fourth one of these today those demo de facto demos with 1 on 14th street and 16 demolishing a two unit building for two new unit one uncouldn't have happened for about more than 10 years and unoccupied yet we sat here and continues an item on green same issue also whether this is a two units building or not i'd like to talk about to mr. williams if we keep on destroying relatively affordable homes i keep saying that over and over one of the priority policies keeping sound housing yet affordable for 11 percent and 15 not a huge number but replacing housing affordable to the one percent he get property environmental impact report i get it and box on green street the city we're starting to lose it noah valley it is epidemic ever block something else and some are seriously permitting and actually involved the department of building inspection i don't i - this takes us into a spiral you'll need work with the neighbors and work more sensitive around keeping more of the building and expanding as much as you can without describing what you have that compasses the tree that's it commissioner antonini. >

one of the-we want people to build these units and building the units is never easy. it can be costly, have to go through a planning process, you--i know our city departments have tried to get better and better for efficiency and making it aizey process it is all -there are challenges and there are factors that can dissuade people from creating the units and more restrictions we place on the units the more we say if you do this there will be negative rem fiications to your building or a different type of housing and have restrictions other housing doesn't have. it just dissuades people building. i am not saying there shouldn't be any restrictions but you reduce the overall units because people don't want to deal with it. in the end, this is housing and housing is housing and we want people to put the units in and say this is a separate class and all these restrictions other units don't have, why is it adu have restrictions that someone who is building a non adu and building development wouldn't have? why do we treat one class of housing differently than others? if we

building. >> right. >>; right? so our consultant has suggested that those to units could be incorporated into the building as it is now with the two units you know as a looks now taking up the parking or separate the parking those two units will have rear facing windows or just eliminate the parking and have the units not that i'm aware there i like the i'm not in a place to redesign. >> we need thoughts because i think we've been in a bit of a loop i don't think i've heard that suggestion i at one of the hearings to put those on the ground floor in the back i'm not sure that works you have to start from the may 10th version and when the may 10th version has a significance massing you know get rid of the see sideably you'll have macon is upper floors in the current version. >> skemg for interrupting you i'm sorry that's why i feel that commissioner moore has it right we're trying to chip and move around the units it needs a fresh look. >> i mean, we keep on saying that but didn't mean you, you know to move piece all around to make the, look better or reduce the massing i have and the neighbors have asked for more r

one of the-we want people to build these units and building the units is never easy. it can be costly, have to go through a planning process, you--i know our city departments have tried to get better and better for efficiency and making it aizey process it is all -there are challenges and there are factors that can dissuade people from creating the units and more restrictions we place on the units the more we say if you do this there will be negative rem fiications to your building or a different type of housing and have restrictions other housing doesn't have. it just dissuades people building. i am not saying there shouldn't be any restrictions but you reduce the overall units because people don't want to deal with it. in the end, this is housing and housing is housing and we want people to put the units in and say this is a separate class and all these restrictions other units don't have, why is it adu have restrictions that someone who is building a non adu and building development wouldn't have? why do we treat one class of housing differently than others? if we

rather than changes - those will not rent cheaper the building that be upgraded but the smaller units will par take in a higher rent there's - the only thing the people are occupying the building on the upper floors maybe have to move to a smaller units what we consider to be their home from a basically philosophy and point of view at that particular moment i would subscribe to you anyone can do the same thing similar situations with the larger buildings with the project and i don't support it. >> what's the status of the units were people are living in them now and rented. >> some of them not all of them that has building going through ongoing vacancy and the building is operating we've been in touch with the tenants on those units annual leases and plenty of time before anything happens we'll not 0 do the interior configuration work for another year so everyone is aware of it. >> to commissioner moore's point i could get behind the project figure we get my type of a net gain of units out t of it has your client thought about that. >> to your statement about not simply keeping a neut

