. >> it means that a tax has to be applied uniformly evenly across the board. this tax for a significant amount of litigation and who knows how many years that will be. >> reporter: reason we keep saying philadelphia is first major city in the country to implement such a taxis because in 2014 berkley, california did so, at 1 cents per ounce. stud friday cornell university found that on average prices went up just half cents, ricky romea is diabetic and doesn't drink diet sewed. >>> i'm in the clear. people will to have deal with that. >> reporter: in center city, alexandria hoff for cbs-3 "eyewitness news". >>> we have learned state unemployment rate has gone up slightly. pennsylvania department of labor and industry says it rose to 5.5 percent in may. the national rate is lower at 4.7 percent. about 17,000 people who live in the state were looking for work. >>> stay with us, still ahead on "eyewitness news" at 6:00 revisiting heart break. >> reason some people are told to go to the cemetery where they buried their pets, remove the head stones and dig up their

her last year in office until she left public life, her speeches on the european union were almost uniformly critical on security, on its intrusions into domestic policy and on its weakening of national sovereignty. here is an excerpt from a speech she gave to the congress of prague in 1996. i quote: the overall european federalist project which was envisaged by some from the start but which has only in recent years come out into the open, is in truth a nightmare. or, from her book state craft: that such an unnecessary and irrational project as building a european superstate was ever embarked upon will seem in future years to be perhaps the greatest folly of the modern era and that britain, with her traditional strengths and global destiny, should ever have been part of it will appear to be a political error of historic magnitude. i think it's hard to accept that this consistent line of argument over more than a decade was a case of blowing off steam, that she would discard when faced with the decision on brexit. secondly, although mrs. thatcher changed her mind on particularly european issu

tickly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized should that apply uniformly to electronic communications? bryan: i agree that it should. i would like to make a couple of points. first of all, it is limited in what it actually says. a search must be reasonable, that does not mean that every search ever conducted has to be done pursuant to a warrant. it says searches must be thatnable or alternatively they are not unreasonable. in some circumstances, emergency situations we were talking about earlier with a critically missing or endangered person or perhaps a dangerous felony needs to be caught before they can do more harm, in those types of emergency circumstances, it is reasonable to conduct a search without a warrant, so i agree with my counterpart here in almost all circumstances, in the vast majority of circumstances, when we have the ability to resort to legal process. obvously, that is the way it should be done, but a reasonable search and some circumstances can be done without a warrant in emergency situations. that is the law for a bank fault, safety d

describing the place to be searched or the person organize things to be seize should that apply uniformly to electronic communications? >> i absolutely agree it should. i would make a couple of points about the fourth amendment. it's very limited in what is it actually says, search must be reasonable. that doesn't mean that every search if conduct hayes to be done pursuant to the warrant. the -- so in some circumstances, emergency situations that we were talking earlier with a critically missing injured person or a dangerous felon needs to be caught before they can do more harm, those type of emergency circumstances is actually reasonable to conduct the search without a warrant. so i agree with my counterpart here, in almost all circumstances, in the vast majority of circumstances, when we have the ability to resort to legal process, obviously that's the way it should be done but a reasonable search, some sort of warrantlessly and emergency situations. that's the law for a bank vault, safety deposit box, somebody's home should be the same for -- >> this question on notice. this isn't in t

should that apply uniformly to electronic communications, mr. porter? >> guest: i absolutely agree that it should, but i would make a couple of points about the forth amendment. first of all, it's very limited in what it actually says. so a search must be republican, okay? so -- reasonable, okay? so that doesn't mean every search ever conducted has to be done pursuant to a warrant. that's not what the text says. it has to be reasonable or,tively, not unreasonable. so in some circumstances like we were talking about earlier, perhaps a dangerous felon who needs to be caught before they can do any more harm to the citizenry, in those types of emergency circumstances it is actually reasonable to conduct the search without a warrant. so i agree with my counterpart here in almost all circumstances, in the vast majority of circumstances when we have the ability to resort to legal process, obviously, that's the way it should be done. but a reasonable search in some circumstances could be done warrantlessly in emergency situations, and that's the law for a bank

