the european union will be collecting, enough forces in the european union to want its own defense. if we wanted with that be a good thing and how do we get them to focus on nato rather than dealing with this unwelcome distraction and constant pushing for a european union defense plan? >> i think you have a very crucial point which i'm happy to respond to. the united kingdom has -- we are not alone greater number of others of individual countries that give priority to nato. >> the danes who were prepared to abstain

they supported the union. however, few of them did it like dolores, who simply put that at the head of her responsibilities. she provided, essentially, another model of what a woman could be and do and be a model of public presence and social and political involvement, simply through her presence as a leader in the efforts of the union. here, we have some of the material culture of the farmworker's union. a flier, that was one of the fliers used in pickets to make urban consumers aware of the conditions in which the farmer worked. here you can see a child in the great fields. and another one in what seems like the entrance of a very poor house. whole families were suffering under the exploitative conditions in which farmworkers worked. you also have a number of pins in different languages, stating different important messages of the union, from "viva la causa," the cause was the cause. two pins that were circulated in canada and france, one that says, n'achetez paz -- it became an international boycott. table

if however we are one of the leading three countries in the european union, with european union comes to formulate its negotiating position it is much more likely to reflect the views of germany, britain and france, with the otherwise do. so it's about negotiations. i'm been involved in negotiations during my time in for an office. i know the extent to which the u.k., france and germany, they have very strong interest which in our case could be funded cared far more weight, sadly perhaps it's unfair the views of individual countries, portugal, slovenia and so forth. may be unfair but that is the reality of any international negotiations. if we can be part of such a large, adopting a mandate agreed with our position that puts us in a stronger position. >> you said the most important objective for the negotiation of the united kingdom should be a binding guarantee that no proposal, should further social justice would apply without our two cents. do you you think that's been achieved? >> any time by the lsc speech that was for five years ago. it would not apply to the united kingdom. >>

union without a political union. if you don't want to go to a political union and you were a bit evasive about that, mario, if you don't want a political union, then abandon the monetary union. francine: we are just running out of time. one more comment from carolyn fairbairn, and everyone can submit questions through the app that we talked about the four. also, this is the right time to vote in the poll. i will be taking questions from the floor. carolyn: i just want to raise a point that hasn't been raised yet, the importance of inward investment into the u.k. the u.k. is doing well in the european union at the moment. g7is probably in the top two countries. one of the reasons is we attract foreign investment to this country. 70% of them give membership of the european union has one of the main reasons they are here. that that would not be affected by leaving the european union is not something that is supported by multinational investors. in terms of jobs, growth, our future prosperity. francine: i need to go to q

they support the union. it's an obvious effort at bipartisan support to say regardless of party, if you stand for what we stand for you need to be with us. what do they stand for? according to their label, the union. i think they would try to argue emphasizing national union, we are not backtracking. we're perpetuating the embracement of emancipation, preserving the union. anything else that you see here? may not be able to read it enough. i have in mind the vice presidential nomination. you, and i want, who lincoln's vice president was, in his first term, you might not immediately know to answer hannibal hamlin. ofthe convention in june 1864 the republicans calling themselves national unionist kick out there vice presidential person on the ticket. hannibal hamlin had been an anti-slavery politician from new england. 1860 republicans and wanted to balance the ticket putting a prominent new englander with a prominent midwesterner. hamlin had done his job. his reputation was too strongly anti-slavery. 1864, as

they are going to use the label national union. national union. national union nominations here. let's start there. before we move to anything else talk to me about that. talk to me about that. talk to me about that strategy and what it seems to be suggesting. samantha? samantha: it is interesting. emancipation demonstrated a shift in focus. emancipation of slaves, they are returning to their initial focus, more popular. focused on keeping the union together. prof. mckenzie: what might look even as a backtracking in the announcement of the emancipation policy, a clear redefinition of republican war aims. now this seems to be returning to the earlier focus. anyone else have thoughts about that? they areseems like trying to attract northern democrats who are probably on the fence about whether they want to support the party. because they were not originally supporting the party. but they support the union. prof. mckenzie: it's an obvious effort at bipartisan support to say regardless of party, if you stand for what we stand for you need to be with us. now what do they stand for? ac

