all medications are unfeasible because no one has studied it. supervisor mar: is there anyone else that would like to speak? public comment is closed. i would like to ask you want to respond to some of the points? i know he just raised how we can be guaranteed that the rent- controlled units will be protected? and the other issue of how solid is the ability improvements' given our plans to submit a different grants. >> thank you for the opportunity. you could have your own opinion, but can't have your own facts. there is a black-and-white development agreement, copies of which have been available for months. this is what is abundantly clear. there are guarantees and that development agreement for all of the public improvements. they're tied to a very system phase in plan, an appendix to the development. if you want to look at how the improvement is triggered by density or vehicle tracking generation. i am happy to sit out after the hearing and walk him through that same document if you would like to see where the triggers are. what is particular

. >> it is not globally unfeasible to do it? >> as technology changes, we're supposed to go back to all previous year's applicants. they evaluate changes to technology. as it moves forward, it might become economically feasible. it requires a certain locations to be underground. >> have a determined that as a general matter, is feasible or not feasible? i know that the specific locations might be appropriate for whatever reason. but at&t has indicated that it is not feasible. there is not an explanation for that. i am asking if i have a position on that? >> as a whole other matter, you have to be deeper than 5 feet in order for you to put a lid over the facility. it becomes part of the sidewalk. it requires a walking area around this facility inside the cabinet. of a sudden, it is a deep facility that becomes 8 feet by 12 or 13 ft. it turns out to be about nine by 15. at that point, it is doable. and from the appropriate use of the public right of way, it becomes very problematic. now you have been companies losing that space. >

. >> it is not globally unfeasible to do it? >> as technology changes, we're supposed to go back to all previous year's applicants. they evaluate changes to technology. as it moves wa

in other cases there are significant impacts not mitigated because of unfeasibility or uncertainty of the mitigation measure. supervisor avalos: so it's quite likely we go forward with a project like this, 20, 30 years from now we'll have the kind of congestion that we've been wanting to avoid in san francisco for many, many years. >> um, i don't think there's -- that's a farrakhan conclusion. i think 19th avenue will be no better than it is now and possibly worse. sunset and lack merced will be more congestioned -- congested. supervisor avalos: our obligations around greenhouse gas emissions, traffic increases creating more greenhouse gas emissions don't matter because we'll move this project forward regardless of what the law would be in the state of california. >> that's not true at all. the impacts are full li --fully identified and qualified. supervisor avalos: but it could get worse? >> greenhouse gases, in balance, no. traffic, yes. supervisor avalos: greenhouse measurements during construction -- what are mitigating measures around reducing greenhouse gas emissions during the

for instance, down here the stenographer has written, in effect non existent and unfeasible. clearly that is not what he said. he crosses and infeasible out and says invisible. he decides that is in need of either because of its non existent of course it is invisible. so the challenge here, and it is throughout the autobiography, to figure out exactly what mark twain wanted and what the others , to leave out the desires of the other marchers. another telesat is hard to explain but worth contemplating is that in many of these daily dictations, one, two, three, four, sometimes rightly, sometimes three, sometimes just to tide copies of the same dictation, not carbons. if they were carbons that would be easier, but these are retyping of this dictation. this is the front page of may 21. you see this looks roughly the same throughout. as you can see here, this one is paid 76. the next one is 83. the next one is for. the next one is 1115. that is a big mystery. why are those differences so prominent? what does it imply? does it imply he is moving this around and therefore it gets di