buildings are at the lobbies, not on the shared public way so there is access to the buildings and unio union i universal desid drop off-loadings there. we met with the task force including m.t.a. and planning to have a discussion and make the presentation to them to see if they have concerns. they have no problem. they think it is a better design because it is better for pedestrians and bikes. before we go to cab and revise drawings we are here to ask you guys if you have concerns or comments about it or reasons why we shouldn't make this an entirely car-free street. that is it. >> thank you very much, kevin. i'm sure we have some questions here. quickly, i guess the major issue that i will have, i understand the implications of limiting the vehicular access. you have to be some of the issues raised by the city agencies has to do with the drive crop or whatever for the -- dropoff for the handicapped. you indicated the loading. i would love to see that clearly marked maybe another map later on to show some of the shared ways retail activities or something to really see what goes on will be ve

union without any say. second, why would this house legislate her plans, which is already been comprehensive rejected by the europeanly unio? the government wants to align with the european union on its to keep dry. about the same time, was to pursue trade deals which would undermine this process. it's not compatible. the technology they need to continue to pursue that plan simply doesn't exist. it's already been ruled but that eq is the legal and practical and an invitation to fraud. and the government has failed to provide any economic analysis to show this would makeno it better off. why would the house support such a chaotic and desperate approach works he set out a sensible compromise plan, over a year ago. including a comprehensive and permanent customs unions with the eu that gives us a safer it would allow us to strike trade deals as part of the park worlds biggest trading block. while maintaining higher standards. it's credible and achievable. ohe best way to protect industry, manufacturing jobs, something this government indifferent to thes crisis as it shows today. the government must be prepared to step in and

unio. but in so doing. they risk increasing the likelihood of us sending. leavingg the european union with no deal. where does not leave britain then in terms of this is being called brags of spoport of coure it's realllly more -- it's not necessarily including -- that that the scottish question the northern irish question. where will this leave to the u. k. constitutionally i mean are we looking us almost that the certain fragmentation -- of of the united kingdom if if if we do go towards a heart brings it. well. i don't think it's necessarily certain but again it increases the likelihood. if we do have a hard brexit -- with a very severe economic consequences that would entitle. and also rememembering.. that scotlanand and northern ireland. ththey should to remain with any you not to leave. so a heart breaks it undoubtedly increases the prospects of a sesecond independence r referenm in scotland --- and the difficulties associated with the border in non and increase certainly the risk of f tension. possibly a return to the troubleses. which we haven't with a. g. ass in northern ireland. between t