clarify prop m, a slow-growth ballot measure from the 1980's was placed on by signature that would be unimpacted by the amended version. sunshine ordinance adopted in the late '90's was placed on ballot by voter signature so, therefore, would not be legislan adopted by the voters in the 1990's, one extending rent control to 24 unit buildings and reducing the kappa on the permissible rent increases. those are both placed on the ballot and will not be impacted. then there was a proposition j from 2008 creating a historic preservation commission that was a charter amendment. i also got questions about the other proposition j from the 1970's relating to contract in out of city workers. it was untouched by this. i have offered to that amendment. because this is a charter amendment, every amendment automatically requires a continuance. therefore, i will request that the committee continued it for two weeks. that is my request. >> this is a significant amendment. it will require continuance? >> any amendments to any proposed charter, a substantive vs. non substantive does not come into play. supervisor

clarify prop m, a slow-growth ballot measure from the 1980's was placed on by signature that would be unimpacted by the amended version. sunshine ordinance adopted in the late '90's was placed on