european map makers, the pacific north-west, was a great unknown, undiscovered, unchartered and unexplored. to learn about the legend and hear the stories, we travelled into the heart of vancouver island, british columbia, down to an acqer, village of the first people. >> we have our big meetings here >>> where we met with tribal leaderer. he has histories recorded from more than 50 years ago. >> the people that had gone to bed at night had felt the ground shake. shortly after that, that's when they noticed the big wave coming in. then it's that wave that wiped out the village down there. >> i will go to my favourite spot >>> dennis took me down to the place where the village once stood in the tsunam i's path. on the water's edge an inlet facing the pacific >>> what did the community look like? where were people living? >> it would look like the most obvious thing that they would be living along the beach and the river >>> so when the wave came, it came right up the inlet? >> yeah. we're talking something huge coming in here because of how shallow it is there. i've been taught that events

they tend to be rather unexplored. emily: you just hired your first woman partner. what is your take on the continued lack of women in the venture capitalist industry? why are there not more? peter: there is always an opportunity to do more. we all need to be doing more. we have two women in senior roles. i always think that in the context of the debate -- it is that the disparities are really big. i do not know if they have to be 50-50, or we need to have a quota, but you have glaring disparities. and there is something about tech that matters a lot. it is not like there isn't a huge disparity in male or female him chess players, but it does not quite matter as much as the only industry that is really working in the u.s. i think it is in this broader context -- when people tell me that silicon valley focuses on this too much. i tell them it is because silicon valley matter so much, and the disparities are really big. the other day i was looking at the unicorn list of 150 startups, and i may have missed one or two, but, by my count, only two of them -- two out of 15

unexplored american history, espionage, and women with real spines, adventurous incredible women. tell us about what this book is about. i will tell you the origins. i was born and raised in philadelphia and moved to atlanta in 2001. the civil war seats in the conversation in the south in a way that it doesn't in the north. i saw the occasional confederate the, heard the jokes of norton -- war of northern aggression. [laughter] homehe point was driven that it wasn't a joke. for i was stuck in traffic hours behind a pickup truck that had a bumper sticker that said. blame me, i voted for jeff davis. i looked at this for hours and started thinking of course, what were the women doing? they didn't have easy access to , they didn'tcourse have the right to vote. they couldn't influence battle. i wanted to see what the women were doing. i wanted to find for women who cheated, lied, stole, murdered and flirted through the war. these are women i want to spend time with. aboutthors we often talk how we find our stories. found it on a bumper sticker hasn't come up quite often. once you got i

. ♪ the relentless >> sitting right there, relatively unexplored, a cross section of the tasty, originalf heroin. it was 1980, i was 24 years old. but in a lot of ways, my whole life up to that point was leading to this address. western massachusetts, the unlikely new frontier of america's war on drugs where heroin has become an exploding problem that's begun to touch nearly every family. ♪ i took a walk through this beautiful worl

across frozen, unexplored yukon countries, they built a 16 mile pipeline to get military field to alaskathey built liberty ships, tanks and bases across the pacific. gave saudi prince and model tanker, a harbinger of projects they would soon undertake in saudi arabia. one of the first jobs, the trans-arabian pipeline that helped fuel europe's postwar recovery. brian lamb: how much did they make over the pipeline? sally denton: i do not remember what the prophets were, but they were really precedent setting in that this is the first company to really go into the middle east at a time that was just being developed for, if you look at the bechtel company it starts with the, after hoover dam it is the road, the automobile had just been developed in the roads and in a needed roads and got the first government contract to build a highway in california, and then oil, and then they expand more oil for the vehicles , so they are at the forefront of the whole industrialization of america at that time, and it was those relationships that steve bechtel senior developed that came throughout the middl

so, in the morning, i mentioned that i think one of the under explored -- not unexplored -- is the use of surveillance technology originally developed for national security surveillance for military surveillance in the domestic context. i want to take a running tally here. we've heard about two of the technologies. we've heard about predictive policing technology, originally developed to detect hot spots in the battlefields of afghanistan in iraq. and is now used to detect hot spots in the inner city. we learned about stingray technology, who thanks to freddie martinez of lucy parsons labs, which you should all follow now, is using free dole of information act to finger out how stingrays is being used on the streets of chicago in predominantly low income black and latino communities. now hear from my wonderful colleagues from the center on privacy and technology, claire garvey and jonathan frankel on a third technology that is being used in this manner, facial recognition technology. >> thanks. alvero. so i want to set up this discussion about facial recognition technology which a bit

