with the ceo, with the fbi, with the drug enforcement agency, and today we learned that they share unfiltered raw data with israel. this is data that they aren't even allowed to share with the nsa. >> that is so say they are turning other the

friends unfiltered, you go through drama with your friend.e it could be that your friend fre spends more her her husband and has no time for you. it could be that your friend has more money, and your friend likes to order fattening food and it feels like it's sabotaging your diet.diet. >> last and not least, for thosh of us who have to whip up a good meal and quick meal, are you going to be talking about dinner fixes maybe simple ones that we can all do? >> yes, we barely have a working stove or running water but it i love to cook. i do like to cook, but i like to get a good healthy meal that tht tastes great on the table. and that is kind of what the focus is.foc they are quick, cooking segments that show you how to get get something on the table really re quickly and easily.easily >> that is what we all need ne these days, bethenny frankel, thank you so much.so >> thank you.you. >> we will be watching. >>> just a reminder, you too, o, can watch bethenny here on fox 5 at 11:00 after wendy williams. i >>> still ahead on the buzz bin, a one in a million recording session, and the rock sho

gave unfiltered private data on its own citizens to israel according to the latest washington.of america safe.

government gives unfiltered communications transcripts and metadata to israel and although the document says that the data cannot be used to deliberately target americans absolutely no legal binding enforcement is placed on the use of the data in other words nobody is in a force in our right to privacy but wait it gets worse not only does israel hold on to information about americans up to a four year but this memo is from two thousand and nine which means for the past five years all of this information is just kicking it in an israeli database great so now i don't just have to worry about my own government spying on me thanks so remember guys next time you tweet send an e-mail or text make sure to give a shout out to our friends in israel and if you're sick of details from our private lives being stored in servers and networks around the world then join me it's time to break the set. the putter a. very hard to take i. want to get. loud have you ever had sex with the terror threat they're looking. to. cut . although months ago the obama administration announced they would be arming the

national security agency has been sharing unfiltered data with israel a -rd do to gaccording to new revsan newspaper and drawn from material leaked by edward snowden. a report includes a secret deal allowing for the routine sharing of war intelligence. but the agreement does not require the nsa to filter and remove information belong to go u.s. citizens, data like e-mails and phone calls. and the deal reportedly place no, sir limits on how israel may use the material. while trevor tim is a cyber security analyst and he says the nsa has repeatedly overstepped the bounds of its surveillance activities and it's time for congress to rein them? >> it's a huge amount of information that the u.s. has access to and it seems like this report that they are sharing it with israel and while sharing it, they are not minimizing it, which means taking out u.s. communications like they are supposed to be doing domestically anyway. they are just giving them everything that they are getting off the wire. and you know, that's a real worry for people in it the u.s., given that, you know, their privacy could

and we feel that we've reached the point where we can really keep it clean enough to drink unfiltered for the indefinite future. and new york city is in a small club of cities that actually have that filtration avoidance waiver. narrator: while municipalities are responsible for maintaining systems and source supply, the standards that protect water are established at the federal level. there are two important pieces of federal legislation that were both enacted in the early to mid-1970s. the first was the clean water act, which acts to protect rivers and lakes, and sources of drinking water. the second was the safe drinking water act, that provides federal standards to assure the safety of the water that we drink. both acts have been amended since they were first adopted, and they're both cornerstones for the water issues that we face in america today. allbee: the clean water act set a floor and basically said, "everybody's who's discharging "is going to have to have a permit, and to achieve this defined performance level." narrator: the clean water act regulates the discharge of pol

government gives unfiltered communications transcripts and metadata to israel and although the document says that the data cannot be used to deliberately target americans absolutely no legal binding enforcement is placed on the use of the data in other words nobody isn't forcing our right to privacy but wait it gets worse not only does israel hold on to information about americans up to a four year but this memo is from two thousand and nine which means for the past five years all of this information is just kicking it in an israeli database great so now i don't just have to worry about my own government spying on me thanks so remember guys next time you tweet send an e-mail or text make sure to give a shout out to our friends in israel and if you're sick of details from our private lives being stored in servers and networks around the world then join me it's time to break the set. the sadness of the terror a. very hard to take that was the trigger. cloud have you ever had sex with the terror threat they're looking. to. cut cut cut cut cut cut. although months ago the obama administrati

