is unprecedented and i agree completely with professors and other people that this was completely unethical the way this is done the problem though is i think people will have the reaction to this particular experiment with its deficit seven point seven deficits and oversight the question of what was targeted and that will be extrapolated to a critique of crisper more generally and that i think is problematic unfortunate because as one of your other guests just did there's a lot of good that can be done through these technologies both sematic cell at a thing that's adding adult cells birds and also germ line editing when we are editing cells that will be heritable and passed on so it's really unfortunate that crisper is going to be given a really block more work because of this particular event. we got this tweet and just now alex near a car says this is an act of an amateur i see this as an irresponsible and i'm at the core act to achieve fame using our shortcut without considering the grave consequences it could bring i guess you've already read heard and learned much about the reaction o

then illuminated don't have it in the code but if you think it's unethical to do this then say so then it's discipline if you engage in at that possibility you have an obligation to be civil or courteous and you make one offhanded remark to a litigant than that is a situation i think having faced discretion that is perfectly reasonable but that is a lot less uncertain than what we currently have which is seven forms of misconduct in which we also add we are not limiting it to that creating tremendous uncertainty what falls between the? it is less certain to say here is what is enforceable exercising discretion of the trivial violations does not rise to misconduct to allow for clarity for judges and complainants and keeps discretion under control because i have yet to find conduct subject to discipline that is also not a violation of the code of conduct. i have never seen it. >> reference to the empirical work you have done on formal mechanisms is that available? . >> that's a great stocking stuffer 1993 university of pennsylvania law review article entitled informal methods of judicial

is it unethical what he did?s going back to jefferson versus adams, for crying out loud. we have unethical campaigns all the time. i always worry when i hear about should the government make this or that illegal. it sounds very close to kind of shutting down free speech. >> the problem is -- >> i don't think -- >> go ahead, danielle. >> i don't think there's as much gray area here as it's making it to seem. creating fake -- thousands and thousands of fake twitter followers, creating a fake facebook page, to me, this is kind of cut and dry fraud. all you have to do is have it exceed $25,000 so legally, you are already there. i don't know, i don't think that this is a gray area. i think that some things should come out given the advent of new technologies that can literally fool people, which is fraud, into thinking something that is not the case. >> well, the problem is, reality being what it is in washington, when they put in these rules and laws they always end up favoring incumbents upon way or the other, entre

and we go to china we'll abara trees are using chris because ninety acknowledge each unethically modify organisms that. crisp it has nine is a gene editing technique used to make targeted changes to d.n.a. . it's a kind of molecular scissors that can sniff the past and cells genes to remove replace all to selected parts of the. microbiologist in charpentier co-developed crisper decipher in the mechanism by which bacteria defend themselves against invading viruses it's a groundbreaking discovery that is made crisper a widely used biotechnological method now a researcher and shun john china has sparked outrage with his claim to have made the first genetically edited babies using crisper. he says the ultimate the genes of two embryos in order to prevent hiv infection scientists in china and around the world condemned the move as irresponsible and unethical but when it comes to breeding animals and plants reese. certain industry secrets that as a tool with huge potential. china is going all in with crisper cast nine technology for example at the agricultural giant syngenta the firm based in

. >> zinke has between 15 and 17 investigations on his conduct and unethical behavior, and brian wantsresident trying to get ready to govern better. some of the investigations have been thrown out, and this is a man since day one has been under a cloud of investigations for some of the things he has done. while you just said it, victor, we don't know who would want to take the job, and president trump put the atmosphere out there, he allows unethical behavio behavior. >> can we put up the faces of the high-ranking members of the administration who have left. i wish the people on the radio could see what is here. dozens of people who left this administration at the top of the ranks here. brian, let's look what the job is over the administration over the next several weeks. they have to find a new interior secretary, and find a new permanent chief of staff, get heather nauert confirmed for the u.n., get barr confirmed for the a.g., and deal with a democratic majority in the house, and they have to deal with the expanding mueller investigation and in the short term come to a budget deal t

