to the united states are larger than the united states i mean trying to cripple one of the biggest economies in the world with an upward trajectory is a tall order i think you need more than just tariffs if you want to cripple economy i think you know what i'm getting at go ahead fred i think james have the right in terms of some of the i think will be president trump and you know his close associates trying to start this confrontation with another country which is china however you know all of the things between united's and china affects the whole world in terms of trade as well so you know they can try. even while we goes bankrupt it will leave $100.00 over 180000 very capable employees and they will start up tents of companies like the hallway and will be competing again so busy i think you know we have to realize ringback that this one is a very very complicated war it's not a very simple one just situation ok james i mean we're looking at western press reports see china walked away from the deal but if you look at the details of the deal that there was being proposed by the trumpet min

unit. during construction for 12 months, the tenants will need to park on the street and this is a temporary interruption of services by rent section 37.2r and administrative code, chapter 65a. the tenants will receive parking by law. these payments are based on the amount they pay for the spaces, if it's specified in the lease or if not, they can obtain other parking or other storage. if they don't think they're getting the right amount, administrative code section 65a.5, rent ordinance 37.8 set out a petitioning process at the rent board and that is the proper form for this. and as kent mentioned, the work is sequenced together with the soft story seismic retrofit so the construction timeline is minimized and there's as little inconvenience to the tenants as possible. all of this is done by the book. the appellant will get parking back at the end and compensation payments in the meantime. so what other argument does she raise? well, she says that the accessory dwelling units will change t

see provides a united front in the face of radiant aggression but just how united is the g.c.c. which you say it is the u.s. worries in any way that this united front will not submerge. well i think that the u.s. would like to see the united front the merge but for some of the reasons that your distinguished previous speaker husham had made with respect to this it may be a hard and very serious and perhaps longer term struggle to bring it back i think there is no question at all that it would like to be back but not in invidious terms not in terms of the numerous requirements that have middle levied on it in the past that required almost that it capitulate on every in every area and so we'll see whether in fact arab diplomacy can bring that about at the moment the g.c.c. is not just due to issue knighted with respect to caught her both kuwait and oman have behalf some serious reservations about how much this facing down if iran will move in how much it will move into the potential for conflict we know that the saudi foreign minister had made a number of statements this week abou

it brings back the issue of how would you like to have a united front when you are not united as far as your concerns concerned as members of the g.c.c. i have to say that the kuwaiti emir has been trying very hard over the last few. months to narrow those differences between the rocketing countries the americans have tried in the past but failed to narrow those differences because particularly . the saudis have been insisting that qatar must meet a list of demands we remember our viewers which include shutting down a turkish military base. closing down all just the lowering diplomatic ties with iran and. the al jazeera channel some of those. some of those demands were widely ridiculed by the international community as completely out of touch with. with reality and also rebuked by many leaders all over the world. ok and where let's listen in because we are starting to hear the speeches and this is king someone who is. giving a speech welcome you in your 2nd home kingdom of saudi arabia. and thank you for. accepting the invitation to come to the emergency meeting in nefesh of the chal

in the united states. we have some interesting trade deals going on. i'm sure you haven't read too much about it with others. last year for the first time in a decade, the united states was ranked the most competitive economy anywhere in the world. during that year, our economy grew at 3%. if the fed didn't raise interest rates, frankly, it would have been much higher than 3%. and the stock market as high as it's been would have been at least probably anywhere from 7,000 to 10,000 points higher. but they wanted to raise interest rates. you'll explain that to me. according to the world economic forum, our financial system and business dynamics and labor market all ranked number one, anywhere in the world. manufacturing and small business optimism have set all-time records and consumer confidence has just surged to a 21-year high. so, they do studies, they do polls, and we're literally at the top of every study and every poll, so that's good. the optimism is what it's all about, when you think about it. we s

burglary unit. i have a presentation here where i'm going to cover the crime statistics that were asked for. and i'll begin the power point now. it's not high enough. okay, so before we get into the different types of crimes, i wanted to give a brief description of the crime categories so we all understand what each -- the terms that are being used mean. i have here on the power point residential robbery. that is the taking of property by force or fear inside someone's home. and it's personal crime, because the victim is present and the property was under their control at the time it was taken. residential burglary is the unlawful entry into a room, house, apartment, any domicile where someone may live with the intent to commit a grand or petty larceny or to commit any other felony. so the next term down there is a hot prowl. this term isuationed quite a bit. a hot prowl is when a residential burglary occurs and any person from that residence is home. if anyone is in the building, it's a hot prowl.