gave unfiltered private data on its own citizens to israel according to the latest washington insisting the secrets of americans safe. from our studios into here in moscow were just ten ten pm this is eleven pm i should say this is r.t. with international news and comment but we start in syria where government troops are forced. out of the ancient christian village of. the settlement which is home to some of the world's oldest religious sites was overrun by opposition fighters last sunday following days of heavy fighting. has made it to that village and joined us from there by phone. that's it we have and. it's not even a good simple theory when the army and go right now and need soldiers. early to say the army are controlling the situation the only big one we are essential to a square right now. could have been impossible to get the courage to do consent to aid. the visibility is not controlled by the army but we are told that the last minute turned up to two hundred as also for the public knowledge i didn't be trying to knock down trees that are surrounding malinda village and this is

government gives unfiltered communications transcripts and metadata to israel and although the document says that the data cannot be used to deliberately target americans absolutely no legal binding enforcement is placed on the use of the data in other words nobody isn't forcing our right to privacy but wait it gets worse.

and we feel that we've reached the point where we can really keep it clean enough to drink unfiltered for the indefinite future. and new york city is in a small club of cities that actually have that filtration avoidance waiver. narrator: while municipalities are responsible for maintaining systems and source supply, the standards that protect water are established at the federal level. there are two important pieces of federal legislation that were both enacted in the early to mid-1970s. the first was the clean water act,

government gives unfiltered communications transcripts and metadata to israel and although the document says that the data cannot be used to deliberately target americans absolutely no legal binding enforcement is placed on the use of the data in other words nobody isn't forcing our right to privacy but wait it gets worse.

. >> what do you look forward for that video tomorrow besides what you're seeing for yourself unfilteredwhat are you hoping to get? >> i intend to vote yes even though i have strong criticism and doubt how the president has handled this. he has not been enough of a commander in chief and vacillated too much. as far as killing, the torture and horrible deaths those children had to endure is almost beyond human comprehension. that alone should not make this act -- i'm not saying that in a hard-hearted way. we could have atrocities in countries all over the world. we have to look to see if there's an american national interest. i think there is. the axis between syria and iran, capacity for chemical nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons with iran and security of our allies, jordan and israel is why we should act. >> help people understand why you say you will vote yes, at the same time you're very critical of the president and his handling of this. why undermine his leadership and the way he's approaching this but you say you agree with the mission. >> first of all, i want people to know i am

national security agency has been sharing unfiltered data with israel, that's according to new revelationsed in the guardian newspaper. the report details a secret deal between the u.s. spy agency and israel allowing for the routine sharing of raw intelligence. the agreement does not require the nsa to remove and filter private citizen information. we have a cyber security analyst, and he says the nsa has repeatedly overstepped the boundaries of its surveillance activities. >> it's just a huge amount of information that the u.s. has access to, and it seems by this report that they are sharing it with israel and they are not minimizing it, which means taking out u.s. communications like they are supposed to be doing domestically any ways. they are just giving them everything that they are getting off wire. and that's a real worry for people in the u.s. given that their privacy could be violated by other countries and people around the world that don't necessarily have those prote protections that the u.s. citizens have. the rules are very lax -- the patriot act they have had this secret int

this was the first time, the first time that all america, to see the civil rights movement unfiltered. it was the first major unofficial event covered live by national tv. and when america was able to see who these people were and how decent the war, and it was palpable. when america was able to see how decent this movement was and how uncomplaining this movement was and have determined to put their own bodies on and have determined there were to love their neighbors. this is all corny. when americans saw this i believe it transformed people's understanding did it do it instantly? for some yes, for others now. but it made a major difference. a couple of other important facts. behind the scenes there was a battle over whether there was born to be a woman speaker. ten officials. the current legitimately complain that they were not represented. the bunch of of the people. and there were told by philip randolph and capping three, look, you are represented james farmer represents to. john lewis represents to. there was eventually a compromise. she was given a short little speech. a gro

