the heights require in consult the station planned to the uninformed i seems to pose a restriction and challenges by the coast guard to the maximum height plan, which has not been mentioned anywhere in the product description, has never been publicly discussed, and has never been as fully with it -- and has never been evaluated. and it has never been add value waited -- it has never been evaluated and proposed tight envelope. the guidelines prepared to govern building and design have rudimentary rarely -- have rudimentarily address this without a guiding principles of how to deal with treasure island should we be stuck with before heights in a number of critical locations. i'd like to suggest the product description fails to mention the heights requiring consultation plan, fails to comment and explain it, and it fails to evaluate any potential impact of what is described. the deir is there for incomplete and not accurate. >> madam president, there is a motion on the floor and a second. if commissioners, before you is a motion to certify the final environmental impact report. on that mo

the heights require in consult the station planned to the uninformed i seems to pose a restriction and challenges by the coast guard to the maximum height plan, which has not been mentioned anywhere in the product description, has never been publicly discussed, and has never been as fully with it -- and has never been evaluated. and it has never been add value waited -- it has never been evaluated and proposed tight envelope. the guidelines prepared to govern building and design have

paula kerger i believe they are committed to public television in the interest of the uninformed american public unfortunately for seven straight years public broadcasting's public television's revenue has been flat and the greatest challenge facing public television at the moment is in fact the minish in resources to do the kind of quality reporting and the kind of a great program me that the american people deserve. bill moyers thanks so much for being with us here tonight it's better than lies keep it up tom your. important voice out there in the independent world of broadcasting thank you thank you very much sir you can watch. this conversation again as well as other conversations of great minds at our website conversations with great minds dot com coming up the deputy editor for the daily caller jamie weinstein writer for the weekly standard damn good and you'll help or at radio host joe madison i'll join me after the break for tonight's weekly robert. let's not forget that we had an apartheid regime right. i think for a beautiful funny well. we have the government says they're going

reports yet sixty percent of americans don't know three branches of government so yes the uninformed horde you know is shit and they're just going if it's an event it's a historical event geraldo is telling us just because you know the day kennedy was killed which it isn't and it's now the white house has released press photos of them all in the command room watching the assault on the live chat feature and hillary's killing. and and look at it came out with the private ryan lady. that got grabbed remember the woman who was at the hospital of the delta force right it and all that and it turned out the iraqis had been gone for two days and the doctors told the troops come help or her private lynch i'm sorry i got the right right right lynch affair and it came out that rock jerry bruckheimer the producer of black hawk down advised them and over sat vid connections with private lynch was advising the entire thing it's all scripted and it's all hollywood it's all made up of lies they are just with comics and private ryan we have the best propaganda in this country that money can buy but

tons of collateral we would go into a depression basically you know so americans are completely uninformed when they say we should not raise the debt ceiling because they don't understand what will happen and politicians don't seem to help that because they make that a source of debate and. thank you for our way and kind of setting us straight on your ideas about that with edward harrison founder of credit write down. now last night the g.o.p. presidential primary debate officially launched washington back into the frenzy of campaign themes then maybe it didn't what made the biggest statement was it who was on stage in south carolina but rather who wasn't there are take a look at ford has more on how money may have had some of the big names missing in action. from the piece in the green bay south carolina the republican presidential debate the two thousand and twelve republican race has officially kicked off with big promise to get the troops out of afghanistan in a in that war that hasn't helped us and hasn't helped anybody in the middle east. big criticisms a pretty united states side wo

president obama is completely uninformed about the oil and gasistry. for every ceo of a major company there are thousands of blue collar jobs affected by his administration's energy policy. if the president doesn't want to be a leader, his silence would be for people trying to reach conclusion. that is a bold statement and exceptionally bold that a democrat made it. what led you to say something so clear. >> i am frustrated and the president gives a speech about oil companies making large profits and he doesn't realize most of the production in the united states does not come from the major companies, it is the small independent companies, some in arkansas and oklahoma and texas and louisiana. we have got a lot of production and 90 some odd percent of the new wells that are drilled in the united states are by small independent firms and he's taking away the subsidies. let me tell you what, the big major oil companies can't take and it is against the law to use depletion. the mom and pop shops, are using incentives to wean ourselves off oil. >> has the