life, herleft public speeches in the european union were almost uniformly critical on security, on into true into domestic policy, and on the weakening of national sovereignty. here is an ex -- here's an excerpt from a speech she gave to the congress of prod in 1996. -- the congress of prague in 1996: "the overall european federalist project, which was envisaged by some from the start, but which is only in recent years come out into the open, is in truth a nightmare." from her book -- "that such an unnecessary and irrational project as building the european superstate was ever embarked on would seem in future years to be perhaps the greatest folly of the modern era, and that britain with traditional strengths in global destiny should ever have been part of it will appear to be a political error of historic magnitude." i think it is hard to accept that this consistent line of argument in more than a decade was the case of blowing off steam that she would discard, and secondly, although she did change of mind, she did not zigzag on europe and go back and forth in policy terms. there is a

and uniformly they say they love of mizzou. their goal was to make mizzou better, not to destroy it or characterize it as a horrible place to be. and i had a very interesting meeting with some recent graduates, african-american in kansas city right after the incident started. they had some high school students, who you know, very, very bright high school students who were admitted to coming to mizzou, but who were second-guessing themselves because of the incident. we met in kansas city. it brought a tear to my eye to hear the testimonies of those african-american graduates. many of them journalists, by the way. so yeah, we experienced the same things that the current students are complaining about. but that was a minor part of our experience at mizzou. i had the best time of my life at mizzou. it made me who i am. i would encourage -- this is for students. i would encourage all of you to attend mizzou, and i would encourage everybody else to attend mizzou. so we have a great deal of support from alums like you guy s. and if yo

there are weaknesses, not uniformly across european banking and i don't want to be misinterpreted.ut enough significant weakness in the european banking sector in a country like italy, for example but in others as well that i'm afraid the continued pressure of negative interest rates, of slow growth, of bail out rules in brussels which are being implemented extremely rigidly give me concern that as the popular discontent grows in some of these countries over high levels of unemployment that it may not be just political event we see but a financial event as well. >> when you look at the broader ftse 100 which just erased all of hits post-brexit losses, that's only down about 2.5% since the brexit vote. do you think that all the doom and gloom that was forecasted by the remain campaign do you think that's really not coming to bear at this point? >> well, i think it's a little too early to reach that judgment. to be honest with you i think -- markets have clearly rebounded and good to see some resilience in global markets. on the other hand it's inevitable we'll go through a period of

threat were al qaeda and the arabian peninsula or various affiliates, now they talk about almost uniformly the greatest threat eating what they call homegrown terrorists. what you have seen the civil liberty abuses, new ones, spreading up almost exclusively on american soil. two years ago, the obama justice department announced new rules where miranda rights were diluted. deluded -- you have legislation being proposed to strip people of citizenship and eliminate legal protections they have. and the end of last year, you had the national defense authorization act which codified the power, probably the most un-american power there is, looking at america and he romanticize sent, on u.s. soil as well. you see this incredibly rapid importation of war theory that used to be applied both outside the united states now being applied on u.s. soil, to the u.s. citizens and those being residents of the u.s. i also think that is unique. attribute i want to talk about that i think distinguishes this current prosecute -- persecution campaign is the way in which extremism rapidly becomes normalized. this

and uniformly, they say they loved mizu. their goal was to make izu noter, not to destroy mizu, as aaracterize mizu horrible place to be. i had an interesting meeting with some recent graduates, , in kansas city right after the incident started. they had some high school students, very bright high school students who were committed to coming to mizu, but who were second-guessing as a result of the incident aired so we met in kansas city. it brought a two to my eye. to hear the testimonies of those african-american graduates. many of them are -- many of them journalists, by the way. they said, yeah, we experienced the same things that the current students are complaining about. but that was a minor part of our experience at izu. mizu. i had the time of my life at mizu. i am.ade me go i incurred all students to attend mizu. so we have a great deal of support from alums like you guys. outou can just get the word , the people with whom you interact, that would be very helpful in turning this thing around, turning it into a posit