building. including the lower units. e propose addition is recessed 25 feet from the front of the building to minimize the impact of the street. the horizontal addition was sculpted in the rear to not create an unfair burden to the surrounding properties.. in the rear, the propose building that is nearly the same with that of the east neighbor though the pop out of the subject property is actually one level shorter. the project retains a large 35 feet long in order to preserve the midblock open-space. i think this slide is important. there are several very large properties all around. as is indicated by the red outline in this aerial view of the rear. it should be said, the overall massing is particularly on impactful because of the subject property is great and sunken in as relates to both eastern and western neighbors. the subject property is outlined by two small hills the race effectively all the other properties around. further, the subject property is the fact that tall retaining walls on either side of the backyard

one of the-we want people to build these units and building the units is never easy. it can be costly, have to go through a planning process, you--i know our city departments have tried to get better and better for efficiency and making it aizey process it is all -there are challenges and there are factors that can dissuade people from creating the units and more restrictions we place on the units the more we say if you do this there will be negative rem fiications to your building or a different type of housing and have restrictions other housing doesn't have. it just dissuades people building. i am not saying there shouldn't be any restrictions but you reduce the overall units because people don't want to deal with it. in the end, this is housing and housing is housing and we want people to put the units in and say this is a separate class and all these restrictions other units don't have, why is it adu have restrictions that someone who is building a non adu and building development wouldn't have? why do we treat one class of housing differently than others? if we

it is clear project sponsor is no building family houses. the design is for unitsr single bedroom rentals. they will not be affordable to members of our community and contribute to gentrification. we ask that you consider the structures on our block are not a random mix of buildings of this 16 structures on the potrero side of the block, six are deemed historic resources and additional to a potentially historic. block 40 11 includes a string of modest two-story single-family homes on hampshire street. these homes are relevant to any proposal involving potrero side of the block. the extensive auto alterations proposed will eliminate any trace of the 1907 edwardian home. please, preserve this home on the merits of the second of the priority policies in general plan. if the development is allowed we ask that the fourth floor be removed . the depth be reduced by 10 feet with no debt so privacy concerns are mitigated. that the north elevation windows that overlook the entire open space of the lopez family home be removed and the edwardian façade the meeting. project the

and cap at no more than one unit in buildings 4 units or less. this retains the existing seismic program in the current form. the size mm program is one the most successful producing adu and low cost way for a city to add needed housing. this doesn't permit construction of adu that have evictions in the ast 10 years and doesn't permit a adu to be used as short termerantals. as part the discussion and compromise part the amendments we will be introducing will also be part of what we will vote on the board in the tomorrow. we will move the component that allows no more than 25 percent commercial store front. add in a portion supervisor peskins proposal that creates a minimum square foot unit size but understand planning may have comments that disallows [inaudible] and insures proper neighborhood notice and new construction. we are also amending the language that states it isn't our intention to include vacancy chromes. the subdivision and sale of adu can happen in buildings that are complete ownership [inaudible] the maementz represent a deal and c

one of the-we want people to build these units and building the units is never easy. it can be costly, have to go through a planning process, you--i know our city departments have tried to get better and better for efficiency and making it aizey process it is all -there are challenges and there are factors that can dissuade people from creating the units and more restrictions we place on the units the more we say if you do this there will be negative rem fiications to your building or a different type of housing and have restrictions other housing doesn't have. it just dissuades people building. i am not saying there shouldn't be any restrictions but you reduce the overall units because people don't want to deal with it. in the end, this is housing and housing is housing and we want people to put the units in and say this is a separate class and all these restrictions other units don't have, why is it adu have restrictions that someone who is building a non adu and building development wouldn't have? why do we treat one class of housing differently than others? if we

on the other side of the project, this empty lot, the site of a 120 apartment unit building. evacuee paula blackwell has lived in the neighborhood 25 years. >> all of the people in this small face and all of the cars, it is completely changing the neighborhood. >> reporter: but there is still a sense of community. a neighbor offering home-cooked soup in front of his home for first responders and evacuees. vic lee. abc 7 news. >>> firefighters had to help of a drone to detect hot spots in the fire zone. we captured the unmanned aircraft in action hovering over tight crevices and helping firefighters on the ground spot areas still smoldering. it kept firefighters safe when crews were on the roofs of buildingsch the drone was launched just as the fire spread to nearby homes. >>> the bay area has seen destructive fires of building under construction before. this fire in march of 2014 looked awfully similar to this morning's blaze and caused $40 million in damage. and that pealed in comparison to the santa rosa building which destroyed mixed residential development and causing $13