union? >> in 2003, i traveled extensively amongst succession states, so extensively, i would make myself notes like tuesday, latvia, to remember which country i was in. and what was quite interesting was in the run-up the year before, which would decide on the expansion of nato where poll land was already a partner and the expansion of the eu, talking to the astonians and latvians, nato was infinitely more important than the membership of the eu. and i think there's this continued confusion which was explained on the subject of poland. there are quite a few countries did not fully appreciate to begin with the depth of the political integration because they thought this was a membership organization. now let's talk why do nato member states, why do big businesses want us to stay in? they like big things. in nato, you don't actually make a constitutional differentiation between bilateral relationships and eu relationships. you just like big units. where you just have to make one phone call. bu

you also have the pin of the union with arabic script. it says, "vote for the union." and you have another one that says, "viva la mujer," with a symbol for women. something i found interesting with these pins is they speak to the reach of the boycott, to the international and multicultural reach of the boycott, and its composition as well. the pin with the arabic message really speaks about the yemeni workers who were part of the movement. this is a movement that has often been referred to as a mainly mexican and mexican-american movement, however, it was broader than that. filipinos were extremely important to the movement. but also, there were african-american workers, there were white workers, there were puerto rican workers, yemeni workers. this series of pins speaks to that multicultural reach and the international reach as well with the accurate and with -- with the effort and the whole message of this being a moral cause. this is a bit of a conclusion where wehe exhibition, see dolores huerta living a life of community organizing. dolores has been arrested two

national cemeteries exclusively for loyal union soldiers. you can see a memorial day observance in ohio. they did so through the creation of veterans organizations including the grand army of the republic. here is another group from st. mary's, west virginia. richmond, the camp of confederate veterans were no less dedicated to creating and protecting their memory of the lost cause. this is an image from gettysburg where veterans had gathered to make this the union memorial park. after -- african-americans for their part, another picture from richmond, celebrated emancipation day. for the most part, confederates the lost cause and african-americans along with their abolitionist allies the emancipation cause. despite the fact that there were very distinct memories of the war and concerted efforts on the part of all of these groups to protect what they saw as the truth of the war, despite this, 1890's, there and was a culture of reconciliation. americans were celebrating that they had come back together. they created the first national military

union? my final point. we can get carried away sometimes. remember only ally was china, said to his people we are very important people albania, together with china we represent a quarter of the world. now, let's not make the same mistake of saying that with our 65 million in a world of 7 billion that somehow we are not strengthened by being part of the european union when it comes to foreign policy and the costs and benefits of leading that union. thank you. >> thank you very much. can i invite you to speak? >> thank you very much. i think it is important to say that i was born in west germany. i know these things are perfectly possible, but i know what it requires for it to work. i spent two years as a health minister, i spent 15 months trying to negotiate a european constitution. on behalf of this committee, by the way, when the constitutional convention was formed, it was this committee which sent representatives. and it was our duty to bring the european union closer to its people. i th

european union, getting out of the european union. so that it is your perspective on this, i understand, but i don't see where you find constantly this majority of voters you are referring to. i think -- i don't think that's real. my third point because you haven't addressed this, both dalibor and jeremy rabkin addressed the question of totalitarianism. words matter. i don't think it's a detail bus it's the title of your book. i will probably be more blunt than our two speakers on this. usually, totalitarianism is a word that's used to define two political projects of the 20th century, nazi germany and the soviet union. very straightforward, do you believe the european union is the heir to hitler and joseph stalin? >> you have quite a bit to chew on. >> yeah. first of all, the iraq war. well, first of all, actually, we could just make assertions against each other, keep doing assertions all day but i just want to tell you that no one who understands how the eu actually works foreign policy-wise can possibly say that the eu high repres