and the markets react to have the latest on an escalating trade war with the united states. and the u.n. calls to end so all financial relations with me in moscow. hello there we're still seeing new york showers across parts of the middle east look at the satellite picture we can see this area of cloud hit doesn't look too impressive but it's given a few showers over parts of iran and that will be gradually drifting its way eastwards as we head through the next few days say for some of us in afghanistan those are the rain he will be intensifying and that will drag down the temperatures as well so next time i'm in kabul just of 19 degrees on thursday they want to be a few showers a bit further towards the north as well so you may just catch one. well marty towards the west here it's looking a bit drier or to back that right up to $42.00 degrees and force an anchor will be at around $27.00 with a decaying system working its way across us so expect a fair amount of cloud and an increase in winds as well as further towards the south and here in doha is just hot now it's 40 degre

options that the united states possesses. they can not replace u.s. guarantees. our asian allies rely substantially on u.s. nuclear forces for they are deterrence needs and the adoption by the u.s. of a no first use policy could incentivize others to develop their own nuclear weapons which would seriously undermine our nonproliferation policy. in fact i would argue that our current policy is one of the great disincentives to nuclear proliferation today. conventional forces are also unlikely to provide the same deterrent effect as nuclear weapons as they may not be able to hold at risk what the adversary's or to deter aggression in vital regions. moreover allies might need to recalibrate how accommodating they might become to protect interests in the face of nuclear armed adversary's. adoption of a new first use policy would cause u.s. declaratory policy to diverge from our u.k. and french counterparts. a significant fissure within the nato alliance that potential adversaries could seek to exploit. such a policy could embolden

mainly because both the united kingdom and the united states insisted on seeing themselves as democracies so what we are ultimately talking about here is is a quality or more specifically the ethnic composition of the israeli democracy do you think that the upper hansen's that the current israeli leadership has about the granting all people under its control it cool rights do those apprehensions ultimately. go down to security concerns or is it all ideological and more specifically is it tied to the ideology of zionism you're raising many questions but let's revisit the american case for a moment it wasn't all the case that abraham lincoln who fought the civil war fought it because he imagined the united states would be a multiracial democracy you never imagined that in so far as you talked about what would happen to the slaves you talked about sending them back to africa there was the united states thought of itself as a white christian country and did not think of itself as a multiracial democracy that it came about as the until not as a result of the elites not as a result of the gover

that's the united states in both cases. the united states gets most of the profit from made in china iphones. and when we put tariffs on china, we're not only hurting china, we're hurring allies and ourselves. so the probably is problem is how do woe try to balance trade while addressing the global supply chain. >> this is vic in saratoga, california. >> caller: hi, i think the tactic of using tariffs is very counterproductive. i think we should focus on aid in the developing world. and focus on getting people out of extreme poverty. because if they're out of extreme poverty, like through things like food assistance, or -- >> we are going to leave this recorded segment of washington journal, with a quick reminder that you can watch all of our programs online at c-span.org. we're going live now to capitol hill for a house budget hearing on immigration and border security, we will hear from customs and immigration officials at the homeland security sub committee hearing. >> u.s. immigration, and customs enforcement, and u.s.

with a veto they lost faith in the united states to see the end of their suffering a little further out of reach. madam president, it's not, however, too late for congress to do the right thing. by overriding this veto, we assert this body's authority to support peace and human rights while making america safer and more secure. madam president, i would yield ficer: withoutsuggest the objection. mr. lee: madam president, over the past few months, the members of this body and the members of the united states house of representatives resoundingly have voted in favor of senate joint resolution 7 which would remove u.s. armed forces from saudi arabia's war in yemen. this unconstitutional, unjustified, and ultimately immoral war has repeatedly come up over the last year. and thankfully america's elected lawmakers in washington have taken a stand against it. now the president has vetoed our resolution. but today we have the opportunity and i believe we have the absolute constitutional duty to once again take a stand on this important matter. today we have the opportunity to override the veto i

