we must protect our best jobs from unfair trade and from u.s. companies who move jobs overseas using our own tax code to pay for it. they are free to do it. but we should not have to pay for it. we can protect our critical jobs without the general use of taxes. , which although successful, tend to be overly political in their formulation and application. as a first step, as a substitute for that strategy, i would amend the tax code to disallow any tax deductions for expenditures for any goods produced or services located outside the united states. don't bring up the problem of call centers. companies can still do it but we taxpayers will not pay for it. section #162 and 212 of the internal revenue code among others would be so amended. next, i would eliminate the foreign tax credit blue paul. that is section 27a of the tax code whereby large corporations and wealthy individuals avoid u.s. taxes by moving their businesses and investment out of the country. they are protected as united states citizens but they don't pay their fair share of tax for

i think it is basically very unfair. thank you. supervisor elsbernd: thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i'm here on behalf of the executive benefits. i would like to talk about the changes made in the board. prior to the election, the makeup of the board was four appointed and reelected, but the vote was always the same. you needed a supermajority. they always maintained the balance. they always had to have a person on the other side. the vote is a totally taken over by the city, which to me is very dangerous. there are things that of happen in the for the past few years, especially with the insurance companies. as you know, the insurance companies said the raids. unfortunately, some insurance companies donate a ton of money to other city programs. we have an incident where there is an interference from the mayor's office to our director who was trying to negotiate rates down from one of the insurance companies, and he was asked to keep the insurance company in, because of, in short, -- ia am sure, because of the benefits.

we must protect our best jobs from unfair trade and from u.s. companies who move jobs overseas using our own tax code to pay for it. they are free to do it. but we should not have to pay for it. we can protect our critical jobs without the general use of taxes, which although successful, tend to be overly political in their formulation and application. as a first step, as a substitute for that strategy, i would amend the tax code to disallow any tax deductions for expenditures for any goods produced or services located outside the united states. don't bring up the problem of call centers. companies can still do it but we taxpayers will not pay for it. section #162 and 212 of the internal revenue code among others would be so amended. next, i would eliminate the foreign tax credit blue paul. -- loophole. that is section 27a of the tax code whereby large corporations and wealthy individuals avoid u.s. taxes by moving their businesses and investment out of the country. they are protected as united states citizens but they don't pay their fair share

>> no it doesn't give an unfair advantage. although you've hit the nail on the head. first of all wal-mart and target because they unequivocally have a presence in all the states, brick and mortar stores they have to collect taxes even online so wal-mart and target have been hiring lobbyists for two or three years, so this is really ought wal-mart target bill. they're just hiding behind a smokescreen calling on the retailer's but never care about ferris amine st retailers. >> gautham nagesh? >> thank you. now can you tell blood collecting and sales tax would have on your business? if you can quantify the would be great if you could describe the process of the burden. >> the impact would be there is about 12% of the u.s. population in california and about ten to 15% of the commerce runs through affiliate's so if you multiply those together you get about 2%. so about -- by california, you are passing this it means of of that 2% of revenue because we have to end those relationships. and in addition, this world of ifill yet marketing is i call it the ho chi minh war of th

providing health care to the worker was, the overarching goal was to make sure that there was no unfair and undue burden placed on san francisco's taxpayers. this loophole is problematic for many reasons, and it impacts a number of individuals. many individuals here in san francisco. i would like to identify who those are. first, it impacts the employees, the workers of the city and county of san francisco. these workers have been harmed by this loophole because they have been unable to get the health care that this health care security ordinance invasion that they would get. we have heard testimony from many employees, and you will hear from many today, that talk about how the limitations on how the health reimbursement accounts work make it impossible for them to access the very basic health care that was intended by the law. i have heard countless stories of workers who sought reimbursement only to discover that their accounts had been wiped out by their employers. others who have put off critical services as they waited to accumulate money in their accounts, only to learn that that

