with his life. he's earned it. and so should his family. but then it begged the question of why shouldn't i be able to go on? >> reporter: she served 21 years in the u.s. military. 13 years in the army reserve. after the affair she was demoted from lieutenant colonel to major, lost her top secret security clearance, and just reprimand. petraeus found out in january that he won't face any military discipline. >> what is your status now with the u.s. army? >> i am waiting for my resignation paperwork to be approved. >> and when do you expect that to happen? >> well, i'd love a merry christmas present. but i don't know. i was -- i thought earlier this year when david petraeus was pardoned for lack of a better soon. and

he said, these are vastly unequal.hey knew they had to have some legal training for african-americans. so they set up this vastly inferior law school. when he had his building blocks in place and made the big pitch, and so the aclu women's rights project, which i co-founded, that is what we tried to do to get there. not in one giant step, so that by the time the big step came it would be inevitable. because they had all the building blocks that led up to it. justice sotomayor: do you think you have reached that stage? justice ginsburg: no. but considering where we were, considering that in 1961, the liberal warren court told wendell android eight, -- told wendell and hoyt, the woman we would call battered, who had been humiliated to the breaking point by her philandering abusive husband, she couldn't bear it anymore. she spied her sons baseball bat, picked it up with all her might, and she beat her husband over the head. that was the end of the humiliation. and the getting of the murder prosecution. and -- in the begin

"it's just that i don't like a man being called unequal nell gets a chance to prove his inequality." bill who -- would later say. this came at a time of personal crisis when he could no longer bear the compound disillusionments of his homecoming. he needed a crusade to just not only his cartoons but the whole catastrophe of the war to which he had borne such eloquent witness. during the war, willy and joe's camaraderie served as partial redemption for the brutalizing conditions of their existence. now the real willy and joe were in the shadows, misunderstood and overlooked, alienated survivors out of the tens of millions dead. their sacrifice -- bill always hated that word and refused to naught in emed for a country that denied equal rights to citieses and deemed to be gearing up for world war the ainst erstwhile ally soviet union. while overseas, mauldin had avoided ideological outbursts and never allowed partisan politics into his cartoons. back home, however, he jumped into the political fray with both feet. he moved to new york city and began giving speeches, offering interviews

caller: i would just like to interject the funding for states is very unequal. forst read an article that $.61 back jersey gets for every dollar of federal tax they pay, whereas wyoming, one of the least dense states, gets $1.11 back from the federal government for every one dollar citizens pay to the federal government. it is important to keep that in mind while you are talking about city budgets. as you said, cities do not want to depend just on their state. there is such a great variation in state funding. thank you. guest: that is right. there really is a great variation in state funding, and typically, the lower -- the states that have lower income population -- more poverty, rely more on federal grant funding. this is largely connected to medicaid, things like that. there is certainly a disparity in terms of what the taxpayers in each state get back from what federal money is coming to their state. ,ypically, the new jersey wyoming example -- wyoming is a sparsely populated state, and new jersey is densely populated and has a significant amount of wealth.

ofcalled it the unequal myth the german soldier. this is really to know avail. myth of siegfried, like that of napoleonic a long, is over. it's finished. they found a few heroes. they found a way to make the most of them. these heroes incarnated on both sides, two different kinds of willpower. defensive among the french, offensive among the german. side --ide, the french officer officer who died valiantly with his men in the woods northeast of verdun. the german advance the day after the german attack began on the 22nd of february. that became the french bureau. the idea of defensive sacrifice. on the other, the german counterpart of that would be the two german attendants, a name who ignored orders with two companies of brandenberger's, troops, andrman sees the mightiest fort in seized it with simply a couple of companies of men on their own initiative. before the end of the war, musical songs had transformed him and his men on the french side into the most interesting when i found was they transformed him into the hero roland. the german side, he and his fort,

as the united states has said repeatedly such unequal treatment, not only hurts israel, it under minesegitimacy of the united nation itself. the treatment at the un matters for votes like this one. even the proposed of today is justified or necessitated by events on the ground. one cannot completely separate the vote from the venue. and members states that they are for the two state solutions must ask themselves some difficult questions. for those states that are quick to promote resolution condemning israel but refuse to recognize innocent israelis of innocence. for those states denounced the closure of crossings but saying nothing of resources diverted from helping gaza's residence to dig into israelis territories. what will you do to end the double standard that under mines the legitimacy of this institution? members should ask themselves of the double standard when it comes to this council taking action. just this morning, we came together as a council and we. >> reporter: -- we were unable to muscle the will. that the un has said to lead to genocide. we could not come together jus

separate and unequal is what you would have. nobody can explain how that works.n israeli accept living that way? will the world except it? if the occupation becomes the palestinian authority could simply dissolve, turn over all responsibility to the israelis. what would happen then? who would administer the schools and hospitals and on what basis? does israel want to pay for the dollars lost in international assistance that the palestinian authority receives? with the israeli defense force police the streets in every city and town? how would israel responds to a growing civil rights movement by palestinians demanding a right to vote or widespread protests? reconcile thel permanent occupation with its democratic ideals? continue to u.s. defend that and still live up to our own democratic ideals? goody has ever provided answers for those questions because there aren't any. there would be an increasing risk of more intense violence between palestinians and settlers and complete despair among palestinians that would create very firm ground for extremists. with all th

