united states and britain are highly unequal societies, and unusually unequal societies. if you look at this graph. if you look at horizontal access here, this is telling you the relationship between basically what wealthy people are and what the working class earns in a a society. you can see the united states and britain are high that almost all oecd countries in terms of that inequality. only surpassed by emerging economies. on the vertical axis is intergenerational mobility, the relationship between what someone earns what the parents aren't. i can't i high level of inequality meaning that with higher levels of correlation between what we earn and what our parents earned compared to get other oecd countries. so high levels of inequality, lower levels of intergenerational mobility and kind of similar countries. this is also true i race. look at net worth, another measure of inequality is actual wealth. median wealth for whites in the united states is 13 times greater than beating wealth from blacks in the united states and ten times greater than median wealth for latin

so unequal again in terms of unequality opportunity and related to race. so the puzzle then is how do students make sense of this inequality especially when -- they're sort of hear this narrative of working hard in high school most of them working incredibly hard in high school most of them are going to schools in which pears peers are not getting get universities tol accomplishment and suggest that outcomes are highly unequal. so -- how -- so the last question that i address in this book is how what the complication are especially when had we think about a diversity practice and so what might we expect? how might we think that students would think about race admissions so on the one hand we might tick a symbolic politic approach and that theory in political science which says that our -- our ways that we think about policy punishes are related to kind of long-standing ways kind of political dispositions they're emotional kind of so if you think of yourself as liberal you're going to support affirmative action. you're going to support the welfare state kin

protects against the government endorsing something so that protect against the endorsement but against unequal treatment so we have to look for different treatments spec that language are not that different. >> that is the distinction but do you have a single equal protection violation case based ever on government speech? >> no except for those that happen to deal with the confederate flag and that is correct. ivory and those plaintiffs that finds the standing based on stigma. >> i don't think so. if you look at those religious cases. >> these seem like separate doctrine there seem there is cases to support your position. >> the is your argument turn on incorporating from the establishment clause? to make that analogy that could be drawn but to a large extent an issue when the government speaks of is that the violation. >> you cannot even cite a case it was decided solely on the merits even if we jump there that is not a valid theory. >> the state cannot cite the siegel case for it has been rejected the whole motion is fairly new to the concept as it is being discussed the reason there is not

about any equal protection case that finds standing based on stigma without attendant finding of unequal treatment? >> i don't think so, yes or your honor. if you look at the religious cases -- >> those seem separate documents. if we focus on separate -- but does your argument turn on incorporating standing from establishment clause? >> it turns on there being an onliology that can be drawn there. >> i think it has to be drawn. >> yes. >> okay. >> this is to a large extent issue of first impression. when the government speaks in a way that speaks, diminishes one racial group over another, is that merit of protection? >> you can't cite a case where it was decided favorably on the merit based on speech alone -- >> even if we jumped to merits, that doesn't seem like that's an equal valid protection hearing. >> that state cannot find a theory that's been rejected. and the reason there aren't equal protection cases out there where somebody says, well, those government speech violate the equal protection clause other than this flag, you can't find government, you can't find government displays

>> what about any equal protection case that finds standing based on stigma without a finding of unequal treatment? >> i don't tnk so, your hono the reason for this is if you look at the religious cases -- >> i know but those seem like separate doctrines. if we focus just on equal protection there is case law to support the position. does your argument turn on incorporating standing from establishment clause? >> it turns on there being an analogy that can be drawn there. >> i think it has to be drawn. >> yes. >> okay. >> you know, this is to a large extent an issue of first impressions. when the government speaks in a way that diminishes, demeans one racial group over another is that a violation of equal protection? that is more of a merit issue? >> you cannot even find a case where it was decided in favor just on the merits. even if we jump to merits that doesn't seem to be a valid equal protection theory. >> the state can't find a case of that being rejected. the whole notion of government speech is fairly new concept as it is being discussed. the reason there are not equal protection