>> guest: no, it does not give an unfair advantage, although you've hit the nail on the head. the push by walmart and target because they unequivocally have a presence in these states, they have to collect taxes even online, so walmart and target have been hiring lobbyists for two or three years, so this is really all the walmart, target bill. they're just hiding behind a smoke screen. they're calling unfair to retailers. >> host: what impact would collecting a sales tax have onour business? describe, also, the burden. >> guest: okay. the impact would be, you know, there's about 12% of the u.s. population is in california, and about 10-15% of e-commerce runs think affiliates. so if you multiply those two together, you know, you get about 2%. so by california passing this it means that off about 2% of revenue because we have to end those relationships. and, and in addition i've always thought this world of affiliate marketing i call the ho chi minh war of the fleas against the elephant. they're tiny companies that somebody may, you know, be a schoolteacher and have a web site a

unfair trading nations will lose their unwanted advantage. the fair competitor will suffer no ill effect. trade will grow, but it will be fair. these few changes would effectively generate millions of american jobs, restore and needed growth in our lagging economy. there's much we need. we need to deregulate small business so they can grow again. that's where jobs come from. we need to be energy independent and create 1 million new jobs. we need to reduce federal spending by 1% of gross domestic product a year for five years consecutively. we need immigration reform that seals the borders but allows legal immigration. it's important to america. we need tax reform that lowers the marginal rate. there's much we need to do, but the place to start is with the money and unfair trade, and no one is speaking about either of them. no one. we must break the stranglehold of special interest money on our political system. so that we can address the whole in the economy, caused by unfair trade through which our best jobs slip away. we must seal the hole

>> no, it does not give an unfair advantage. although you have hit the nail by the head, pushed by walmart and target because they unequivocally have a presence in all these states. they are brick and mortar stores. they have to collect taxes even on-line so walmart and target have been hiring lock buyists for two or three years so this is really all the walmart, target bill. they're just hiding behind a smokes screen. they're calling it fair street retailer. well they never cared about fairness toss main street retailers. >> thank you. now, mr. byrne, can you tell us what impact would collecting a sales tax have on your business, if you could quantify that would be great but if you could, describe the process or the burden. >> ok. the impact would be, you know, there is about 12% of the u.s. population is in california, and about 10 to 15% of e-commerce runs through affiliates so if you multiply those two together, you get about 2%, so that's that's -- by california passing this, this means about 2% of revenue, because we have

going forward, it is unfair to those already sentenced under it. today's vote ensures the purpose of the pair sentencing act makes sure justice is served. i look forward to working with everyone -- with the criminal justice committee -- to address other critical sentencing issues facing the nation. thank you. >> on behalf of all of us, i think it is appropriate for us to thank you for the work you have done with regard to getting us prepared to take this vote as well as working with our staff director and everybody on the staff to make sure we had all the information we need to make this decision. we appreciate your leadership with regard to this whole process. >> thank you very much. thank you to everyone. are there any other comments? is there a motion to adjourn? >> i knew that we adjourn. >> do we have a second? >> i second. >> all in favor? [all say "aye"] [laughter] [applause] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2011] >> gop presidential candidate mitt romney of the u.s. e

we're also willing to discuss common sense spending cuts, but at the end of the day, michael, it's unfair to ask somebody in my district, in rhode island, to bear the brunt of this. they might want to send their kids to college. give up pell grants and don't send your kids to college. if you're making over $1 million, you get your tax cut. that's not a deal we could support. >> my question, couldn't the gop declare victory and go home if there were no revenue increases beyond allowing the bush tax cuts to expire? apparently giving a green light by grover norquist?

