this is the most unglamorous sort of research paradigm might be a thousand files. have to read each file might have an e-mail for that is 20 pages long and there is nothing that a machine can do -- this is something that you have to read with your own set of eyes and do this and one other thing that is widely underreported to date is looking backwards. these files go back to 1985. is beyondeam who fantastic -- do you realize that some of these files are in lotus notes? they had to make them readable most the files before 2006 are in a format that is equivalent to a jpeg that is not searchable. of adobe acrobat. all of this old data about you on contra, we barely even looked at because it wasn't the time trade-off wasn't there. i think -- one of the things i would like to see that would make it easier to research older files which i think what clarify a number of scandals around the world -- >> on that point, why not make available -- viewable --? here is everything we have, absolutely everything -- >> you need to make all of this files available to the public? ther

emily: unglamorous. unfunny. alec: it could not be more relevant.ou look at the speed at which tech is moving and the role that it plays in our life. mike: yeah, i think hollywood has always been very puzzled about -- like when the internet first just exploded and was everywhere, they tried a movie called "the net." they tried to make it all sexy and intriguing. and it just was kind of ridiculous. this was an interesting challenge just because, as alec says, it is unfilmable. but it is also, that challenge can lead you to do more interesting stuff that has not been done in television. so it seems like a good time to take a look at the people who are getting rich off of it and building all these things that we use every day. emily: when you ask doctors about "grey's anatomy," i feel like they always say, oh god, it is nothing like that. what do you want engineers to say about "silicon valley"? and how important is it to you to get it right? mike: i always like it when they say -- we have a lot of people saying that we have gotten it right, for the mo

.>> he had to climb through the dirt to get in there, and very unglamorous.>> what was behind this? >> protesters were out front so we had to go through the back. and someone said that the concrete wall that he had to jump down was a 2 foot drop, and you see him coming down. people were out there, taking pictures of themselves, and making selfies because the -- they thought this was a historical piece of concrete. >> definitely bringing attention to the republican party in california, long overlooked. and you probably would have been at the convention. >> it will be the same way, and suddenly california is in play. nobody but donald trump can get the republican nomination by way of vote, 1237 votes, and he is the only one eligible for that. and that will come only from california. he is going to make a play to make sure that he can go into that convention with those numbers. back let's get to indiana in a minute.>> but in california, donald trump can probably win big, but it is broken up by the congressional districts, so we could win the majority of the southern california republic

this is the most unglamorous sort of research paradigm might be a thousand files. have to read each file might have an e-mail for that is 20 pages long and there is nothing that a machine can do -- this is something that you have to read with your own set of eyes and do this and one other thing that is widely underreported to date is looking backwards. these files go back to 985. the tech team who is beyond fantastic -- do you realize that some of these files are in lotus notes? they had to make them readable most the files before 2006 are in a format that is equivalent to a jpeg that is not searchable. it predates of adobe acrobat. all of this old data about you on contra, we barely even looked at because it wasn't the time trade-off wasn't there. i think -- one of the things i would like to see that would make it easier to research older files which i think what clarify a number of scandals round the world -- >> on that point, why not make it all available -- viewable -? here is everything we have, absolutely everything -- >> you need to make all of this files av

this is the most unglamorous sort of research paradigm might be a thousand files. have to read each file might have an e-mail for that is 20 pages long and there is nothing that a machine can do -- this is something that you have to read with your own set of eyes and do this and one other thing that is widely underreported to date is looking backwards. these files go back to 1985. the tech team who is beyond fantastic -- do you realize that some of these files are in lotus notes? they had to make them readable most the files before 2006 are in a format that is equivalent to a jpeg that is not searchable. it predates of adobe acrobat. all of this old data about you on contra, we barely even looked at because it wasn't the time trade-off wasn't there. i think -- one of the things i would like to see that would make it easier to research older files which i think what clarify a number of scandals around the world -- >> on that point, why not make it all available -- viewable --? here is everything we have, absolutely everything -- >> you need to make all of this files

this is the most unglamorous sort of research. there might be a thousand files, you have to read each file, might have a e-mail thread that is 20 pages long. there is nothing there but she did you. this is something that you have to read with your own set of eyes and do this. one of the things that is wildly underreported to date is looking backwards. these files go back to 1985. the tech team is beyond fantastic. you realize that some of these files were in low desk and notes and may have had to make them searchable unreadable. most of the files before 2006 are in a format that is equivalent to a j pack -- jpeg that is not searchable. data about the iran-contra notice scandals, we've barely looked at, because the time trade-off is not there. i think one of the things i would like to see some tools that would make it easier to search the older files which i think would clarify a number of scandals all around the world. it all available it stood up to be little bit at a time. ? list -- there isn't credibly incredible private inform