by the end of the war, at least 186,000 had shouldered arms for the union, comprising 10% of the union army's strength. thousands more served in the navy from the beginning of the war, so there was no resistance to them being used in the navy. but there rank was at the level of "boy." that did not seem to offend anyone. lincoln had come to believe black soldiers were crucial to winning the war and saving the unit was evident in a letter he wrote to general grant after the vicksburg campaign. mostding to general thomas' recent effort to raise troops in the mississippi valley, lincoln encouraged grant to do the same. it --eve, he wrote, meaning black soldiers -- is a resource if vigorously applied now will soon close this contest. while friends and adversaries criticized his emancipation policies, when they criticized his emancipation policies, lincoln pointed to the indispensable services these black men rendered in defense of the union. on one of those occasions, he penned a letter to his good friend james conklin which he attended to be read in the assemblage of fellow republicans in

and the union union is not entirely without it here. we have seen examples following the united states of america and we have seen support going toll extreme islamic groups and also to isis. the union countries must not -- we have a historic obligation to refrain from getting in and iving in to an anti-islamic -- will rm we cannot simply accept this -- these attacks being used as a guise for imposing draconian measures that will restrict and curtail peoples' freedoms. the most effective way of going against the dark forces of terrorism is waging war on injustice and inequality and and aggression, which provides to tourism. . . i believe that recent events have shown the bankruptcy of our policies, both within and beyond. and combating terrorism is not going to be done by simply introducing bold measures, it's making sure that we can clear the bases for social growth and unemployment, that's the best way. thank you very much. next for the greens, mr. lambert. >> thank you, president. colleagues, we cannot help but be disgusted to see the

unionists the union cause.nd african-americans along with their abolitionist allies the emancipationist cause. despite the fact there were these very distinct memories of the war and very concerted efforts to protect what they saw as the truth of the war, despite this, by the 1880s and 1890s there was a culture of reconciliation. americans were celebrating the fact that they had come back together. the creation of the first military park authorized by congress in 1890 and dedicated in 1895. this is proof that the nation has come back together. here we had union and confederate soldiers united to dedicate a national military park. a popular play, musicals at the time, celebrating the reunion of the nation, even political campaigns. the populist campaign celebrated reconciliation. in all of these efforts, there was a focus on the bravery and valor of the american soldier, not the union soldier or confederate soldier, but the american soldier. and often, but not always this culture of reconciliation tried to stay

this is a union coalition aimed at preserving the union. that canig tent accommodate a lot of views on the issue of slavery. just a few more images. put is a campaign banner out by courier in dives. and ives. the slogan says "liberty, union, and victory." those are broad, vague term. -- terms. the platform of the national union party has about 11 or 12 points. sayfirst one is going to this is paramount. of every highest duty american citizen to maintain against all their enemies the integrity of the union and the paramount authority of the constitution of the united states. to go on through this particular plank in the platform. they talk about crawling the rebellion, bringing traders -- traitors to justice. they are all about preserving the union. is this very long sentence. -- it is a very long sentence. "layinglution says, aside all differences of political opinion, we pledge ourselves to this." it is a fiction largely. the strategy here is the say this is not the old republican party. this is a new movement. a new bipartisan coalition t

this is the national union cemetery in florence, south carolina. like florence and in other national cemeteries throughout the south, for years after the war, the primary people who had showed up for memorial day had been african-americans. they had been the ones to show up and place flowers and other markers on union graves. but in 1899, memorial day in 1899, white leaders of south carolina's gar post observed that the african-americans who so long participated in the day had failed to decorate the graves of florence. so in the name of reconciliation, white gar members called for the formation of a florence blue and gray association. this is directly responding. their founding documents say they're responding to mckinley's call for a joint nation. their goal was to sponsor memorial days and decorate the graves of both union and confederate soldiers in the area. but perhaps most significantly the group elected to bar african-americans from the days observances. again, this is in the south. i want to make it clear, as doug pointed out earlier, there