a couple of questions this project is really about the units merger i think outside the box is the first one we need to look at the front building is two units two bedroom and one bedroom we're asked to look at a unit merger where the front building is an independent building and the rear is the substitute for the unit which is being eliminated i think that creates a diversity set of questions than a dr where someone is obtaining to this and that but a policy question that is larger than supporting the cu with the building i'm wondering i personally believe that we are in an rh1 we're not in rh2 where we could consider this is as a in fact, following are rh2 zoning allows us to do is this in keeping with rh1 tries to do rh1 is specific about where buildings fit in the lot, how thigh aggregate to the larger and in this particular case we're basically moving being so another part of property with something from my perspective is issues with the residential design team touched on with the roof decks and i want to stick with this question that being the unit merger and it indeed the building dense fizz in the rh1 the densification o

> i think the point shed at the rear that was demolished and there was a proposal to build a 3 unit building behind the existing building that was a permit submitted in 2004 that was approved and issued no work was done and thought to extend it in of 2010 so that was underway to build out this project. >> commissioner. >> i guess i'm a little bit confused about you said 8 more bedrooms; right? >> uh-huh. >> but that's okay by the way, you it would be group housing which will be allowed or 0 could be i got a little bit lost. >> both uses are allowed in the planning code whether group housing or the 3 dwellings the issue with the making a determination is their calling this a between i mean their rechls that is a dwelling unit with more bedrooms and the limitations on that in terms of the review at the staff level with a project like this we're generally constrained by what is shown on the plans the representation of use if it is ultimately used in a manner that is more consistent with group housing they need a permit to document the change of use that permit will still be allowed as of right

one of the-we want people to build these units and building the units is never easy. it can be costly, have to go through a planning process, you--i know our city departments have tried to get better and better for efficiency and making it aizey process it is all -there are challenges and there are factors that can dissuade people from creating the units and more restrictions we place on the units the more we say if you do this there will be negative rem fiications to your building or a different type of housing and have restrictions other housing doesn't have. it just dissuades people building. i am not saying there shouldn't be any restrictions but you reduce the overall units because people don't want to deal with it. in the end, this is housing and housing is housing and we want people to put the units in and say this is a separate class and all these restrictions other units don't have, why is it adu have restrictions that someone who is building a non adu and building development wouldn't have? why do we treat one class of housing differently than others? if we

the intent and goal if you rin a 3 unit building and add the 4th unit it doesn't remove from the subdivision process that you otherwise would have had. whatever the rules are or for other buildings are the rules that apply to you and that is the intent. >> we weed the words available on may 31, 2016? that cupture what you are going for here? >> i think so. i don't know supervisor peskin has any feedback on that? >> hold on, i'm looking for it. this is the amendment that says adding coordination with bailding undergoing. >> maintain eligibility to end of the condo conversion lottery available may 31, 2016. there is no lottery available. >> i think-this is subject to the city attorneys interpretation and written by your staff, mr. [inaudible] powers but i believe that once the moratorium is rescinded which was cont plated prior to may 31, 2016 they will be eligible but i'm not a attorney or your staff. >> i think the intent is that whatever the lottery rules are or not, the lottery may exist or not exist and may exist for certain size buildings but not other size building. when the moratorium

this empty lot, the site of a 120 unit building. evacuee paula blackwell lived in this neighborhood 35 years these people in' small space and it's changing the neighborhood. >> there is a sense of community. a neighbor offering home-cooked soup for first responders and evacuees. vic lee, abc7 news. >> many of of you saw the fire this morning. the scaffolding is standing though the building is gone and john shows this look as a complex under construction is engulfed in flames. when news happens you can become part of the story, share pictures and videos online with #abc 7now. >> road work is underway on a long awaited project. >> big changes drivers will see along 101 once it's all done. >> i'm spencer christian. if you can brave the chill, you'll be rewarded with warmer weather. the forecast is coming up. >>> a thief withdraws money from a man's account, but the bank why are you deleting these photos? because my teeth are yellow. why don,t you use a whitening toothpaste? i'm afraid it,s bad for my teeth. try crest 3d white. crest 3d