happened in the united states what is import. and is that these sanctions are not only equal and have no legal effect not no economic effect but they also won't have any political effect the success or failure of these sanctions is going to be who buy their on the oil so we are talking about countries such as china turkey and india who are your major oil importers are they going to continue to buy a new normal two points first world these countries have declared that they do not recognize u.s. sanctions for. their private companies may because of u.s. corage and because of their heavy hand that the united states is exercising on these issues may find it just prudent for themselves in the short term and i don't think it's prudent for anybody in the medium and long term to decrease but that doesn't mean that the government's agree and the governments have announced that they do not recognize what is your plan how are you going to make sure that the people of iran don't feel the crunch that the united states wants to well first of a

in the united states. i suspect, although i cannot prove it, one reason abortion remains so controversial in the united states is that it was introduced judicially, i.e., by a method which relegated the wid wider principal debates to americans. instead it is a candidate for the supreme court with results that were apparent in the indignified party and procedures in the most recent hearings. in his first inaugural address in 1861, abraham lincoln drew attention to the implications of filling gaps in the constitution by judicial decision. his words are very well known. the candid citizen, he said, must convince that if the policy of the government on vital questions are affecting the whole of people is to be relatively fixed by decisions. they resign their government into the hands of that evident tribunal. lincoln had in mind dread scott who decided that they were not easily made decisions. a nation cannot hope to accommodate divisions among its people unless its citizens actively participate in the process

so what other countries agree to is not binding to the united states.s far as china is concerned, they want to make a deal. i think they probably wish they made the deal that they had on the table before they tried to renegotiate it. they would like to make a deal. we're not ready to make a deal and we're taking in tens of billions in tariffs. and that number could go up substantially very easily. but i think sometime in the future, china and the united states will absolutely have a great trade deal. and we look forward to that. okay? thank you. >> the united states second question goes to jeff nayson of reuters. >> thank you, sir. i am going to ask two questions, if i can. first is a follow up on trade, can you lay out, mr. president, what japan needs to do to avoid auto tariffs? and before you come back to the g20 in another month or so, do you expect talks with china to get back on track at all this je year? >> get to be the g20, i think we are very much discussing different things with japan. we have a large trade imbalance that has been there for m

the united states will have seen -- see rules-based order is in the interest of the united states. not that i speak for the united states. i am a canadian. [laughter] >> what happens if we end up in a situation in which trade disputes are settled between countries on a bilateral basis, which seems to be the preference of the u.s. at the moment, rather than by an international body or independent arbiter? are we entering a new world of thestrongest get to dictate rules of the system? what are the implications? min. carr: i can only speak for system.dian we have successfully negotiated with the europeans and recently with asian-pacific states. this is interesting. the process through the parliament of canada broke land speed records. never before according to people who have been around longer than i have has a bill gone through parliament, the house of commons in the because there was a consensus among the political parties that it was good for canada. why is it good for canada? it gives us preferential access nowmportant markets and that the trade results are available for the firs

, the united states congress. it is inappropriate for there to be saber rattling by this administration with iran, with no explanation, as to can why we send young men and women in harm's way. we should not use one approach to start a war. to overcome an approach dealing with the investigation of the rule of law. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady's time has expired. ms. jackson lee: i oppose any such saber rattling and we need to understand what is going on in the middle east. we have to protect the men and women of the united states military though they fight for us. thank you. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california, mr. lamalfa, seek recognition? mr. lamalfa: unanimous consent to address the house for one minute. revise and extend. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. lamalfa: thank you, mr. speaker. sadly i rise today to honor fallen u.s. marine from my district in northern california. staff sergeant

when china has 10% of united states gnp, bigger than the united states in 2014, in 34 years everythinghanges. but what is china threatening? is china threatening the liberal international order? or is china threatening the global balance of power, the number one power in the world so ably represented by general mcmaster and michael pulse bury. [applause] and the honest answer, there's only one simple, honest answer. china is stretching the global balance of power. and i'll tell you why china is not happening. the liberal international order. because why has china come out of nowhere and in 30 years became the largest economy in -- [inaudible] how did china do it? china did it because of the rules of the liberal international order. now, many of you will be confused by this phrase, "liberal international order." i mean, i could completely agree when they said china is not a liberal domestic order, but that's not the issue of the day. it's not whether china is liberal domestic order. the issue of the day is whether china's working with the liberal international order. and i can tell you