union?epresent a quarter of the world. now let's not make the same mistake, that somehow we are not strengthened by being part of the european union. thank you. >> thank you very much. can i invite you to speak? >> thank you very much. i think it is important to say that i was born in west germany. i know these things are perfectly possible, but i know what it requires for it to work. i spent two years as a health minister, i spent 15 months trying to negotiate a european constitution. on behalf of this committee, by the way, when the constitutional convention was formed, it was this committee which sent representatives. and it was our duty to bring the european union closer to its people. i think it literally was in july of 2003 when after all attempts i reached the conclusion that this institution did not wish to be democratically accountable. that it was incapable of changing. and looking back now, i think the trajectory of where the united kingdom peeled off in some ways, started off wit

union is not only about europe. the vision of the eu, the supranationalist approach, is a model for a new way to model the world. the super nationalism is a new governance, putting the super national governance in practice on a global scale to realize by overcoming the unlimited sovereignty of nations, which the eu believes is the root of war. here is a model for global governance, the eu has real credibility. it is e only functioning model of how a global governance might work. what is global governance? both definitions are technocratic without getting to the heart of the matter. here is how i would define global governance. the attempt to introduce a global rule of law and interest of achieving an unprecedented degree of world peace and prosperity -- not via one government, but by the development of a network of international institutions that administer an ever greater body of international law, to which nationstates are subject. states in nation their foreign-policy and substantial areas of domestic policy. the

union, getting out of the european union. so that it is your perspective on this, i understand, but i don't see where you find constantly this majority of voters that you're referring to. i think it's, i don't think that's real. my third point because you haven't addressed this. both dalibor and jeremy addressed this brilliantly, totalitarianism. i think words matter. the title of your book, the new totalitarian temptation. i will probably be more blunt than our two speakers. totalitarianism used to define the 20th century, nazi germany and soviet union. simply do you believe the european union is the heir to stalin and -- >> first to the iraq war, we could make, assertions against each other, you know, keep doing assertions all day but i just want to tell you that, no one who understands how the e.u. actually works, foreign policywise can possible say that the e.u. high representative, even before there was officially a high representative under the lisbon treaty does not have power. javier solano, beef the lisbon treaty had

we think of unions differently than unions were there. question, the courts were aware of union agitation. and safetylth reason, but adequate, like the rest of the bill, we might suspect other motives responsible for the passage of it. actuallyle, this was prounion as opposed to management legislation. and the courts said the legislatures and supposed to put their self on the side of one or the other, which is what paul was saying was going on in terms of the police power. ms. swain: there is beginning to be a revisiting of lautner especially among libertarians. about senatoris rand paul. [video clip] senator paul: the right to contract as part of your due process. someone can't deprive you of determining how long your working hours are without due process. so president obama is a big opponent to this year and but i would ask him come among the other things i am asking him today, to rethink the lochner case. the case in lochner is whether a majority rule, a state legislature can take away your due process. your due process to contract. ca

union or getting out of the european union. i understand your perspective, but i don't see where you find this constant majority of voters you are referring to. my third point, you have not addressed this, the question of totalitarianism. i think words matter. it is the title of your book "the new totalitarian temptation." usually, it is used to define nazi germany and the soviet union. do you believe the european union is the heir to adolf hitler and josef stalin? >> you have a lot to chew on. >> first of all, the iraq war -- we could make assertions against each other, keep doing assertions all day. i just want to tell you that no one who understands how the eu actually works foreign policy wise can possibly say that if the high representative does not have power -- before the treaty, they had high representative power. i was not focusing on the eu there come i was focusing on the ideology of global governance. how it has hindered the war on terrorism. arguing by saying the big conflict was about the idea of whether preventiv

the european uni union.er means 2/3 are not, therefore will continue in the same direction. they're not seeing

the soviet union attended to keep u.s.orces that they by establishing to defense lines to control this blue wall right here. and the outer defensive line, operating to defense lines like here and here the first and the second island chain to deny u.s. access. but then, the soviet economy collapsed. including, the u.s. and japan. today, the u.s. and japanese economy might go broke as a result of that. the soviet union was a superpower, capable of a raging a global nuclear war. it is a long way for china to become a similarly capable superpower, involving conventional and nuclear. most of all, while the united states and soviet union were in the cold war, the united states and china, are not. based on a good understanding of those of those similarities and differences, we can learn lessons from the cold war experience and find a way to maintain peace and security in the asian pacific region today, while shaping mutually beneficial relationships among the west, japan, and china. in the following one plus hours, we will discus