prevent hiv infection scientists in china and around the world condemned the move as irresponsible and unethical but when it comes to breeding animals and plants research and industry secrets but as a tool with huge potential. china is going all in with crisper cast nine technology for example at the agricultural giant syngenta the firm based in switzerland was acquired by kim china in twenty seventeen. beijing is head of research at the beijing laboratory crisper technology is being used on crops here they could one day end up on dinner plates. in china also make a national strategic priority say or a need to. be also or want to walk as a leader in this area so china put to us a national strategic you're proud to say we need to invest think united we need to also develop the technology. crisper technology is already proving a revolution in plant breeding a trend beijing believes is urgently needed. we only have a limited demand a resource for the whole world is there are there eventually is our people population is growing and await me a lot more food if the new breeding technology just help us

can say is that it's a problem for the trump presidency, but the prosecutor is not doing anything unethical there isn't anything on trump as to what the fundamental charge of the investigation supposed to be which is coordination and links with the russian government. the most we've seen as to that is most recently with the trump tower in moscow and the putin penthouse and that got about far off the ground as lead balloon. >> when the president says this is a trap, trap insinuates there's truth underlie to go it, you're protesting and sending lawyers and tweeting about it makes you seem guilty and doesn't -- heather: well, it's rudy giuliani said it. >> well, the president's lawyer who said it, we have to understand that what it makes it look like the administration trying to shut down probe, hide what's going on, let the probe play out. let the american people see what is going on and if you've done nothing wrong the truth will come out. heather: ken, the president has repeatedly said that he will allow to play out but the american people are ready for it to be over with and then we have r

as ray says can illegal, unethical and it has to stop. >> you expect beijing to learn enough her, realizingll not put up with bad behavior going forward? >> that's a fascinating question. what kind of lesson will they learn? we see pushback from the trade tariffs and a shocked beijing's leadership. the question is are they going to participate with other states and be a good international partner? huawei says they were for many years. it's a huge company. but the largest maker of smartphones. until china learns to play by the rules of the international and we have to be suspicious and our top five intelligence chiefs around the world have told cannabis specifically not to let huawei work on g network. beijing has to change course. we can't let them go on like this and we can see them grow into the world power they want to be until they can learn to play by some of the rules of the international system. hard to say if they will or won't. mike: dr. rebecca grant, fascinating picking your brain. thanks for your time. >> thank you a majority. should the most notorious missing persons case. jimm

. >> some argue that today's bright spotlight on unethical behavior has exaggerated the problem.. and if we excuse unethical conduct by saying, well, everyone does it, or it's really okay unless you get caught, or it's not against the law, we miss the point of why it's important we not do it, period. the point may be no less than national survival, as a people who can live together honorably. if we let lying, cheating, and stealing become an accepted way of life, it's not just a few dollars that will be lost, it's the spirit of the country that will be lost. the decision is ours. ♪ >>> the u.s. president's new threat, donald trump warning he may shut down the entire southern border if he doesn't get the walled th that he wants. >>> the british home secretary declares the fast growing number of migrants crossing the english clanlele lle a lle channel as incident. >>> and we'll take an in-depth look at the special counsel at the department of justice. we are live in atlanta and we welcome our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm george howell. th

if he turned it over to the president, at the very least they would be wildly unethical if not violation of the department of justice regulations. and we have to ask ourselves and congress needs to find out did he do this and has the president asked for this information? what communication is taking place and obviously if the president asks for it it would be another one of his abuse of powers. >> right, but he's not been -- recused himself, whitaker, at all. why wouldn't he just ask mueller's team? let me look at that unredacted, i want to know what's in there. >> that's been his behavior. >> because it's unethical. >> that's what trump has done. he's tried to paper over things and made the situation a whole lot worse at different points. we're talking about the situation in terms of what conversations flynn had with kislyak during the transition and the question being whether he was directed by trump, did trump know about these things? trump was at mar-a-lago when flynn was having these conversations but trump, after russia decided not to respond to obama expelling the russian diplomat