this is important, because a people uninformed about what they are asking the military to endure is ale to fully grasp the scope of the responsibilities our constitution levees upon them >> this is a frequent theme of admiral mullens, there is a growing disconnect between the bulk of the civilian population and the military. i'm trying to figure out if there is any connection between that and between the fact that at the moment our veterans seem so underserved. >> well, i think admiral mullen's comments are, as we say, spot son. that's a concern of all of ours. that's why he, as well as the white house, is leading this dialogue to connect veterans with the local communities. you know, there's always a tendency to try to do that from washington, d.c., but that's really not how it works best. the best solutions to doing this, as admiral mullen has us going out speaking -- i was recently out in seattle, washington, spoke to a town hall at the university of washington where we talked about veterans organizations and the need for the community to reach out. if you ask just one question --

so either donald trump is the most uninformed individual in the western world because he doesn't know how his comments fit that narrative or he knows full well what he's doing and is deliberately pushing the buttons of racial resentment. this narrative has been around a long time and seems like whenever a person of color attains a high position, whether it is pat buchanan or donald trump, rush limbaugh, whoever it is, they question whether it was deserved. they don't give out this at harvard law but pilling names out of the had. you have to earn that. the fact that he inherited millions of dollars from his daddy, they would question anyone on what they have learned with the definition of irony. >> buck davis? >> this first thing we are talking about the influence of money and power donald trump has in the country. he's a leader whether you like him or not. he changes minds. with power comes responsibility. and when you have a fella like donald trump whose questioning grades, it quickly sounds like he's questioning academic ability which quickly jumps to questioning intelligence. when

instead we allowed a small uninformed minority and one publicity star reality tv purveyor to lead uses behind the birther movement political gain, ignorance or something even more sinister, the issue struck some of us as more than a little curious given that it involved a black man whose name does not sound so typically american. questioning this president's birth amounted to a frontal assault on his legitimacy. his character and his very being. it was a few tile attempt to undo his inspiring personal narrative, something as americans we should all celebrate and not denigrate. my friend dr. cornell west puts it this way. we need to respect the president. we need to protect the president. and when necessary we need to correct the president. holding this or any president accountable on important issues is our right and our duty as american citizens. but when we allow falsehoods to trump the truth, real accountability gets lost in the fictional fall. and what has this moment taught us about the notion of civility? i was moved as i'm sure you were to see congresswoman gabby giffords make

on they try to play, this side said this and the other side said that and that's one of the most uninformedountries in the world and it's killing this country. host: we'll leave it there, bill. guest: two apposing sides. one reason why reporters try to point out both sides is their divided too. we have a pretty divided electorate right now and some of that is evidence by the elections we've had. these swing elections and i think it's resulted in a really divided congress and it's just stemming from a country that's philosophically divide. do we spend more or stop spending? that's what we're really at a critical point where congress is being forced to decide how - listening to voters and watching the pole numbers. what do we do? are we to cut spending? people think spending is a little high and that did happen some of it under the obama administration. it's true in some ways everyone is talking about the democrats and spending and not really focusing on the massive amount of spending during the bush years. host: can you recollect on our line for republicans. caller: i want to thank c-span fo

these sound bites and a pie in the sky comments will get people to vote, especially uninformed peoplebut it is not solving our problems. when you get a conservative speaker, they throw things at them, they are terrible to them. the economy is not good. many young people are getting out of school and and they have not been taught the constitution or the founding fathers. the liberal agenda has destroyed our public schools. guest: on the budget and deficit reduction, obama's proposal is reducing our deficit by trillions of dollars. there are spending cuts. he understands this is serious. he also wants to reinvest in head start programs, research, development, education reform. he does not want to put the burden on those most needy. i think there is a difference in value. the democrats want to end tax subsidies to big oil companies and reinvest them in finding alternative energy and getting more people back to work. host: what about the issue of immigration? how is it playing out among the young republicans? guest: there is a healthy debate on the issue. it is an important one. both part