it's unfair, it's bizarre-o. and maybe some people have only been in this body for six or seven months or so really believe that. >> john mccain talking to those kids. up on capitol hill yesterday, members of both parties taking shots at their rival's plan back and forth, clearly staying on message. >> nobody believes that the boehner problem is anything more than a big wet kiss to the right wing and i mean the tea party. that's who i mean. it's too bad his caucus is being run by such a small number of people. >> what about the president's plan? when i asked the president's plan, his aides point to a speech and a veto threat. with all due respect, congress can't vote on a speech. and a veto threat won't prevent default. >> we are urging the republicans now to step back, put their party caucuses aside, put their pledges to grover norquist aside, put their caucus pledges to one congress manor the other aside, and put this country first. >> it's unfair of the president of the united states to lead from behind. it's

well i mean i certainly think that we can say that that's unfair but. i don't know that that's necessarily reality. i mean you know. in the sense that corporatism rules. in corporatism does wrong mean it is running our country and in the legal system the criminal justice system is a tool of those in power and so we shouldn't necessarily expect that tool to be used against those that it did or controlling our government piccoli and corporations accountable is more our job than it is the legal justice system's job and we should be looking for other ways to do that besides just you know hoping for some u.s. attorney somewhere to to indict some bankers or for oil executives. you know i mean we can we can decry the fact that that's not necessarily here but i mean being a young person at this point is not necessarily fair because we're inheriting a completely broken world from the people who have gotten rich by by ruining it i hope that what actions like make your arse more folks will be more willing to stand up for people even and try to actually change the

businesses is not that they have to provide health care, but that they are having to compete in an unfair business environment against individuals that are actually skirting the law and trying to circumvent the rules that are already in place. if we want to help those businesses, what we should do is make sure we address the underlying issue and challenge that they face, which is that there are businesses in the region that are unfairly competing with them. the best thing we can do for those businesses is make sure that those issues are addressed. something that i have heard from folks in the business community, from the chamber of commerce and the golden gate restaurant association, is this notion that instead of creating this amendment, we should beef up the notice requirements and perhaps conduct a study to evaluate how many employers are placing restrictions on these accounts. let me be very clear that from our perspective and the perspective of this very broad coalition that includes workers, businesses, and taxpayers, that proposal is a nonstarter. this is simply not just about a la

it is not just unfair at that point, it is inhumane. and just because we passed care not cash does not mean that we can't do remedial work on that. so, i want to thank all of the supervisors who are sponsoring this legislation. thank you. >> thank you mr. barnes. >> my name is nancy cross. and i am a senior. i have been in the shelter system for over two years. and why is it two years? because the shelter system is designed to make it very difficult for anybody like myself to get a reasonable place in succession. the city has adopted an ordinance about smoking that the regular hotels for tourists, 75% of the beds are reserved for non-smokers. but what about the people that are trying to get out of the shelters? i had a scientific education and i know the harm for smoking. i don't smoke but i am forced to go in and out of shelters which maintains a perpet -- secondhand smoke. and people going in and out of the shelter and out what they breathe and smoke in the shelter. they can go 24 hours a day. it used to be 8 hours until some of the s

these fees are unfair to thousands of low-income workers, the city's cab drivers. there is a disincentive for drivers to take credit. that creates inconveniences' for the public. it creates safety hazard for drivers. it is a bad thing all around. it also does not make any sense. fees of 5%, far higher than other merchants pay. the mta, why they're doing this, one excuse is that it is being done in other cities. cabdrivers are powerless everywhere. you may have heard this from a cab company owner that drivers actually make more money if there is a back seat terminal in their cab with a tip prompt. the person that is saying that is a paid consultant for one of the providers of the equipment and the services. it is baseless. thank you. >> hi. my name is john. i am a san francisco taxi driver. i still like the people over there. i am a san francisco taxi driver. i just wanted to echo what he said. i know the resolution for the credit-card fees. i hope you will support that. to make taxi drivers rent their cabs from a cab company is like making a kid pay the property ta

