you arrived in the netherlands early this morning and has been transferred to the united nation detention center in the hike. something like 5 o'clock one morning. i got a phone call rather than heritage has been captured. would you like to prosecuting for the siege of sarah? and i said yes, heritage remained fugitive from justice and he did that through a very clever disguise as a faith healer. and it was a disguise that worked. the man that was arrested in 2008 looked nothing like relevant carriage but what was very interesting was when carriage made his 1st appearance in court after she was rest. everything was shaved off, the hair was short, and the man that he once was was back. mister curtis. i see that you alone. i did not see come. so assisting or representing you at this moment. is it your choice not to be represented by counsel? at this initial appearance, i have an invisible advisor. i have decided to represent myself. in the car. i found rather than heritage, extraordinarily well prepared. he was a master of detail. who is really good is on council. good morning to everyone, see me a

large here arrived in the netherlands early this morning and has been transferred to the united nation detention center in the something like 5 o'clock one morning. i got a phone call rather than carriage has been captured. would you like to prosecuting for the siege of sarah evil? and i said yes. heritage remained a fugitive from justice and he did that through a very clever disguise as a faith healer and it was a disguise that worked. the man was arrested in 2008 looked nothing like rather than carriage but what was very interesting was when carriage made his 1st appearance in court after his arrest. everything was shaved off, the hair was short, and the man that he once was was back. mr. courage, i see that you alone. just, i did not see. com, so assisting or representing you at this moment is it's your choice not to be represented by counsel. at this initial appearance, i have an invisible advisor. i have decided to represent myself, but i am in the car. i found, rather than heritage extraordinarily well prepared. he was a master of detail who is really good. this is on counsel. good morning to eve

clearly violates the united nations 1951 refugee convention, which britain is of course a symmetrical so is it that is it that white and white the can they not say that these detention centers are off shore, but still within the jurisdiction of the u. k. which means they haven't kicked out the asylum seekers. well, the question is, if the detention center does come up and there isn't, i mean the, the danish memorandum understanding with rwanda from the london government's point of view, there is no agreement with mark about this processing. so the question remains, even if these off show centers are set up under which legislation will these claims beheld so who into the service of denmark and their, which all with these processes be conducted. and i tend to be answered well, when you're in denmark, does this, does this system work in denmark and can you see it working for the u. k? it is, it is not a system that is working in denmark. it is still just a member of understanding and as i said, there is no such agreement between denmark and one day, yet just simply a miranda of understanding and one's in foreign policy just issued a statement a few days ago to stipulate that t

united nations 1951 refugee convention which britain is. of course a signatory of so is it that is it that white and white the can they not say that these detention centers are off shore but still within the jurisdiction of the u. k. which means they haven't kicked out the asylum seekers? well, the question is, if the detention center does come up and there isn't, yes, i knew the danish memorandum understanding with rhonda from the london government's point of view. there is no agreement with mark about this processing. so the question remains, even if these offshore centers are set up under which legislation will these claims be held. so who into the service of denmark, under which law will these processes be conducted? and can to be answered when you're in denmark, does this, does this system work in denmark and can you see it working for the u. k? it is, it is not a system that is working in the market is still just a member of understanding. and as i said, there is no such agreement between denmark and one yet just simply a member of understanding and one, the foreign policy just issued a statement a few days ago to stipulate that there's no such agr

united nations 1951 refugee convention which britain is. of course the signatory of so is it that is it that white and white the can they not say that these detention centers are offshore but still within the jurisdiction of the u. k. which means they haven't kicked out the asylum seekers? well, the question is, if the detention center does come up and there isn't, i mean the, the danish memorandum understanding which we wonder from the runs and government's point of view. there is no agreement with mark about this processing. so the question remains, even if these of show centers are set up under which legislation will these claims beheld. so who into the service of denmark under which law, with these processes be conducted and to be answered. well, let me ask you, you're in denmark, does this, does the system work in denmark and can you see it working for the u. k? it is, it is not a system that is working in the market is still just a member and of understanding. and as i said, there is no such agreement between denmark and one day, yet just simply amount of understanding. and one's in foreign policy just issued a statement a few days ago to stipulate t

united nations 1951 refugee convention which britain is. of course the natural so is it that is it that white and white the can they not say that these detention centers are off? sure, but still within the jurisdiction of the u. k. which means they haven't kicked out the asylum seekers. well, the question is, if the detention center does come up and there isn't any of the danish memorandum understanding which we wonder from the running government point of view, there is no agreement with mark about this processing. so the question remains, even if these offshore centers are set up under which legislation will these claims be held? so who into the service of denmark, under which law would these processes be conducted? and then to be answered, well, when you're in denmark, does this, does this system work in denmark and can you see it working for the u. k? it is, it is not a system that is working in the market is still just a member and of understanding. and as i said, there is no such agreement between denmark and one day, yet just simply amount of understanding. and one's in foreign policy just issued a statement a few days ago to stipulate that ther

united nations 1951 refugee convention which britain is. of course the natural so is it that is it that white and white the can they not say that these detention centers are offshore but still within the jurisdiction of the u. k. which means they haven't kicked out the asylum seekers? well, the question is, if the detention center does come in there isn't she has the danish memorandum understanding with rhonda from the london government point of view. there is no agreement with mark about this processing. so the question remains, even if these offshore centers are set up under which legislation will these claims be held? so who into the service of denmark under which law with these processes be conducted, and to be answered. well, let me ask you, you're in denmark, does this, does this system work in denmark and can you see it working for the u. k? it is, it is not a system that is working in the market is still just a member and of understanding. and as i said, there is no such agreement between denmark and one day, yet just simply amount of understanding. and one's in foreign policy just issued a statement a few days ago to stipulate that there's no