with the ceo, with the fbi, with the drug enforcement agency, and today we learned that they share unfilteredaw data with israel. this is data that they aren't even allowed to share with the nsa. >> that is so say they are turning other the records isn't the response be that's the courts order we have so. >> so for the fist six years there were no court ordered at all, there was no othersight, and the companies were complying. now, yes, there is a court order saying that they have to, it's argued that the company really should fight these illegal unconstitutional court orders. i have is seen google started to fight them, but the telecoms at&t and verizon, and the like, certainly have not pushed back. >> nate from the electronic frontier foundation, appreciate your insight into all this. >> thank you for having me on. >> ahead here, a historic recall election. colorado lawmakers kicked out for supporting tighter gun restrictions, we will get that story, ahead. >> this is the result, that's okay. we will fight another day, and fight fight fight. they may have won the battle but they are not goi

all the lies and putting aside all of the misinformation that has been out there, an unedited, unfilteredon about what is the truth about what's going to happen to this country and how we are moving forward. it's kind of a hope and change thing, which i'll talk about later on. but last night, what we saw was actually fascinating. when you start thinking about what this really means to our economy, to saving lives, to the younger generation, to the seniors in this country, and how we are moving forward. and if there is one thing that liberals and progressives in this country have to understand, we have to grab this moment. this is what happens when you have power. when you have power, power and authority is a hell of a thing. and if you've got oh political power, you can drive the agenda. the republicans, i think, have kind of done a better job of this over the years. but this is truly a moment where we have to recognize the crossroads. and we are going through this intersection, and we are going to deliver health care to more than 30 million people in this country who have been denied, wh

bringing this c-span channel to us and giving us the only open forum in american now that is truly unfilterednd thanks to you guys for being on. can be bipartisanship good, can be bad. x-democrat. again -- i am a born-again ex- democrat. 18.ve been a voter since i volunteered my time over the years on and i am a baby boomer. workdelighted with the that error alabama delegation has done, particularly jeff and all the other guys from alabama. bipartisanship is good when ideas are hashed out and something real and true comes together. compromising your basic rent supposed, which is what i think the democrats have sold us down the river, i feel this is not the 21st century. this is something like during the civil war. when we were the seventh district, military district after we lost the war. -- we were occupied for 15 years and we know what it's like in the south to live in a y .eated country tumm and it does not feel good. our eyes are open. obama was elected twice, good for him. , i'm sorry buts i don't agree with the majority of his policies or his politics. host: we will get one more viewing

this was the first time, the first time that all america, to see the civil rights movement unfiltered. it was the first major unofficial event covered live by national tv. and when america was able to see who these people were and how decent the war, and it was palpable. when america was able to see how decent this movement was and how uncomplaining this movement was and have determined to put their own bodies on and have determined there were to love their neighbors. this is all corny. when americans saw this i believe it transformed people's understanding did it do it instantly? for some yes, for others now. but it made a major difference. a couple of other important facts. behind the scenes there was a battle over whether there was born to be a woman speaker. ten officials. the current legitimately complain that they were not represented. the bunch of of the people. and there were told by philip randolph and capping three, look, you are represented james farmer represents to. john lewis represents to. there was eventually a compromise. she was given a short little speech. a gro

she will tell you right now in an unfiltered tone. ellen has been a wonderful friend.-span: where do you live now? >> guest: ohio near columbus ohio. c-span: married twice and divorced twice. current relationships? >> guest: no. c-span: kids? >> guest: two children. i have to mention my grandchild. c-span: go back to prison. the thought of public officials being in prison and the experience isn't rarely written about any put it all here on paper. what was it like that first couple of days so what kind of the cell were you in? you mention there was a toilet in the cell with you and did that serve the people? >> guest: i mentioned the shu for solitary confinement unit. i mention that because if you get in trouble that is where you are placed and it's not a good place to be. c-span: did you ever get in trouble? >> guest: i did get in trouble once because i want to do some laundry and one officer said what he doing? i said laundry and is hard to explain that the tv was turned on so you could get up and move around. here they had not turned the tv soft. i said i'm sorry and