rudy giuliani, his latest charge against robert mueller in a series of charges is that it's unethicalp witnesses, get them to cooperate in effect. >> i think the special prosecutor lined up with the way he's intimidating people. this is what's wrong with the special prosecutors counsels, they think they're god. the only trust that exists, even if there's a lot of doubt about it. >> beyond this being rich for rudy giuliani, the former d.a., who i'm sure pressured a witness or two to cooperate with the prosecutor, beyond the richness of that, is there anything legally unethical for a special prosecutor to offer leniency in effect, although this agreement, we don't know what the leniency is, but to offer something in exchange for cooperation? >> no, absolutely not. i mean, that's exactly the way that we have cooperation structured. and rudy giuliani certainly is, as you said, very familiar with that. i think, you know, there's a danger he's creating for himself here, making these sorts of assertions is one thing when we all know they're completely baseless, but he actually potentially ha

calling his tactics in the russia probe "unethical." how will this play out? now that mueller has his written answers from the president 'legal team? >> this isn't a search for the truth. it's a witch hunt. >> this is what's wrong with the special pound prosecutors and independent counsel. ♪ have served our country honorably. one of the benefits that we as a country give you as a veteran is the eligibility for a va loan for up to 100% of your home's value. if you need cash for your family, call newday usa. with automatic authority from the va, we can say yes when banks say no. give us a call. call 1-877-423-5732. if you're a veteran, own a home, and need money for your family, call newday usa to use your valuable va home loan benefit. thank you, admiral. it lets you borrow up to 100% of your home's value. thank you, admiral. with today's rising home values, that could mean more money for you and your family. thank you, admiral. money to pay down debts and get financial peace of mind. thank you, admiral. we'll do everything we possibly can to get you approved.

you called this wrong, unethical, inexcusable.he president's defender also say this is just of the president venting, as long as whitaker doesn't take any action, there's nothing to be concerned. >> president trump ignoring the rule of law and decades of precedented policy. this is exactly what we feared about whitaker's appointment, that he was picked not because he was qualified for the job. he really isn't. he was picked because he was auditioning on tv, talking down the mueller investigation, how he could cripple the mueller investigation. so trump chooses him. then he doesn't appear to do what the president wants him to do, at least not yet. ethics committee told him that the public wouldn't have confidence in his judgments and now we learn that they're discussing the case. the president of the united states is discussing a case in which he is involved with the attorney general. it will taint any role he plays in this investigation. this is a real assault on the rule of law. and we are going to scrutinize every single action

i'm here because i think this is unethical. i think the city of san francisco, what they did, they took out a swimming pool and they built a full basketball court, and that's plenty. i mean, a full basketball court in their bottom, which is under this terrace, and now they want to do more. and i just, you know, the light and privacy issues are one thing, but it's the unethical part of this that really is bothersome, and that's why i'm here. and that's why i just want to set a precedent in the neighborhood, you know, saying, you know, let's all work out these neighborhood, you know, discussions and rebuilds and stop using up city time to do this. because i know city has a lot of other things that you all could be doing and working on and building new communities. so thank you. i just want you to look at the ethical part of this, you know, thank you. >> president hillis: thank you very much. any public comment in support of the project sponsor? seeing none -- sorry, public comment in support of the d.r. requester. yeah, you'll ha

illegal, unethical and unfair. it's going to take all of us working together to protect our economic security and our way of life. the american people expect and deserve no less. thank you. >> good morning. i'm just burning from a u.s. attorney for southern district of new york. today we announced charges against two chinese hackers, july john shirt long in the massive theft of intellectual property and information from u.s. foreign companies as well as u.s. government agencies. the extent and types of data is by the defendants is shocking and outrageous. as the deputy attorney general and the director noted, the they are alleged to have been members of a hacking group operating in china called apt 10 an association of the chinese ministry of state security peered over the past 12 years, apt 10 has mounted a series of sophisticated computer intrusion campaign that targeted more than 45 commercial and defense technology companies in the united states as well as managed service providers and their clients across the