what drove them apart was danny's perception that as their situations and status became unequal, thathe feelings from amos changed and he began to believe the press clippings. charlie: that was what danny thought. michael: maybe he felt condescended to. danny felt of that he became another person amos could be slightly contemptuous about. i do not know if that is true. i think danny felt that way. he was -- it was incredibly wounding because they were in love. danny fled. charlie: amos must have seen that coming. he had extraordinary intelligence. michael: the stereotype is like the powerful man and the woman who is important to him but he does not acknowledge her. and she just gets sick of it. the dynamic is kind of that. there is a line that amos writes to danny, that to me captures inability to measure his emotions. he says i do not get your sensitivity metric. i think there were limits to the emotional intelligence of amos. i think he thought, judging by the correspondence, that danny should not need the bucking up that he needed. that it would be insulting to danny to condescende

the power of the states will be unequal. william paterson of new jersey says with a large state folks put up their plan for representation, new jersey will never agree. she will be swallowed up. the man of delaware says, to the large state folks, madison and the rest, i do not, gentlemen, trust you. he did call them gentlemen. i do not trust you. sherman of connecticut says, before july of 1787, we are now at a. stop. we are not going to get this thing done. delegates break for the fourth of july. the 11th fourth of july, if you will, 1787. in philadelphia, there is celebration here they take stock of what they are doing, what they are here to do. they come back with this resolve to get something done. to make some sort of a compromise to get a new constitution, and they do on july 16 of 1787, the most important day, i would say, during the whole constitutional convention. and they come back with a grand compromise, and you know it well. what is it? in the lower house, that representation we determine by population. and in t

he told the courts separate but equal is not before the court today, these facilities are vastly unequal. take the separate law school, university of texas had set up, and they knew they had to find, they had to have some legal training for african-americans. so they set up this vastly inferior law school. what he had was building blocks in place, then he made the big pitch. and so the aclu women's right-- process which i cofounded, that is what we tried to do. to get there not in one giant step but so that by the time the big step came, it would be inevitable because all the building blocks. >> do you think you have reached. >> no, but considering where we were, considering that in 1961 the liberal warren court told gwendolyn haute, a women we would today called battered, who had been humiliated to the breaking point by her fill anderring abusive husband, she one day couldn't bear it any more. she spied her son's baseball bat, picked it up with her her might, hit her husband over the end, that was the end of the humiliation and the beginning of the murder prosecution. a florida didn't p

comments will be directed towards her with my japanese friends in mind because i think this is an unequal dialogue. japan is interested in more industrial development and the united states. there are. there are some reasons why that is good for the alliance, but in terms of previous panels, and had to partake or participate in that relationship in the burden of that rest at the japanese in the beliefs on where we stand in a relationship. luckily, japanese industry is not competitive on defense articles. the problem is the ministry of finance every year tends to craft a budget with jobs in mind and to ensure that job stability are the primary factor. there's never been in a competitive to japanese industry in the way that there have been another countries, which means the efficiency house had not sacrificed, but have been put aside for development and maintenance of the japanese defense industrial base such as this. japan also has a few indigenous capabilities that are qualitatively competitive around the world. the submarine is right up there as an example that is globally competitive wit

most don't understand how unequal it is to take four votes in texas to equal one vote in rhode island. a unique quality we don't think is appropriate and we think the national popular vote winner should be the president, but you know, if today, the electors choose donald trump, we have built a big network and brought a lot to the subject. >> reporter: this is the way we've done things here according to the constitution of the united states. in our great nation, have you ever spoken up before or stood up against the electoral college? why now? just because you don't like donald trump? >> i think he's completely unfit. does not understand the constitution and has announced his intentions to attack the bill of rights. he talked about reforming civil liability laws, registering people based on religion and condoning torture and his relationship with russia is concerning. not just that i don't like him, these are not simple policy disagreements but the kind of person the founders warned us about and the reasons they created the electoral college. >> reporter: this is a bit of a media circu

the estimate, they find that what's behind the lower mobility is the prior inequality and the unequal distribution of economic growth. theyfind that higher growth alone is not going to solve the problem . and that the bigger issue is actually today's high inequality. even if some of those i waited people are earning are because they are extremely talented and innovation did, there's something pernicious going on in terms of level of the inequality in the united states affecting overall mobility. this connection between how well the economy delivers for families and economic growth is i think at the heart of economics or should be and it's of course one that's been reverberating through our politics and for a long time, economists and policymakers that we advise have believed that if the economy grows, the gains will be distributed across society and what we now know is that's really not going to happen. we used believe the research that was done in the middle of the 20th century who postulated that as the economy grew, there would be this series where you have tightened inequality but