from the united states with the threat of its own sanctions while other e.u. nations call on iran not to take aggressive steps. also this hour the vote counts under way in south africa in what's being seen as the biggest election there in decades because the incumbent ruling party looks set to hold power we're going to how divided political life in the country is and the possible implications of the election. and the french telecoms giant orange is sued for. the prosecutors arguing the company created intolerable working conditions that led to thirty five suicides and . good morning from now on may the ninth. welcome to news for r.t. international the future of the historic twenty fifteen iranian nuclear agreement is hanging by a thread after a number of twists on wednesday washington's tighten the screws further on iran with a new round of sanctions that's after tehran's partial withdrawal from the pact the reason being it says to protect itself while stressing that the deal should be saved europe's urged iran to avoid taking any aggressive steps i got more o

the commander of iran's elite military units the revolutionary guard says the u.s. does not have the ability to wage a war against his country he also described the deployment of extra u.s. warships and fighter aircraft in the region as psychological warfare the pentagon says iranian aggression is the reason why it did so the increased u.s. military presence was discussed in the iranian parliament on sunday president hassan rouhani unity in the face of pressure that he calls from president it has more now from tehran. while it is a matter of routine for the new head of the islamic revolutionary guard corps to address iranian members of parliament and answer their questions major general turn comes at a time of heightened tensions with the united states the new i.r. g.c. chief assured m.p.'s that a war with the united states is unlikely because americans know the closer their military hardware comes to iranian territory the more vulnerable it becomes to iranian defenses and iranian firepower the head of the air force was also present and reinforced his boss's comment

oh by the united states to taiwan always fall on a deaf ear but the point is. what is a real use. to taiwan. the men in the china is becoming stronger and stronger no matter how many weapons to taiwan would have by their would not be useful. was the scenario i believe the taiwanese. is not to really buy weapons they're trying to buy you sure it's are you sure is that it could be filled with american blood are you sure it's not to could not to really guard he's a safety so what. is the safety of the taiwanese people their safety and security come from good relationship with them and then china that is where the security lie and even economically dependent so heavily upon men and china i know we have extended the good will time and again if you compare the previous. and the current to us r.t. you would find the difference so. and it won't be. across a strait utilizing the trust of china taiwan. now at the moscow conference on international security minister of aid said that china is strongly against the taiwan travel act that the united states adopt it is a blatant interference in c

there's no mandate for the united states to assert thing.hat you're going to continue to see is sanctions being increased more pressure on the regime, hopefully coordinated with the international community, but as you said, the situation is fairly dire, the water supplies are blackouts. there's no internet connection, whenever there's something that the government doesn't want people to see, they shut down internet connections, airways for statesmen media, really fquite a close society when the regime wants it to be. so this is a society that's in whole-scale collapse and the question is, you know, what can the venezuelans do about that and that's what people are discussing right now. >> host: let's take calls, first one from minnesota, independent line, jack, you're with eric, go ahead. >> good morning, gentlemen, you just had a quote lovely president trump here on venezuela, the usual bs, like the bs we are hearing from our guest, here is a quote from andrew mccabe's recent book, trump is quoted as saying, why aren't we at war with venezue

have increased flows to the united states because the united states has a good economic situation.hich is not the case in central america. >> should i ask you in spanish or english? in eppinglish. ok. - english? i was wondering if mexico is willing to support actions regarding the persecution of people linked with the maduro regime. according to our investigations, there are many eople linked with crimes against humanity trying to hide themselves, trying to see mexico among many other places as a safety haven and trying to use this neutrality, or leverage on this neutrality policy. to my mind, as desmond tutu said, when you are neutral in situations of oppression, you choose the side of the oppressor. i was wondering and there are many specific cases i can talk to about one. i was selected by a former major of a district elected in mexico. i don't know if you guys are going to do something about it. hanks. >> the mexican position is not about no position. we have a position. we present our idea and our proposal with 15 countries o have a dialogue. excuse me. i listened to you. than