today, claiming their harming california and asking for an unfair advantage. >> amazon has, well... declared war on california, on california's economic recovery. and california's struggling unemployment rate and california businesses. >> the businesses claim they just can't compete with amazon and the tax requirement for retailers was included in the state budget tonight in june and expands the definition of having a physical presence in the state. >> and coming up, from 7 on your side, new bureau designed to protect us? so why are lawmakers fighting it? >> that is coming up. and disturbing details about what oez was apparently plotting for the 10th anniversary of september 11th. >> and i'm sandhya patel, temperatures inching up for a change incoming days. i'll be back to tell you more about a warmer forecast coming up. >>> plus internet put information just a click away but its changing what we choose to store in memory banks. >> closed captioning brought to you by mancini sleepworld. >> and oez was planning offenses against the news on the anniversary of september 11th according

unfortunate and it's part of my problem, i didn't have a chance to talk about this rule, this is a terribly unfair rule. i asked the chairman of the rules committee yesterday if we could have more time to debate, not all the amendments, we have an important amendment by the gentlewoman from texas to talk about 2/3 majority, this is an important amendment about conflict of interest. we had an important amendment coming up about the powers. it is outrageous that the rules committee said you only get five minutes on each side on each amendment and the chairman of the rules committee he is a mag namous fellow and he said get a unanimous consent to suspend it. i approached the other side and i was told not by the chairman who has been very gracious but the republican leadership. so we have fundamental issues not being adequately debated and this is one of them. i have some differences about what happened during the tarp, but only 10 minutes on this? . and to be so dismissive of a valid amendment to say, here's why i'm against it, because a staffer probably didn't read it when they wrote it and they gav

unfair trading nations would lose their unwarranted advantage. trade will grow, but it will be fair. these changes will effectively generate millions of american jobs, restoring needed growth in our lagging economy. there is much we need to do. we need to deregulate american business. we need to be energy independent. we need to reduce federal spending for five years consecutively. we need immigration reform that seals the border but allows legal immigration. it is important for america. we need tax reform that lowers the marginal rate with simplicity. there is much we need to do. the place to start is with the money and unfair trade. no one is speaking about either, no one. we must break be stranglehold of special interest money on our political system so we can break the hold caused by unfair trade by which our best jobs slip away. this growth is essential to paint the debt. we will not do it any other way and get out of the financial -- this financial trap in which we find ourselves. it is the special interests that make their fortune through

it's unfair to make it a spending bill when we have billionaires and millionaires and corporate jets and yachts. the american people agree with us. the polls, democrats and republicans there should be shared sacrifice. that was what our bill was called. we're happy to have a trigger but they can't keep turning away their head there should be shared sacrifice. this will be the last question. >> the colonel lo question i had with the senator on the floor today. he complained he was called dooltd white house and he told the president. let us work this out by ourselves. today he has changed his mind. he wants the president involved. the president has been involved. he told us and i said this on the floor with a republican and democratic leaders in the cabinet room of the white house. he had been there a long time. he said i have spent more time, i have spent more time dealing with this raising the debt ceiling than all the other presidents combined. so he has put in the time. ronald reagan had the debt increase during eight years as president 18 times. he didn't spend ten minutes with me

yes, it's unfair. estimates unfair, but not until around the time the harvard law review, and interminable i should not say that. adr 90 pasted note, the need for the law to come about, not until a round them had it been thought that it was much of an issue for the long. but they are in the year 1999. there appeared to be. law review student notes. and it did not take too long before it became an interest for legislators and for judges. indeed, the district of columbia right here has asked one ordinance banning lookism and so have a number of other municipalities leading to cases like the one reported a couple of years back of the gentleman who was finding it hard to keep his job at every tell al that because of the multiple tongue piercing is which actually had inflicted on in a speech impediment. he said, this is what got me fired. he called a lawyer, i believe, and was proceeding to contest this. well, the harvard law few article has thought through a lot of these implications and gone to the extent