on they try to play, this side said this and the other side said that and that's one of the most uninformedntries in the world and it's killing this country. host: we'll leave it there, bill. guest: two apposing sides. one reason why reporters try to point out both sides is their divided too. we have a pretty divided electorate right now and some of that is evidence by the elections we've had. these swing elections and i think it's resulted in a really divided congress and it's just stemming from a country that's philosophically divide. do we spend more or stop spending? that's what we're really at a critical point where congress is being forced to decide how - listening to voters and watching the pole numbers. what do we do? are we to cut spending? people think spending is a little high and that did happen some of it under the obama administration. it's true in some ways everyone is talking about the democrats and spending and not really focusing on the massive amount of spending during the bush years. host: can you recollect on our line for republicans. caller: i want to thank c-span for

we could afford in this day and age, that somehow we are all, as he put it, kwoet unkwoit, quote uninformedor miseducated or a number of words that i think is an insult to people who are representing constituents trying to save the taxpayer money and at the same time provide the best possible defense, those of us that served in the military and those of us that believe we should carry the biggest stick on the block, believe that what we did a couple of weeks ago by striking the second engine was the right thing to do. and regardless of whether or not this bill advances, the second engine coming back to life or not, remains to be seen, and we shall see. but with regard to mr. andrews' amendment to store and have the proprietor of the second engine fund their own advancement, i have no objection. i yield back. >> any further discussion on the amendment? gentleman from texas, mr. conaway. >> mr. chairman, i, too, support the amendment, also support the issue of competition, which is not competing. i would remind my colleague from florida that the entire house didn't vote for striking the engin

but it's not the sort of pragmatism of the uninformed or uneducated. it is, again, its wisdom. i think this project of encouraging people to look at the way that other countries and other communities think about their options and think about their strategies will promote that kind of ideas among foreign policy analysts here in the u.s. finish and i think what daniel mark key said was -- markey said was absolutely spot on, that he wished when he was in government he had the advantage of this kind of information. it would have provided him a great deal of help in trying to just understand what am i -- who are these people, what are they, what are they thinking as they look at me, and how can i begin to think about how to deal with them effectively? if we're going to do that well, if we're going to produce them well, i think we need to think a little bit about the kinds of studies we're going to produce, the kinds of inquiries that we can carry forward. what does it take to make a kennan? i would say -- and perhaps a slightly improved can kennan. i'll give dean acheson that much c

we could afford in this day and age, that somehow we are all, as he put it, kwoet unkwoit, quote uninformeded or a number of words that i think is an insult to people who are representing constituents trying to save the taxpayer money and at the same time provide the best possible defense, those of us that served in the military and those of us that believe we should carry the biggest stick on the block, believe that what we did a couple of weeks ago by striking the second engine was the right thing to do. and regardless of whether or not this bill advances, the second engine coming back to life or not, remains to be seen, and we shall see. but with regard to mr. andrews' amendment to store and have the proprietor of the second engine fund their own advancement, i have no objection. i yield back. >> any further discussion on the amendment? gentleman from texas, mr. conaway. >> mr. chairman, i, too, support the amendment, also support the issue of competition, which is not competing. i would remind my colleague from florida that the entire house didn't vote for striking the engine. a majorit

i think we can all agree this issue requires thoughtful debate and discussion, not the kind of uninformed rhetoric i quoted earlier from the house debate. by forcing an up-or-down vote through the congressional review act, house leadership short circuited the normal legislative process and ignored the f.c.c.'s work on this issue. the f.c.c. spent months examining this topic and meeting with tons of stakeholders and internet companies that carefully considered and compromised on a range of issues that i frankly wish they hadn't budged on. to claim that the f.c.c. engaged in a power grab is unfair and far, far from the truth. the white house has stated that the president will veto this resolution, but i will be working hard in the coming months to make sure that we have enough votes to stop this before it reaches the president's desk. we are at a pivotal moment. if we don't act to preserve the f.c.c.'s open internet rules, the internet as we know it today may cease to exist. i hope my colleagues will recognize this and will join with me in voting down the house's resolution of disapproval.