they don't uniformly support trump, but i think hillary, of course, will unite them. [laughter] so they will be voting for trump. but, again, there's a real split. i think a lot of tea party activists favor ted cruz, and it didn't go -- they're still very bitter about the election, and they felt that ted cruz was the authentic champion of the tea party cause, and so they're mad. they're angry that cruz wasn't able to sort of become the party's nominee. so they're not really keen on donald trump. but he does have his supporters even in the tea party too. >> [inaudible] is there a possibility for -- [inaudible] >> okay. so what do you think the future holds for the tea party, will it fizzle out and in what form will it go into the future? well, i think in a couple ways the tea party's actually been successful, right? if you look at how far to the right the republican party has come on a lot of economic issues, some of the initial rationale for the tea party -- reducing the deficit, lowering taxes -- that's become republican party orthodoxy in lots of ways. so i think th

i mean, they're going to do it uniformly across the board. >> gotcha. >> and the players are already asking when are you going to start blowing the horn? an important point that is -- is that the officials would be notified before the horn is blown. so sometimes if you're -- if you tell your players, the horn is going to go in 30 seconds. >> just a moment ago, sergio garcia at 9. out of the ditch. >> he was able to get this out of the ditch into the fairway. that was an unbelievable shot. >> would have been the hardest shot he had all day. >> sergio at 2 under. only two shots off the lead. this could have been a deal breaker for sergio garcia. >> took a big chance. >> wow. >> took a huge chance to get that ball out on to the fairway. if sergio's the man -- he may look back on this shot. >> david, finish your thought. >> okay. points on the golf course that are obviously darker than others. if it becomes unfair, that will trump -- that will force the decision. if someone would say on hole 7 would say it's too dark there, i can't play, that would be compelling enough generally and i th

what i'm telling you is that, in my opinion, the people who create jobs, uniformly, across the countryarlie: feel like they are not creating them because of regulations -- sen. mcconnell: they cannot borrow. i was just reading an article today by one of the founders of home depot, who said, regretfully, they could not have started home depot in today's environment. charlie: because of environmental issues? sen. mcconnell: regulatory issues. quickie elections, the effort to turn us into a western european country. the president would not put it that way, but that is what he wants to do. charlie: give me an example of a western european country. he does not want to turn the country and the france. president obama does not want to turn the country of france. i am not defending him, i am just saying, why would he want to do that? go ahead. sen. mcconnell: he would not put it that way. look at what you have got in western europe. high taxes, overregulation, slow growth. last eight years? high taxes, overregulation, slow growth. the formula is the same. when you do that, you slow the economy

now, i've nominated somebody who uniformly everybody, including republicans, acknowledges is probably>> merrick garland. >> jimmy: very common name. >> he's the chief judge of probably the second most important court in the land. he's been a judge longer than many of the judges who are now justices on the supreme court. republicans in the past have said he has impeccable credentials. he's smart, he has a good temperament, he knows how to work with people from all political spectrums. some of them won't even meet with them. so far, at least, they haven't given him a hearing. and that's an example of where if the process of democracy starts breaking down to that degree where you can't even show the courtesy of meeting with a guy who you know is qualified and you won't give him a hearing, because you want to wait and see if maybe your guy wins the election and nominates somebody. then you start seeing the court system breaking down. you start seeing vacancies. people can't get access to the courts. and you see the country start dividing in ways that's really unhealthy. so that's a good e

but those that sustained gunshot wounds to the head uniformly died. >> how close was the hospital. >>ospital was only three blocks away. >> it helps. >> tremendous. that is why we have had the excellent outcome that we have had is that patients got to us so quickly. >> doctor, thank you for joining us, i should add he is on the board of samaritan's purse and does medical work for samaritan's purse and so does his father so i am a great fan of. thank you for being here. >> glad to be here, thank you. >> what do the orlando exterrorist wife and father exterrorist wife and father have to say? safety doesn't come in a box. it's not a banner that goes on a wall. it's not something you do now and then. or when it's convenient. it's using state-of-the-art simulators to better prepare for any situation. it's giving offshore teams onshore support. and it's empowering anyone to stop a job if something doesn't seem right. at bp, safety is never being satisfied. and always working to be better. at bp, safety is never being satisfied. i've been blind since birth. i go through periods where it's ha