if they did not do it, they could not to the project, and that was unfair to the sponsors there. i do not like to see underhanded stuff going on, and when you asked about the benefits, i have been sitting there over 30 years. myself and shirley jones, who is not here, who is the president, been sitting there hear all that time, we had never gotten any benefits and did not ask for any. it is unfair for you to try to just keep pumping these developers trying to do a job out there in my community. i want to see that project bailed out and done. thank you so very much and has this on, and do not give visitation valley a dime. i want those lines removed because when they were drawn, there was never a public hearing about that. i explained that to you. that is the reason why i am so upset of how things have been done in my community. and people do not care that do not live there. and they want to take away, but i can say this -- the planning department -- they said -- supervisor cohen: thank you. >> can i finish my conversation? supervisor cohen: you can finish your sentence. not the c

we believe that's grossly unfair and we have a follow-up report.hen, threatening a presidential candidate. it may be legal to do that. is it legal has been investigating and we hope you stay tuned to those reports. [ male annocer ] things seem better with travelocity's best price guarantee. our girl's an architect. our boy's a genius. we are awesome parents! biddly-boop. [ male announcer ] if you find a lower rate on a room you've booked, we won't just match it. we'll give you $50 towards your next trip. [ gnome ] it's go time. >> bill: factor follow up segment tonight, as we told you last night, the "new york times" and other liberal media have branded the norwegian mass murderer anders breivik a christian, even though there is absolutely no evidence the man is a follower of jesus christ. joining us now from washington sally quinn the editor of the on faith blog at "the washington post." so, you know, i was pretty outraged last night and we posted that on bill o'reilly.com, my analysis of it. i just think it's so -- >> -- i saw your posting. >> bi

but i think that unfairness itself and that charge that somehow the ratings agencies are not doing well actually i think it rather shows that they're doing the job. or let's take a look at the markets now oil is trading near a four day high after signs of rising through demand in the u.s. countered speculation that the world's biggest consumer may face a credit downgrade by the agency put the u.s. under review for raising downgrades as talks to raise its a fourteen point three trillion dollar debt limit store of light sweet and brant decline around thirty five cents at this hour. to stock markets and across asia markets are trading in the red following a moody's for to lower the u.s. credit rating as we mentioned. stocks are pressured as an increase in risk aversion pushed the u.s. dollar below the seventy nine again the per dollar threshold exporters are the biggest losers with the nintendo dropping more than one and a half the cent to sheeba more than one percent in hong kong financials are also understanding pressure bank of china is losing almost two percent in china construction ba

who are already millionaires trousering millions more in bonuses that's going to be fundamentally unfair since the crisis. has entered into a new war in a foreign country and recently. just said that he needed more money to sustain. and also enough got it started keeping a moral vacuum in westminster that causes these kinds of things to happen that the government would cut spending and to enjoy another war. but i think there isn't any politico consistency quite clearly we have been told there were. everything that we hold dear has to be slashed and yet we can still talk about renewing trident i'm fighting wars overseas irrespective of the cost my own view is that the war in afghanistan and the current war in libya wrong they misjudged what people claim they are about and we should actually find a way out of those pretty quickly and not make the situation in those countries worse as well as the same time to chronicle resources. could go into schools and hospitals and finally you opposite number at unison the country's biggest union is stressing this wave of industrial action that carries

do you know any product that is not already illegal, unfair, deceptive or abusive within the act? >> congressman, i can recall no product. >> have you had any discussion with your team as to any such product or how you will go about identifying such products? >> i have not had a discussion with my team about a particular product, no, sir. >> don't you think that's probably one of the most responsible things? the power to ban, to stop the marketing of certain products, don't you think, though, that would be something you and your team should be addressing as you go into your first year next year? >> congressman, i appreciate the advice, but actually, no. i think what we should be doing is concentrating on the places where we can best make changes in the marketplace. and that's, for example, in our form. >> so it would be ok to -- >> congressman -- >> believe me, i am being very respectful, ma'am. i'm from the south. >> i think the point is that we are starting our work in the places like, for example, congressman mchenry suggested which was an important place to start and that is w