trumark go union go credit union, trumark financial. bimbo proud baker of arnold's whole grain bread. by independence blue cross, learn more at ibx.com. >>> two to nothing is the final score in this one fill union get victory on goals by chris pontius and cj sapong first in the first half. to learn more learn more at ibx.com. >> here's a look a at the play, le toux, played the ball in, and find sapong right away but bar need a find pontius, square him up, and keeps it alive, gets his head up, perfect goal to pontius for early one to nothing lead but fantastic call by le toux, great job by barnetta to find pontius. >> team in the post game especially pontius and jim curtin, said it before they didn't feel like they played one of their better games but come away with the win. that is something they could not have done last year f they didn't play their best last year they didn't win. >> good teams can getaway with that. it tells you union are progressing from where they have been in the past three consecutive home wins. didn't get possess

the union won't even notice you. betty passes along, waves to the sentries and they say what a pretty girl. they let her go by. she goes to beauregard's headquarters, lets down her luxurious hair and produces this note that rose had put in, and therein contained very important information for the first battle of the bull run, which aided the confederates in that surprising victory. so after this, you can imagine -- i should say that the detective pinkerton is on the case, gets on rose, and she becomes public enemy number one for the union. denise: you mentioned pinkerton. one of the things that's interesting is do you have all of these other characters and elements from that moment in history that enter into the story. pinkerton is one. what are some others? karen: pinkerton was a main one. i was surprised by his involvement. here is somebody who was contracted by the union army to do secret service work, and has as big an ego as anybody. here was somebody just as interested in advancing his own personality and his o

negotiations the soviet union in many ways saved his presidency. >> mr.seen much of america, but he certainly made sure a lot of americans saw him. motorcades don't often turn heads in a city. when they stop on a dime, so does everyone else. >> i want to say hello to you. >> that was very special. he didn't have to do it. he did it. i am surprised and pleased. >> the guy is a pr genius. jumping out of the car like that. unbelievable. >> congressional leaders say they gave president reagan a round of applause on the morning after the summit meeting, but there was caution against euphoria. >> everybody applauded when the president came in. >> the president said gorbachev is a different leader, he no longer wants world domination. do you agree? >> it is one thing to sign the imf agreement, something else to follow through on other areas. i still don't trust him. pet moments are beautiful, unless you have allergies. then your eyes may see it differently. flonase is the first and only nasal spray approved to relieve both itchy, watery eyes and congestion. no o

. >> well, yes, but not a national union, right? not throughout the united states of america. so we don't have a union in the midwest or in the south or... you know, it's only at this point in time only in california for the united farm workers. but there are other organizations, like there's picun up in oregon, there's the farm workers down in miami, there's another group, i think, in new york city. and so... and floc in the midwest, in ohio. so there are, you know, separate groups. but i think about all of these organizations, and probably the one that had the strongest contracts, the strongest benefits for farm workers are the united farm workers. >> hinojosa: most people know the united farm workers. most people know cesar chavez. and one of the things that you and i were talking about before we started was that you actually think it's important to talk about your relationship with cesar chavez, to talk about what we as americans can learn about the experience of organizing and creating a labor movement. so what are the lessons

to leave the european union. mps may describe themselves as eurosceptic to some degree, almost half of light to leave the year. >> what about labour party? they have been quieter on european issue. >> labour party still has eurosceptics and some are those people are very vocal. as a whole, the parties position is that it once the u.k. to stay in the european union. you are right, we have not seen much of an effort by the labour party to capitalize upon the debate that is going on within the conservative ranks, and is not an issue that labor has really pushed in parliament. outside parliament, there people ,nvolved in referendum campaign but inside parliament, not seen many challenges to the government over conservative split on europe which we have seen emerging last few weeks. george osborne counted as tactician and political chancellor. how is it all going so wrong for him? >> they say he is a great strategist and he can think ahead, one of the things that his critics say is that sometimes has a bit of a -- and