potentially dangerous solution of mandates are backdoors and exceptional access because it seems unexplored potentially viable to making quite fruitful's. one of -- there is no single magic bullet that will solve problems here or anywhere, but a sustained and committed understanding of things like the exportation of data in the cloud, data available in the hands of 3rd parties requiring significant resources that has the potential to address many of the problems, and we owe it to them to explore them as fully as possible. >> thank you, vice chairman. chairman murphy, ranking member, this comes at an important time. commented the real needs of law enforcement and digital age. i don't think there's any sense that law enforcement is exaggerating or overstating. we think about the introduction. throws everyone through loop they should not expect this problem to be solved overnight. a growing consensus i think we can move forward because back to the safety deposit box analogy we heard. it is reasonable. but the problem here is that we are all using the same safe. so for make the safe deposit box

our conferences cohost, professor butler argue that there are unexplored connections between these two debates. i agree with them. i am so delighted to hear where this colloquy will take us. our speakers today, it's an extraordinary group of speakers. they are forces in their field. you will hear from pulitzer prize-winning biographers about martin luther king jr. you will hear from senior officials at the federal bureau of investigation and you'll also hear from the advocates and activists who are using the freedom of information act to lay their what they see as excessive government surveillance. you will hear from technologist and you will hear from leading scholars in the field of law anthropology and other fields. i'm particularly proud that this conference draws upon several of the strengths of our faculty, criminal law and criminal law practice, civil rights and privacy and surveillance law. now recently, we made a concerted effort at georgetown to offer hands-on technology intensive courses. at georgetown are law students are literally building apps, their learning how to code

across frozen, unexplored yukon countries, they built a 16 mile -- 1600 mile pipeline to get militaryield to alaska. they built liberty ships, tanks and bases across the pacific. in 1944, steve gave saudi prince a model tanker a harbinger of , projects they would soon undertake in saudi arabia. one of the first jobs, the trans-arabian pipeline that helped fuel europe's postwar recovery. brian: trans-arabian pipeline. how much did they make over the pipeline? sally: i do not remember what the prophets were, but they were really precedent setting in that this is the first company to really go into the middle east at a time that was just being developed for, if you look at the bechtel company it starts with the -- after hoover dam it is the roads the automobile had , just been developed in the roads and in a needed roads and got the first government contract to build a highway in california, and then oil, and then they expand more oil for the vehicles, so they are at the forefront of the whole industrialization of america at that time, and it was those relationships that steve bechtel ,

surveillance, and our conferences co-hosts, professor butler and professor bedoya, argue that there are unexplorednections between these two debates, and i agree with them. and i'm just so delighted to hear where this colloquy will take us. so, our speakers today, extraordinary group of speakers, and their forces, and their fields. you'll hear from the pulitzer prize winning biographers of martin luther king jr. and debbie lee deboyce. you'll hear from senior officials at federal bureau of investigation and the department of justice, and you'll also hear from the advocates and activists using freedom of information act to lay bear what they see as excessive government surveillance. you'll hear from technologists and leading scholars in the fields of law, anthropology, and other fields. so, i'm particularly proud that this conference strikes upon several of georgetown law's strengths as a faculty. criminal law, criminal law practice, civil rights, and privacy and surveillance law. now, recently, we made a concerted effort at georgetown to offer hands-on technology intensive courses. so at georgetow

potentially dangerous solution of mandates for back doors and exceptional access because it leaves unexplored potentially viable alternatives that may be quite fruitful for law enforcement going forward. one of -- there's no single magic bullet that will solve all of law enforcement problems here, or really anywhere in law enforcement, but a sustained and committed understanding of things like exploitation of data in the cloud, data available in the hands of third parties, targeted exploitation of devices such as miss hess described in her testimony will require significant resources but have the potential to address many of the problems law enforcement described. we owe it to them, and to all of us, to explore them as fully as we can. thank you very much. >> thank you vice chairman mckinley, chairman murphy and ranking member, thank you for having me. i think this hearing comes at a very important time in the debate about how to best accommodate the very real needs of law enforcement in the digital age. i want to say i don't think there's any sense in which law enforcement is exaggerating or