first while they're not counted because they were people thought they were uniformly committed to remaininghin, but that is not quite true. the labor vote contains a lot of people. who want to leave. they they are discovering this and some of the people move to brexit. now it's part of the british struck structure and though tried to see that if any of other government keep their promises that they made in the campaign. so the european, as, as i said british politics has been altered permanently by this referendum campaign, whatever the result. and it's going to be altered in a way that i think is better because the previous result was to try to deny the plain fact that millions of british people were skeptics and to treat them as people who are really not listening. >> i know tony as you probably do and i think very highly of him. i think he is wrong on this, but it's not surprising, the entire international establishment which tony is the kind of not a member of really but nonetheless he didn't, he would've had to spend a lot more time thinking about it and really looking into it before h

but those that sustained gunshot wounds to the head uniformly died. >> how close was the hospital. >>ps. >> tremendous. that is why we have had the excellent outcome that we have had is that patients got to us so quickly. >> doctor, thank you for joining us, i should add he is on the board of samaritan's purse and does medical work for samaritan's purse and so does his father so i am a great fan of. thank you for being here. >> glad to be here, thank you. >> what do the orlando exterrorist wife and father have to say? you will hear from them next. festyle. and it keeps my investments fully mobile... even when i'm on the move. sign up at etrade.com and get up to six hundred dollars. introduces new, easy-to-swallow tablets. so now, there are more ways, for more people... to experience... complete protection from frequent heartburn. nexium 24hr. the easy-to-swallow tablet is here. do you really know what it means? no. the answer is no. because it's complicated and science-y. but with my nutrition mixes, you don't have to worry about the science. you can just put it in your pie hole. plan

so people are saying uniformly that people aren't complying, implying that they're uninformed, but we all know we have to pay taxes. we all know that if we have income, we owe somebody something or at least a report saying we fell under certain -- so i don't buy that people don't know that they owe something to someone. and i do think there's an -- miss velazquez said there is a subtle incentive to make everybody a private contractor because look at what you avoid. the whole fica issue. the health insurance. all those things, you know. so i think it's a really complicated issue. i'm interested in any response you might have, miss bruckner, because it's not -- i mean, who wouldn't want to be like rabbit saying these are all independent contractors and we're not responsible for anybody? that would be ideal for you, you just collect your percentage and move on. but yet it's a problem. it's a big problem. yes, mr. reed? >> i actually -- having been a small businessowner and having been on both sides of this, i'm not sure i would completely agree with the concept that everybody would love

but i'm telling you that in my opinion, the people who create jobs, uniformly across the country. >> rose: feel like they're not creating them because regulations. >> they can't expand. they can't borrow. the regulations, i was just reading an article today by one of the founders at home depot, bernie mark-- who said regretfully they couldn't have started home depot in today's environment. >> rose: because the regulatory-- environmental issues. >> no, regulatory. >> rose: health care issues. >> microunion, quickie elections. the whole effort to turn us into a western european country. that's what the-- the president wouldn't put it that way but that is what he wanted to do. >> rose: you think he did he wanted to turn us-- give me an example of what western european country. let me stop you, he didn't want to turn the country into france. president obama does not want to turn the country into france. i'm not defending him. i'm just saying, why would he want to do that. >> he wouldn't put it that way. >> rose: here is the guy who said, go ahead. >> he wouldn't put it that way. >> rose:

what i like about the decisions as they weren't uniformly pro-or anti-agency, but you could expect him to the agencies through their paces in you saw lawyers at the nation is no when they are making roles, they would have to expect search and review of their decision and tried their best to make their roles more reasonable, more logical and grounded in the text of the statute that congress told them to implement. that is one of the most impact areas with oligocene in the scholarship behind administrative law and what the federal agencies are doing, which is so timely right now given the growth of the federal administrative state and so much is decided by this agency far from congress --. >> i have to agree. both of utah without justice scalia is at emphasis on the tax. on the taxpayer by the rest of he the constitution center and let a statute as. think it impacts not just judges, but i see it in my own work as a lawyer. if you don't start with the relevant language of the rule for the statue, you know you are in trouble because why ouldn't you start with the text if it helps you. i ne

they haven't counted because -- people thought they were uniformly committed to remaining within. but that's not quite true. it contains a lot of people who want to leave here they are discovering this. some of these people moved to brexit. u.k. itself is a part of the british structure. if britain decides to remain in it will be a watchdog to make sure that any other government will continue to keep the promises it made to the british people in this campaign. the british politics have been altered permanently by this referendum whatever the result. it will be altered in a way that i think is better. millions of british people are skeptics, and to treat them as people who are not worth listening to. i know tony abbott as you probably do. i think highly of him. i think he is wrong on this. it's not surprising. the entire bezos establishment, he would have had to spend a lot more time thinking about it and looking into it before he felt he could come out with anything on the other side. i think his main motives, his main concern is the unity and stability at a time when it is threat

the court definitely wants a bright line rule but it didn't uniformly disfavor the police. host: we can hear the continuing debate over miranda all these years later. and in fact, it was a divided decision. 5-4. warren, black, brennan, douglas and fortas. the minority, clark, harlan, white and stewart. is there a backstory to how they came to the split decision in this case? paul: one of the things we have been talking about is the f.b.i. practices. chiefwho were pushing justice warren, pushing for broad regulation of the police, said, look, the f.b.i. is already administering this, it wouldn't be a problem to extend the practice to other agencies. the problem of course was that the f.b.i. had not been doing anything like the sorts of things that miranda opposed, not just federal agencies but every agency in the united states. host: from time to time we've heard stories about justices finding coalitions to bring them to their side. are there any good stories in the miranda case that convinced somebody to go to one side or the other in this one? or were they pretty well line

communities, rebuilding our parks, rec centers and libraries, we're investing in universal pre k, uniformly recognized as not only massive education initiative for the city three and four years old, but when kids go to a quality healthcare and quality, and education setting, women go back to work. so this is an initiative that puts women to work, families, puts income into money family pockets, great pre k system out of it. >> councilwoman, i think for some people hearing you list all of this stuff, big focus on pre k, but then recently we hear oh, wait it will also pad the general fund. for the city. so, a lot of people are saying why didn't we talk about that sooner, just focus on pre k? >> because the amount of monday that i was going toward the city funds balance was such a tiny amount. over the overall amount of money over the time, it is a tiny fraction of what is actually going toward this. we're also funding community, schools, doing a loft other things and the bulk of the money going towards the initiatives that matter. >> even if it is the bulk shouldn't it still be something put

you're saying, uniformly that people aren't complying implying they're uninformed. we all know we have to pay taxes. we all know that if we have income we owe somebody something or at least a report saying we fell under certain -- so i don't buy that people don't know that they owe something to someone. and i do think there's -- ms. velazquez said there is a subtle incentive to make everybody a private contractor because look at what you avoid. the whole fica issue, the health insurance, all those things, you know. so i think it's a complicated issue. i'm interested in any response you might have, ms. bruckner. because who wouldn't want to be like rabbit saying these are all independent contractors and we're not responsible for anybody. that would be ideal for you, you just collect your percentage and move on. but, yet, it's a problem. it's a big problem. mr. reed? >> i actually having been a small business owner and been on both sides of this, i'm not sure i would completely agree with the concept that everybody would love to have independent contractors, as somebo