maybe these people will become members of unions even though they are not a union shop.le, her union mentorship is way down. so it is sort of a question of, can she save the union? david: a preacher i was working mr. subway stop. give me an example of what you could get him to do if you wanted him to hack the election you are in. what could you get him to do? allen: it was kind of like ordering cable tv. get the premium package or the burglar package. you can get e-mail sent. you could get rudimentary packing. if you wanted to pay $20,000 a month, you got all of that bus the encryption and more advanced hacking. you could pick your package. david: we all talking about the united states presidential election. does he think the election is being hacked? ellen: he is absolutely sure the election is being asked. if you listen to him,

union had chances. they had one earlier in the second, first off the foot of le toux he couldn't convert. leads like this against quality opponents will come back to haunt you. >>> defensive players of the game. barn warn -- barnetta was very good creating good service getting people involved a great first touch putting through to sapong. his coming into form will be key. this ball is world class this is the ball that led to the corner kick that led to their first goal. he is so important to the team and getting him 90 minutes fit will be integral. >>> barnetta our defensive player of the game who is your pick? >>> richie marquez, he has been solid. he is the veteran leader out there in the middle, but he wins balls in the air, he is matched up against their top players, richie had another solid game. >>> the negative they don't get all three points at home, but what do you take from a positive standpoint. >>> you're getting guys who are fit. raymon gaddis, joshua yaro progressing. the product on the fi

the national union party had numerous advantages. the united states army dwarfed any previous manifestation of any power, patronage and communication. with more than half a million voting men gathered in the army, the party and power fused the purposes of the nation with the purposes of the party. soldiers received a steady stream of pamphlets harper's weekly, paid for by supporters of the party but distributed through the national post office. victories on the battlefield and victories for the nation became victories for the party. the democrated hated this. they sneered at the new party the union party convention was no convention at all. rather a coronation of king abraham. the democrats characterized lincoln -- this may be useful to remember in this election season that this is what people said about abraham lincoln -- he is totally unfet for the position he holds he is weak, incapable. a time server without either wise kpre hence of the present or segacious forecast of the future. lincoln's future seemed clear. through his misma

it isn't a union run by communists, it is a union run by polish patriots. it is a tremendous threat to the ussr. >> spent part of the weekend, reinforcing the link between the workers and the catholic church. >> it is impossible to understand solidarity, without understanding the impact of john paul ii. >> the soviets are -- he is anticommunist. the pressures are forcing the polish government figuring out to to keep control. >> for the polish strikers, it was a day worthy of hyperbow hyperbowhyperbowl -- our showing that you can have an independent union in a communist country. and the question was, how independent were they going to be allowed to be. >> regan has spent his career blasting the soviet union, and leading policy of trying to ease relations with the soviets. would he -- what he disliked about it, they were hitting the negotiating team as equals. regan thought, there are two super powers, democracy is inheritantly good, and soviestism is inherrently bad. >> the only thing they recognize, meaning rereserve under the right to commit any crime, lie

i am here for the sake of the union. >> i regard the union as the greatest blessing upon a free people douglas, the take-home message is clear. >> the south has already launched itself to create something entirely new in the new world, a slave empire. >> the very idea of america is at risk. 81% of the electorate come out to vote. one of the highest turnouts in united states' election history. >> the stakes were so high because it might have been the last election for a united states of america. >> lincoln is waiting on the telegraph to tell them just what the vote count is. >> look, you have to be nervous because you have a brand-new party. it has never won the presidency. you're only its second candidate. you are up against very powerful forces on the other side. >> and it's not just superstition. you realize that something funky could happen. elections have the capacity to surprise us enormously. >> there's only one result lincoln needs to know. has he won new york? >> message for mr. lincoln. >> he is not taking anything for granted. >> gentlemen, we've taken new jersey, indiana and