those plaintiff -- standingbout any equal case that finds standing without unequal treatment? mr. scott: i don't think so, your honor. the reason for this is -- jdg. higginson: those select separate doctrines -- those seem like separate doctrines. mr. scott: there is a complete absence of case law. jdg. higginson: does your argument turn on incorporating standing from the establishment clause? mr. scott: it turns on there being an analogy that can be drawn there. jdg. higginson: i think it has to be drawn. mr. scott: jdg. higginsonyes. this is an issue of first impression. when the government speaks in a way that diminishes one racial group over another, is that a violation of equal protection? that is more of a rr iue jdg. higginson: you cannot even cite a case that was decided favorably on the merits, based on speech alone. even if we jump to merits, that doesn't seem to be a valid equal protection theory. mr. scott: the state cannot find a single case where that theory has been rejected. the whole notion of government speech is fairly new as a jurisprudential concept. the reaso

is it fair for germany to provide its exporters with a 19% vat rebate when under the unequal treatment of our income tax system by the world trade organization, american exporters to germany can't get a reciprocating rebate? is it a coincidence that india has some of the highest tariffs on finished goods in the world and a company like harley davidson has to export its motorcycles to india in parts for assembly by local hands? is it fair for countries like vietnam and thailand to serve as platforms for the diversioning their be dumping -- diversionary dumping of chinese state-owned industries? and how many a chinese company can set up production on u.s. soil and sell freely into our market when a u.s. company producing on chinese soil must take on a 50% joint venture chinese partner and run the very real risk of losing its intellectual property? i could go on and on here. you though this. you though this. and if i had to filibuster all day during this conference -- i won't do that -- all i would need do is pull out a copy of the latest annual national trade estimate report on foreign t

is it fair for germany to provide its exporters with a 19% vat rebate when under the unequal treatment of our income tax system by the world trade organization, american exporters to germany can't get a reciprocating rebate. is it a coincidence that india has some of the highest tariffs on finished goods in the world and a company like harley davidson has to export its motorcycles to india in parts for assembly by local hands. is it fair for countries like vietnam and thailand to serve as platforms foor the diversionary jumping of chinese state industries and korean conglomerates. how come a chinese company can set up production on u.s. soil and sell freely into our market when a u.s. company producing on chinese soil must take on a 50% joint venture chinese partner and run the very real risk of losing its intellectual property. i could go on and on here. you know this. and if i had to filibuster all day during this conference -- i won't do that -- all i would need do is pull out a copy of the latest annual national trade estimate report on foreign trade barriers published by the unite

wealth is to unequally divided in our country. president of and subservient france in europe and the world. finally i will be the president of peace, because i am alarmed at the rise in the world and in europe itself. will leave nato. we have no control -- we will no longer be forced into wars we have no control over. i will serve them with honor. the meaning of my candidacy is a program. >> it is your turn. >> good evening to all of you. i share the words by the other candidates that are not here this evening. nothing was written before hand. i haven't been a bit -- then a member of the establishment. i was a civil servant, a banker. some criticized me for this. i'm proud of having been a banker. ministera government and i think it is a useful thing. i fought for what i believe in. i see what is blocking our country. i decided to take my responsibility and launched a political movement. i left the government, i resigned from the civil service and by taking my freedom i assumed my responsibility with many of you in order to change

establishment clause protects against the endorsement but equal protection clause protects against unequal treatment so we have to look for different treatment. >> the language of the two clauses i would submit are not really that different. >> that is the distinction. do you have a single equal protection violation case based ever on government speech? >> no, your honor. i will be candid to say except for circuit cases that happen to deal with confederate flag. >> they get there but doesn't seem that standing was contested there. there is no addressing. >> that is correct. the standing was not contested. >> i agree those are interesting cases. >> those cases standing was not contested. there were equal protection claims and those plaintiffs -- >> any equal protection case that finds standing based on stigma? >> i don't this go so. the reason for this is if you look at the religious cases -- >> those just seem like separate doctrines. if we focus just on equal protection there is case law to support your position. >> complete absence of case law. >> does your argument turn on incorporating