. >> i think he's unequally qualified for many positions, but that's not my position. i think the president-elect would decide and members of the senate. as i woke up to the news, you know, it's a bit of a shocker he's considered for a cabinet position. i was both shocked that i'm still in this tenuous position, and yet happy, because i think he should be able to go on with his life. >> she says he deserves a second chance. she certainly believes she does as well. what do you think of her saying that and also whether that could affect his chances, just a reminder of his issues? >> well, look, he's going to have those issues whether paula broadwell came out or not. i know miss broadwell. i know general petraeus. and he'll have those issues regarding, you know, whether he has to check in with his parole officer. that's going to exist whether broadwell came out and spoke today or not. look, they made personal mistakes. that's the world that we live in. it's not -- to me, that's not a big deal. the one is the professional issue. only general petraeus was the director of th

, but came close to saying it, although he's used the term in the past talking about separate but unequal society in the west bank. hala and others, thank you for being here. >>> secretary kerry may have had good intentions but "divorced from reality," that and more when we come back. anything else to talk about. s but then i realized there was. so, i finally broke the silence with my doctor about what i was experiencing. he said humira is for people like me who have tried other medications but still experience the symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease. in clinical studies, the majority of patients on humira saw significant symptom relief. and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, h

i think he was unequaled. john herschel glenn was born in 1921. he passed away today at

separate and unequal is what you would have. and nobody can explain how that works.d an israeli accept living that way, would an american accept living that way, would the world accept it? if the occupation becomes permanent over the time the palestinian authority could simply dissolve, turn over all the administrative and security responsibility of the israelis, what would happen then? who would administer the schools and hospitals and on what basis? does israel want to pay for billions of dollars lost for assistance that the palestinian authority now receives? would the israeli defense force police the streets of every single city and town? how would israel respond to a growing civil rights movement from palestinians demanding a right to vote or widespread protests and unrest across the west bank? how does israel reconcile a permanent occupation with its democratic ideals? how does the u.s. continue to defend that and still live up to our own democratic ideals? nobody has ever provided good answers to those questions because there aren't any. and there would be an

. >> no, i think he's unequally qualified for many positions, but that's not my position to say.resident-elect would have to decide and members of the senate. as i woke up to the news, you know, it was a bit of a shocker that he was being considered for a cabinet position and i was both shocked that i'm still in this tenuous position and yet happy because i think he should be able to go on with his life. he's earned it. so should his family. but then it begged the question of, why shouldn't i be able to go on? >> uh-huh. so is it a double standard? she's saying he should be able to go on. should he be allowed to move on? >> of course. >> and what about her? she's -- i think she feels in some way stuck as you said, right? >> she -- she is very excited for david petraeus. she told me she thinks she's the best candidate for the job and the right fit for this candidate but david pa tretraeus is campaigning for a job and the military has not yet allowed her to retire. hey, it's great he's able to campaign for a job, i want to be able to campaign for a job as well. >> go ahead, mel, wh

. >> i think he's unequally qualified for many positions, but that's not my position to say.hink the president-elect would have to decide and members of the senate. as i woke up to the news, it was a bit of a shocker that he was being considered for a cabinet position. i was both shocked that i'm still in this tenuous position and yet happy, because i think he should be able to go on with his life. >> so she still admires this man greatly but she has a very a admirable past with lots of military experience. i'm making a left turn here but it just seems so wrong to me. >> she's the nicest ex-mistress anyone has ever seen. she's like i know he kind of ruined my career but i really think he's a good guy. look, i think the general thing is this. number one, it seems like the list of people to potentially be secretary of state keeps getting bigger and bigger. i'm waiting for trump to suggest like omarosa and bill belichick. i don't know what he's really going for because the people he assum seems to be pointing out for secretary of state are very different and don't have any unive

separate and unequal is what you would have. and nobody can explain how that works. would it israeli accept living that way? would an american accept living that way? will the world accept it? if the occupation becomes permanent over the time the palestinian authority could simply dissolve, turn over all the administrative and security responsibilities to israelis, what would happen then? who would administer the schools and hospitals? does israel want to pay for the billions of dollars of lost international assistance that the palestinian authorities now receive? would the israeli defense force police the streets of every single palestinian city and town? how would israel respond to a growing civil rights movement from palestinians demanding a right to vote or protest unrest across the west bank. how does israel reconcile a permanent occupation with democratic ideals? how does the u.s. continue to defend that and still live up to our own democratic ideals? nobody has ever provided good answers to those questions because there aren't any. and there would be an increa

separate and unequal is what you would have. and nobody can explain how that works. would an israeli accept living that way? would an american accept living that way? will the world accept it? if the occupation becomes permanent over the time the palestinian authority could simply dissolve, turn over all the administrator and security responsibilities to the israelis. who would administer schools and hospitals and on what basis? does israel want to pay for billions of dollars of lost international how would israel respond to a growing sieving rights move frnt in palestinians demanding a right to vote or widespread protests and unrest across the west bank? how does israel reconcile a permanent occupation with its democratic ideals? how does the u.s. continue to defend that and still live up to our own democratic ideals? nobody has ever provided good answers to those questions, because there aren't any. and there would be an increasing risk of more intense violence between palestinians and settlers and complete despair among palestinians that would create very fertile