if you look at the south, the deep south, black women's earnings are not uniformly distributed across the nation. instead there are specific states that are clear winners and losers. the worst states in the country is mississippi. carrying the distinction of being the worst state in the nation for black wum's earnings. the best states for earnings is maryland. we still lag behind in pay. my mother just tender urned 87 yesterday. when i got the call to do that, i said i have to do this for my mother. she's a retired teacher and if it wasn't for social security, she would be in a situation. we still lag behind when it comes to retirement security. the average black women retires with a wealth of $100. but if social security were to disappear, the poverty rates would more than double. so social security is high in preserving that for black women. one of the things i want to talk about is jobs. we're talking about the idea of dealing with and addressing pay equity and economic opportunity when it comes to high wage jobs in the tech industry. there are a couple good things i'd like to say

but having the notion we're going to be able to obtain an antibiotic free uniformly across all animal production is frankly unrealistic. it doesn't diminish the fact that having choices and finding situations where antibiotic-free status can be attained. which companies like tyson or perdue, who may be getting there with production, that's great. the challenge may be it's one thing to be able to institute those kinds of changes in the context of raising chickens who have a very short life span in a very controlled environment to applying that to other sectors of the industry and being able to maintain animal health. i think it's an important factor, and provides choices for consumers, but it's not necessarily going to be the solution. i agree with grady's comment that a significant element needs to be focused on in encourages standards around the notion of appropriate use or judicious use and consumers can have confidence that the products they're purposing are coming from farms that are applying good stewardship principles in terms of the use of antibiotics. >> we have folks with que

consumers, but going to having the notion that we are going to be able to obtain an antibiotic free uniformlyacross all animal production is frankly unrealistic. it doesn't diminish the fact that having choices and finding situations where and about a can be attained and which companies like tyson or purdue who may be getting there with grower production, that is great. the challenge may be it's one thing to be able to institute those kinds of changes in the context of raising chickens who have very short lifespans in a controlled environment to a fine not to other sectors of the industry and be able to maintain animal health, so it's important factor, but it provides choices for consumers, but it's not necessarily going to be the solution. i agree with brady's comment that a significant element also needs to be focused on encouraging standards around the notion of appropriate use or judicious use and that consumers can have confidence that the products they are purchasing are coming from farms that are applying good stewardship principle in terms of the use of antibiotics select so, we have

the court wants a bright line rule but it didn't uniformly disfavor the police.ost: we can hear the continuing debate over miranda all these years over. it was a divided decision. warren, black, brennan, douglas and fortas. the minority, clark, harlan, white and stewart. is there a backstory to how they came to the split decision in this case? paul: one of the things we have been talking about is the f.b.i. practices. chief justice warren pushing for broad regulation of the police, said, look, the f.b.i. is already administering this, it wouldn't be a problem to extend the practice to other agencies. the problem is that the f.b.i. had not been doing anything like the sorts of things that miranda opposed, not just federal agencies but every agency in the united states. host: from time to time we've heard stories about justices finding coalitions to bring them to their side. are there any good stories in the miranda case that convinced somebody to go to one side or the other in this one? do either of you know? jeffrey: i don't know. paul: i know there was some deba

and evidently done on expenditure lobbyist, but that measure even uniformly to define lobbyist as bothontact lobbyists at expenditure lobbyist could bolt thrust of what we did last year old thrust of what we've been doing is to not have any distinction between the two. that a contact lobbyists and expenditure lobbyist is a lobbyist. and is going to be subject to the same kind of scrutiny. could mr. chairman, if i cannot that be incorporated into your directions to the staff for the writing of it and have that before us ? >> right i would join in that suggestion because when were talking about political contributions, i don't know why an individual or an entity that's identified as an expenditure lobbyist should not be subject to the same restriction as a contact lobbyists. >> they need to bring up that issue. just a good i think with the staff was and is proposed to the commission tonight. when refers to lobbyist or lobbyist, it includes both categories. that's how the term is not currently defined in the lobbyist speed is good i will admit there's one place at the applicable word cont

