commissioner antonini: there is a prohibition on all existing housing units? >> all housing units. commissioner antonini: ok. let's try to pull out this tourist hotel. i think that's not a housing unit. i would say perhaps we could modify it. vice-president olague: we saw some other things. i mean, i don't want to encourage that we start converting tourist hotel uses, because i think sometimes it's not really appropriate to a neighborhood -- i don't know. it got into a complicated conversation. it's not the type of thing i want to encourage. even the way they are structured may not be appropriate for students to live in in many ways. commissioner antonini: what do we do when we convert tourist hotel rooms to nonstudent housing? >> ann marie rogers worked on that legislation. i would like her to answer if she can. >> the large tourist hotels that are over 100 years are regulated by the administrative code and it's by lottery, but a lottery will not be allowed until the city produces 600 new rooms of these large tourist hotels. we aren't going to see anybody being able to convert a la

next month, we will be opening a brand new 22 unit housing complex in a block away from the original site. we spent $10 million replacing the building. just to clarify, there is a it replacing house meant ordnance in the city. none of us go into committees -- into communities and all those housing. if we do, we replace it. in order to address the ordinance today, i just want to reiterate what previous speaker ron smith said. we do support the consolidation of the appeals process, but in addition to that, one of the things we want to make sure happens is all of us in the medical community, including kaiser permanente, would like to have a seat at the table as we go to this planning process. we are very much in support of the health care master planning and we think the concept is a good one. we think we have a lot to offer in the wake of our experts involved with planning. we would like to be at the table in pursuing the planning. the other thing i would like to address is the historical role our facilities have served. we have been in the same location for 60 years. we have invested

housing developer. we have developed about 1200 units of all 100% low-income housing in san francisco. we are very proud of that. as linda richards and mentioned in her presentation, mission housing developed the first affordable housing in mission bay. 100 units of affordable housing with two units set aside for licensed family day care homes and also a number of units set aside as housing opportunities for people with aids, and this is work that we have done with the redevelopment agency with the mayor's office and other various city departments. i think i have experience that could contribute to the treasure island development board and actually, the development of a new neighborhood in san francisco, which is a really exciting prospect for me to be part of. i know the current members of the board and worked with them over the years. as they have said and i will say, it is very important that the residents who are currently there in treasure island are able to stay there. i would support policies that would provide opportunities for them to stay there during the development of new h

>> a united house -- >> charlie: a source of great tension. >> a united house is just means the football is something we can all do as a family as long as i can keep them interested in it. i was going to a football game with my father about two years ago. this is a couple years into me taking over. >> charlie: i can't wait to hear this. >> and turns up at my place and i go to football by boat. fantastic. the stadium they built is for the olympics it's on sydney harbor and i get on a boat and we just scoot down the harbor and it's fantastic so my dad turned up in a south sydney jacket. i said, um, what's this about. what are you wearing that for and he just looked at me cleanly and simply and said "it's a family business." just one of the coolest moments of my relationship with my dad. >> charlie: it's the family business. >> it's a family business. >> charlie: great to have you here. >> cheers, charlie. >> charlie: russell crowe. "the next three days" opens in theatres november 19th. captioning sponsored by rose communications captioned by media access group at wgbh access.wgbh.org

housing. .-- for new areas. it will apply to any area in the city that has five or more units. they will be exempt from having to participate in the affordable housing fee, so in one section, the criteria for those are laid out, and i will go through them quickly. there is the institutional master plan on file with the planning department. in that, it has to describe the type and location of housing used by the city. it has to state the number of students that will receive some aid. once we have received those, we will be recording notices of restrictions on the property and will outline these requirements, and there will be a monitoring program. on november four, we recommended some modifications. we had a meeting last week with supervisor dufty's office and the housing coalition, and planning commission wants to propose something that has been introduced, that this will only apply to new construction. there will be no conversion of any residential units. that was very important. as supervisor dufty mentions, wrote we want to also provide for -- we want to also provide for stud

this amendment would establish a fee waiver for affordable housing units. affordable housing units are defined as an affordable at or below 80% ami and subsidized by the housing authority and the san francisco redevelopment agency. the administration of the fee has changed so that the prioritization of funds is considered by the interagency planning committee first, which will ensure interagency coordination rather than individual agencies going directly to the board to request funds. lastly, the supporting visitacion valley nexus study has been updated to show the demand generated by new development in the fee area, per california legislative requirements. a number of amendments have been discussed, summarized in the memo sarah is passing up to you right now. while it is a bulky memo, everything is summarized in the cover page. i am happy to go into detail if the commission requests it. as such, a revised ordinance recognizes these potential amendments. thank you for your attention. i am available for any questions you have. president miguel: thank you. i h