the truth to the congress of the united states. that's a crime. reporter: speaker pelosi, what are you considering for members of the administration who don't comply with congressional subpoenas? ms. pelosi: i have great confidence in our committees. we have six committees that have -- five of them have subpoenas. so far, we don't have one from the foreign affairs committee. but five of the six committees of jurisdiction have the potential for subpoenas. they haven't all should subpoenas. but that's where we see some of that activity. as you probably know in the articles of impeachment for president nixon, article 3 was that he ignored the subpoenas of congress, that he did not honor the subpoenas. this is very, very serious. but my judgment will spring from the judgment of our committee chairs. and in terms of -- i'm looking at mr. nadler's statement, in the close of his statement today relating to the attorney general he said history will judge us on how we face this challenge. we will be held accountable one way or the other. if

front end of the bus unit you need to get a one dollar biddle m c when you boss i'm familiar but if it were me me my. letter to fisa in tell you. where we're at. but i thought i would ask the more that is in the blog and one of them fassett not my loss of a bone not but i would have been one around him in the. police joy i want that again no. panic in the anyone yet. most metallic mccaskey leaving really see no deal on a moment when anybody at yes you don't buy you. one though one meal where gunbattle better to just to see. what is for me what does not. work is quickly here yet again is me an idiot but this is something me and so missing in those in the i'm in uniform we're in the mug asking you to sign a silly idea. but the bucket in the singer is me mad. when i was a girl i met at the morning. after a like in the you know where you want to know if you should and to let them know when i'm gone by you is if they are going to these and consider more simple than i can think i mean this is a. race of woman to sublimate of them by your advice is a valid one from say. your own and that he o

there was no unit merger. the building retains two units, both units larger than when we started. the project was not tantamount to dep ligs. demolition. this does not increase the scale of the building visible from the public right away or any adverse effect on the properties. for over a year we have done everything to right the wrongs. the process to date has been a heavy penalty to pay. we currently have $7 million in debt on this project. our carrying costs have been $50 million a month and increased to $5,000 a month. this is not being able to lose the building and impacts the survival of our company. our heartshiourour hardship is . we believe penalties impoe impoy the planning department are important for our project and we have fully cooperated and accepted the consequences from performing work beyond the scope of the permits. no owner has come forward about the finished property. we have strong support from our neighbors and have worked with them from the beginning. we sincerely, sincerely regret the actions that got us here and take full responsibility. we respectfully a

united states know how to. take a step back from this destructive policy. for raaz we have always committed. political and diplomatic dialogue. the diplomatic approach jag always civilizational. tens of thousands of years. of being religious people we have not been looking for a conflict or a war we've been trying to solve issues through dialogue as well as the united states or a much smaller timeframe has existed it created more wars that we have been participating in history that spans over towns of us i was in this years. we've just been listening there to a joint media conference between sergei lavrov fund zarif the foreign ministers respectively of russia and ran a lot spoken about over the last thirty minutes there but as you could hear the big topic being to ron's announcement earlier of a gradual scale don of the country's nuclear commitments in essence the twenty eight fifteen nuclear deal the joint comprehensive plan of action is a refund indeed surrogate lavrov saying that signatories to the deal. fa

a decision, are they conforming with the constitution of the united states as interpreted by the unitedtates supreme court or not? if they are not, then that law will be invalidated and it will not be able to be applied to the women of that state. [ applause ] >> the supreme court that decided this case -- >> yeah -- >> -- includes neil gorsuch, who has that seat because mitch mcconnell held it open, refused to even allow confirmation hearings for merrick garland. >> right. >> president obama's last choice. >> right. for nine months. >> and mitch mcconnell at the time said of course you don't confirm supreme court justices in the last year of a presidential term. let's listen to what mitch mcconnell said today about that question. >> if a supreme court was open before next year, what would you do? >> we'll fill it. >> he'd do what? >> he said i'd be filling the seat, if a supreme court justice were to die in the last year of the trump presidency, what would he do? he would go against what he said was the principle he was using in the last year of the obama presidency. >> well, he also s