demand the acquisition, improvement and rehabilitation and conversion of at[r-eufbgs/] multi-unit residential buildings to permanent affordable housing and performing needed seismic, fire, health and safety upgrades and other major rehabilitation in an amount not-to-exceed $350 million. item no. 3 ordinance calling and providing for a special election to be held in the city on november 8, 2016 for the purpose of submitting to san francisco voters a proposition to amend proposition a. >> okay. thank you very much. these items were sponsored by supervisor peskin. so i will turn the mic to him. >> thank you, chair farrell and thank you for accommodating the amendment that i offered in conjunction with the mayor's office last week, which necessitated this hearing today, subject to public comment. i would like for the committee to forward the matters to the full board for their consideration to put forth on the ballot. >> okay. thank you. colleagues, any questions or comments? okay. we'll open up to public comment. anyone wishing to comment on these items? >> eileen district 4 resident. i would urge the com

the subject property that's with only of first properties when looking a variance and it is a 2 unit buildingheir smaller lots 25 feet wide the same depth are single-family dwellings and the property to the north the appellants property is actually did receive a variance in 2001 a rear yard variance to reconstruct the deck within the riders rear yard and added a bay window that was appropriately down done with permits it was submitted in early 2015 it is subject to neighborhood notification and the neighborhoods notification for section psi between august of last year and no questions the variance hearing was heard at the end of august at that hearing there was neighborhood opposition to the project also issues were raised about the unpermit nature of the decks that were there the primary concerns from the appellant to the west about united states privacy from the decks and from the structure and light and air impacts i did indicate i could see given the constraint of the lots a justification for a variance but continue to work to resolve the matters unfortunately, there was not a resolution

this empty lot, the site of a 120 unit building. evacuee paula blackwell lived in this neighborhood 35 years these people in' small space and it's changing the neighborhood. >> there is a sense of community. a neighbor offering home-cooked soup for first responders and evacuees. vic lee, abc7 news. >> many of of you saw the fire this morning. the scaffolding is standing though the building is gone and john shows this look as a complex under construction is engulfed in flames. when news happens you can become part of the story, share pictures and videos online with #abc 7now. >> road work is underway on a long awaited project. >> big changes drivers will see along 101 once it's all done. >> i'm spencer christian. if you can brave the chill, you'll be rewarded with warmer weather. the forecast is coming up. >>> a thief withdraws money from a man's account, but the bank - hi, it's me. [imitates fanfare] lois prices from grocery outlet. - hi, it's... the rest of us! - hey there. - hi! - hey. loifor over 60 years now, grocery outlet has

and cap at no more than one unit in buildings 4 units or less. this retains the existing seismic program in the current form. the size mm program is one the most successful producing adu and low cost way for a city to add needed housing. this doesn't permit construction of adu that have evictions in the ast 10 years and doesn't permit a adu to be used as short termerantals. as part the discussion and compromise part the amendments we will be introducing will also be part of what we will vote on the board in the tomorrow. we will move the component that allows no more than 25 percent commercial store front. add in a portion supervisor peskins proposal that creates a minimum square foot unit size but understand planning may have comments that disallows [inaudible] and insures proper neighborhood notice and new construction. we are also amending the language that states it isn't our intention to include vacancy chromes. the subdivision and sale of adu can happen in buildings that are complete ownership [inaudible] the maementz represent a deal and c

demand the acquisition, improvement and rehabilitation and conversion of at[r-eufbgs/] multi-unit residential buildings to permanent affordable housing and performing needed seismic, fire, health and safety upgrades and other major rehabilitation in an amount not-to-exceed $350 million. item no. 3 ordinance calling and providing for a special election to be held in the city on november 8, 2016 for the purpose of submitting to san francisco voters a proposition to amend proposition a. >> okay. thank you very much. these items were sponsored by supervisor peskin. so i will turn the mic to him. >> thank you, chair farrell and thank you for accommodating the amendment that i offered in conjunction with the mayor's office last week, which necessitated this hearing today, subject to public comment. i would like for the committee to forward the matters to the full board for their consideration to put forth on the ballot. >> okay. thank you. colleagues, any questions or comments? okay. we'll open up to public comment. anyone wishing to comment on these items? >> eileen district 4 resident. i would urge the com