and it doesn't matter if it's federal or state, eventually that will all have to fall because it's unequal. >> do you have anything to add with regard to maybe cooper's story or background you learn from the case? >> nothing that i can think off the top of my head, honestly. i know all of those parents involved in the case would go through the second parent adoptions for that very reason thinking at least we can do this and how that additional layer of legal protection, but it does come down to the simple fact that no one should be forced to do that when the supreme court has said your lawful same sex marriage brings with it everything that goes with it as an opposite sex marriage. it's a matter of time before legislators across the country to retire, to die, to be replaced by people who live in this current century. >> your on the left, please. >> i have heard a lot about what judges should consider whether it's science or history or from a plaintiff's perspective and sort of a host storing or poor commentator perspective what do you want a judge to be considering? i think about the helpe

this is unequal, it's not fair. i'm wondering what are they going to do if they say they are going to save money with $800 million? what about infrastructure and things we need to get done? why do the rich have to get more tax breaks? guest: the build that the committee passed after 27 hours last week would save the federal government a lot of medicaid. where that money would go would be subject to the ways and means committee. if they wanted to give tax cuts to the wealthy, but in our committee, i don't want to cut health care opportunity for people just for someone to get another tax cut. willie,orida, independent. caller: how are you doing, sir? guest: i'm doing well. i am in houston. caller: evidently, they don't believe in math because they don't like the numbers. they liked it when they were knocking down the aca, when obamacare was being passed. it took about a year to pass it -- it would not add up. bill,rse they had this eight years to write it. everybody knew they were going to get rid of medicaid. it is s

although the relationship may be unequal, emmanuel and kate say there are effective ways to fight these harsh changes. sheryl agreeses and the battlefield is the contract. >> i'm always the one to pick up the phone and call. say, look, love your contract. it's great. i have a few issues with this. can we discuss it and here's what i would like. >> you need to go to their customer when you're negotiating your contract and be forthright. >> clarification is the first step. trouble starts when they need the contract and ignore terms sgls you have to realize what the reality is and denial is not a business plan. >> you have to decide if that business is worth it or isn't. we're not here because of our good looks. we're here because we produce good equipment. we need to produce that at a prompt. >> if i do lose this job because of terms, frankly, we're willing to do that because it's not worth it. you have to set your limits. >> the second key factor is diversification. avoid becoming dependent on a single large client. >> putting all your eggs is one basket is not a business plan. >> you ma

although the relationship may be unequal, emanuel and kate say there are effective ways to fight these harsh changes. sheryl agrees. the battlefield is the contract. >> the first answer is don't let it change or don't enter into agreements that have longer terms. >> i'm always the one to pick up the phone and call and say, look, love your contract, it's great, but, i have a few issues with this. can we discuss it and here is what i would like. >> you need to go to the customer, when you are negotiating your contract and be forthright. >> clarification is the first step. trouble starts when a business needs the contract and ignores the terms. they simply hope the changes won't impact profits. >> you have to also realize what the reality is and denial is not a business plan. >> you have to decide if this is worth it or isn't. we are not here because of our good looks, we are here because we produce goode equipment and we need to produce it at a profit. >> if i lose the job because of terms, frankly, we are willing to do that because it's not worth it. you have to set your limits. >> the

is it fair for germany to provide its exporters with a 90% -- 19% rebate when under the unequal treatment of power incontact system, by the world trade organization, exporters from america to germany can't get a reciprocating even gets rebate. rebate.rocating india has some of the highest tariffs in the world and harley davidson has to export its order cycles to india in parts for assembly by local hands. as it fair for countries like vietnam and thailand to serve as platforms for the divers and eric dumping of chinese state-owned industries and korean conglomerates? company sethinese up on u.s. soil and sell brewed into our markets when a u.s. company producing on chinese soil must take on a 50% joint venture chinese partner and run the very real risk of losing its intellectual property? i could go on and on here. if i had to filibuster all day during this conference, i won't do that. all i would need to do is pull out a copy of the latest trade estimate reports on foreign trade barriers published by the united states trade representatives and start reading it. filibuster, ithat could ju