i personally reviewed them with the new zoning administrator, and it is a three-unit house. it's a three-unit apartment building. there may or may not be three individual tenants living in there, but we do not get involved in that. it is legally that three-unit building. supervisor mirkarimi: and to that earned, can it be changed from a three-unit building, and what if the property has been sold? does the designation in this particular case continue to affiliate with the new property owner? >> they can. we recommended or said one of their options if they wanted it to become a single family building again, they can apply for a dwelling merger. like i mentioned, the property owners decided to retain it as a three-unit building. as for the contract being transferred owner by owner, it does run with the land. so the contract and all of its restrictions as well as benefits will go for each successive owner of the property. over, if a subsequent owner did decide to do a dwelling unit merger, i can't say for sure, but i think we would re-evaluate and redo the numbers based on the pr

this amendment would establish a fee waiver for affordable housing units. affordable housing units are defined as an affordable at or below 80% ami and subsidized by the housing authority and the san francisco redevelopment agency. the administration of the fee has changed so that the prioritization of funds is considered by the interagency planning committee first, which will ensure interagency coordination rather than indivial

i personally reviewed them with the new zoning administrator, and it is a three-unit house. 's a three-unit apartment building. there may or may not be three individual tenants living in

. >> what unites house republicans is the agenda of the american people. if we are listening to the american people, i don't see any problems incorporating members of the tea party along with our party in the quest that is really the same. they want to cut spending and focus on creating jobs in america. >> evan, can the tea party folks get houstraid, so to sak? >> everybody has to get honest about this. yes, cut government spending, but where is entitlement spending? -- where is government spending? it is entitlements. >> ken john boehner keep these folks in line, mark? >> john boehner has the most difficult job in washington could have the voters on tuesday identified -- half the voters on tuesday identified more with the tea party that the repubcan party. they will come here seeking immediate gratification. the what to expand the statutory budget limit -- they will have to expand a separate budget limit in spring did that but there were coming to close the government. -- they thought they were coming to close the government. >> one who was interviewed at

they have been playing a game where they think they are housing units, but if you leave the school, you have to leave the housing. this clarifies the. the one situation -- the one point i made is that we include the right of private action to enforce this. we do it like a residential hotel where we define who has that right, and you say it is a non-profit fed has in their mission preservation of affordable housing. -- that has in their mission the preservation of affordable housing. you want there be a way to make sure they stay on the straight and narrow. i would be happy to answer any questions, but i support the legislation. >> is that in there at all. do you want to go over the last part of it? >> i believe that is the purpose of the fee, for them to do the monitoring. >> we had a time where it was defined as whatever people want it to be, so the reason we have 18,000, which is the same number we had when we passed this law in they 1978, because we have the action, so without any disrespect to any city department, as a backup, it is important to have that. i think if you take the la

. >> what unites house republicans is the agenda of the american people. if we are listening to the american people, i don't see any problems incorporating members of the tea party along with our party in the quest that is really the same. they want to cut spending and focus on creating jobs in america. >> evan, can the tea party folks get house trained, so to speak? >> everybody has to get honest about this. yes, cut government spending, but where is entitlement spending? -- where is government spending? it is entitlements. >> ken john boehner keep these folks in line, mark? >> john boehner has the most difficult job in washington could have the voters on tuesday identified -- half the voters on tuesday identified more with the tea party that the republican party. they will come here seeking immediate gratification. the what to expand the statutory budget limit -- they will have to expand a separate budget limit in spring did that but there were coming to close the government. -- they thought they were coming to close the government. >> one who was interv

worked with that developer to convert that from a live-work loft to be a housing development and in the process bring on 56 units of affordable housing. and the good news is san francisco has an enormous housing shortage. and there's a significant housing issue that we're struggling with in san francisco. so the fact that the market is pushing development is good news. so what we're able to do is basically allow these south of market community groups to share the wealth that developers are going to bring to the eastern part of south of market, through basically payments to the city-established community stabilization fund. in the end, between affordable housing dollars, and dollars for eviction prevention, for job development, community artistic purposes, etc. etc., we're looking at almost $120 million in community benefits paid to the city. ben: the huge projects- i sometimes worry. i've read jane jacobs and "life and death of great american cities" and it seems to me that even the most well-intentioned large-scale projects can go awry. maybe the lots could be divvied up just a little bit smaller? you could hav