>> reporter: we are outside the oakland police unit building downtown. downtown. we have women chained, bike locks outside the main building. we also have four other protesters who are chained further down in this building, which also houses a police supply store as well as the sf police credit union. they are very cooperative with the police chanting black lives matter. matter. they are upset, certainly, that a number of african american men have been shot and killed by police. they have also concerned about the on going police exploitation scandals involving police and other enforcement agencies involved with a woman who calls herself a call girl. this group arrived around 2:00. they plan to be here for a couple of hours. there are intentions by police to use bolts or cutters to take them away. right now the plan is to let them per size their 1st amendment rights. just before i got on the air, i want to tell you that oakland police have extended an invitation for a barbecue with this group. police and the community get together. as we come back out here live, thi

the reason why this requirement applies to buildings with 16 or more units is because buildings with 16 or more units must have resident managers who live on site. we have [inaudible] great feedback from the fire department and dbi and like to ask committee members to adopt the following amendments today. remove the separate requirement for a fire safety posting in the common area. we combine this requirement so that posting of the tenant disclosure in a frequently used area will suffice. we believe it is impactful when the [inaudible] which are available at the posting. secondly, also like to amend effective date for implementation. the tenant disclosure requirement is implemented 6 months after adoption of theords nns and training will be implemented 12 months after adoption of this ord nnls. lastly, also like the amends the residents [inaudible] 5 business days to 20 business days and compliance of this requirement is not ground for eviction. as there city population continue tooz grow, fire hazards grow as well. through the legislation we hope residents can be better prepared to p

shown as much before i'm excited about in this design is that in the performa building where we have sdientdz the bmr units kind of building you'll find a bay here is divided into the foot 6 with a living room on one side and a bedroom on the other and for us we felt this 6 dimension was not that great for either uses your building we developed an enter lot with a 14 and 15 foot wide and part of bedroom that comes up to the front has a study area that's so it actually as well has a bay window on the front sow we were agriculture to get interesting spaces in the design of the bmr units this view shows the how it is distributed between the one bedrooms and two bedrooms and the three bedrooms so in green the two bedrooms and as you can see there are distributed around throughout the sites so for the podium you know massing was the main concern but also to make that building to define it as an independent building that compliments the other buildings on the site the tower and townhomes but also to make sure that it has nice light seals to natural light with the bays bay windows this is a view of per design whe

were talking about when we were spelling out a more distribution between the two unit size just for the commission the buildingncreased today is 4200 square feet and will be 8 hundred square feet taken into the increase of overall feel of what is possible the bulking of both units for one and 5 three hundred square feet for the other he leaves me budget committee wilted the average apartment is 11 hundred square feet the smaller units is 27 and the larger one is 56 plus having said that, what our concern was is was i think you addressed this not necessary just the size of unit but the inclusive location in the basement with no entrance i think you've resolved that and continue to debate the size whether or not that fits i doubt it does given the concern it is predictability and the potential of children in the neighborhood that the otherwise a fast neighborhoods in that particular part of green street i'd like to ask the city attorney a question that goes beyond what we normally ask we are very concerned about roof deck in areas where they are not roof decks and in this particular situation we never had that b