it was already unequal distribution. . an article, he is urging people to look more at the trade deficit. how much does that concern you, the size of the deficit right now? the size of the deficit is not, i think, the huge problem. there is a tendency to think that inflation is awful, all these people are selling these things cheaply. to some negative effect extent, but it has a positive effect. i think the macro effects are good. the problem is very negative distribution effects. there is economy. i agree. it is a procyclical policy in that regard. so i not worried about the overall deficit in terms of slowing down growth. obviously, the rest of the world , there is a drag on our growth. there is an upside to imports. nobody is forcing america to import. stuff to give us goods. the benefits are unfairly done. david: is it more difficult to deal with inequality when there is a multilateral deal? it will push for more one-to-one deals. is that better for the case -- >> they are unrelated. the deals, the multilateral deals m

powerhouse with giant offshore oil reserves but on the other hand, it's wealth distribution remains unequal commodity prices said the economy down. the president working to put brazil back on solid footing. he wants to limit expenses and restore the social security system and execute a more business friendly environment. unlike his predecessor, he is a seasoned politician with experience striking deals and has good relations with legislatures. but growing opposition within his own coalition to austerity .easures the petrobras scandal has exposed a system of institutionalized corruption, connecting brazil's largest company with its political party. read more about brazil and the quick takes on the bloomberg. go to bloomberg.com for more stories. , ecb breaking news policymakers have discussed whether interest rates could rise before the asset purchases come to an end, according to people familiar with the matter. we will come back to the ecb in a few moments. let's talk about the eu summit in brussels this week. theresa may reaffirming she will trigger article 50 by the end of the month. the

most of the big thing wes have learn about unequal and mobility in this country have come from private researchers getting access to public data. >> for that to happen does mean that people have to trust your ability to match data and then keep the individuals private. to lose the match so nobody can track individuals that's one thing that stops data improvements because people don't trust it. goes back to how to communicate about this and how to be careful. >> privacy concerns are obviously real but don't want to go so far that we -- i'll try to go through the questions. some great questions. one is: derrick baker reddy oh, would you improve the delivery of government data? current live it's spread across web sites and not easy to find, which i dead on should we have a centralized thing? how can we make it easier for people to get data from the different web sites? >> as you know, the moment the solution to that is there are various private companies, data stream, reuters, have basically said, it's incredibly confusing, you can get everything here and they are selling nothing else tha

plus call attention to injustices including unequal pay, sexual harassment and inadequate family leaveatherine? (catherine) hundreds of people in san jose's vietnamese community are trying to figure out how to rebuild after the recent severe flooding city officials say about 80 percent of the 400 families still displaced are vietnamese..many don't have much - aside from the clothes they were wearing.. a california billionaire who was a refugee from vietnam and built a fortune in medical products -donated $5 million dollars for flood relief. he presented a check to city officials for a relief fund operated by various charities. (steve) a seven point four earthquake. that's what a southern california fault is capable of producing. according to researchers at the university of san diego. they say two faults that were once studied separately...are being considered one long fault. stretching from san diego to los angeles. researchers say even a moderate quake could have a major impact on the region. (steve) you're looking live outside s-f-o tonight.. where it's clear skies. but a little chi

ear squall, what that means is that the inequities in our society must not be because people are unequal but they're equal so we have to look for the policies causing inequities and then we as a society become focus us on eliminating policies and there are create mortgage equitable policies but if we are constantly manipulated and -- ill know i've been manipulated and i'm sure everybody this room has been manipulated in oak the inequities are cause build inferior people we won't see the policies that are the problem and then racism will continue because the racist continue ideas will continue to be produced and we ill not look for the policies to he people who benefit from the policies can continue to do so. [applause] >> thank you. thank you so much for asking the most difficult question of the night. i am very honestly tell you i don't have answers for you, but one of the things that historians can do is provide the broader context. and even though you talked about the racism and et cetera, there are some -- if we take a step back, there are some -- some ways we are much better off and