, unions.plause] unions, labor. now, i am a proud member of three unions. that is where i got my health insurance for most of my adult life. don't know about you, but i am sick and tired of watching governor,s, like your [laughter] unions into a dirty word. it is not just him. that,icans want to do take scott walker's assault on organized labor, his war on working people, and spread it to every state in the country. and it is up to democrats to stop him. [applause] and it is up to us to say that a hard days work should earn you a decent days hey, and that a lifetime of work should earn you a secure and comfortable retirement. [applause] and it is up to us, up to us to brokeat no one should go just because they get sick. [applause] one, no one, should get sicker just because they can't afford to see a doctor. [applause] it is up to us, it is up to us to see that every child in america is able to go to a great public school, and that every family, every family should be able to put a kid through

to stay in the union.ou're right, we have not seen much of an effort by the labour party to capitalize upon the debate is going on within the conservative ranks and it is not an issue that the labour party has really pushed in harlem it. -- parliament. inside parliament we have seen the conservative split on europe over the last few weeks. alwaysge osborne is touted as a tactician, how has it gone wrong for him? >> one of the things that his supporters say is that he is a great strategist and can think ahead. his critics say that sometimes he does not always understand how things will go down in the country. things that look clever on paper, sometimes do not go down well with the media and the wider public. he favors the caravan tax, and other problems he has had. now, with the latest budget, what he hoped we would all be talking about, the sugar tax, instead it turned into a big row about to the welfare budget. in the most damaging thing was the fact that many of his critics were not on the opposition, bu

what you had at that time, you had a soviet union with 30 thousand something weapons. you had a russia then left with somewhere around 1.4 million kilograms of fissile materials. the stuff you can make the bombs out of. that means plutonium and highly enriched uranium. just to remind you, that nagasaki, the plutonium bomb, 6.2 kilograms of plutonium blew up a city. that's this much. that's it. hiroshima was highly enriched uranium. it was more. today, about 25 kilograms, so smaller than a soccer ball. and we're talking about 1.4 million kilograms in hundreds of facilities and buildings, and this is not ft. knox stuff. and actually one of the things that really bothers me about the nuclear security summit, there's too much of this talk of lock up. why don't we just lock up -- you can't lock up these materials. you dissolve them in acid, there's waste, you work with them, either in nuclear power or in nuclear weapons. so the problem is, there was all this. so we talk about concern about loose nukes. and of course nunn lugar was really essential. the second one was loose

they left quite a few union men at the altar. altar.lted them at the i wanted to find a way to fit them in but there wasn't enough for a nonfiction count. and some interesting mail spies. women were dealing with cross-dressing. there was a fellow, benjamin stringfellow, a confederate spy for jeb stuart. he was 94 pounds, delicate features, blonde hair and according to a comrade he had a waste that was as wispy as a woman. he would put on an elaborate down and called himself sally and go to military balls. he would just say what his general grant up to these days? there were devious people on both sides of both genders. mma was my favorite. do you have a favorite? karen: i like them all for different reasons. belle was comic relief. ise is somebody who attending she is a man. she's on the front lines, in the bloodiest battles. she has an excruciating personal story. she falls in love with a fellow union soldier and has to make the choice, do i suffer in silence. i am.i tell him what denise: they were very close. just, i really app

it's thought they were a boat or several boats attempting to reach the european union. german muslim leaders have drawn an angry parallel between one of the country's nationalist parties and hitler's nazis. the backlash has been sparked by calls from the alternative for germany party to ban minarets and burqas, warning that islam is incompatible with the german constitution. berlin has refused to get involved with the debate. here's more. >> if the a.f.d. had its way, the construction of minarets would be banned, so would the wearing of the full-face veil but a spokeswoman for the party insists the a.f.d. calls for religious freedom, including for muslims. however, she was quoted in a newspaper saying "islam is not combatable with the -- compatible with the german constitution." she has backing with her deputy. >> we have a clear separation of religion and state. islam rejects this separation and i think it's incompatible with our constitution. reporter: it's not clear to what extent the a.f.d. would restrict the practice of islam in germany but such statements do not s

