this is what i mean by unicameral is him -- unicameralism. one house. this is where you were kind of hesitant. technically there are branches of government, but they don't have a whole lot of power. power is invested in the people of the legislative branch. i will test her memories, -- your memories. under the charter of privileges, the 1701 colonial government, thathere unicameralism in government? remember the charter of privileges? or one?re two houses one house, the quaker assembly. this is not a change. they are not shifting years and changing what they already had in the colonial period. however, there is a profound change when it comes to, this is kind of what i just summarized. supreme power invested in the house of representatives. no governor, no upper house to check the assembly. under a system of checks and balances, not only do the three branches of government check each other, but the upper house always checks the lower house. the lower house is always the house of the people, the upper house is always the unelected house that make sure th

this is what i need my unicamerally. one house, one house legislature, but technically, and this is where you are hesitant, technically they are branches of government, executive and legislative, but they don't have a lot of power. power is in the people of the legislative branch. i will test your knowledge, your memory. in the charter of privileges, 1701 colonial government, was the unicameralism in that document? the government, or member the charter of privileges, 1701 and 1776? were there to houses or one? no, there was one house, the quaker assembly. this is not a change. they have had unicameralism. they are not shifting tears with what they had in the colonial period. however, there is a profound change when it comes to -- this is kind of what i just summarized, supreme power invested in the house of representatives, no governor, no upper house to check the assembly. they did have that in the colonial period, only one house. but under a system of checks and balances, not only do the three branches of government ch

do we really want these people running the show, this unicameral legislature? we find the uncontrolled power of the whole state is in the hands of one body of men, no checks. one body. by the way, these people are just common people. they don't even only and. -- own land. it was dangerous to the safety of the community. if you put the power in the hands of the people according to rush, it is more dangerous than if you have a king. that is how much a lot of these guys fear the d-word, they fear democracy. is one more, and the idea of making the people at large judges of the qualification necessary for magistrates were judges of law, the checks and assemblies proceed that mankind is all alike, and have equal leisure. this government that they created, rush says, it assumes everybody has common sense. it proves everybody is equal. that is not true. we don't want to give people the right to govern themselves because they have common sense. we want wise people, just people, men of leisure. . love william hopper i quoted him before. the pennsylvania constitution was

is he has undercut and tried to wipe out the authority of their national assembly which is their unicameral legislative body. the way he's done that is by hijacking the supreme court of the country. they call it the supreme tribunal of justice and it's packed, literally packed with puppets who do his bidding. as an example, these puppets recently ruled that they would rescind the democratic powers vested to the elected members of the national assembly by the constitution of that country. in essence, they ruled that the national assembly no longer had legislative authority. the protests were so massive, even within the government that they had to backtrack from that ruling. but here's what's interesting. this is a recent opinion piece written by francisco toroo in "the washington post." it said it best. here's the headline. beware of mikhail marino. the hatchet man. he is a former intelligence agent, was tried and convicted of murder in 1987, though the corroborating documents from the court system are no longer available. he spent just two years in jail before being released. he was then im

to address these delays, the nebraska unicameral unanimously passed legislation that would have allowed the nebraska department of roads to assume the nepa permitting process. a letter has been sent to the federal highway administration to begin that implementation of this program, and that could take up to 18 months to complete. i asked the secretary for an update on the progress of the application, and she assured me that the department is following it closely. she said, we know the issue. we are tracking it, and we will continue to pay attention. furthermore, secretary chao explained that the administration will not specify any list of projects in an infrastructure plan. states know their transportation needs best, not the federal government. the larger role states have from start to finish in developing their own infrastructure, the more they can direct funding to the projects that directly affect their citizens. for the benefit of families across america in both our urban and our rural areas, we need to look for out-of-the-box soluti solutions to en sure that our infrastructure is