think it's important to also educate that she was assigned a staff bathroom and that separate is unequal. and we've been through this before, and bathrooms have been the center of -- [laughter] discrimination for a long time. and i think if we remind people of that history and how we broke that down, it's really no different. it's a red herring, the arguments that are used with regard to bathrooms. they just really are. and i think a lot of it has to do with if you meet someone like nicole, if you meet a transgender person, then i think you understand. it, but it takes talking to that person. and nicole is out this and willing to talk, and not everyone is, but enough people are that it will headache a difference. but you have -- it will make a difference. you have to be willing to listen, and you have to not be afraid of lawsuits. [laughter] >> i'm sorry, i think that we're out of time. i want to thank you -- >> one more. [applause] >> do we still have time? two minutes? okay. two minutes. >> oh, two minutes. >> run, run! >> sorry. >> okay. this is particularly for ms. nutt, but for the

it is intended to highlight women's economic power and call attention to injustices including unequalassment and inadequate family leave. (vicki) university of california officials have proposed limiting non-resident enrollment to 20 percent of all undergraduate students. the move is an effort to prioritize in-state applicants. this would be the first limit of its kind for the 10-campus public university. the board of regents will consider it starting next week. last year, lawmakers threatened to hold back nearly 19 million dollars if the uc system did not put a cap on students from outside california. ((grant/ on cam)) extreme weather is whipping through the midwest this week. at least five people have died in wildfires in texas. and two tornadoes tore through parts of missouri on monday night. from c-n- n...dianne gallagher is there as authorities in half a dozen states are still surveying the damage. flames, smoke, high winds and a tornados terrorized parts of the midwest leaving devastation, forcing evacuations and already being blamed for loss of life... including three texas ran

republicans criticized the rules saying they put internet service providers on unequal footing with datalike facebook and google. democrats criticized the repeal saying consumers do not want their personal information shared especially without their permission. the house of representatives is expected to follow suit next week followed by a signature by president trump. >>> uber is ruling -- rolling ought a new service to give parents a peace of mind it's called teen uber and it allows parents a way to keep track of their kids even after they've been dropped off. the ride sharing service just rolled out this new program. first, mom and dad can add their teens to a family profile. that means the kids can now request their own car. but here's the catch. for 20 minutes after the drop-off, parents can confirm their whereabouts through gps so that they know where they got dropped off, say s-the library is really where they're going. seems uber is in the pilot phase and right now it's only available in a few cities. >>> finally there may be a little egg on his face. but a funny talented and bra

not even equalising the amount of tax being paid per worker, they arejust making it a slightly less unequalght direction. they point out its progressive. that means it hits people on higher incomes more than it hits people down the income scale. if white van man earns less than £16,000 a year, another measure, which is scrapping a flat rate of national insurance contributions, which costs £150 a year, will more than make up for the extra 2% he will play on his class to national insurance contributions. they say is essentially what the chancellor has done hasn't been unfair, because the differences at the moment aren'tjustified and closing the gap a little, to them, isa closing the gap a little, to them, is a step in the right direction. you can send your questions about the budget and how it affects you, we'll put them to personal finance experts at 3:30pm this afternoon. you can text 61124, email askthis@bbc. co. uk and tweet using the hashtag bbcaskthis. the health secretaryjeremy hunt has said it is essential that a and e departments in england hit their target for waiting times now that

driven by comparison, by vanity, by wealth seeking, and when you find that, this is an incredibly unequal society where opportunities are horribly and evenly distributed. even those who have, start to be victims to the same fear and anxieties as the have-nots. this is what we see today. the house also have, in addition to economic inequality, they also have other problems which is that even though they have money and wealth, they don't have access to intellectual capital which is certainly the case of the president who is neurotic about the culture of power possessed by manhattan liberals, for example. he's constantly beating them and targeting the new york times. there are those kinds of resentments also at work where people feel that a tiny elite has monopolized. >> it was to me striking to see renÉ girard show up in the middle of this argument. most of the thinkers in the book are from the 18th, 19th and first part of the 20th century in europe and suddenly the frenchman who taught at stanford and died last year contributed to a key idea, the idea of human neck rivaling. >> it is a not

