united states of america. three of these amendments were submitted jointly by denmark, france, greece, slovenia, and united kingdom. and two were submitted by the russian federation. rule 36 of the provisional rules of procedure states the following, if two or more amendments to emotion or draft resolution are proposed, the president should rule on the order in which they are to be voted upon. ordinarily, the security council shall first vote on the amendment furthest removed in substance from the original proposal. and then on the amendment next furthest removed until all amendments have been put to a vote. but when an amendment adds to or deletes from the text of a motion or draft resolution, that amendment shall be voted on first. accordingly, i intend to put the proposed amendments to the vote first. i shall now put to the vote the proposed amendment to preamble paragraph 1 submitted by the russian federation and contained in document s2025118. will those in favor of the proposed amendment contained in document s2-25118 please raise their hand? s --2025118 please raise their hand? against? abstentions? the res

that is why i am honored to present from the house of france the united kingdom denmark and greece a motion to postpone this session with regards to article 33 of the provisional rules of this council until 21 february at 3 pm so we can take the necessary time to examine this matter, thank you. >> i think therepresentative for the statement i now give the floor to the representative from the uk . >> i wanted to say we strongly support the request by friends to adjourn this meeting till tomorrow at 3 o'clock. we note the draft resolution offered by the united states was circulated late friday evening without consultation. surprising councilmembers the opportunity to fully consider and negotiate the text. we would urge colleagues to vote in favor of the request to adjourn the meeting. under rule 33 of the provisional rules of procedure during her has been a precedent for such a request. >> i think the representative and give the floor to the representative for the us. >> united states strongly opposes a proposal to delay voting on our resolution. i would note the united states already

that is why i am honored to present from the house of france the united kingdom denmark and greece a motion to postpone this session with regards to article 33 of the provisional rules of this council until 21 february at 3 pm so we can take the necessary time to examine this matter, thank you. >> i think therepresentative for the statement i now give the floor to the representative from the uk . >> i wanted to say we strongly support the request by friends to adjourn this meeting till tomorrow at 3 o'clock. we note the draft resolution offered by the united states was circulated late friday evening without consultation. surprising councilmembers the opportunity to fully consider and negotiate the text. we would urge colleagues to vote in favor of the request to adjourn the meeting. under rule 33 of the provisional rules of procedure during her has been a precedent for such a request. >> i think the representative and give the floor to the representative for the us. >> united states strongly opposes a proposal to delay voting on our resolution. i would note the united states already

monday, he invited france, italy, germany, denmark, poland, and the united kingdom to meet with him abouthis. notably absent was hungary and slovakia. it depends on who you ask. president macron is trying to set himself up as the primary voice on european cooperation and partnership. scarlet: does france have leverage they can use? it feels like they are very much in reaction to whatever moves donald trump makes when it comes to unilateral discussions with russia to end the war in ukraine. does france or any european country have anything they can use to shape the outcome? >> i am not sure they truly do. i think they are trying to use the promise of greater financial contributions as their leverage. i have read when prime minister starmer comes at the end of this week, he is supposedly going to announce a deadline by the time he will contribute more so i think they are trying to bring this up as their leverage. if this does not work, i think president macron is still trying to emphasize the human touch. he is very bold on his diplomatic gestures trying to befriend president trump. i think

we are introducing amendments on the hall falls, denmark, greece, from slovenia, and the united kingdom that can be no equivalence between russia and ukraine. in how this council refers to this war. russia chose to launch a war of aggression against the sofa in state costing hundreds of thousands of lives. the council must be clear on this to find a path to a sustainable peace. we must also be clear that peace must respect the un child to do credit and suffering t and territorial integrity within it's internationally recognized folders. these are cool principles or upholding the charter is the responsibility of every member of the un, especially this council. earlier today in the un general assembly that was widespread support for these amendments among the wider un membership. we would hope that all in this council would be able to support similar language, a search. mr. president, we request 1st to replace, i quote, the russia, ukraine conflict on quote, in paragraph one ways, quote, the full scale invasion of ukraine by the russian federation, and quote, 2nd, to insert a new pre, i'm

