i think people are calling it unforebearing. but has the commission -- there's this concern that, well, you may have foreborn all of these provisions in the statute, but that doesn't prevent a future fcc from -- is there any evidence that a future fcc would do that in the future, based on past actions? >> that's the right question. here's the issue. so section 10 of the act instructs us how we forebear it. we must forebear if certain things are met. if you were to go and reverse that, that would have to be an on the record, notice and comment proceeding that follows section 10 and says that, here is the record that builds to deforebear. so technically, you could. realistically, there's a lot -- >> you're actually on my next question now, which is, how procedurally and legally would you kind of do the evaluation and then on an operational level, how would you forebear. but in the fcc's history, has it taken to undo a forbearance? does it do that? >> not that i'm aware of, sir. and, again, what you would have too -- so, for instan

i think people are calling it unforebearing. but has the commission -- there's this concern that, well you may have foreborn all of these provisions in the statute but that doesn't prevent a future fcc from -- is there any evidence that a future fcc would do that in the future, based on past actions? >> that's the right question. here's the issue. so section 10 of the act instructs us how we forebear it. we must forebear if certain things are met. if you were to go and reverse that, that would have to be an on the record notice and comment proceeding that follows section 10 and says that, here is the record that builds to deforebear. so technically, you could. realistically, there's a lot -- >> you're actually on my next question now, which is, how procedurally and legally would you kind of do the evaluation and then on an operational level, how would you forebear. but in the fcc's history has it taken to undo a forbearance? does it do that? >> not that i'm aware of sir. and, again, what you would have too -- so, for instance, l