if you've seen something that's illegal or unethical, don't speak to the feds. we now have the president of the united states, again, the head of the executive, telling people in the united states, messaging them that when the executive branch via the department of justice and fbi comes to speak with you, if you know something unethical or illegal, the right thing to do, shut up. it's hard to imagine how do you build a case when you have people who are advised by the president of the united states don't speak. it makes it a lot tougher, john. >> abby, the person who has taken a different tact and it is fascinating to watch this is michael cohen. michael cohen who once said he would take a bullet for president trump, who was so dedicated and dutiful to the president has decided to take a different tact and to confess and to -- i mean, from what we can tell, to sort of open up to everything that he has done. "the new york times" has an interesting article this morning on why michael cohen had done this. mr. cohen it says has concluded that his life has been utterl

clearly unethical.een january 2016th and january 20 17th 19,000 between january 2016th and january 2017th19,000 pupils dropped off school rules between ten and 11 and around half that number, nearly 10,000, did not appear on the role of another state funded school. they could be being, dedicated, could have gone to a private school but why are you so concerned about that? the numbers of children who are disappearing at this point, it's abnormal to disappear at this point at all, halfway through a gcse course, , at all, halfway through a gcse course,, half of them are not appearing on any state rule, some of them could be in private alternative provision that's not registered or inspected at if so, these are the children with the biggest problems, the biggest academic problems and social problems, we should want to know for it they are and be co mforta ble know for it they are and be comfortable they are being looked after. we don't know where they are, how can that be? we are a very permissive country a

at the very least, it's unethical.w the president is saying, oh, he was a good boy, i'm going to possibly keep the issue of a pardon on the table. at first, they didn't know what to do. he was like, they weren't thinking about it. now, i'm thinking about it. and now that's probably even changed now with what we're hearing today with these filings and then with this cohen issue, the president needs to be worried, because there is evidence out there, not only does the president need to be worried, but those who bear his name need to be worried because they are involved as well with that -- the russia meeting. you know, and all of these payments. this does not bode well for the president, and it's going to be a slow process, i'm not even going to say impeachment right now but trust and believe, come january, democrats, especially in oversight and government reform, they're going to be dealing with these issues. >> all right. thank you all very much, and i think that the bottom line point here that everyone is making is th

for example, drink or murder or something unethical. then obviously. but if it is something you just do not like to do, then, the prophetic tradition says even if you do not like your ruler, even if he is doing wrong, even if he is beating your back. even if he is beating your back and texting at a high rate, still, obey the ruler. now, these traditions first and foremost, they do exist.let's be honest, they are in all of the books of tradition. and they have influenced political thought by and large. without getting into the fact that even in classical you know let's just briefly say, that is one school. it is not the only school. and it is not only the only school. but even with in islam, they have always been dissenting voices. really need to look at the early -- and how he viewed the kingship that began. even within the tradition there is a spectrum of opinion about how these need to be interpreted. second, let's also realize that those traditions, even if we were to act upon them and believe them, the question is, do they apply in modern circumsta

when i came into this job. , the afghanistan strategy was not only ineffective, i would unethical. the reason it was ineffective is because it neglected the fact wills.r is a contest of as the previous administration sends troops to afghanistan, they announced their withdrawal the same day. how does that work? i thought in war, winning means convincing your enemy that you and and has been defeated. in this case we need to convince the taliban that they cannot complete their objectives through violence. how does that work? it was completely disconnected what we were doing militarily from what we said we were willing to achieve politically. we were creating all of these myths. which are a bold line between the taliban and al qaeda, there is no bold line between the taliban and al qaeda. training -- there is a taliban training center set up for al qaeda. so we created a whole mythology about that, we did not even explain it to the american people. the reason i say it is unethical is -- thomas aquinas said one of the toughest test for a just war is you have a just end in mind. it was n