the union rack -- the union realized the critical importance a chattanooga, and also defensive area, protecting against the confederate invasion into the heart of the northern mid-land, into the midwest. union brought in grant, said we want you to take care of this, we want you to save the army that is trapped there and ruin the confederates that live in that area. around two entire course, 20,000 troops went by rail to the virginia theater, to the midwest all the way down to alabama and then into chattanooga. sherman was marched from the mississippi valley all the way across the length of tennessee. while the union is building its forces in chattanooga to 75 to 80,000 troops, lee's wonderful suggestion has resulted in the content -- in the confederates were spreadederates thin. you have the article breakthrough. the confederates have no reserve. there line starts being rolled up from the middle, and the entire army leads back into georgia, setting the stage for sherman's atlanta campaign of the next year. this is a good example of the kinds of impact that lee had on other theaters o

would retaliate in kind against union soldiers. you couldn't hold african-american soldiers as prisoners. that wasn't policy. and you couldn't re-enslave them because that was policy. so the best solution was just to not have any prisoners. and that is one of the reasons why you get the massacres, the most famous one is at fort pillow, but there are other ones too. i'll say something else, too, about these episodes between confederate troops and u.s. colored troops. most atrocities take the form of -- william callie's platoon carried out the massacre under orders from captain ernest medina. what's interesting about the way confederate soldiers treated u.s. colored troops is they slaughtered u.s. colored troops without any goading from higher authority. they did it spontaneously. to me, someone who is an historian of these kinds of things, it's striking to me that that was, in fact, the case. >> were there any episodes of u.s. colors troops encountering native americans in native american warfare? >> that's not something that i expl

as discussions over the referendum over whether or not great britain should remainin the european union . barack obama has weighed in on the case for why he believes why they should remain in the eu. the two have been discussing that today and michelle obama, the first lady had lunch with green to celebrate her 90th birthday and then, prime minister david cameron and the president meeting to discuss a joint effort in the fight against terrorism and isis. we are told that he is on his way to 10 downing street. it should be arriving any moment. we're expecting that news conference and they are going to buy the way waiting, the beginning of this news conference. a lot of the world curious to hear. they will have opening they will have opening statements and question and answer sessions. we are going to listen to president obama and david cameron. >> president obama on his fifth visit to the united kingdom, has been president for seven years. i have been president for six years and are two countries have worked together through the most difficult and troubled global times. we need to revive

states combined with a war between severed portions of the union.t seems to me that it's result must be slavery from this whole continent and calamitous and decimating is this course of events as this progress must be, so glorious would be a final issue that as god shall judge me i dare not say it can be denied. that was adams in 1820 and not speaking to anybody else, and indeed the remainder of his tenure as secretary of state, he said nothing in his diary, a non-issue for him, it obviously remained inside him but was not the focus of his career. after he was beaten for reelection in 1828 and returned home he went back to congress in 1831. he was the first president to return to congress and remains to this day the only president who served in the house of representatives after the presidency. by now, anti-slavery movement had begun in the united states. by 1835 activists have begun sympathetic congressman calling for end to the slave trade, and the district of columbia. the federal government had jurisdiction. they started to call for the gag orde

guest: the european union to most germans is more than just a union of states that work together, especially economically. the political union and a project of europe flying -- of unifying europe in peace is very important. we just have to see that germany about 70 years ago was in ruins. it lost the second world war and most other countries were very hostile against germany and the project of unifying europe put germany back on the map again. this is like one of the center pillars of german success, at least the germans feel so and the british leading europe, this would be a severe low against this project and this is what germans fear the most. brent: what about 53% saying there would be no difference to europe's economy if britain did leave? that is quite an indictment that says germans don't think britain is a big player in the eu economy. guest: perhaps germans don't feel the britons are a major economic player within the european union, but as i tried to point out already, germans think britons are very decisive for the cultural way of how europe is working and that is why germans want