well, we live in and on balanced and unequal country, very much like the whole of the uk where londonm, the same risks happen here in wales under labour we have seemed more investment around the capital city and that is not to say that the capital city does not deserve investment but we want to see that investment but we want to see that investment might throughout the country, in the north in the middle of the country, in the west and the east you criticise labour there but you've done deal with them in the assembly. we have a contract with labour in the assembly there was a minority government situation that we work with them we did a deal to get their budget through where we managed to get a lot of plaid cymru priorities bomb our manifesto implemented and funded to that budget deal, but we are not in coalition with them. —— priorities through our manifesto. we cannot trust the tories and ukip to act as responsible... surely you are trying to have it both ways, you criticise them but at the same time you are with them? you could look at it that way, i look at it as maximising the be

we saw an unequal reduction and our retention which ideally of 91% for aviators or in the officer committee fell down to 86% or 87%. we made that up in a session. our challenge right now is i have got 500 officers still in the training pipeline more than i need. this year, because in addition to reducing the size of the force, we are introducing new type model service in the inventory. f-35 and mb-22 and etcetera, camelot is going forward requesting of the secretary of the navy and tho right turn tau retention bonus in three communities. >> f-35 and f-18 and b-22 are current aly growing communities. we don't want to be caught short in those communities. we got more majors than lieutenant prefers. and so we want to make sure we have the opportunity to lev tragedy leverage to maintain those officers and coming out of the requirement of commitment and capture for a bit time. >> thank you, general. >> miss speire, you are now recognized. >> thank you. >> that's when they graduate from the training. that training takes a year and after that year, they have a ten year commitment so it is typicall

maintain stability and stay in the city which as pinots extremely expensive and becoming increasingly unequal. so i would like to see increased counseling services available for people to better have better knowledge of how to access a for the housing and also how to be improving their financial health. >> thank you. >> supervisor yee >> so mr. lofton in.first book of how long have even serving on this? >> two years >> you seem like a real busy guy. have you been able to make the meetings? >> yes i have. >> always a good time. i'm just curious in the two years what you think you have had the biggest impact on in terms of some of accomplishments with moving the committee? >> in the last two years i think that it's on the most valuable for me is the committee a reach when we go into the community have these meetings and get to hear from the individuals in the community for example i get one in the castro grime the seniors got their input and think that's really important to hear directly from the people who are recipient of the funds. i think that's the kind of stuff that's important and bring

we saw an unequal reduction and our retention which ideally of 91% for aviators or in the officer community fell down to 86% and 87%. we lost some aviators. we made that up in a session. our challenge right now is i have got 500 officers still in the training pipeline more than i need. >> okay. good. >> this year because of in addition to reducing the size of the force we are introducing new type model service into the inventory. f-35 and the mb-22 and et cetera. camelot is going forward requesting of the secretary of the navy and authority to pay a retention bonus in three communities. f-35, f-18 because the legacy platform are the most challenged platforms right now. and b-22. f-35 and b-22 are the most growing communities. we don't want to be caught short in those communities. we're a bit imbalanced. we got more majors than and lieutenants that are preferred. and so we want to make sure we have the opportunity to leverage to maintain those young officers as they come out of their required commitment to us and capture them for that extra bit of time before we got them by the -- >> thank y

right now small businesses are often on an unequal playing field with larger companies and unions. because they have few employees, small businesses have limited bargaining power when it comes to negotiating for lower insurance costs for their workers. this bill levels the playing field for small businesses. allowing them to band together -- 30 more seconds? ms. foxx: i yield the gentleman 15 seconds. mr. walberg: thank you. to band together through association health plans and negotiate the best deals to provide health care at a lower cost. it also represents an important step forward, purchasing health insurance across state lines. today's vote is an immediate first step to help job creators provide affordable health care options to their employees and a transition toward a patient centered health care system. i urge my colleagues to support this legislation. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady reserves her time. the gentleman from virginia. mr. scott: thank you, mr. speaker. mr. speaker, i yield four minutes to the gentleman from connecticut, mr. court nifment