when we believe transactions are legal people will seek to hold you to account you they see them as unethical shell is facing exactly that situation with court action and investigations over nigerian oil block cold o.b.l. two for five with hindsight it is not one that we want to find ourselves in again we wish to confirm the correctness and compliance of every aspect of the transaction in respect of o.p.o. two four five concluded and twenty eleven both with a political laws and global industry practice putting a lot in layman terms of what it actually means the alleged bribe used to secure the deal is larger than nigeria's entire national health care budget almost half of the country's population there and eighty seven million people live in extreme poverty a corruption investigator we spoke to claims international companies exploit nigeria's natural resources and he's of the belief they don't give anything in return. evidence is. show. in new. involved in bribery. this is he a nigeria and you know you produce in concert and you realize just as simple as you shield what you call you. because

rudy giuliani taking aim at mueller, saying he is using unethical tactics. the focus now turning to republican operative roger stone, who is already striking a defiant tone against the special counsel. here's david wright at the white house. >> reporter: longtime political adviser roger stone insisted today he won't betray president trump, no matter how much pressure the special counsel brings to bear. >> there's no circumstance under which i would testify against the president, because i'd have to bear false witness against him. i'd have to make things up. >> reporter: today, stone told george stephanopoulos there's no proof he collaborated with wikileaks, the site that released thousands of democratic e-mails stolen by russian hackers. but a series of e-mails suggests stone did make efforts to contact the wikileaks founder, julian assange, and admitted as much in 2016. >> i actually have communicated with assange. i believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the clinton foundation. >> reporter: today, stone insisted curiosity is not the same as c

when we believe transactions are legal people will seek to hold you to account you've seen them as unethical. schellas face in exactly that situation with court action and investigations and i blog called o.p.l. two hundred forty five with hindsight it is not one that we would want to find ourselves in again we wish to confirm the correctness and compliance of every aspect of the transaction in respect of o.p.o. two four five concluded and twenty eleven both with our political laws and global industry practice nigeria's and national health care budget is less than the sum of the alleged bribe half of the country's population of eighty seven million living in extreme poverty more than any other nation on earth rolling down the corruption investigators say is that international companies exploits nigeria's national natural resources without giving anything in return. evidence is. sure. even involved in bribery and corruption this is he. producing country. is just as simple as you feel or what you call. because there is no one refinery in nigeria that is walking on the however you feel the fore

jim: it's unethical but possibly accurate.t is worth noting the jury question did not come back with john edwards nailing him for using money from a wealthy donor. a wealthy backer said i will throw money around to make sure it goes away. howie: edward did this while he was a presidential candidate. but trump did this in 2006. cone said he would reimburse the "enquirer" rsh. "enquirer." so when you get into the dirty details it doesn't sounds like a news operation. it sounds like a bunch of guys doing donald trump's bidding. that practice in the tabloid world didn't originate with donald trump. adrienne: it didn't. but this could be a campaign finance violation. if the story had come out it would have influenced the decision of the voters whether to support donald trump. but that's a hard thing to prove. is this legal, is it illegal? that's what's hard to prove. but the optics look terrible. the president of the united states as a candidate had his cronies paying off stories that would have negatively affected him. howie: afte

so for you to present yourself isic highly unethical -- [inaudible] >> host: okay, is that the point you wanted to make? >> caller: and the real finish well, the point i'm making is that she's not a real psychologies, and people a are going to take her ignorance as a possible real opinion when she's just a right-winger who's, you know, presenting, you know, opinions that are not even -- >> host: all right. mike, i think we got your point. let's get a response from our guest, gina loudon. >> guest: sure. well, yeah, obviously, i do have a degree in psychology. no, i have not sat for licensure, i've been doing m th. but i did my clinicals, internships, and i don't have any degrees from any mail order institutions at all. you know, my background being in human behavior, what i usually refer to myself is as a human behavior expert, you know, human and organizational development expert, those sorts of things. sometimes people will call people psychologists because they know that they do something psychological -- [laughter] but that's not me. and anyway, don't, you know, i ithave no desir