kingdom to the united states in the sort of architecture of. world power perhaps and trump you know that great britain sees it that way. well here that when when trump is it's great britain now you you've been on so many of these t.v. stations that are now suddenly defending as sons do you think when you talk to the other commentators and pundits and all the rest trump is a sort of fair weather friend of assad's because of course he famously said we love wiki leaks and has since said he doesn't know anything about them what's his view we don't know for sure whether he had any role in this decision or whether it was made by lower ranking justice department officials i think generally an indictment like this has to be approved by the attorney general bar i don't think it would have to go up to the white house in fact it would not probably go to the white house so i don't know what president trumps you this is he has been a fair weather friend again free speech for me but not for the when a son has done things which are perceived as helping trump

states to stand trial in the united states this is a threat to any journalists covering u.s. war crimes or national security issues around the world do you think as the u.s. intention in throwing the book at us songs too would also any other journalists and publish says from. revealing classified information there's no doubt that's part of that they want to frighten the media into not covering us activity around the world the u.s. is often involved in activity that could be characterized as war crimes certainly atrocities and certainly often corruption of our transnational corporations that was all the kind of thing that wiki leaks was reporting and they obviously offended wiki leaks i was defended the united states by challenge the military industrial intelligence complex here and they want revenge and they want to send a message to any other journalist who dares tries to expose us workarounds remember the international criminal court was threatened when they said they started to investigate us potential war us workers in afghanistan and force the i.c.c. to back down to the

states to go along the united states demonstrates its omnipotence its power its unilateral. posture in the world as the sole superpower when it can actually go it alone and force others whether they're allies or adversaries when the united states can force them to toe the american line that's when the united states is demonstrating its strength and in terms of how bolton sees the world that's when the united states is successful well separately iran is planning to come back cold some. all entry commitments under the nuclear deal but foreign minister german serif says tehran will remain parts of the agreements washington we impose sanctions on iran ever since it would drew from the pact last year or diplomatic editor james bays has more from the united nations iran is using the anniversary of the u.s. pulling out of the nuclear deal to announce what it says or its own countermeasures now we don't believe that iran will be completely pulling out of the deal itself bought is going to try and ease some of the constraints on it particularly regarding research and development thes

and that is that the united states involvement in this war is clearly unconstitutional. now i hear many of my republican friends claim that their strict constitutionalists. well, if you are a strict constitutionalists, voting to override trump's veto should be a no-brainer, because this war has not been authorized by congress, is unconstitutional. let me remind my colleagues who may have forgotten what is in the united states constitution. article one section eight states clearly, and i quote, congress shall have power to declare war, end of quote, while the president has the authority over the conflict before once it has been declared. the founding fathers day the power to authorize military conflicts to congress, the branch most accountable to the people. mr. president, under the war powers act of 1973, the assignment of a member of united states armed forces to, quote, demand, courtney, participate in the movement of or a company can end quote,du another countries military during a war constitutes the introduction of the united states into a conflict. our military inv

a unit engaged in cyber operation. unit 74455 assists in the release of those uses and the publication of anti-clinton campaign on social kbleed. >> they had state boards of elections, secretaries of state and u.s. companies that provided soft bare and other technology to the administration of u.s. elections. beginning in march 2016, 250u7b9 17 as well as email accounts of individuals affiliated with the clinton campaign it. to learn about something redacted. dirchlt webo. it began before the gru gained nyack assess to these networks with, laying out that the previous crimes mpt not. they also sent pictures to clinton campaign employees and volunteers. between 2015 and 20816, unit is 65 appears to have set aside 90 email accounts. they started to target email accounts. the spear fishing allowed us to get in touch with large clinton campaign. junior volunteers assigned to the clinton dance team, and a dod employee. >> plus various campaign-related many md. if i'm no later than april 2016, the gru had gained access to th

in the dirty sick that is the current state of united states foreign policy. it appears hawk watchers that right in time for supper we've added yet busy another big dish a potential conflict to our already rising pile of potential conflict dishes smelly saying this week the u.s. state department announced that the syrian government may allegedly be using chemical weapons once again as attempts to recap recapture at least the last outpost of rebel and terrorist groups the country's been fighting since march of 2011 u.s. state department spokeswoman morgan ortega's told the media quote we are still gathering information on this incident but we repeat our warning that if the assad regime uses chemical weapons the united states and our allies will respond quickly and appropriately. she was then quick to add that assad's regime has culpability in horrific chemical weapons attacks is undeniable. is that though this is undeniable you speak of i say this because just last week a newly leaked engineering report out of the organization for the prohibition of chemical we