united states of america, students, science. you know, 3 of these amendment on my was admitted joins way by denmark from the law. greece, lorraine, yes. or you and the united kingdom now in status, you and to your was submitted by the russian federation. so finally what size it least size. you use a waiver, the essentially a rule. so the 6 of the concepts provision order was a procedure states the following. the d 43 is hot. we own there is 2 or more and my mind to a motion or draft resolution. i proposed heat in the president, you don't show no on the order in which they are to be voted upon the barrier or the not really i'm fairly sure of what you say could you call them so? no. so 1st of road on the amendment. so this removed a substance from the original proposal. yahoo and then slowly on the, on the amendment next for this, removed until the full amendments has been put to them both then bound to the went and amendment adds to the o. d. i'm from the text of emotion or drunk resolution drug the showed on that amendment sample shall be voted on 1st pencil accordingly. so far and i intend to put the proposed amendments to the vote 1st and i don't i don't i put s

united. >> states. >> but a lot of the people. >> there also do. >> not want. >> to be part of. >> the kingdom of denmark. >> they want. >> to. >>ak free. >> of what they see as a colonial past. and so some folks are. >> a bit more. >> practically considering a closer relationship. >> there with. >> the united states. >> have a look. >> i really want this statue gone. >> why? >> because why. >> should he be up there? why isn't. >> it a greenlander. >> up. >> there? trump wants to. >> buy my country greenland. >> this is. >> kupuna olsen. >> today. >> meeko and i are having whale skin. >> she's known. >> as greenland's biggest. >> influencer, and she's running in the island's. >> upcoming elections. she's a native. >> greenlander, and for her, this statue. >> of an 18th century. >> missionary is a daily. >> reminder of denmark's control. >> of her country. >> so you would like to be independent of denmark? >> yes. >> but that doesn't mean. >> you want. >> to be part of the usa. >> no. >> i don't. >> i don't want to become a part of the usa. >> i definitely. >> don't want to be an american. >> no? >> why not? >> why should i? >> w

greenland, which is part of the kingdom of denmark and canada, which e, as we we, we heard that he wants to make the 51st state, he says, we think he's all close friends of the united states. that's the bit that seems most shocking to me. i mean, even if he doesn't follow through on some of these things, what do you think it sets as a precedent given the backdrop of the invasion of ukraine, given the fact that we know china thinks that to what taiwan belongs to china? that's why i think that's an interesting contrast between uber, human, roger, and in how they see trump. uh, you know, abraham's point of view is that you just can't deal with that. there's no way to engage with it. whereas if i understand roger's correctly, you say what can, can still engage with charles on specific issues like the japanese or tried to do me. my point of view here is that you can engage with trump, that you can engage with them as a transactional product. in other words, you have to give trump something which is not something for america. it's something that makes donald trump look good and that may not match shop to american interest . it certainly doesn't match up to multilateral i

kingdom of haiti to, great britain. astonishing. and then to a lesser extent, to the united states, to denmark, various other countries, europe, bothestern europe and europe. in fact. but they also get their hands. robert wanted them to on those books and pamphlets that he was writing. and so today it's one of his lesser known, his book, reflections. it was translated into english later on reflect as reflections on the blacks and whites from 1860. but we're going to talk before it was translated. so it appears english translation in 1817. but before the original french makes its way to jamaica through a man named thomas strafford, who was a white british colonist who had lived for a time in the kingdom of haiti. he was originally from kingston. he stayed there for quite some time in haiti. then he went back home to kingston. but think about how great england in particular they're trading with haiti. but in the colonies, it's a different story. remember they still have a have slavery in effect in jamaica. so here comes this guy. and he shows with a pamphlet of brown devotees in vat is dismantling the idea that africa ends on a lower