this is totally unethical hackery and you know we all know that the press in every european country has its own organization and indeed looking to issues like our hope the british press is going to look into what the times are because this is not acceptable this is not acceptable these people ever done nothing wrong but their work and they've done it because they have put their finger where it hurts and. by hussein because they show that they said boy just british just to do horse reports to spread use a toll oh please it is sponsored by the navy sponsored by the television services and by other ministries in the british government this is not acceptable or at least the british citizens should norgaard it now they know thanks to the russian media established you know the bro. if i were a british it has a s f o your appeal to them are not ok they are they independent journalist thanks very much for sharing your views on the program on this issue thank you. and many bashing sputnik in the times article the out that science been in their defense fellow with the atlanta council who calls sp

gillian: i think the media is saying it's unethical for a president to comment about a presidential party. howie: the president could have deflected the question, but it's not his style. he's taking a lot of flack for retweeting this picture. when does the trial for treason begin it was rob rosenstein, bob mueller, kind of a unique thing for a president to do. thetheythe tone was very differn george h.w. bush was this isn't just any moving day. this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome. stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today. howie: the papers are filled with glowing tributes to george h.w. bush. "washington post," public servant and statesman. "new york times" using the same picture. a jeaniawhat do you make of

i would say it was unethical. the fact it was ineffective is because it neglected the fact that the war is the contest of wills. they announced their withdrawal the same day. how does that work? i thought in war winning means convincing your enemy, your enemy's been defeated or in this case to get the deal with the taliban to believe them they can't accomplish their demands with violence and they're making battlefield games. how does it work? it was completely diskecked what we were doing militarily from what we said we wanted to achieve politically. we had created all these myths. we drew a bold line between the taliban and al qaeda. osama bin laden's son is creating a taliban unit. and there was a taliban training center set up for al qaeda so we created a whole mythology about the war. we didn't explain it to the american people to generate our will in the contest of wills and the reason i said it's unethical, thomas aquinas said it is a tough task and duff a rough end in mind, and certainly we were aren't doin

minister commit -- >> the minister presumes to try to shout down the right honorable lady, not only unethical, but always, everywhere, without exception doomed to fail. >> a little dangerous. [laughter] >> will the primary to commit to this? when the deal failed as we all know it will, will she then commit to allowing this house to consider all the various options to her deal by way of proper meaningful votes as a matter of urgency given the clock is ticking down? >> the house will be having meaningful vote, that meaningful vote will be on the deal that has been agreed in negotiation with the european union subject to the further work that is being undertaken in relation to the assurances. what i say to my right honorable friend, i recognize her concern she and others raised about no deal might come back to the point the only way to ensure we don't leave with no deal is make sure we leave with a deal. >> mister speaker. will the prime minister intervene for difficulties at the home office obstructing my constituent from accepting her medication which may mean there will be unaffordable procur

. >> lincoln did a lot of things that today seem unethical, but he never appealed to the darker angelsid. and stephen douglas should have been ashamed of himself. >> the very union itself is coming apart under the pressure of the election. down south the homes of republican sympathizers are attacked. >> the prospect of a lincoln presidency drives southerners to extremes. they prepare politically. they prepare militarily. their state arsenals are opened up, their militia companies begin to drill. >> one newspaper declares, let the boys arm. abolitionism is at your doors with torch and knife in hand. (atlas) do humans know they are paying too much with verizon? (paul) no, they just don't know that sprint's unlimited plan gives you 5 lines for just $24 dollars per month, per line. (mom) wow, that would save us... (atlas)...nearly $1,000 dollars? (mom) what about the network? (paul) now sprint has lte advanced. (atlas) it's up to two times faster than before. (mom) no way! (dad) robots don't lie. (atlas) the man in the mom jeans is correct. (avo) get up to two times faster speeds and see h