and our conferences co-hosts, professional butler and professional budoyia argue there are unexplored questions between those two debates. i agree with them. and i'm just so delighted to hear where this colloquy will take us. it's an extraordinary group of speakers. you'll hear from biographers of martin luther king jr. you'll hear from senior officials at the federal bureau of investigation and the department of justice and you'll hear from the advocates who are using the freedom of information act to lay bare what they see as excessive government surveillance. you'll hear from technologists and leading scholars in the fields of law, anthropology and other fields. i'm particularly proud that this conference strikes upon several of george town's law strengths as a faculty. criminal law, civil rights and privacy and surveillance law. recently. we made a concerted effort at georgetown to offer hands on technology intensive courses. at georgetown our law students, our law students are literally building apps. they're learning how to code in python. and they're working in teams with m.i.t

potentially dangerous solution of the mandate or backdoors and exceptional access because it leaves unexploredpotentially viable alternatives that may be quite truthful for the law enforcement going forward. there is no single magic bullet that will solve all of the law-enforcement problems here or anywhere but a sustained and committed understanding of things like exploitation of data in the cloud, data available in the hands of third parties, targeted exploitation of devices such as described in the testimony, it would require significant resources that have the potential to address many of the problems law enforcement described. .. >> >> but the up problem here that every single one of us. so it is a little too easy to drill into then everyone is a risk. not just a couple thousand customers who are at the one bank that is why political leaders projecting the idea of mandatory back doors parker recently secretary of defense ash carter said i not a believer in the back door. robert can begin to said in a talk he delivered last month that mandatory back doors are not the solution. the encrypti

potentially dangerous solution of mandates for back doors and exceptional access because it leaves unexplored potentially viable alternatives that may be quite fruitful for law enforcement going forward. one of -- there's no single magic bullet that will solve all of law enforcement problems here, or really anywhere in law enforcement, but a sustained and committed understanding of things like exploitation of data in the cloud, data available in the hands of third parties, targeted exploitation of devices such as miss hess described in her testimony will require significant resources but have the potential to address many of the problems law enforcement described. we owe it to them, and to all of us, to explore them as fully as we can. thank you very much. >> thank you vice chairman mckinley, chairman murphy and ranking member, thank you for having me. i think this hearing comes at a very important time in the debate about how to best accommodate the very real needs of law enforcement in the digital age. i want to say i don't think there's any sense in which law enforcement is exaggerating or

potentially dangerous solution of mandates for back doors and exceptional access because it leaves unexplored potentially viable alternatives that may be quite fruitful for law enforcement going forward. one of -- there's no single magic bullet that will solve all of law enforcement problems here, or really anywhere in law enforcement, but a sustained and committed understanding of things like exploitation of data in the cloud, data available in the hands of third parties, targeted exploitation of devices such as miss hess described in her testimony will require significant resources but have the potential to address many of the problems law enforcement described. we owe it to them, and to all of us, to explore them as fully as we can. thank you very much. >> thank you vice chairman mckinley, chairman murphy and ranking member, thank you for having me. i think this hearing comes at a very important time in the debate about how to best accommodate the very real needs of law enforcement in the digital age. i want to say i don't think there's any sense in which law enforcement is exaggerating or

so in the morning, i mentioned that i think one of the under explored -- not unexplored -- is the use of surveillance technology originally developed for national security surveillance for military surveillance in the domestic context. i want to take a running tally here. we've heard about two of the technologies. we've heard about predictive policing technology originally developed to detect hot spots in the battlefields of afghanistan in iraq. and is now used to detect hot spots in the inner city. we learned about stingray technology who thanks to freddie martinez of lucy parsons labs which you should all follow now, is using free dole of information act to finger out how stingrays is being used on the streets of chicago in predominantly low income black and latino communities. now hear from my wonderful colleagues from the center on privacy and technology claire garvey and jonathan frankel on a third technology that is being used in this manner facial recognition technology. >> thanks. alvero. so i want to set up this discussion about facial recognition technology which eight bit o