team planning to boycott the world championship if they can't strike a deal saying they're getting unequal, negotiations overnight not resolving the dispute, even senators are weighing in on the side of the team, so where does it stand right now. >> no go right now and we're only a few days away and i mean this is a team that's -- >> what are they negotiating. >> for the future they say. it's not as much about them and what they'll make playing for usa hockey as it is about growing the women's game, adding funding to the women's national development team. trying to make that more equal than necessarily the actual dollars they're getting for suiting up for team usa. >> does the men's national team get more support than the women's? >> in terms of actual dollars for suiting up, no. in terms of the amount of millions poured in and first class airfare, bringing a guest with you, little inequities that have built up over the last 20 years for this team like not being invited to the jersey unveiling before sochi, these are the inequities they're fighting as well as the 3.5 million that goes to t

because of starkly unequal concentrations of wealth and ever-increasing corporate power aided and abetted by decisions like citizens united, because they have skewed the playing field even more decisively to special interests and away from the individual citizen, we need a nominee who would reverse that trend, not exacerbate it. donald trump campaigned on helping average people. his nominee sides with corporate interests against average people like mr. madden, miss caplander and the wong family over and over again. so from all indications, judge gorsuch is not the kind of nominee who has sympathy and helps average americans when it comes to judging in the law. mr. president, i yield the floor and -- no. okay. the presiding officer: under the previous order, the leadership time is reserved. morning business is closed. under the previous order, the senate will proceed to executive session to resume consideration of the following nomination which the clerk will report. the clerk: nomination, office of the director of national intelligence, daniel coats of indiana to be director. the presidin

view is the previous system which had checks and balances, which had individual rights and was very unequal landscape in social america. they are able to lead a strong impetus for short-term redress and the institutions are not allowing them to do it so these people back on ripening their relationship with the executive and the people are incorporating into constitutions these limits that in fact pose a new type of democracy. this is not liberal democracy. liberal democracy is for cosmopolitan elitists.this is participatory democracy where the people, where the majority, where those that feel unrepresented and in fact have a direct channel to the president are listening, and offering some of this rich rest on behalf of health perceived addition franchise disinfected. >> i want to go in to ask a quick question about anti-elitism. we talked about that a lot this morning and it's coming up a lot. you think of in the us case we have an administration basically saying that the media what the opposition party . very anti-media, anti-elites as well. we saw the same sort of dynamic with brexit in c

when we are so unequal? either in the short term, there is going to be some kind of political blow up in 1989, which means we will have some sort of populist. and that is in issue that is coming to the four in brazil now, the economic problems will lead to some kind of populist backlash. [indiscernible] >> i guess you could say they were creative. james: yes. that is right. 1989 is a year -- where people are celebrating, at least the people i have looked at. again, sort of going on to this question of the power. power i think american power in brazil is manifested in economics, which means it is challenging as a scholar, i'm not economist and i try my best. but on the congress, coming from the point of -- we do not see very much on human rights but we see a lot on trade. and it is on the other side. the thing not in the paper, or in the delivered remarks, was the way in which the reagan administration pushes back against protectionism on the congressional side, the very unglamorous issues like the importatio

think it's important to also educate that she was assigned a staff bathroom and that separate is unequal and we've been through this before, and bathrooms have been the center of -- [laughter] discrimination for a long time. and i think if we remind people of that history and how we broke that down, it's really no different. it's a red herring, the arguments that are used with regard to bathrooms. they just really are. and i think a lot of it has to do with if you meet someone like nicole, if you meet a transgender person, then i think you understand. it, but it takes talking to that person. and nicole is out this and willing to talk, and not everyone is, but enough people are that it will headache a difference. but you have -- it will make a difference. you have to be willing to listen, and you have to not be afraid of lawsuits. [laughter] >> i'm sorry, i think that we're out of time. i want to thank you -- >> one more. [applause] >> do we still have time? two minutes? okay. two minutes. >> oh, two minutes. >> run, run! >> sorry. >> okay. this is particularly for ms. nutt, but for the e