and so what i liked about his decisions is they weren't uniformly pro or anti an agency. you saw lawyers within agencies know that when they're making rules, they would have to expect searching review of their decisions and try their best to make their rules more reasonable, more logical and grounded in the text of the statute that congress told them to implement. that's one of the most impactful areas to me, the thought and the scholarship behind administrative law and what the federal agencies are doing, which is so timely right now, given the growth of the federal administrative state and so much is being decided by those agencies, far from the halls of congress. >> both >> both of you talked about justice scalia's emphasis on the text, whether it's what the constitution actually says and what a statute says. i think it impacts not just judges, but i see it in my own work as a lawyer. if you don't start with the relevant language of the rule or the statute, you know you're in because trouble. because why wouldn't you? >> smart. >> with the text if it helped i never you

the states in their treatment of blood and breath tests as the court described in mcneily, almost uniformly treat breath tests and blood tests identically. and as the courts -- >> that's really my unknown question. why? that's why i started with that. was i really don't know the answer. >> and i think the answer, your honor is people understand the breath test to be -- it's designed to obtain the same evidence, exactly the same evidence as the blood test. and in response to -- >> i guess -- please. go ahead. >> but i think that you're concerned about the dissipation of this evidence. i think as for blood and the breath test, it's exactly the same. >> you write that it's designed to get at the same evidence, and you're right that the dissipation of the evidence works in exactly the same way. but you're suggesting that we should close our eyes to the fact that there's a very significant difference in the degree of invasiveness. even assuming that both of these are searches, which i have to say i think that that's -- we've held that and so blowing is a search. there's no question about that. b

stuart: the elites in business and media and government are uniformly opposed to what i'm calling protectionismlevying tariffs at the border. the elites are opposed to this. you don't think that trump loses-- that's the wrong word to use, but has he touched a real nerve here? >> i was in the u.k. last week when the brexit vote went down, stuart. the elites didn't see that coming and it was a round house to the left jaw that they were unprepared for. what has happened in this election, donald trump has touched the nerves of people that the elates are out of trust. the medial, the political center are totally disconnected from reality when it comes to how people are struggling. the result is, donald trump is winning and i believe he will win in november and the elites will tear their garments and they will be sitting on the edge of ledges of high buildings, but it's just at some point going to have a see a change. stuart: i think the biblical expression is gnashing of teeth, is that it? >> there will be a lot of gnashing of teeth for the dennis. thank you. >> good to be with you, stuart. stuart:

i have a question for you, how good is this for britain, even if it is an exit uniformly?effect is this going to have on the united states and china? it is going to be pretty dramatic. so we need to fix it in the same way the united states in the 19th century, every time what was affecting the confederacy, the financial crisis, you managed to create institutions to bring it together. this is what we should do in europe. i believe this is the best possible part for all of us. >> mr. varoufakis, i'm surprised to hear your plea to keep the eu as one. you yourself mentioned you're not a fan of brussels. and a year ago you were advocating when they were still working through the talks with greece, you were saying that you had to have a backup plan, a plan b for breeze to sta-- gree to start issuing its own currency. to say if things didn't go your way you were going to leave. >> that is not completely accurate. what i did have is a backup plan b. >> yes, of course it was. >> but it was a plan to get out of the eurozone. it was a plan to close down the banking system. the federa

by and large scotland was very much against it, almost uniformly voting against the as well as- brexitnorthern ireland. that has offered speculation as seeking to leave the u.k. and have its own referendum. we have matthew coming in from hackensack, new jersey on the independent line. caller: good morning and thank you. i would like to congratulate our british friends for voting for their independence from the unelected bureaucrats in brussels who were running their lives. taxation without representation. and by the way, congratulate the british for ignoring their fawn overmedia who our failed, incompetent president and his failed, corrupt secretary of state hillary clinton who allowed the jv team isis cancer to metastasize. know that the media is dishonest -- host: let me ask you this question about the brexit. no member of the european union has ever left it before. this raises a great deal of uncertainty, both politically and economically. are you concerned that whatever percussions all over the world, including here in the united states? are you there? caller: yes, hello. i am not