the united nations onslaught is smashing ahead on many fronts.ere in rome, general clark watched his men march into the city. the allies were able to view the work of their mighty air support. some of these rail yards were bombed months ago, but repairs for the germans were out of the question. this is the same devastation being brought to nazi transport throughout the whole of europe. in their triumphal entry, they moved past moments of antiquity. the long history of the ancient city has seen few more joyous events. the liberators were acclaimed with fervor. rome was the first great capital to be freed from the enemy. the flags of united nations were unfurled at once, heralding the end of four years of nazi tyranny for the people of rome. and here is the balcony where musolini once harangued his people. but suddenly there is excitement in the square. a bomb has been thrown into the former german headquarters. the italian people discovered that some were hiding inside. and soon they smashed their way in. the traitors who collaborated with germany

yemen that is in the best interest of the united states madam president. not in the slightest or even by a shred. to have our support especially when our own security of the american people on us soil is not on the line. of course, there was the killing of jamaal khashoggi. february a report came out suggested the united arab emirates actually transferred american-made weapons to al qaeda and other military groups it is a saudi led coalition is getting our old weapons in violation of her own and user agreements with them.y to get to the terrorist groups we try to fight those that pose - - with the majority shia muslims. five gay men that were suspected to have been tortured into a confession. perhaps we ought not be supporting that regime at all, matter president or give unflinching or unwavering unquestioning devotion to a regime that treats its own people that way. and has harmed others in its own region. but add a bare minimum we should not fight an unjust civil war half a world away without congressional authorization article one section eight of the c

it is disgusting to see leaders in not only the united kingdom but in the united states as well. who continue to support the murderous dictator dictator. and it is not in either of our country's best interest for those leaders to continue to advocate on their behalf the venezuelan people have spoken through their constitutional mechanism they have put one guy though as their interim president that he is the duly elected leader there and material is on borrowed time and to see american leaders or leaders from this country. continue to provide support and comfort to a regime that has created so much devastation so much destruction i was in i was in colombia i saw those families who had to make choices about whether to feed their children and even days or odd days that is a direct result of nicolas maduro and no leader in a country of western demagogue democratic values ought to stand behind them. this is a country where three million people have fled the country g.d.p. has gone down by forty percent in the last four years people can access basic medicine people are rifling through

god bless you all and god bless the united states of america. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2019] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] announcer: four door to -- world war ii aircraft flying in honor of the 75th anniversary of the d-day invasion of normandy, france on june 6, 1944. we will show you the flyovers starting with the planes taxing taxiing and taking off from frederick.

accusations the united arab emirates is using chinese made drones to launch attacks in libya. and later in sport welcomed back into the side two of australia's cricket stars return from their cheating back. again where across a long we are watching plenty of rain here across parts of turkey not just a weather system that is moving here across the area into the caspian that's going to bring a lot of rain across turkey baku your rain is going to continue from saturday into sunday but down towards a cell you're going to be seeing most. cloudy conditions at least on saturday by the time we get to sunday though that system really begins to dissipate we're going to see and still more clouds but for tehran you may see a little bit of rain with the temps are there twenty seven degrees well here across the gulf we have been dealing with the heat it's going to continue it's been fairly dry but we do expect to see clouds pushing through now the problem is from saturday night into sunday we could also pick up a shower or two here in doha as that little system pushes across the gulf for ab

>> i'm not aware that the government in the united states or in this country -- or in the united kingdom -- has the constitutional power to confer rights unless it is exercising a statutory power to do so. i'm not entirely sure how the problem arises. your obviously right in saying that if the government has the power either to confirm or to take away rights on its own initiative, i.e., without a specific statutory power it wouldn't differ from a privilege at all. >> can i ask a supplementary question to that? it is not the case of old world arrogance that you will come over here and tell these good people when the majority of countries in the world right now have written constitutions that we do it better not just because we did at first, but we do it better because we haven't written it down.>> i haven't said we do better. i think we obviously start from completely different points of view. in the us a written constitution on the legal model has nearly a quarter of a millennium of history. so that is where you start and i'm not for one moment suggesting that it is something that you sh