jeanine: you just heard mire open and you heard alan dershowitz saying he believes the fbi act unethicallythey acted unconstitutionally. mike huckabee joins me. good to have you back on "justice." the return that was ordered by the judge in this case because, he said to mueller, i will give you 48 hours. i want the 302 or the fbi's report of what flynn said to them. and the judge never got it. what's curious is when the fbi interviewed hillary clinton, that 302 was written on the same day, july 2 of 2016. and when hillary clinton went to speak to the fbi, she was told to bring a lawyer. she was advised about what she was going to be speaking about. do you any there was a difference between the way necessity treated hillary clinton and the way they treated michael anyone? >> oh, no, not at all. justice is blind. my gosh, judge. this is just ridiculous. you have been on the bench. if you order someone to provide evidence to you in the case, that's contempt of court. i don't know how this continues to go on. people like donald trump talk about this being a witch hunts. it is a witch hunt. but

it is unethical? yes. heather: that was a lot to get through. happy friday.ee what happens over the weekends. the time is 20 minutes after the top of the hour. she targeted the president and his orders, now maxine waters is at it again. >> i believe this president is dangerous. i think he aligned himself with the enemy. he loves dictators. heather: shimkus here with reaction to her latest comments. ♪ place, the xfinity xfi gateway. and it's strengthened by xfi pods, which plug in to extend the wifi even farther, past anything that stands in its way. ...well almost anything. leave no room behind with xfi pods. simple. easy. awesome. click or visit a retail store today. >> maxine waters, taking this shot at donald trump. >> i believe this president is dangerous. i think he has undermined our democracy. heather: carly shimkus with serious xm is here with reaction online, a lot of it. >> you heard maxine waters taking a hard-line stance in favor of donald trump's impeachment. many of democrats are calling the allegations against him impeachable offenses but the o

gillian: i think the media is saying it's unethical for a president to comment about a presidential party. howie: the president could have deflected the question, but it's not his style. he's taking a lot of flack for retweeting this picture. when does the trial for treason begin it was rob rosenstein, bob mueller, kind of a unique thing for a president to do. thetheythe tone was very differn george h.w. bush was president. -here comes the rain. [ horn honking ] [ engine revving ] what's that, girl? [ engine revving ] flo needs help?! [ engine revving ] take me to her! ♪ coming, flo! why aren't we taking roads?! flo. [ horn honking ] -oh. you made it. do you have change for a dollar? -this was the emergency? [ engine revving ] yes, i was busy! -24-hour roadside assistance. from america's number-one motorcycle insurer. -you know, i think you're my best friend. you don't have to say i'm your best friend. that's okay. psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for ps

and it's decidedly unethical not to in thinking about the politics that we're going to impose on our neighbors. and it's striking in my experience being once the socialist, now a free market advocate i call myself a humane libertarian or a bleeding heart libertarian or a christian liberal. it's striking that my socialist friends resist reason. regist the reasonable claims that this book that david plans to come out of these speeches have the claims of reason of socialism. they're the claims of sheer experience that would be historical reasoning. the people who advocate socialism now i'm kind of saying that we're bernie sanders and jeremy corbyn both of whom are about my age, we shared the same views in 1960. but they didn't change since then. you hear speeches by bernie sanders and they sound like 1960s socialist. and it's striking they haven't learned from history at all. jeremy corbyn, my friend the economist, praised issue stress and now maduro in venezuela in the coverage of the venezuelaen catastrophe it's quite notable that the journalist again innocently, i'm sure this is not

questions about unethical behavior. >> this is a sudden change. >> the timing does not appear to be ancidence here, anna. we can see the secretary of the interior david burnhart, and that's a name that's been floated out there. he is a name that's taken over by zinke. he is certainly a contender. another is nevada senator dean heller. he is someone who may be interested in the position. obviously, he lost his race for re-election in that state. he could be a name that's out there. as far as when we'll find out, the president simply said soon. >> soon. any day. any time. thank you. boris sanchez at the white house. let me bring in curt to join the conversation. he writes for huffington post and usa today. he was also an advisor and a spokesperson for congressional republicans sflo knowing for the first time in two years, this was an administration that would have to be subject to congressional oversight from democrats. the last two years, they've gotten the pass really from the republican on the oversight committee, but that's not going to change as we have this new leadership coming i