the reason why this requirement applies to buildings with 16 or more units is because buildings with 16 or more units must have resident managers who live on site. we have [inaudible] great feedback from the fire department and dbi and like to ask committee members to adopt the following amendments today. remove the separate requirement for a fire safety posting in the common area. we combine this requirement so that posting of the tenant disclosure in a frequently used area will suffice. we believe it is impactful when the [inaudible] which are available at the posting. secondly, also like to amend effective date for implementation. the tenant disclosure requirement is implemented 6 months after adoption of theords nns and training will be implemented 12 months after adoption of this ord nnls. lastly, also like the amends the residents [inaudible] 5 business days to 20 business days and compliance of this requirement is not ground for eviction. as there city population continue tooz grow, fire hazards grow as well. through the legislation we hope residents can be better prepared to p

that you put in a notice of special restriction and the reason it is following residential buildings with 3 units't require an elevator that is building as it is now, however, there is a possibility by happenstance the owner can choose to put the residential unit on the second story the building with automatically require an elevator which it does not have at the moment the notice of restriction does this building be adaptable it will require with the prevailing code i feel that is protecting use it is a suits he will part of code but for the architect knows that there can be a change in venue i consider that to be just a good idea. >> there's the second question i have i'd like to have the other commissioners think about it the roof hatches i find them really in this particular neighborhood of lower buildings a little bit two aggressive suggest that we do what we consistingly did suggest an access by hatch but indeed quiet the roof escape and take any addition of height away i make a motion to modify the building as property for the conditions i'm suggesting. >> second. >> exposure one note rega

units. >> building another 150 units of affordable housing. we are in the process of including 15% affordable in the new properties that the going to be right here at 1911 telegraph. >> everybody loves progress but you don't want to leave people behind. >> reporter: that's tough, trying to find the right balance between progress and share the wealth. the mayor earlier this year announced her plan to create 17,000 units of housing to try to ease the situation in oakland. by the way, entertainment here will continue until 8 p.m. live in oakland, i'm da lin, kpix 5. >>> a suspected gunman is under arrest after police say he targeted an oakland police sergeant just moments after she was hurt in a car crash. >> i just got shot at! [ indiscernible ] >> police say the man shot into sergeant clark's suv near 73rd avenue in oakland saturday. she wasn't hit. but she had injuries related to the crash. the suspect took off. police tracked the man down in stockton. sources tell kpix 5 he ran to his mother's house. he got into a six-hour standoff with offic

a representative tells abc 7 news that the 172-unit building is now 97% occupied. >>> turning to our weather, it is time to take a look from our east bay hills camera. can't see much of anything out there. >> no. we can't prove this is east bay hill camera. but trust it. spencer christian is here with an update. >> it is hard to see anything with the clouds we have today, eric and ama. even by san francisco standards, this day has not looked or felt like a summer day. here is live doppler 7 hd and we have a lot of low clouds not only at the coast and over the bay and some inland spots as well and it is windy right now. we have gusts up to 30 miles per hour at sfo. 26 at livermore. 29 miles per hour at fairfield. 25 at hayward. 24 at san carlos. all around the bay area is quite windy and we have a lot of cloud cover as could you see here from the live true of. >>>. 58 in san francisco. 64 across the bay in oakland. mountain view and san jose at 71. 76 at morgan hill and 55 at half moon bay. the low clouds at the golden gate. 67 at napa, 61 at novato and 79 in fairfield and the expecte

unit so it is okay. >> certain nothing sxeerd. >> is that a motion. >> yeah. >> i can move to not take dr and approve the project. >> second. >> commissioner wu. >> can i ask staff where the various definitions are building unit versus group housing. >> so there are two types of single-room occupancies that are group housing and sros that by definition dwelling units the difference between the two sros dwelling units haveville cooking facilities within their units and whereas group housing the cooking facilities are shared by per floor that's the difference. >> all of those are planning code dpivengsz. >> that's correct. >> independence the difference between dwelling unit and group housing and like a good way to think how the planning codes independence an sro is a used characteristic so it is not a type of unit per say but overlayed on either a dwelling unit or group housing units. >> and independence by square footage. >> western soma between 350. >> a followup question talking about the communities room i think you mentioned you spoke about it is on this assessable from the interior halfway. >> no, it needs doors from the streets as well. >> so the little inlet the idea maybe the communities members

