we recommend closing out also prior year unexpended general fund encumbrances which would allow the return of 15,339 to the agenda fund. so, those two amounts combined result in a savings of 1,315,747 to the general fund in 13-14. and on page 41 i recommend the rep roeducks total a million 664,7 78.14 50 of that amount, [speaker not understood] are ongoing savings and 210,90 4 ongoing savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of 10,2 41,733, or 3% of the department's 14-15 budget. and we will certainly work with the department in the ensuing week and report back to the committee. ~ >> thank you very much. chief, anything else to add at this time? >> no, thank you very much. >> okay, thank you. up next we have department of emergency management, ann crone enberg. thank you for your patience here. ann is not next in line, went to pick up her grandson. so, we're going to get moving. >> also included would be item number 9. >> could you call item 9, thank you? >> item 9, ordinance amending the police code to transfer administration of the police emergency alarm ordinance from the

there's 15,539 of unexpended encumbrances, when you add that number that you mentioned plus the -- the 987,702, comes up to 2,200,541. -- and i commented to the committee that our savings recommended salary savings result in less than one third of one percent of your budget of 219 million dollars. >> supervisor farrell: can you clarify exactly what the amount in dispute is. >> the bulk of the amount that is in dispute, it is timely to point out on the last item that we refer to, the work of my chief financial officer who has been doing this for a while is right on the money. we can to you in april same we thought we would need 466 it was held because it was a question about whether or not that would be needed; we came within 19,000 dollars. the main point of contention -- at this point we would be willing to concede to a total of 627,329 off of what mr. rose and his staff is asking for. the bulk of the contention is the salary piece. we have a fundamental disagreement. we provided numbers and calculations over to the budget analyst office. we agree that we will be hiring people and hav

and in addition, we recommend closing out prior year unexpended general fund income brentes which return another 3,362 to the general fund for a total of 84 4,316 in general fund savings in 13-14. in 14-15 our recommended reductions total 761,204 in 14-15 which are ongoing and we'll be happy to work with the department in the ensuing week and report back to the committee. >> okay, thank you, mr. rose. colleagues, any questions for mr. rose? or for the department before we adjourn? okay, thank you very much, chief. >> thank you. >> i look forward to seeing you back next week. >> thank you very much. >> good slides, kate. >> okay, colleagues -- >> mr. chairman, i have [inaudible]. >> mr. clerk. >> i believe item 3 and 4 will need to be continued to june 20th. items 6, 7 and 9 have continued to june 21st. we have not called item 8 yet, but that one will need to be called -- continued to june 20th. item number 8, ordinance amending the police code article 24, section 2404.1, to increase the fee for a street artist certificate in accordance with the applicable consumer price index when necess

in addition, we recommend closing out prior year unexpended encumbrances which allow a return of 17,2 12 from the library preservation fund library special revenue fund and the etf request fund. together these recommendations would result in 557,83 2 savings in 13-14. our recommended reductions ~ total 5,7 34 in fiscal year 14-15. of that amount 497 34 are ongoing savings and 10,000 in one-time savings. that would still allow an increase of approximately 3.2 million or 3.2% and the department's 14-15 budget. and, again, they are not general fund reductions. as i understand it, the department concurses with our recommendations. >> thank you, mr. rose. colleagues, any questions for mr. rose on his report? supervisor breed. ~ >> the question i asked before, is it possible to use our general fund allocation and allow the budget -- allow the department to redistribute those reduction in funds to meet that particular need? >> is that a question for mr. rose? >> supervisor, if i understand your question, it's savings -- should the board make savings and reductions in this department's budget