unfair to there is any possible nomination but not a maybe. even you are trying to shoot me in on the other hand there is just ole. relation. very. bad that. sandra was always basically like your problems and. wrong way. justin gardener research fellow with the dubai initiative says recent years have created the perfect environment for far right extremism to florida. while this transnational terrorism has been on the radar for some time the very real threat of the homegrown right wing extremist has been over law within most western countries we have seen two things happening at the same time we have seen this type of ratcheting up of rhetoric anti immigration rhetoric this is happening to us and also western europe and there's also been this demise we can say of multiculturalism so there have been individuals that have more or less because quite quite self radicalized due to vironment and also due to the idea that there's just been an influx of immigration then compound these factors is also better and the global economic crisis so you have th

we believe that's grossly unfair and we have a follow-up report.eatening a presidential candidate. it may be legal to do that. is it legal has been investigating and we hope you stay tuned to those reports. remember the days before cop my son and i never missed opening day. but with copd making it hard to breathe, i thought ose days might be over. so my doctor prescribed symbicort. it helps significantly ove my lung function, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for suddenymptoms. ith symbicort, today i'm breathing better, and that means... game on! symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell yo doctor if you have heart condition or high bod pressure before taking it. [ whistle ] with copd, i thought i might miss out on my favorite tradition. now symbicort significantly improves my lung function, starting within 5 minutes. and that makes a diffence in my

and to criticize them is unfair. they did what they thought was right. and to criticize the judge or the other folks in this case is underminding our legal system. and you know we adopted our legal system from great britain. and we do allow cameras in a courtroom. the state of florida does. and it's a two-edged sword. it sometimes is just absolutely unfair to the defendant, because it doesn't give the defendant an even playing field. >> thank you very much for your time, and also to dan abrams. the case closed on casey anthony, or is it? the court of public opinion remains firmly and vociferousl in session. two legal experts after the break. >>> at this time, i would like to announce that the defendant was given credit for 1,043 days, and at this time, her release date has been calculated as july 13th, 2011. >> casey anthony's just a few more days to spend in jail, but the debate over whether the prosecution failed to prove their case against her isn't going to end anytime soon. could she actually be innocent? joining me now are two lawyers who specializ

i think this was unfair to a man o

until 1994 counties that if the law is unfair going forward, it is unfair to those already sentenced under it. today's vote ensures that the purpose of the fierce and enact does not commit justice is served in the goals of sentencing further. i look forward to working with everyone but the criminal justice community to address other critical sentencing issues facing the nation. >> on behalf of all of us, i get is appropriate for us to thank you, chair saris for the work you're done with regards to getting us prepared to take this vote as well as working with our staff direct your and everybody on this staff to make sure we have what we need to make this decision and a greenish appreciate the leadership with regard to this whole process. >> thank you very much. thank you to everyone. is there any other comments? with that, is there a motion to adjourn or >> and move we adjourn. >> we have a second? all in favor? [applause] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudib

and to criticize them is unfair. they did what they thought was right.d to criticize the judge or the other folks in this case is underminding our legal system. and you know we adopted our legal system from great britain. and we do allow cameras in a courtroom. the state of florida does. and it's a two-edged sword. it sometimes is just absolutely unfair to the defendant, because it doesn't give the defendant an even playing field. >> thank you very much for your time, and also to dan abrams. the case closed on casey anthony, or is it? the court of public opinion remains firmly and vociferously in session. two legal experts after the break. [ male announcer ] this...is the network -- a living, breathing intelligence that's helping people rethink how they live. in here, the planned combination of at&t and t-mobile would deliver our next generation mobile broadband experience to 55 million more americans, many in small towns and rural communities, giving them a new choice. ♪ we'll deliver better service, with thousands of new cell sites... for greater acces