we should tell you that according to "financial times" uniformly known as mcafee performed for $7 millionthat's quite a loss there. it's a busy week for economic data in the u.s. today you've got to look for trade deficit numbers. may trade deficit numbers. tomorrow we'll be getting final estimate first quarter gdp, case-shiller home price index, june consumer confidence. on wednesday we get may personnel income and spending and pending home sales. thursday we look for june chicago pmi, ism index for june and may construction spending and also june auto sales. >> we're going to get to a reader here -- that's news speak for a story. i'm going to call an audible for a second. i know we've got kayla there. do we have potential to put up royal bank of scotland shares in london. i don't know if we can do that on the fly or not. i want to call your attention to them. they are down 25% right now. royal bank of scotland shares, one of the biggest banks in the united kingdom. great job, guys. thank you so much. royal bank of scotland down -- that shows 23, i show 25. we knew it was a weak day for

our numbers at this hour, still uniformly in the 50s as they have been this time of day. napa 52.ta rosa 48. you can see covering eastern valleys very well all of the way out to stockton you can see and so we have quite a different change in weather pattern. what's driving all of that basically has been the high is still there. make no mistake about that. but off towards the northwest, here is a little trough providing a little on shore flow. feeling a lot better for this go around today. and as it did from yesterday. and it will be to finish the week. but this is just temporary because the end of the week we're going to warm back up. some fog making the eastern grab. there you can see the warmup happening in the central valley very nicely. it's still going to cover the communities in the far east bay but taking a little bit of the edge off of what we had from tuesday and aerply on during the week. a little -- early on during the week. a little early. san mateo at 75. santa clara at 84. san josi we'll go with about 83. in your seven day forecast there, we have 89 to lower 90s to t

first of all having counted because they thought they were uniformly committed to remaining within but that's not quite true. the labor vote contains a lot of people who want to leave and they are discovering this is some of those people move to brexit. it is now a permanent part of the british structure and britain decides her mean it's going to be a watchdog to make sure any of the government will continue to keep the promises it made to the british people in this campaign. so the european as i say, british politics has been altered permanently by this referendum campaign whatever the results and it's going to be altered in a way that i think is better because the previous result was to try to deny the plain facts that millions of british people were skeptics and to treat them as people who are whirly worth listening to. >> tony abbott, i know tony as you probably do and i think very highly of him. i think he's wrong on this but it's not surprising. the entire international establishment which tony is not a member of but nonetheless he did and i think, he would have had to spend a lo

and mid block open space so you'll see ♪ compare active - to the rear evaluation of russel their uniformlynt turn around homes on russel street light including our proposed addition the image that was shoenl earlier in the evening to depict the view from 1243 union street was taken from the basements level of 1243 union street you'll find is slightly disingenuous to be speaking to that vantage point additionally the union street provide zero to the space your proposal provides greater than the codes requirements addressing 64 russel street steps outside the box well into the moved and seconded open space again to a much greater sixth than our proposal this illustrates the relationship the union street prosper that tower over the russel street properties i visited some of the homes on union street and able to fraundz obvious and appreciate the panoramic views and we feel that to a large extents the objections are in the interest of protecting panoramic views additionally the roof deck that is proposed is adjacent to the nursery for the new bones you met and by no means any kind of party dec

and evidently done on expenditure lobbyist, but that measure even uniformly to define lobbyist as bothtact lobbyists at expenditure lobbyist could bolt thrust of what we did last year old thrust of what we've been doing is to not have any distinction between the two. that a contact lobbyists and expenditure lobbyist is a lobbyist. and is going to be subject to the same kind of scrutiny. could mr. chairman, if i cannot that be incorporated into your directions to the staff for the writing of it and have that before us ? >> right i would join in that suggestion because when were talking about political contributions, i don't know why an individual or an entity that's identified as an expenditure lobbyist should not be subject to the same restriction as a contact lobbyists. >> they need to bring up that issue. just a good i think with the staff was and is proposed to the commission tonight. when refers to lobbyist or lobbyist, it includes both categories. that's how the term is not currently defined in the lobbyist speed is good i will admit there's one place at the applicable word contac