what we have not done is you with the fact that the distribution of the pie has in the unequal.he pie has not grown so fast. we have to get on board with doing the right thing on the domestic side. it is complemented by a range of domestic policies we have chosen not to do. have taken away fiscal mechanisms for redistribution over the last four years. we have made the situation worse. how does the nation of the east india trading company, how do they establish a place within the new power of trump politics versus the plenty we all desire. mervyn: it has plenty of size and weight in the economy. having aave seen, large economy does not necessarily give you the power you want. china was growing at extraordinary rates and could not maintain its growth rate the cousin of the lack of demand from the rest of the world. unless we find a way to get out of our problems through some sort of cooperation, ice expect we will see a continuation of slow growth. kingdom, we need to accept the fallings hurling as a necessary part of the british economy and see resources move. you see the possibi

quote, i have no doubt that the supreme court's opportunity to pronounce separate schools inherently unequal in the brown vs. board of education case would have been delayed for a decade had my colleagues and i been required upon paying a potential sanctions to plead our legal theory explicitly from the start. , i so for that reason alone urge the adoption of this amendment and i yield back, mr. chairman, the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman from ichigan yields back. mr. conyers: i reserve my time. the chair: the gentleman from michigan reserves. for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. smith: mr. chairman, i claim the time in opposition to the amendment. the chair: the gentleman from texas is recognized for five minutes. mr. smith: mr. chairman, let me say first of all that the ranking member of the judiciary committee, the gentleman from michigan, mr. conyers, has been a champion of civil rights all of his life. i recognize that and respect that and for that reason i would like to try to reassure him, the base bill already says, as i mentioned in my

. >> the border adjustment -- the border adjustment tax is an unequal tax treatment which treats different industries. there are winners and losers. >> exactly. his terse money to lower uses for the economy. dagen: 20% tax on increase with the cost of basically everything sold at wal-mart and target and discount stores to go out. gas prices up immediately. dagen: tried to sell that your constituents. dagen: good to see you. thanks for weighing in this morning. british prime minister theresa may has departed down a street en route to the parliament where she will deliver a speech on beginning negotiations for british exit to the european union. the u.k. to formerly trigger article fit the over an hour from now. we'll take you live to london when we see the developments. theresa may move-in on her promise to leave the european union. plus, a deadly crash in texas. three storm chasers killed after car as collateral tracking a tornado. the horrible scene max. several taken into custody after two police officers were shot. and am bush style attack and it happened in miami. the latest developmen

disregard key civil rights protections in the every student succeeds act and could scal -- allow unequal, unfair and unaccountable reliability for schools across the country. mr. president, the every student succeeds act rule is supported by democrats and republicans, by teemps and -- by teachers and businesses, by parents and communities. we should not go backwards. so i urge my colleagues to reconsider moving forward with that resolution that i understand they want to bring up later this week, and work with us to continue building on that bipartisan progress that we all worked towards for our students. thank you, mr. president. i yield the floor. a senator: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from pennsylvania. mr. casey: mr. president, i ask unanimous consent to speak as if in morning business. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. casey: mr. president, thank you. i rise today to offer a few comments about the house republican bill that was just unveiled yesterday. they are claiming in the house, those who have been promoting it or those who have been working on

country to have affordable quality care by providing monthly tax benefits that ensures parity to an unequal-today marketplace. americans deserve a competitive insurance marketplace that provides quality care at an affordable cost. for that reason, i would like to welcome the gentleman and gentle ladies who have been part of the development of this plan, the architects of this legislation. from oregon, greg walden, chairman of the energy and commerce committee. the gentleman from texas >> thank you for being here today. objection, anything you have in writing will be entered into the record. i would like to defer to the ranking member of this committee , the gentleman from massachusetts. chairwomanue and is still in the hospital, chest colds are tough when you live in syracuse new york. shouldus to know that we keep her in our prayers. she can't wait to get back. to get her hands on me, i mean the bill. [laughter] >> the spirit she has brought to this committee, the spirit of which she represents her ideas across this country. i will miss her today. i want us to know that she will be back shortly