prozac production you'll be asking for an amendment you have to. >> the cu or lose it actually build a unitu want to taj mahal and two if you buildings this puts forth affordable housing you'll have for on amendment that puts a value mechanism that additional profit give to the vendors by the by right is actually results in affordable housing and if you believe that public process of the kind we have in san francisco is not impediment us from building up a backlog of 19 thousand approved units that is 18 thousand units went through the planning commission and the kinds of things they're waiting to be built then you will keep the public process especially for large projects we urge you to support supervisor peskin resolution to oppose the buy right bill thank you. >> good afternoon, board of supervisors i'm here to urge you to forward the supervisor cohen's resolution to the full board my reason a frankly the governor's bill raises questions the first one buy right for whom and second bow right and third what cost the first question the analysis by the displacement project using the same the

shown as much before i'm excited about in this design is that in the performa building where we have sdientdz the bmr unitsa standard kind of building you'll find a bay here is divided into the foot 6 with a living room on one side and a bedroom on the other and for us we felt this 6 dimension was not that great for either uses your building we developed an enter lot with a 14 and 15 foot wide and part of bedroom that comes up to the front has a study area that's so it actually as well has a bay window on the front sow we were agriculture to get interesting spaces in the design of the bmr units this view shows the how it is distributed between the one bedrooms and two bedrooms and the three bedrooms so in green the two bedrooms and as you can see there are distributed around throughout the sites so for the podium you know massing was the main concern but also to make that building to define it as an independent building that compliments the other buildings on the site the tower and townhomes but also to make sure that it has nice light seals to natural light with the bays bay windows this is a view of per

he started off building in the united states years ago. he'd build plants in the united states. i see him the other day and say, how's it going? good. how's business? unbelievable. i say, great. i thought that was good for the united states. i said, how many plants you building? many. he said, you've got to see what's happening in mexico. now, by the way, this guy's better than a consultant. if i hire a consultant, i'll hire some guy that, you know, that's terrible, to tell me what's happening. they'll charge a million bucks. he'll give you a report in seven months from now. they have to take a long time, otherwise they can't charge as much. this guy tells me in two minutes. in one minute i learned better about what's happening from him, talking to him about how's his business, than i can learn from some phony consultant because if he was any good, he would have been the one building the plants, you know. so an amazing thing. so i said, so what's going on? he goes, you got to see mexico. it's the eighth wonder of the world. he said, we are building the biggest, the most sophisti

supervisors unanimously and signed by the mayor this summer my legislation gives people the option to build more unitshether in a new building without changing or the visible character of the neighborhood and the size controls remain we use the space for efficiently for example, a project with 20 units 21 hundred feet could build 3 times the affordable units and all the units and everything bathrooms less expensive so let's consider what this means for housing production and affordability with our projects first brother the changes with nct zoning the site out loud 41 units 8 below-market-rate housing at the 14 inclusionary second after the changed nct the site allowed one and 52 units with the bmr units at the 14 and a half percent we heard that the study from the planning department staff said they, change by one and 19 percent and so i'll propose that going if the 8 to the 23 units units is an increase of below-market-rate housing more than the one hundred and 9 percent that disallows the grandfathering one and 52 unit but get 38 bmr units which will be 4 hundred and 75 percent increase i think you

burns also tells him that the united states is building a weapon great enough to destroy the whole world truman writes that in his memoirs. , trumaneginning understands that the atomic bomb is not a bigger bomb, a more powerful bomb. it is a weapon great enough to destroy the whole world. on april 25, he gets a fuller briefing. this is from secretary of war simpson. do we have a secretary of war today? because we don't fight anymore wars, right? what is the secretary of war called now? secretary of defense, a euphemism, a more palatable word than secretary of war. so simpson was secretary of war at the time, and he and leslie -- does that name mean anything to you anymore? he was the military head of the manhattan project. he is the brigadier general in charge of the manhattan project. about,y brief truman they give him a full briefing on the atomic bomb. they basically tell him that we will haveonths a weapon that can wipe out an entire city. how we use it and what we do with it will determine the future of mankind. truman later records that simpson said to him that even if we have this

