you represented the production center in the gibdebut and the union of cinematographers of russia cooperations in full swing with union graphic artists. it plays a serious role here, because we are moving informally. eh, this process. uh, these work contacts. we really already know each other with our friends and have formed a working group . i consider cinematic cooperation between iran and russia not only within the framework of the two countries. i see it wider. it will have an impact on the international film industry, it is necessary that the filmmakers of the two countries pay attention to three important the components of this creation content is the economy of cinema and it is technology. cinema another important event was the forums russia india iran dedicated to the joint production of animation by the leading animation company in russia with experience in international cooperation talked with foreign colleagues about new opportunities for co-production of children's content. in fact. this is one of the most important topics. the most important directions for the development of our

the leadership of the union of cinematographers wrote a letter to the minister of culture olga borisovnav with a request. at least postpone the screening of this film until better times, they supported us , the head of the presidential administration talked to me. asked what i think, i said what i think, not only that. i said that if the picture comes out, i won't have to talk about it in public, because it's not to be missed today, at least. but the picture came out, why i was told there would be a scandal. what scandal scandal with whom? with a spectator with guy ritchie with whom the scandal with yandex we put on the scales. fear and apprehension of a scandal, what do you see, the picture did not come out on the screens. with that, to put it mildly, bewilderment that may arise among people who are now at the front of their relatives. what outweighs the interests of yandex and compared the question, why do we need the ministry of education of the ministry of culture, if they do not answer? if others decide for them, probably those who know the trick above that the people who are indign

it's not nonsense if the union of cinematographers comes to us with a question. at do we think about this? and we answer what we think, why ask us if nothing means what we think, including the minister of culture, well. i understand that this is a reason to quarrel with me, to be offended by me, but if you don’t talk about it, then they will receive ordinates only for silence. well, that's all did, the chinese, there is biased wisdom, if you sit quietly on the porch of your house, your enemy will bring by beautiful words beautiful fashion, but is it suitable for us, can we sit quietly on the porch of our house and wait until you find the enemy, bring peace, will we not find ourselves in the place of the one whom he asks, past those who want. this imagine that we are in the forty-fifth year. we would stop at the borders of our country, the ussr, what would happen next, even if even with our victory already in the forty-fifth year, churchill offered a terrible the plan is unthinkable to arm the prisoners of war of the surviving germans to throw a nuclear bomb on the

in the union of cinematographers in the summer of 2000, shooting a film together with him, and a leatherer dedicated to the centenary of my film teacher , everyone who worked not next to him gathered. here, many claimed expressed their wishes to act in the film in that. and i said that only those who were with him, who worked in his film crews, who were behind the camera, organized the shooting, who wrote about the film, would only be filming. most importantly, who were the actors? and here is nikolai nikolaevich eremenko talking about curonian, this was just his last shooting. you see, this means the fifty-ninth year and the year 2000 is 40 years old. here is the first shooting until the last by the witnesses whom i was some time after this shooting i met him at the corner of komsomolskaya and karl marx he walked very tired, very tired, barely i was walking so, glukol, what is he talking to you, volodya i feel very bad. i say i feel very bad. and where are you going? here i go, he says to the theater. now i’m saying there, why should kolya, let me tell him now i ’ll take you to a person

was then called a comedy with a sharp mass, then they showed it to the secretariat of the union of cinematographerswhere people gathered who still remembered quite well the beginning of the twenties. sergei yudkevich was there. there there was sergey gerasimov there was a cameraman anatoly glavnya, and they assessed just like that, what it is for gerasimov, the finale was unconvincing, too rounded, but he really liked it. here is this primitivist painting. it turned out that he himself loves such painting, he loves it very much, despite the fact that his films were made very realistic , very correct, very boring, according to some, and someone said that the audience in the film are the ones who watch. doing with the cream , the mass somehow does not react very violently to them somehow, they don’t like it all. such the feeling that our hero is an eye crying out in the desert. well, your final. why do you have a hero dying said anatoly smut? the green one is killing him, but this is a work of art, so it means something , it means, in principle, such generalizations treat artists like that, which, uh

and why are you silent, we were not silent. the leadership of the union of cinematographers wrote a letterostpone this film for now, yes, better times supported us the head of the presidential administration spoke to me. asked what i think, i said what i think, not only that. i said that if the picture comes out, i won't have to talk about it in the interview, not because it can't be missed today, at least. well the picture came out, why i was told there would be a scandal. what scandal scandal with whom? with a spectator with guy ritchie with whom the scandal with yandex probably, but if we put fear on the scales. and fears of a scandal that you see, the picture did not come out on the screens. with that bewilderment to say the least, which can occur in people who are now at the front and their relatives. what outweighs? interests of yandex and compared the question. and why do we need the ministry of education of the ministry of culture, if others decide for them, probably those who are higher, but the trick is that the people who are indignant and indignant. he will turn his indignation

well the film was watched, it's not nonsense it's not nonsense if we are addressed to the union of cinematographersestion. what do we think about this? and we answer what we think, why ask us if nothing means what we think, including the minister of culture, well. i understand that this is a reason to quarrel with me, to be offended by me, but if you don’t talk about it, then they will receive ordinates only for silence. in general, he did everything, the chinese. there is, wonderful wisdom, if you sit quietly on the porch of your enemy's house will bring past the beautiful words beautiful fashion. well, is it right for us? can we sit quietly on the porch of our house and wait until the enemy is found and the world is carried away, will we not be in the place of the one who is carried past by those who want to. it imagine that we are in the forty -fifth year. would stop. on the borders of our country, the ussr, what would happen next? even if, even with our victory, already in the forty-fifth year , churchill proposed a terrible plan, the unthinkable to arm the prisoners of war of the surviving ger