but actually i think that unfairness itself and that charge that somehow the ratings agencies are not doing well actually i think it was shows that they're doing their job. now let's go back to russia for a second prime minister putin says he'd like to see a rock star rating agency know how to go about building trust and be fair like he said. well it's a really ironic out certain here because the only way in which an a ratings agency can build independent global credibility is if it seems to be free of all pressure now the only way in which it can really be seen to be free of all pressure is to produce a lower ratings on the ball news all the assets that it starts to consider rather than produce high ratings because after all if a new ratings agency whether it was in europe were losing russia or whether it was anywhere else in the world if a new ratings agency in iraq it was decided that its opinion the rating was substantially higher than anyone else had previously thought i think that would raise grave doubts about its credibility so ironically enough the only way that a new agency

>> i don't necessarily think it's unfair. consumer perspective. this is absolutely a windfall. it's not going in the government's pocket. it's not going into the consumers' pocket. it's going into the airlines pocket. if the airlines split the difference with consumers, i think consumers would have given the airlines a bunch of credit. this is after the last three years of being nickel and dimed with a variety of fees. >> mary, what do you think about it? >> well, it is unfair because these ticket taxes don't go into the general united states revenue. they go into a trust fund which funds the construction of airports, runways, air traffic control systems. we desperately need this air traffic control system and by the airlines pocketing the money instead of giving it back to the consumers or they could fund some of this construction that they need at the airports, they are being unfair to literally our nation and the traveling public and it's -- it's just plain bad pr, bad practice. >> seth, what do you say to consumers who sa

. >> it's unfair of the president of the united states to lead from behind.t's unfair of the president of the united states not to come forward with a specific plan. >> our congressional correspondent kate bolduan is where the action is found tonight. that's up on capitol hill. kate, i guess the first question is, when the speaker boehner met with his troops this morning, yes, he used some pretty choice language. has he made enough changes to his plan to get the tea party members back in line? >> reporter: you never know the votes until we see them done, but i tell you, things are looking better than yesterday. a top republican leadership aide said this evening that things are moving the right direction in terms of votes and that they're adding to the confidence is the cost estimates for the rewritten bill out late this evening. the house speaker john boehner, he's not quite at his target that he originally set but he's meeting his principles. the cbo, the congressional budget office, john, says that his new, rewritten plan reduces the deficits by $917 billio

but one point he repeatedly makes that is unfair, he takes the most unbalanced and unfair people in this filming and he slimes all of the fox news. >> he does that. >> and we let him do it. >> i said early, you keep it with me. this is the debate. comedy central doesn't have diversity of opinion. >> they are all that way. >> and here, there is gazil 81s of opinions from all sides which is why this is a vibrant network that wins. you are right. stewart tryied to put all of us in the jar, but he came in here and he was a gentleman about it and i respect that. >> i used to be a liberal and now i am a conservative. he is than most liberals. >> and he is funnier. >> best of the cultural warriors. >> these are not naked. they want you to wear sun block. >> and ed asener said he is a socialist and has thoughts on president obama. my doctor told me calcium is besabsorbed in small continuous amounts. only one calcium supplement does that in one daily dose. new citracal slow release... continuously releases calcium plus d for the efficient absorption my body needs. citracal. and i can have a propo

it's unfair. it's bizarre. maybe some people who have only been in this body for six or seven months or so really believe that. >> all right. the house is expected to vote today on speaker john boehner's plan to raise the debt ceiling. it's after he released an amended version of the bill requested by the congressional budget office. now the cbo says it will cut deficit by $917 billion over ten years, it's $66 billion over the original. it's expected to save $22 billion. they reviewed harry reid's proposal. the main difference is the reid plan extends the debt ceiling for a longer period of time. boehner responded to the news saying, quote, this report shows the senate plan for what it is. a grab bag of gimmicks that gives the president a blank check. many house republicans are hesitant to back the speaker's bill. boehner confirmed he had tough words for his party during a closed door meeting. >> is it true you told some of the republican members this morning that you need to get your a wort in line behind this