they have evacuated people on apgar, evacuated units, apartment buildings or units on adeline, just in case. they want to keep people safe and just in case this does spread they want people away from this area. butali at this point, we haven' heard of injuries. stay with us because this story is far from over. firefighters say they'll be here for hours. i'm reporting live from oakland, that buildings right there is emeryville, amy hollyfield, abc news. >> right on the border. thank you so much, amy. >> sue hall is looking at your morning commute. looks like the traffic on the highway is still okay and obviously the surface streets really affected. >> correct, reggie. san pablo, adeline, 39th avenue, 40th, apgar, surface streets. this is a live look at the mccar author maze and 580. the fire viz frbl 24 and 580 making the turn westbound on 580 and seeing smoke in the area and traffic slowing nicely through the area. we have reports of another brush fire just down by ashby avenue and probably just from embers in the eastbound direction and visible from there and probably from embers blow

>> we will help them and we will build safe havens over in syria. >> we in the united states are going to build these -- >> we will get gulf states to pay for it because we're going to have $21 trillion very soon. trillion. in debt. we will do safe havens and safe zones in syria and we will get nations that are so wealthy that are not doing anything, they are not doing much, they have nothing but money, and you know who i'm talking about, the gulf states and get them to pay for it. we would lead it but i don't want to pay because our country is going down the tubes. we owe too much money. >> let me move to something with nato. mitch mcconnell said this about your remarks "the new york times." he said it was a rookie mistake and once you -- let me finish the comment here. it's a rookie mistake and proves that trump needs people like us around to help steer him in the right direction on some basic things. >> he's 100% wrong. okay? he's 100% wrong if he said that. i didn't hear him say -- >> he did say that. >> fine. if he said that, he's 100% wrong and frankly, it's sad. we have nato and

displacement and looking at many more building this is year and within six month this is program just within the first six months of this year already saved close to 30 units in the mission so this program really does are a rapid success rate of serving tenants and of the buildings we're looking at in the mission at least three to four of the buildings were buildings that are currently listed asicizically needing retrofit and the owners were under the requirement to retrofit by 2017 to 2020 and part of the reason for selling the building they couldn't afford that along with fire sprinkling the building and we encourage the repurposing of the funds to help owners otherwise selling the building because of that requirement to the right owners and to the right owners are the non-profit owners and help the tenants stay in place. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker please. >> thank you supervisors. name fernando with the council on community housing organizations also urging you to support this very important measure. one of the things that it does it extends a lot of the work that this board has committed its to over the last few years, both in strengthening

housing and the mayor's office of loan for the purposes to acquire and convert at the risks multi unit buildingspermanent housing. >> colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the ordinance is finally passed unanimously and item 15. >> for the business and tax code to impose a transportation starkly at the rate of twaerldz for a period of 25 years for the state board of equalization and is limit by the amount to 4 years from november 2016. >> roll call vote. >> on item 15. >> supervisor kim no. >> supervisor mar supervisor peskin no supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell there are 8 i's and 3 notices were supervisor kim supervisor peskin and supervisor yee in the descent the ordinance is finally passed item 16. >> an ordinance to amend the administrative code for the city contractor that provide health care and social services to seek to collect and analyze the data for the sexual orientation and gender identified of the clients they serve. >> roll call vote. >> super

sharing a home, your home and one room, that doesn't affect our housing, as much as entire units entire buildings being taken off the market. those people will never register, because they are property -- they own 8 properties say in -- scattered throughout the city. they don't live here. they are not living in those buildings. those people will never register. so it's to hold the platforms accountable for the illegal activities that have indeed been go on and people do need to register in person. it's not about 21st century, but to make sure that that person matches the paperwork. thank you >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is rodolpho and we have one tiny little room we rent out. we're registered. first i would like to comment on the multiplicity of attempts of registering airbnb because of the unregistered hosts and every piece in a units that seems to punish registered hosts and drive away non-registered hosts. accomplishing little or nothing while collecting a measly $130,000 for the city and just making people uncomfortable. that and other attempts at regulation also have the o